Justice Kagan warns parts of East Coast
could be 'swallowed by the ocean' in dissent
in EPA case
Fox Business,
by
Haley Chi-Sing
Original Article
Posted By: Beardo,
6/30/2022 10:29:17 PM
Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan warned parts of the East Coast could be "swallowed by the ocean" in a dissenting Supreme Court opinion in an environmental regulation case Thursday.
"If the current rate of emissions continues, children born this year could live to see parts of the Eastern seaboard swallowed by the ocean," Kagan wrote in her dissent.
Justices Stephen Breyer and Sonia Sotomayor joined Kagan's dissent in the 6-3 case.
"Today, the Court strips the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) of the power Congress gave it to respond to ‘the most pressing environmental challenge of our time,'" Kagan wrote.
Reply 1 - Posted by:
wilarrbie 6/30/2022 10:35:01 PM (No. 1202536)
She's White. I'm White. My eyes rolled so far back in my head, I could see Yesterday. Is that still considered racist?
60 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
Blue Hen1 6/30/2022 10:36:12 PM (No. 1202539)
Dues paying member of the Greta Club
49 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
earlybird 6/30/2022 10:43:40 PM (No. 1202541)
And she was consideredqualified to be on the highest court in our great land? A mental midget. Maybe AOC is right about the present Supreme Court...
47 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
Flyball Dogs 6/30/2022 10:47:31 PM (No. 1202544)
Has she told Barry and Big Mike? They’ll need to make arrangements for their ocean hut.
63 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
earlybird 6/30/2022 10:48:58 PM (No. 1202546)
Correction: The DEMS on the present Supreme Court.
26 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
NorthernDog 6/30/2022 10:50:41 PM (No. 1202547)
Once again liberals cannot see past their own ideology on a ruling. The question was whether the EPA was ever granted powers to force massive shifts in our energy sources. It was not. If the planet is really drowning then lobby Congress to act. But that's too hard...
54 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
Rich323 6/30/2022 10:57:46 PM (No. 1202549)
What about the Obama’s ocean front home? Don’t worry, Big Mike will plug the dike! Look Barry! No hands!
41 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
davew 6/30/2022 10:59:18 PM (No. 1202550)
Her opinion on the power of the EPA is so stupid it isn't even wrong. The idea that a government agency can create emissions regulations for US industries while ignoring the effects of all other countries not subject to these rules is an example of virtue signaling, not effective regulation of a threat to US citizens. It has no practical possibility of achieving its regulatory purpose to protect American lives.
But even if we were stupid enough to buy into this illogical exercise in futility, the SCOTUS ruling just says that such decisions must be made through the consent of the governed via their representatives and can't be made by unelected administrative bureaucrats. If people really want to reduce our carbon emissions, there is nothing stopping us from passing legislation to enforce whatever restrictions we want to impose.
Kagen and her elite colleagues simply believe that the sheep must be led by the "really smart people" for their own good and shouldn't really have a say in their fate. Wasn't this why we fought the Revolution?
63 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
Avikingman 6/30/2022 11:00:12 PM (No. 1202551)
Won't that make things turn over?
11 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
Fasteddie 6/30/2022 11:07:59 PM (No. 1202555)
Yeah you bet. Right after Guam tips over.
Only a Liberal Lawyer could be this f'n stupid.
54 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
Axeman 6/30/2022 11:10:41 PM (No. 1202556)
The one question I always stop the fascist Dems with is "How do you prove that?"
29 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
EQKimball 6/30/2022 11:15:41 PM (No. 1202559)
Her argument is fine in the other two branches, but it is not a constitutional one, which is the province of the Supreme Court.
25 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
halfnorsk 6/30/2022 11:17:22 PM (No. 1202562)
How dare she. She's not a climate scientist.
24 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
iraengneer 6/30/2022 11:18:21 PM (No. 1202564)
A less-than-worthless ninny in a position of power. A position attained with help of some of the equally loathsome Republicrats stinking up the Senate, deeming themselves to be our "betters". TWANLOC all, "Those Who Are No Longer Our Countrymen".
26 people like this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
Bassman1911 6/30/2022 11:19:50 PM (No. 1202566)
How did somebody so gullible and stupid make it to the Supreme Court. What a rube. Embarrassing.
46 people like this.
Reply 16 - Posted by:
Ribicon 6/30/2022 11:20:45 PM (No. 1202567)
Congressman Hank Johnson (D-GA) once grilled a military spokesman about his concerns that Guam might "capsize" because too many troops were stationed there on one side of the island. You wanted a stupid bLACK congressman? Well, here he is. Likewise a disgusting lesbian Supreme Court justice; any possibility of intelligent decision making is of no consequence because in our Marxist utopia, we value surface features only.
