Post New Article

Account information for this Lucianne member

[Lucianne.com]

Username: Hazymac

Is this you?

If this is your information, you can change it by clicking on your user profile.

The only thing that you cannot change is your screen name.
If you MUST change your screen name, then email us [contact us]
and we will see if there is an alternate screen name available.

Latest Posts by Hazymac:

Democrats cheating again, sun still setting
in the West
replies
Posted by Hazymac 6/5/2026 11:09:55 AM Post Reply
So, a late-night ballot drop in Los Angeles appears to have changed the dynamics of the midterm election. But, hey, the state might be counting for days or weeks yet, so let’s not jump to conclusions, right? Sure, Florida can count 10 million ballots in one day and evening, as can many other states and nations, and Florida has mail balloting, too, but California Democrats say that the reason it takes the erstwhile Golden State so long to tally its votes is because they want to make sure every vote is counted. It’s about “our democracy,” you see. Well, they want to make sure every illegal ballot is counted, that is for sure.
Who’s Obsessed With Race? replies
Posted by Hazymac 6/5/2026 9:50:59 AM Post Reply
Liberals like to denounce the rest of us as racists, but the truth is that they are the ones who are obsessed with race. This is a classic example: “BBC apologises for misquoting Farage on Nowak murder.” The BBC has apologised to Nigel Farage after one of its presenters misquoted his comments about the killing of Henry Nowak. During Tuesday’s Newsnight programme, Matt Chorley, the presenter, said that the Reform UK leader had told the public to respond to the murder with “white cold rage”, when he had said “pure cold rage”. Reform argued that this implied a racial element to what Mr Farage had said and changed his meaning. Of course it did.
It's Not Racist to Notice Reality replies
Posted by Hazymac 6/5/2026 8:43:10 AM Post Reply
When you are passing judgments on individuals regarding their character, it is not right to judge them based on their immutable characteristics as part of a group. We judge individuals based on who they are and what they do. On the other hand, when you are evaluating a group, it's just as wrong to disaggregate it into individual atoms and claim that there are no group characteristics that are relevant to making a judgment. That's why it is simultaneously true that individuals who are part of some group may be good, and the group as a whole is still harmful. When I meet a liberal, for instance,