Ohio's National Guard shouldn't be in D.C.
Chronicle-Telegram [Elyria, OH],
by
Editorial Board
Original Article
Posted By: Harlowe,
8/21/2025 2:18:01 PM
If any governor should know the risks of sending the National Guard to police an American city, it should be the governor of Ohio. Everyone in Ohio knows what happened on May 4, 1970, when National Guard troops opened fire on anti-war protesters at Kent State University. Four protesters were killed and nine others wounded, including one who was paralyzed from the waist down. [Snip] He’s sending them to police American civilians and further Trump’s political agenda, which includes normalizing the deployment of military troops on the streets of American communities even when local leaders don’t want them there.
Post Reply
Reminder: “WE ARE A SALON AND NOT A SALOON”
Your thoughts, comments, and ideas are always welcome here. But we ask you to please be mindful and respectful. Threatening or crude language doesn't persuade anybody and makes the conversation less enjoyable for fellow L.Dotters.
Reply 1 - Posted by:
DVC 8/21/2025 2:24:58 PM (No. 1993576)
Stupidly comparing this to the Kent state situation.....NOT at all similar. First, I have not seen ANY weapons, let alone loaded weapons in any of the news coverage. As far as I can tell, these National Guard troops have NO weapons whatsoever with them. I haven't seen any of them with so much as a holstered handgun, let alone a rifle. Perhaps there are some guns somewhere. Is there any ammo? Are they permitted to defend themselves? We have no word on rules of engagement.
Comparing to Kent State is pure BS.
40 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
Vaquero45 8/21/2025 2:25:26 PM (No. 1993577)
Typical libtard nonsense. Disregard.
35 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
crashnburn 8/21/2025 2:25:44 PM (No. 1993578)
Another Democrat on the wrong side of an 80/20 issue. If the Democrat "leaders" don't want NG troops in their cities, they should have competently policed them themselves. As it is, considering the residents and police forces are welcoming the troops, the "leaders" are NOT representing their constituencies at all.
BTW, the bluer the city, the worse the crime. There might be a clue in there, somewhere.
25 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
JackBurton 8/21/2025 2:26:47 PM (No. 1993580)
Sending the guard to suppress a political (anti war) protest: Political.
Sending the guard to stop criminals and illegals from turning the nation's capital into a poop reservoir: Law enforcement. Someone on the radio pointed out the stats that you are 30 times more likely to be murdered in DC than London (England's Capitol).
I guess they really do like crime.
23 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
earlybird 8/21/2025 2:28:31 PM (No. 1993581)
Wasn't this paper on the wrong side of the Oberlin College kerfuffle with the local bakery?
20 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
hershey 8/21/2025 2:29:40 PM (No. 1993582)
Another BS liberal rag...knew it when they dumped on Trump...
20 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
mc squared 8/21/2025 2:31:35 PM (No. 1993585)
Kent State in 1970 is as relevant as slavery in 1860.
23 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
earlybird 8/21/2025 2:32:24 PM (No. 1993586)
"The National Guard is a state-based military force that becomes part of the U.S. military's reserve components of the U.S. Army and the U.S. Air Force when activated for federal missions"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Guard_(United_States)
They didn't get the memo.
11 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
HPmatt 8/21/2025 2:33:55 PM (No. 1993587)
Sure as heck don't need them in Cincinnati....got that covered dontcha Governor...
10 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
kdog 8/21/2025 2:47:59 PM (No. 1993593)
The National Guard gets over 90% of it's funding and ALL it's weapons from the Federal Government. States can refer to them as "their" National Guard, but its not true.
9 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
Mcscow sailor 8/21/2025 2:51:35 PM (No. 1993597)
To begin with, the District of Columbia is a federal district, not a city. It has some self-rule powers delegated, but not transferred, from the federal government. It has its own national guard, commanded by the president.
Second, a president can nationalize the DC police force, and can and has ordered NG units into cities. The last of seven notable times were the 1992 LA riots.
Third, as others have noted, the guard units ordered into DC to support metro police are not even carrying weapons.
In conclusion, this mayor’s comments are waaaay out in left field.
17 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
Safari Man 8/21/2025 2:59:19 PM (No. 1993601)
This is an insult to the Ohio Guardsmen. Of course, that's what libt*rds do.
10 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
jasmine 8/21/2025 3:12:15 PM (No. 1993607)
FTA: "Yes, crime remains an issue in D.C. and beyond, but the proper way to address it is through cooperation among local, state and federal authorities."
Tell that to the families of the three American killed by an illegal alien who got a drivers license and couldn't even speak, read or understand the English road signs. He was licensed in at least two states. Every step of the way, that American family was betrayed by "COOPERATION among local, state and federal authorities." They all "cooperated" in giving that illegal alien the "right" to stay in the US, drive on our roads, and end the lives of three innocent people. He should have been deported in 2018 when he arrived, and he shouldn't have been working in the US, let alone driving on our highways. Let's investigate how many of those local, state and federal "authorities" acted in the best interests of that family and the rest of the American people. Because those people are dead because Democrats care more about protecting illegal aliens than they do their own constituents.
