How Barack Obama Built an Omnipotent Thought-Machine,
and How It Was Destroyed
Tablet Magazine,
by
David Samuels
Original Article
Posted By: Hermoine,
12/22/2024 9:27:20 AM
If anyone in the future cares enough to write an authentic history of the 2024 presidential campaign, they might begin by noting that American politics exists downstream of American culture, which is a deep and broad river. Like any river, American culture follows a particular path, which has been reconfigured at key moments by new technologies. In turn, these technologies, which redefine both space and time—canals and lakes, the postal system, the telegraph, railroads, radio and later television, the internet, and most recently the networking of billions of people in real time on social media platforms—set the rules by which stories are communicated, audiences are configured, and individuals define themselves.
Post Reply
Reminder: “WE ARE A SALON AND NOT A SALOON”
Your thoughts, comments, and ideas are always welcome here. But we ask you to please be mindful and respectful. Threatening or crude language doesn't persuade anybody and makes the conversation less enjoyable for fellow L.Dotters.
Reply 1 - Posted by:
Twinkle93 12/22/2024 9:43:43 AM (No. 1859473)
The article has a very high fog number.
12 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
Knotwyrkin 12/22/2024 9:55:04 AM (No. 1859482)
Yeah, I spent my 4th through 7th grade diagramming sentences with the Dominican Nuns, and have seven years of post-grad education, but what I take away from this article is that the author writes as he has to give a book report on a book he didn't read and thinks that longer sentences convey deeper thoughts - see what I did here?
51 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
anniebc 12/22/2024 10:16:20 AM (No. 1859492)
What I can say about the article is obama didn't build jack! He was/is a puppet just like biden: obama just knows how to sound like he's speaking well. With a teleprompter, of course.
59 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
DVC 12/22/2024 10:28:31 AM (No. 1859501)
A very interesting summary of the last couple of decades, where the author uses hindsight to explain it all. Some of the nomenclature and intricate 'intentional design' ideas seems contrived after the fact to me, but perhaps it is as it was.
In any case, Twitter being freed from the control of the leftist totalitarians and left open to all sides was a major good deed by Mr. Musk. And I hope that the terrible evil that is Obama and his whole cadre of festering totalitarian thugs are permanently kicked to the curb and left out of any connection to the levers of power.
56 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
Italiano 12/22/2024 10:44:18 AM (No. 1859512)
He gives Obama far too much credit. Obama was/is a tool.
53 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
Quigley 12/22/2024 11:21:27 AM (No. 1859532)
It is a very interesting read with a huge scope correlating Obumbum's "vision" for the Middle East and the domestic "permissions" machine he built, and Bibi's vision of the ME and Elon's purpose in buying Twitter. A very interesting story on first read. Joe Rogan's interview of Mike Benz would probably flesh out many details of the "whole of society" approach and the institutions/organizations involved.
FTA: "The coincidence marks the end of Obama’s pretensions to be a new kind of world leader, running a new world order of his own making from his iPhone, grounded in his own strange combination of nihilism and virtue-mongering."
FTA: "At its core, Obama’s Iran deal was an attempt to remake the Democratic Party in his own image, by establishing fealty to the ayatollahs as a litmus test for the party faithful—thereby elevating third-worldist “progressive” POC elements within the party at the expense of Jews, who undermined the premises of DEI ideology by doing well on standardized tests and making money and who were annoyingly loyal to Bill and Hillary Clinton, Obama’s rivals for control of the party. Conversely, the recent disintegration of Obama’s world-building project in Middle East has helped to further collapse his mystique, by showing that his grand vision for America’s role in the world was founded on sand. If Obama the global strategist is clearly a failure, and his hand-picked successors at home were a senile old man and a babbling idiot, then the country’s corporate elite and tech oligarchy might rightly question the wisdom of continued payoffs to Obama’s Chicago-style Democratic machine and make peace with Donald Trump instead. Which they did."
FTA: "Exceptionalism is the master narrative of American greatness, and today its only true defender seems to be Donald Trump."
FTA: "As for Barack Obama, I will admit that I wasn’t sure I’d ever see him face the consequences of his own arrogance, obsession with personal power, and efforts at vanquishing the exceptionalism that makes this country different from every other one. But I guess, as a wise man once explained: “Life’s a b***ch.”
19 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
mc squared 12/22/2024 11:37:49 AM (No. 1859551)
I found it enlightening. An opinion of American politics and culture from 30,000 feet.
14 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
jimincalif 12/22/2024 11:43:46 AM (No. 1859556)
This article helps explain a lot. I remember well the production of narratives-as-fact ramped up a lot in 0bama’s second term. It really struck me when all of a sudden we were being told it was accepted wisdom that anyone can use whatever public restroom they want based on their identity du jour. it was Orwellian. All the state media spouting in unison with democrat politicians, using the same phrases, and it just got worse from there, culminating in the installation of an elderly dementia patient as president.
