Post New Article

William, Kate Portrait Panned By Art Critics:
'Frumpy, Inanimate, Sulky'

Original Article

Posted By: Harlowe, 6/26/2022 12:35:18 AM

Prince William and Kate Middleton's first official joint portrait--unveiled on Thursday in Cambridge--has been panned by Britain's leading art critics, suggesting that viewers wanting to see a truer likeness would be "better off going to Madame Tussaud's." (Snip) A.N Wilson, writing for the Daily Mail, reserved his most scathing criticism for the depiction of the duchess, who is shown looking to one side wearing a glamorous green shimmer dress by indie designer The Vampire's Wife.

Post Reply

Reply 1 - Posted by: Harlowe 6/26/2022 12:37:48 AM (No. 1197170)
After observing the Duchess of Cambridge’s fashion selections for several years, it is with reluctance, but well-intentioned resolve, to comment on her fashion choices and, at the same time, prepare for the slings and arrows that will very likely be posted to this personal observation and opinion. The Duchess of Cambridge is a beautiful, elegant, refined young woman who might do well to consider consulting with Queen Elizabeth’s senior dresser, Angela Kelly, to avoid some of the dowdy, overly fussy, and/or flouncy attire she wears from time to time. The dress chosen for this portrait is, as described elsewhere, vamperic—a Morticia Addams dress. Queen Elizabeth is always “elegant” in appearance due to the selections made for her by Ms. Kelly. With Ms. Kelly’s guidance, the Duchess would very likely look sensational with consistency rather than hit-and-miss.
19 people like this.

Reply 2 - Posted by: Faithfully 6/26/2022 1:10:10 AM (No. 1197176)
Having heard Lady Colin Campbell's defense of this portrait, I have to say the couple look slouchy and not at all regal. JMO.
9 people like this.

Reply 3 - Posted by: chumley 6/26/2022 1:13:52 AM (No. 1197178)
I have no thoughts about him either way, but I do adore her. Her beauty is incredible. The portrait does not do her justice. He looks like the creepy guy outside an elementary school, and she looks like AOC.
11 people like this.

Reply 4 - Posted by: Harlowe 6/26/2022 1:28:13 AM (No. 1197188)
In defense of the artist, it may be appropriate to suggest that he was presented with a bit of a complex situation in how to depict the couple due to Prince William dressed in a business suit and the Duchess in “fancy dress.” They are mismatched in their clothing choices.
10 people like this.

Reply 5 - Posted by: NYbob 6/26/2022 1:30:15 AM (No. 1197190)
Kate really ought to give Melania a call. This portrait is a mess for many reasons, but the weak fundamentals of William's likeness is unavoidable. He isn't the easiest subject, but that angle and the hamfisted painting of his head, make him look really weird. NOT a goal of any competent artist. Lighting is about as creative as what you would find waiting for an elevator. zero drama or interest in the color and shading of the background and her dress. For goodness sake you DON'T use one color from top to bottom and side to side and then make it darker for shadows. If you do it makes the subject look like a flat cutout, which this does. It is awful. SO many talented artists in the world and they choose this one. Every painting has critics who will attack it for one reason or another, often unfairly, but this thing fails on the basics, long before it comes up short on all the other things a good portrait conveys to the public.
16 people like this.

Reply 6 - Posted by: Maggie2u 6/26/2022 1:39:05 AM (No. 1197194)
O.K. I looked at the picture before reading the article and I thought the dress was frumpy. The color was all right but the ruffle at the bottom was weird. Also, I agree with another poster about how Kate was wearing a fancy dress and William was in a business suit.
9 people like this.

Reply 7 - Posted by: LadyHen 6/26/2022 2:19:56 AM (No. 1197206)
The content of their character and the good works they do should really be far more the focus than how some no talent painter portrays them. Screw fashion and pop culture mavens. Be the future King and Queen the people need. The Royals and all of us should have had enough of window dressing the corpse that should be the British Royal Family. Be relevant and you will thrive!!
8 people like this.

Reply 8 - Posted by: DCGIRL 6/26/2022 5:19:44 AM (No. 1197225)
My opinion, this dress was not one of her best. Color, texture, etc is not her.
9 people like this.

Reply 9 - Posted by: 5 handicap 6/26/2022 6:29:49 AM (No. 1197247)
Anyone who uses the term "Frumpy" is a pompous Ass, so who cares what they think! Kate was as gorgeous as ever!
19 people like this.

Reply 10 - Posted by: ramona 6/26/2022 6:31:26 AM (No. 1197248)
I like the portrait. It is an almost photographic likeness. Kate is a mom, and rather modest. She is not a slave to the fashion industry pimps. I was glad that Lady Colin Campbelll agreed with me. With a hug to Poster #3, Ramona (the Pest)
14 people like this.

Reply 11 - Posted by: Petronius 6/26/2022 6:48:28 AM (No. 1197257)
I think the subjects are ok (not great) other than William's hand being in his trouser pocket. The painting's strange background gives it a somewhat odd and surealistic look in contrast with Kate and William.
3 people like this.

Reply 12 - Posted by: BarryNo 6/26/2022 7:43:45 AM (No. 1197283)
The critic is probably a Harry/Meghan supporter. Nothing like politics to sour the whole day. I'm an artist, and I think it looks fine.
16 people like this.