7 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
Strike3 8/21/2025 3:25:23 PM (No. 1993614)
Kent State students were not armed except for the FBI informant who caused the panic but they did cause a lot of property damage and the local cops could not stop it. DC street thugs are armed and dangerous and if one or two of them get shot there will be no complaints out here in flyover country.
6 people like this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
PESSIMIST 8/21/2025 3:46:08 PM (No. 1993621)
Just a little reminder about "Kent State" and what really happened that day, from someone old enough to remember. I don't get my history from TikTok.
KS was the latest in a series of outrageous college protests across the country in Spring '70. (I assure you these "anti-war" gatherings were uglier even than the jihadist rituals seen on campus today.) And the KS riots were among the most violent. The evening before the shooting, the "kids" had burned down a campus building. The mob that then confronted the National Guard was hurling bricks and flaming objects.
Polls of the time showed he Guardsmen who fired back were supported in their actions by the overwhelming majority of Americans. Ohio Governor James Rhodes spoke in their defense.
My point is not that Kent State wasn't a tragedy. It can be argued that the National Guardsmen -- mostly terrified Ohio farm kids, not much older or even the same age as the students, and untrained for civil disturbances -- "reacted" too quickly. Maybe. They weren't charged criminally And critical analysts of their behavior weren't there.
But then and now, as this Ohio editorialist reminds, reserve their fear and hatred for law enforcement, not the criminals from whom they protect us.
10 people like this.
Reply 16 - Posted by:
paral04 8/21/2025 4:12:38 PM (No. 1993625)
Those rioters would not stand down and unfortunately for them, paid the consequences. We are at war as we have been invaded. Some people have not been affected but many have. They have been murdered, raped assaulted and robbed. Since the local powers that be think that's OK, our Federal had to step in and protect the innocent. Quit brining up Kent State
4 people like this.
Reply 17 - Posted by:
Roscoelewis 8/21/2025 4:14:11 PM (No. 1993627)
rather have the guard than the fatiqers.
2 people like this.
Reply 18 - Posted by:
vhs68 8/21/2025 4:22:02 PM (No. 1993634)
Well, it's obvious that the Chronicle-Telegram people sit around all day and watch CBS news if this is the what they report.
4 people like this.
Reply 19 - Posted by:
Californian 8/21/2025 5:15:30 PM (No. 1993653)
Kent state was 55 years ago. No one cares. It was an entirely different situation, a different time, a different culture. There are zero similarities.
Clean up DC. Get it done then go clean up the rest of the blue cities.
2 people like this.
Reply 20 - Posted by:
Toodles3956 8/21/2025 5:29:44 PM (No. 1993657)
Hasn't been anymore trouble at Kent State.
3 people like this.
Reply 21 - Posted by:
WV.Hillbilly 8/21/2025 5:39:56 PM (No. 1993662)
Those Kent State protestors got what they deserved. Don't throw rocks and construction debris at armed soldiers.
1 person likes this.
Reply 22 - Posted by:
MickTurn 8/21/2025 5:41:27 PM (No. 1993666)
That is ancient history and has NOTHING to do with Today's situation.
1 person likes this.
Reply 23 - Posted by:
JHHolliday 8/21/2025 5:49:11 PM (No. 1993675)
Ike sent the 101st Airborne to Little Rock and federalized the Arkansas National Guard to enforce integration. The left applauded then. Now, it’s “Hitler is back from the grave “.
3 people like this.
Reply 24 - Posted by:
udanja99 8/21/2025 5:57:45 PM (No. 1993679)
Elyria is just down the road from Oberlin if that gives you any idea of what its politics are like.
The South Carolina NG is in DC and I’m thrilled that they and our governor have stepped up to help PDT.
1 person likes this.
Reply 25 - Posted by:
cor-vet 8/21/2025 6:07:41 PM (No. 1993681)
Kent State was an early example of 'FAFO!'
2 people like this.
Reply 26 - Posted by:
Birddog 8/21/2025 7:11:34 PM (No. 1993716)
The communist SDS inspired rioters at KS burned the ROTC buildings to the ground, then attacked the police and firefighters trying to put it out...they also unhooked, carried away, and slashed the fire hoses...an act of war against a military installation.The protests were against incursions into Cambodia, to stop the communist Viet Cong based here as well as the genocidal communist Cambodian govt. By 1979 the average age of Cambodians had dropped to 19yo,,,,because sooooo many were slaughtered by the Cambodian Govt. They snatched up and killed anyone wearing a watch, or wearing glasses, simply because those two accessories meant that individual could likely READ, and reading, getting educated was detrimental to the Communist agenda.
1 person likes this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Harlowe"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
Comments:
“Opinion” from a Midwest newspaper.