31 people like this.
Reply 17 - Posted by:
formerNYer 6/30/2022 11:22:19 PM (No. 1202570)
We have 10 years or their will be irreversible damage. (Heard that for the last 40 years,)
41 people like this.
Reply 18 - Posted by:
Rama41 6/30/2022 11:24:18 PM (No. 1202572)
What does that have to do with your job, Elena? If you have a problem with government policies, write your Congressman.
37 people like this.
Reply 19 - Posted by:
PChristopher 6/30/2022 11:25:59 PM (No. 1202573)
If the east coast is going to be swallowed by the ocean, ehy do all the rich politicians keep buying and building oceanfront homes? And why is just the east coast getting swallowed? What about the West Coast? Has water stopped seeking its own level?
37 people like this.
Reply 20 - Posted by:
planetgeo 6/30/2022 11:30:34 PM (No. 1202578)
Aside from her stupidity on the science of the issue, the really gobsmacking aspect of her position is that it is completely irrelevant to her job as a Supreme Court Justice. Her job is to assess the constitutionality of the issue. Period. Instead, she (and her 2 other leftists on the court) constantly see themselves as super-wise Supreme Legislators bravely fixing all the world's ills.
Just do your dang job.
50 people like this.
Reply 21 - Posted by:
smcchk 6/30/2022 11:43:40 PM (No. 1202585)
Have lived through overpopulation and we will all starve, next Ice Age, acid rain, Silent Spring, ozone layer vanishing, and global warming/climate change in my 70 years. Have not seen anything change at all.
58 people like this.
Said the renowned oceanographer Kagan.....
What are her credentials?
29 people like this.
Reply 23 - Posted by:
smokincol 6/30/2022 11:47:38 PM (No. 1202590)
now, if she's basing her legal decisions on this kind of thinking, there should be a competency hearing, maybe hers could be right after the one for diapers
25 people like this.
Reply 24 - Posted by:
Anti_democRAT 6/30/2022 11:51:45 PM (No. 1202593)
Based on what facts? Wasnt she the one that incorectly stated that 100,000 kids died from covid in a hearing on mandates.
22 people like this.
Reply 25 - Posted by:
Maggie2u 6/30/2022 11:54:41 PM (No. 1202595)
Poster #21, the exact same thing with me. Lived thru all those 'disasters' and still here to talk about them.
25 people like this.
Reply 26 - Posted by:
ladydawgfan 7/1/2022 12:00:41 AM (No. 1202598)
Oh, bullfeathers!!! Go pull someone else's leg, ya alarmist moron!!
18 people like this.
Reply 27 - Posted by:
sterling431 7/1/2022 12:10:03 AM (No. 1202603)
I have but one question for Ms Kagan: Where is the evidence?
21 people like this.
Reply 28 - Posted by:
synchronicity 7/1/2022 12:18:15 AM (No. 1202607)
I would bet you if someone asked her to define what a "woman" is she would refuse to answer because "she is not a biologist", as her new Supreme Court partner has recently testified under oath, even though they both appear to be what they can't define but she knows as an absolute certainty what the ocean is going to do even though she is not a scientist nor an expert on global climate and what its possible impacts might be in the short, medium or long term. Funny how that works - don't know who or what they are but they "know" for sure what nobody knows for sure. Does this mean her / their legal opinions are / will be based on hearsay that conforms to their preconceived notions and political correctness and not "law", sure seems so!
21 people like this.
Reply 29 - Posted by:
Blue Hen1 7/1/2022 12:21:11 AM (No. 1202612)
Hunters dad is a genius, he’ll have ocean front property in Wilmington, Delaware
12 people like this.
Reply 30 - Posted by:
DVC 7/1/2022 12:33:08 AM (No. 1202618)
Such idiots. Arrogant morons.
The oceans have been rising roughly an inch a decade for centuries. We are in a interglacial warming period, between Ice Ages, so the seas rise. Not our fault, nothing will stop it or accelerate it.
We are passengers on this rock. We are not in charge.
28 people like this.
Reply 31 - Posted by:
Omen55 7/1/2022 12:45:59 AM (No. 1202625)
LOL!
Does that mean DC will drown?
15 people like this.
Obambi just received permits for THREE hydrocarbon gas tanks on one of his east coast properties. I guess he is not too worried about Global Warming, Climate Change, Climate Crisis, or whatever they call it next.
18 people like this.
