Pentagon Won’t Name Official Who Divulged
Misleading Info About Chinese Spy Balloons
During Trump Admin
Legal Insurrection,
by
Mary Chastain
Original Article
Posted By: WhamDBambam,
2/7/2023 7:09:19 AM
The Washington Free Beacon‘s Chuck Ross revealed that the Pentagon wouldn’t name the official who provided misleading information about three supposed Chinese spy balloons during President Donald Trump’s administration. (snip) The media and Democrats ate it up. During his administration, Trump and his former officials, including John Bolton, denied knowledge of Chinese spy balloons.
Reply 1 - Posted by:
mobyclik 2/7/2023 7:36:19 AM (No. 1397079)
I've also read where NORAD has denied any knowledge of spy balloons during the Trump years. But these ''unnamed officials'' know all about it. Anyone else sick of these continuous bald-faced LIES from this mal-administration?
50 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
mobyclik 2/7/2023 8:07:12 AM (No. 1397118)
I see there's an article now posted above stating this exact thing. It's all in the timing.
9 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
czechlist 2/7/2023 8:59:37 AM (No. 1397187)
the good old "usually reliable source" and "expert" scat
we still don't know who leaked the SCOTUS info nor who was the "whistleblower" in DJT's first impeachment (although there is little doubt it was the little Ukrainian LTC puke) Whatever happened to the right to face one's accuser?
I have no confidence in anything reported by government officials and limited belief in reporting from the legacy media. Even sports and weather reporting often have political bias.
22 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
Lonestar Jack 2/7/2023 10:46:27 AM (No. 1397305)
Sounds like Adam Shitff is at NORAD
24 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
Starboard_side 2/7/2023 10:49:14 AM (No. 1397311)
Does not matter to the very gullible people in the news industry, they have a story to tell, and they will repeat whatever the Democrat advocates feed them.
They've convinced roughly 45% of the people that President Trump did so many things which are not even closely true. And, they'll continue to feed that story line since it's been working so well for them.
Hope the House Republicans can get to the bottom of many of those false accusations and insert them into the public record so the news folks aren't able to use that misinformation tactic any longer.
I would bet Trump would walk away from running if they simply corrected the record (i.e. Russiagate, the two impeachment) and acknowledged there was no there, there, for any of them. That it was made very public.
6 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
joew9 2/7/2023 10:51:44 AM (No. 1397316)
The general public spotted the balloon with their naked eye and reported it on social media. The Biden administration wants us to believe it happened during Trump admin BUT NO ONE SAW IT!?
Biden is saying this because he wants to try to minimize his failure to act. Waiting to shoot it down over the ocean could be construed as an attack in international waters. He should have shot it down over the US.
(Warning: Conspiracy Theory meant to be humorous but...) He waited so the balloon could fully expel it's payload of a new round of infections all across the US.
I had to make the explicit statement that I was trying to be humorous with my conspiracy theory because otherwise the Biden administration has you arrested and faced with ten years for such jokes.
12 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
DVC 2/7/2023 10:56:24 AM (No. 1397323)
"Misleading" = Intentional lie.
And they cover it up. This liar should be located and immediately removed from the service if in uniform, fired if a civilian.
15 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
Lawsy0 2/7/2023 11:32:37 AM (No. 1397374)
Waving my arm like a 4th grader, I know the answer. Pentagon wouldn’t name the official who provided misleading information about three supposed balloons: He cannot because there were not ANY. Just a little drama envy by some eunuch desk pilot wishing he could fly a fighter jet.
12 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
rochow 2/7/2023 7:57:39 PM (No. 1397766)
Perhaps it was the dumber than wood Jake Sullivan???
9 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
5 handicap 2/8/2023 5:43:45 AM (No. 1397917)
PROOF beyond any doubt that the Pentagon is no longer trustworthy and is run by America-hating Socialist Scum! Perhaps it time to send part of "Churchill's speech to the British People" to the miserable dictators in Washington..."Even though large tracts of land have fallen into the grip of the gestapo of Democrat rule, we will not flag nor fail...We will fight on the beaches we will fight on the landing grounds, we will fight in the fields and in the streets, we shall fight in the hills, we shall never surrender...
Please forgive the few edits!
8 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
Rinktum 2/8/2023 7:01:17 AM (No. 1397947)
Clearly, every agency in this administration has gone rogue and believes it is its own little fiefdom which proves that Democrats’ lust for power is insatiable. They have no right to withhold information from their Commander in Chief. They are completely lawless. This is the result of doing nothing when evil is on the march.
13 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
Zigrid 2/8/2023 11:32:48 AM (No. 1398120)
Well...the establishment elites had to find something to blame on President Trump...it's like the little boy who cried wolf to many times...no one believes the government anymore...the china balloon over our country was fact...and Montana proved it with pictures...not a report from some none existent official telling a fairy tale to cover biden's posterior....who must have been jacked up on something if he could finish his speech....Greg Kelly will give me a true story of what happened last night...
3 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
Speedypetey 2/8/2023 7:34:36 PM (No. 1398397)
And no ships at sea or commercial airline flights reported these sightings? Are career bureaucrats in the military lying? Again?
1 person likes this.
Hey, if the media can do unnamed sources, so can the Pentagon.
1 person likes this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "WhamDBambam"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
Comments:
Perhaps because this "senior official doesn't exist.