33 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
Dreadnought 12/22/2024 12:06:42 PM (No. 1859575)
TLDR:
Adam Smith > Howard Zinn
5 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
Jesuslover54 12/22/2024 1:13:20 PM (No. 1859600)
Why does nobody try to assassinate the people who really need it?
13 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
paleoconserv43 12/22/2024 1:29:19 PM (No. 1859608)
The article is unreadable.
5 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
Laotzu 12/22/2024 1:43:52 PM (No. 1859616)
Each paragraph should be a chapter in a book. But that is largely driven by the the fact this is the first real comprhensive recitation of post 2000 history that I've seen in print. It's a lot to cover the rise and fall of a totalitarian dystopia in one essay.
21 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
Italiano 12/22/2024 2:27:31 PM (No. 1859642)
David Axelrod should have been taken off the board a long time ago.
12 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
DVC 12/22/2024 3:26:51 PM (No. 1859668)
Re #13. Axlerod was said by David Horowitz, the reformed leftist, as one of the "red diaper babies" raised from birth by Communist parents to be Communist infiltrators into the US system. Axlerod is a very bad person.
22 people like this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
Starboard_side 12/22/2024 4:05:46 PM (No. 1859682)
Very long but very informative article. Hope many in the Trump world and RNC read it a few times.
FTA:
When I wrote about Rhodes’ ambitious program to sell the Iran deal, I advanced the term “echo chambers” to describe the process by which the White House and its wider penumbra of think tanks and NGOs generated an entirely new class of experts who credentialed each other on social media in order to advance assertions that would formerly have been seen as marginal or not credible, thereby overwhelming the efforts of traditional subject-area gatekeepers and reporters to keep government spokespeople honest. In constructing these echo chambers, the White House created feedback loops that could be gamed out in advance by clever White House aides, thereby influencing and controlling the perceptions of reporters, editors and congressional staffers, and the elusive currents of “public opinion” they attempted to follow. If you saw how the game worked from the inside, you understood that the new common wisdom was not a true “reflection” of what anyone in particular necessarily believed, but rather the deliberate creation of a small class of operatives who used new technologies to create and control larger narratives that they messaged to target audiences on digital platforms, and which often presented themselves to their targets as their own naturally occurring thoughts and feelings, which they would then share with people like themselves.
This is where they used reporters who were more than willing to comply if they felt they were "in the know".
The campaign used them in their townhall settings where they were able to control the agenda and any follow up questions but gave the reporters the sense they were being given access.
Obama certainly isn't the brains of anything - just listen to him speak without a teleprompter - but useful in the sense people were afraid to challenge him for fear of being accused of being labeled a racist which they used often to simply shutdown the conversation and stop anyone from thinking more about it.
11 people like this.
Reply 16 - Posted by:
jeffkinnh 12/22/2024 4:08:53 PM (No. 1859684)
Lots and lots of words and ideas and speculation about intentions and goals and methods but it boils down to this"
"The human future rests on individuals in all walks of life and representing all parties and all currents of opinion being brave and independent-minded enough to make that same choice."
In many ways, that is the promise and goal of America. As soon as BO said he wanted to "fundamentally transform" America we should have known nothing good could have resulted from his efforts. Axelrod effectively created a tool for mind control and, as with most tools, they can be used for good or evil. BO is evil.
America may not be perfect. With so many individuals seeking their own truth, we are bound to walk a wandering path to our best outcome. However, a good yardstick is to understand the the goals of the founders of the country and see if we are truly trying to fulfill their vision. America didn't need to be transformed, our direction might need some reconsideration at times but our underpinnings are solid and strong.
It is nice to see that the author feels that BO has been mostly scrubbed from the playing field. For an egoist like BO, that has to be quite a putdown. We should be on guard against he or his minions slipping back in again.
17 people like this.
Reply 17 - Posted by:
Strike3 12/22/2024 5:46:06 PM (No. 1859703)
The writer is listed as David Samuels but I highly suspect that Kamala Harris wrote that bit of philosophy. I don't think there was as much thought in the Obama administration as there was childhood abuse, hatred, racism and propaganda.
4 people like this.
Reply 18 - Posted by:
Msquared112 12/23/2024 6:35:47 AM (No. 1859832)
#1,I didn’t think the fog number was that high and I really liked the essay. You want a high fog number, read Jordan Peterson’s new book.
6 people like this.
Reply 19 - Posted by:
BirdsNest 12/23/2024 7:09:59 AM (No. 1859848)
I can tell from reading the posts that I don't have enough brain cells to read the article. I just want Skippy and his minions gone...forever.
5 people like this.