Reply 33 - Posted by:
GoodDeal 7/1/2022 12:57:57 AM (No. 1202645)
If this was a real problem, then every property being sold on the coast that could be flooded would be required by law to have a disclosure of the hazard made to prospective buyers. Since there is nothing of the sort happening in the real estate market, this rising sea level myth and property being swallowed by the ocean is pure environmental fiction.
18 people like this.
Reply 34 - Posted by:
DVC 7/1/2022 1:08:21 AM (No. 1202652)
The Zero doesn't think so, having purchased a home on the shore in Massachusetts, and building another in Hawaii, again, right on the ocean.
The KNOW that nothing serious is happening, and it's all part of the scam.
21 people like this.
Reply 35 - Posted by:
Zeek Wolfe 7/1/2022 1:09:45 AM (No. 1202654)
Kagan has been channeling the Black Democrat representative who wondered aloud about too many people on the island of Guam and why their combine weight would tip it over. An admiral said 'no, it wouldn't happen.'
11 people like this.
Reply 36 - Posted by:
Safari Man 7/1/2022 1:30:07 AM (No. 1202663)
And The Great Pumpkin® will be here soon.
17 people like this.
Reply 37 - Posted by:
Birddog 7/1/2022 1:43:52 AM (No. 1202667)
Henny Penny Hyperbole has no place in a SC opinion.
14 people like this.
Reply 38 - Posted by:
daisey 7/1/2022 1:52:16 AM (No. 1202668)
For Pete’s sake Elena, if you’re that stupid, you have no business on the Supreme Court.
20 people like this.
Reply 39 - Posted by:
kono 7/1/2022 2:24:44 AM (No. 1202673)
Idiotic hyperbole on par with Hank Johnson's bit about Guam capsizing.
10 people like this.
Reply 40 - Posted by:
watashiyo 7/1/2022 3:06:59 AM (No. 1202675)
Another nut case in the Supreme Court.
15 people like this.
Reply 41 - Posted by:
mifla 7/1/2022 3:17:40 AM (No. 1202680)
Al Gore just called. He wants his fear mongering back.
13 people like this.
Reply 42 - Posted by:
ussjimmycarter 7/1/2022 4:34:17 AM (No. 1202714)
That would be awesome!
6 people like this.
Reply 43 - Posted by:
SweetPea3 7/1/2022 5:18:23 AM (No. 1202725)
Source of info, please. Dr. Google and Dr. Gore?
7 people like this.
Reply 44 - Posted by:
BarryNo 7/1/2022 5:24:54 AM (No. 1202727)
Oh?
Why not parts of the West Coast? If so, why do people like the Obama's and their supporters BUYING ocean front property, Kagan? Are you being used? Or are you cheerleading attempts to chase "little people" out of the coastal areas so you "Elites" can buy them cheap?
Global warming is nothing more than a scheme - a fraud. And you have put your personal mark on it for all time.
12 people like this.
Reply 45 - Posted by:
ARKfamily 7/1/2022 6:05:25 AM (No. 1202737)
Dear Justice Kagan, I am sure God has it figured out!
7 people like this.
Reply 46 - Posted by:
Subsuburban 7/1/2022 6:18:18 AM (No. 1202744)
And to think that with the installation of Ketanji as the replacement for Breyer, she is going to be the SMARTEST of the three female (I can say that; I'm a biologist) left-wingers on the Court. We can look forward to some real deep thinking opinions out of that bunch. You could add their IQ's together and you would still come up short of Justices Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch and Barrett individually. Imagine the fun the conservative block will have during the deliberative sessions! It will be like Einstein, Hawking, Newton and Heisenberg talking to Snoop Dog, Flava-flav and Cardi B. They should sell tickets and apply the proceeds to the national debt. We'd be solvent within a year.
14 people like this.
Well it might happen if she decides to swim in the ocean.
7 people like this.
Reply 48 - Posted by:
F15 Gork 7/1/2022 7:09:13 AM (No. 1202773)
Move to higher ground perhaps?
3 people like this.
Reply 49 - Posted by:
Rinktum 7/1/2022 7:15:03 AM (No. 1202779)
Explain to me what these leftists have to bring to the table? It certainly is not intelligence. All I see and hear coming from them is lying, corruption, hysterics and depravity and these are not the qualifications you want in any leader. These fools believe that whatever they say is truth regardless of its veracity. “Their truth” is all that matters. I’m sick of their arrogant ignorance.
11 people like this.
Reply 50 - Posted by:
lakerman1 7/1/2022 7:25:04 AM (No. 1202784)
Kagen never practiced a day of law, never had a legal client, (or a date with a man, I suspect) until she was selected by Barack Obola to serve as Solicitor General - a federal position where she was responsible for arguing appeals to the U.S. Supreme Court, where they teed up a few easy cases for her to argue.
She was totally unqualified for the U.S.. Supreme Court, except that she had a vagina, a requirement created by Barack.
We now have three really dumb women on the court, and one smart one. the three in question have faces that would stop a clock, and brains to match.
God save us from a feminist majority, with the three witches involved.
I predict that we will see the worst dissenting opinions in the history of the Court. Each dissent will be worthy of mocking by SNL, but none will be.
17 people like this.
Reply 51 - Posted by:
skacmar 7/1/2022 7:30:41 AM (No. 1202786)
Kagan exposes just how far left and ignorant of the law and Constitution with her opinion. Kagan wishes to make law from the bench. This is not what the Supreme Court is for. Maybe she needs to run for Congress. Kagan won't, because she will then be held accountable for her stupid opinions.
7 people like this.
Reply 52 - Posted by:
Bur Oak 7/1/2022 7:31:55 AM (No. 1202787)
The question before the court wasn't about sea level rise. It was did the EPA have the authority to regulate CO2. Her dissent shows she is unqualified to be on the court. Sotomayor and Breyer joined her dissent. They stated, "Section 111 of the Clean Air Act directs EPA to regulate stationary sources of any substance
that “causes, or contributes significantly to, air pollution” and that “may reasonably be anticipated to endanger public health or welfare.” 42 U. S. C. §7411(b)(1)(A). Carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases fit that description." So they have bought the lie that life giving CO2 is a pollutant.
10 people like this.
Reply 53 - Posted by:
Jethro bo 7/1/2022 7:32:34 AM (No. 1202788)
This is what we get with RINOs voting on 'qualified' judges. A kinder-gardener that hasn't learn to tie his shoes is more qualified.
5 people like this.
Reply 54 - Posted by:
RussZilla 7/1/2022 7:35:43 AM (No. 1202791)
Chicken Little
3 people like this.
Reply 55 - Posted by:
downnout 7/1/2022 7:40:34 AM (No. 1202796)
The duties of a Supreme Court justice are to rule on the constitutionality of cases that come before the Court. It is not to indulge in legislating from the bench,
5 people like this.
Irrelevant to the legal issue.
She doesn’t understand the role of the courts.
7 people like this.
Reply 57 - Posted by:
sw penn 7/1/2022 7:53:57 AM (No. 1202804)
Clearly wants another job; Saving The World
Impeach her
4 people like this.
Reply 58 - Posted by:
Clinger 7/1/2022 8:00:01 AM (No. 1202811)
Another graduate of the Hank Johnson Institute of Technology.
11 people like this.
Reply 59 - Posted by:
Adam 7/1/2022 8:00:54 AM (No. 1202812)
In one part of her term paper, she writes the eastern seaboard will be underwater. In another, SCOTUS unqualified to address climate change. Does she bother to read her own writing?
4 people like this.
Reply 60 - Posted by:
privateer 7/1/2022 8:32:19 AM (No. 1202837)
Her qualifications were ideal: short, fat, ugly, lesbian, elitist, America-hating, loyal democrat, Marxist activist.
11 people like this.
Reply 61 - Posted by:
paral04 7/1/2022 8:59:06 AM (No. 1202869)
And Kagan has the credentials in the earth sciences to know this? Anyway, from what is going on in the Northeast maybe it would not be a bad thing. The world recovered form The Flood and other climate events, which were not caused by carbon emissions, the earth will recover from that.
1 person likes this.
Reply 62 - Posted by:
Phantomll 7/1/2022 9:05:31 AM (No. 1202880)
According to Algore, I should be sitting under water right now.
8 people like this.
Reply 63 - Posted by:
Wetenschapper 7/1/2022 9:24:32 AM (No. 1202893)
Kagan is easily the dimmest bulb on the SCOTUS Christmas tree, but with the arrival of Brown-Jackson she's going to face some serious competition in this arena.
8 people like this.
Reply 64 - Posted by:
Highvoltage 7/1/2022 9:39:53 AM (No. 1202913)
Karan is acting like a legislator rather than a jurist. I suspect she doesn’t know the difference since SCOTUS has not been acting judicial for so long.
1 person likes this.
Reply 65 - Posted by:
bigfatslob 7/1/2022 9:41:45 AM (No. 1202915)
Kagen is so ignorant and stupid she doesn't even grasp what this ruling is really about. Talk about an activist judge she just showed her activism writing it in a dissent. Some of the leftist idiot judges should rule with the majority sometimes so it's not so obvious they are plants on the bench for the left. This would have been a great time for a unanimous ruling on this obvious case.
5 people like this.