Reply 20 - Posted by:
govlawyer 12/23/2024 7:19:09 AM (No. 1859852)
The absence of ValJar in this article ignores the fact that she was as much an agent of the mullahs as she was of obongo; without ValJar and her agents Susan Rice and Samantha Powers (with an assist from Victoria Nuland) the mideast color revolutions would not have occurred; it was their stirring of the effluent in that cesspool that made the conditions right for the Iran deal.
8 people like this.
Reply 21 - Posted by:
bpl40 12/23/2024 7:26:11 AM (No. 1859858)
I passed out on the Dean's List from one of the top business schools in the world. But I will let someone with a higher pay grade summarize this article before I attempt to understand it..
4 people like this.
Reply 22 - Posted by:
Dodge Boy 12/23/2024 8:33:12 AM (No. 1859874)
Obie's thought-police even instructed us how we were to pronounce certain terms. Such as the Tollybon, Pokiston, and Eron.
6 people like this.
Reply 23 - Posted by:
franq 12/23/2024 9:08:40 AM (No. 1859889)
Hussein built nothing. He tore down a lot, though.
8 people like this.
Reply 24 - Posted by:
janjan 12/23/2024 9:20:38 AM (No. 1859900)
This author uses a lot of words to convey a pretty simple truth. Wokeness took over the Democrat party and destroyed it. People are no longer impressed with Obama and his communist agenda. A lot of eyes have been opened.
9 people like this.
Reply 25 - Posted by:
Zigrid 12/23/2024 9:58:48 AM (No. 1859922)
Barack HUSSEIN Obama ...along with Valerie Jarrett are Iranians at heart...and they hoped to convince Americans WE are dumb and stupid and can be controlled...what the ole boy didn't get was....WE Americans are very smart...even his "bros" that he blasts because they decided to think for themselves....his charm is gone and his judgmental attitude shows it's face every time he opens his mouth.....his admiring public has disappeared...and he looks pathetic...
8 people like this.
Reply 26 - Posted by:
Lawsy0 12/23/2024 10:03:52 AM (No. 1859928)
Some may call it a long read; others may call it diarrhea of the word processor.
1 person likes this.
Reply 27 - Posted by:
Gallo3 12/23/2024 10:04:43 AM (No. 1859930)
The 'Permission Structure' concept explored by this author is simply a euphemism for Illegal Surveillance, Cancel Culture, De-Banking, and Censorship. Musk's purchase of Twitter broke that structure and it has all been downhill for Obama since that time.
3 people like this.
Reply 28 - Posted by:
Muguy 12/23/2024 10:13:38 AM (No. 1859938)
So much of NoBama's background and motives are explained in Dinesh D'Souza's well-researched and brilliant 2012 documentary "2016: Obama's America"
His childhood background, his activities before he was thrust upon the national stage and the lack of media vetting of his back story before he defeated John McPain and then defeated ANOTHER poor republican candidate in Mittens Romney. So many issues just get a pass in his subtle plan of ultimately dividing Americans against themselves!
The article is a long read and requires deep thought on the points raised, but few people read things like this anymore preferring to have it more 'digestible' rather than to engage in personal analysis of the content. Hindsight is truly 20/20 and the 'cause and effect' over time is hard to see and understand while we are living through it.
6 people like this.
Reply 29 - Posted by:
Ruhn 12/23/2024 11:04:34 AM (No. 1859962)
Interesting--yet verbose-article with many insights. But I agree with many posters that the author gives Barry way too much credit. Barry has always been a red-diaper empty suit who believes in his own hype. A very odd fellow with a lot of unanswered questions about his past. Granted, he talks a good game (in front of a teleprompter) and there's no denying that he's charismatic. And yet Barry has been an empty vessel for the left to project their white guilt and their hobby horse agendas. Perhaps that's the whole point: the powers that be shifted the Overton window regarding Barry. Otherwise he would not have survived scrutiny back in 2008.
Who was not noticeably mentioned was Valerie Jarrett, a key Chicago machine player who mentored Barry and guided his warped foreign policy thinking with regards to Iran.
4 people like this.
Reply 30 - Posted by:
pensom2 12/23/2024 1:13:34 PM (No. 1860014)
Mr. Samuels' insights are impressive. When I find my prose growing convoluted, I take a break by reading a few dozen pages of Ernest Hemingway. He composed lean, sturdy prose. Doing so helps get me back on track. I commend this practice to Mr. Samuels.
2 people like this.
Reply 31 - Posted by:
PrayerWarrior 12/23/2024 1:56:28 PM (No. 1860027)
This was a long read to say what we all knew; Obama was a destructive force against the foundation of our country.
God willing, we will survive him and Biden's reign of terror and rebuild.
2 people like this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Hermoine"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
Comments:
Very long read but very informative. I'd like to see a follow up article on WHY Obama was obsessed with restructuring the power order in the Middle East to prop up Iran. One person never mentioned in the article is Valerie Jarrett and I'd argue she is as important to his rise to power as Axelrod.