Reply 66 - Posted by:
bighambone 7/1/2022 9:46:06 AM (No. 1202924)
In reality nature is going to do what nature is going to do, no matter what any Supreme Court super legislator or other politician claims in support of a political agenda.
1 person likes this.
Reply 67 - Posted by:
Historybuff 7/1/2022 9:49:59 AM (No. 1202927)
Please site your sources.
3 people like this.
Reply 68 - Posted by:
hershey 7/1/2022 9:58:16 AM (No. 1202934)
And the West coast will tip over and Kalifornia will just slide into the ocean...wasn't there some stupid congresscritter that said something like this about Guam or somewhere? She's just 'channeling' the Pickle Boy...
1 person likes this.
Reply 69 - Posted by:
msts 7/1/2022 10:22:55 AM (No. 1202952)
The funny part about these conversations is that the rise in ocean levels that will swallow up places is measured in centimeters. Kids, there is 2.5 cms to the inch! How exactly does that inch, lets say two inches, swallow anything? Interestingly, I live in a MA coastal town. All the original old homes are still there on the water. They built their houses near the water but up away from it if possible. They were not college MBA/PhD people but the knew that the ocean was not something that was to be f'd with and kept themselves at safe distance
2 people like this.
Reply 70 - Posted by:
marbles 7/1/2022 10:54:58 AM (No. 1202982)
She looks like Nathan Lane in pearls. Looks aside, she's dumber than the dumbest dem constituent . Put ice in glass, fill it with water, the ice melts, the glass does not over flow . Melting icebergs ( which they are not ) will not swallow up the East Coast or any other coast. That's physics.
3 people like this.
Reply 71 - Posted by:
MickTurn 7/1/2022 11:42:23 AM (No. 1203060)
The Typical Fear Mongering of the Leftist Morons. Hey idiots, NONE of your dire predictions has or will come true. Go back to being Communists and MOVE TO the Communist country of your choice, to NEVER return!
3 people like this.
Reply 72 - Posted by:
mc squared 7/1/2022 11:49:23 AM (No. 1203075)
Like RB Ginsburg - expressing their 'opinion' while having to decide on matters of law and the Constitution. Very poor form, but not unusual,
1 person likes this.
Reply 73 - Posted by:
DCGIRL 7/1/2022 11:49:58 AM (No. 1203076)
Kagan, stick with the law. You are no environmentalist. If you choose to do so, then resign as Justice.
2 people like this.
Reply 74 - Posted by:
cold porridge 7/1/2022 12:25:13 PM (No. 1203133)
I agree that Kagan is very dumb, but Sotomayor is just as dumb.
3 people like this.
Reply 75 - Posted by:
udanja99 7/1/2022 2:51:17 PM (No. 1203301)
Hey, Elena, NYC was supposed to be under water 20 years ago. What happened?
Not one single prediction from this bunch over the last 50 years has actually come to pass. With a record like that I don’t understand why anyone listens to a word they say.
2 people like this.
Reply 76 - Posted by:
David Key 7/1/2022 3:06:48 PM (No. 1203321)
Well, granted that there are parts of the east coast that would look good under water. At the same time we've heard this before and the truth is that the Chicken Littles of our culture have always been wrong. Regarding the legislation authorizing the EPA we put legal power in the hands of unelected officials and they ran amuck with them. All the SCOTUS did was say that powers that the Legislature did not make laws for cannot be made by agencies of the Govt out of whole cloth. This is like the Federal Dept of Education. Where is the actual constitutional authority for a Dept. of Education and the EPA. There isn't any. These agencies were formed out of an excess of liberal enthusiasm. Near as I can tell, the govt takes a lot of money from us in taxes and doesn't actually educate anybody. Very little is done to stop or clean up messes although the money supposedly to do so is there.
2 people like this.
Reply 77 - Posted by:
JimBob 7/1/2022 3:23:03 PM (No. 1203349)
Kagan and that new broad belong on 'The View' alongside Caryn Johnson and that loudmouth redhead, instead of of the Supreme Court.
2 people like this.
Reply 78 - Posted by:
rochow 7/1/2022 8:49:40 PM (No. 1203734)
Trash like this sits on the Supreme Court which now also features a dame who does not know what a dame, I mean, woman, is.
1 person likes this.
Reply 79 - Posted by:
jimboscott 7/1/2022 10:02:22 PM (No. 1203774)
#30,
The ocean levels, as measured at the lower Manhattan Battery for the last 160 years or so show that the rise during the 4 years of the Trump administration was exactly the same as the rise when Lincoln was President. It is rising. We have nothing to do with it.
1 person likes this.