Reply 13 - Posted by: padiva 6/26/2022 8:27:47 AM (No. 1197318)
Looks fine to me. Why is William wearing a boring tie?
4 people like this.

Reply 14 - Posted by: udanja99 6/26/2022 9:02:09 AM (No. 1197352)
The only issue I have with it is the glitziness of the dress. I wonder if the dress really was glitzy or if the artist painted it that way to liven up the portrait. As far as official portraits go, I’ll take this one any day over the monstrosities which were painted of 0bama and Mooch.
13 people like this.

Reply 15 - Posted by: konocti95 6/26/2022 9:18:54 AM (No. 1197374)
John Singer Sargent call your office.
3 people like this.

Reply 16 - Posted by: DVC 6/26/2022 9:20:03 AM (No. 1197378)
The heads look great....but don't seem to scale properly to the bodies. And the bodies seem to have been done by understudies. Heads looked "photoshopped on". I see nothing wrong with the faces, but overall......substandard, IMO.
3 people like this.

Reply 17 - Posted by: marbles 6/26/2022 10:11:58 AM (No. 1197422)
If you want a photographic likeness you take a photograph.Their posture is awkward as is their gaze. And that dress is awful. As painted it looks like cheap crushed velvet.
2 people like this.

Reply 18 - Posted by: Gordon Mills 6/26/2022 10:43:16 AM (No. 1197446)
The painting does not do justice to either. They are much better looking in person and should have nixed the approval or release.
7 people like this.

Reply 19 - Posted by: earlybird 6/26/2022 12:19:09 PM (No. 1197510)
It’s an OK likeness that is very much like a photo snapped as they were talking to each other and something caught their attention. Kate’s photo in the dress is also in the article. Odd-looking fabric, but a different green and not so satiny-shiny The designer should have skipped the flounce,, although it added a flare at the bottom of the actual dress while simply hanging limply in the portrait. I am wondering about the fuss about their clothes. Her dress is not “fancy dress” which in England means a costume party. It is a cocktail dress. His suit is OK with that. A tux would have looked pretentious.
1 person likes this.

Reply 20 - Posted by: Citoyen 6/26/2022 12:24:42 PM (No. 1197515)
As usual these days the public is far more discerning than the critics. Today’s critics hate and mock any work of art that is traditional. The couple looks great and, yes, they are, with their position and looks, glamorous. The critics would love it if Kate had blue hair and a nose ring and was wearing an orange skin tight dress that exposed her breasts. William, with a wool cap, ugly facial hair and tattoos from wrist to armpit, would delight the critics.
1 person likes this.

Reply 21 - Posted by: happywarrior 6/26/2022 12:26:34 PM (No. 1197517)
I would prefer them to be looking straight ahead at the artist but I do like it.
1 person likes this.

Reply 22 - Posted by: ussjimmycarter 6/26/2022 12:32:11 PM (No. 1197525)
Kate is a beautiful woman! She can wear anything and make it sparkle! Only fashion snobs would care…and we don’t care about what is “in”! Enjoy life, Kate and let the jealous critics chatter! It means NOTHING!
1 person likes this.

Reply 23 - Posted by: udanja99 6/26/2022 1:23:29 PM (No. 1197598)
Unless you’ve been shopping for a party dress lately, you might not know that flounces at the hem are in style right now, as are sleeves which are puffy at the shoulder. I wore a dress with a flounce at the bottom to my daughter’s wedding a few weeks ago.
0 people like this.

Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Harlowe"
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
Most Recent Articles posted by Harlowe"
William, Kate Portrait Panned By Art Critics:
'Frumpy, Inanimate, Sulky'
23 replies
Posted by Harlowe 6/26/2022 12:35:18 AM Post Reply
Prince William and Kate Middleton's first official joint portrait--unveiled on Thursday in Cambridge--has been panned by Britain's leading art critics, suggesting that viewers wanting to see a truer likeness would be "better off going to Madame Tussaud's." (Snip) A.N Wilson, writing for the Daily Mail, reserved his most scathing criticism for the depiction of the duchess, who is shown looking to one side wearing a glamorous green shimmer dress by indie designer The Vampire's Wife.
Gibsons again demand payment of $36 million judgment 17 replies
Posted by Harlowe 6/25/2022 12:05:03 PM Post Reply
Attorneys for Gibson's Bakery and the Gibson family have once again filed documents with the Ohio Supreme Court opposing Oberlin College's request to halt payment of the more than $36 million the college owes the family and their business after losing a lawsuit.(Snip)It's too late for the college to ask the court to rescue it from paying the nearly $32 million in damages and attorney fees Miraldi awarded the Gibsons, plus another $4.5 million in interest and counting, their attorneys wrote. There is no reason for this court to now entertain Oberlin's motion when its own inaction has already directed the outcome in this matter," the Gibsons argued.
Oberlin College asks court to stay Gibson's
judgment while it appeals
23 replies
Posted by Harlowe 6/18/2022 11:50:17 AM Post Reply
Oberlin College has asked the Ohio Supreme Court to issue an order halting payment of the $36 million a court has awarded Gibson's Bakery while the college appeals rulings by two lower courts. (Snip) The college also accused the Gibsons of trying to prevent Zurich from filing a response.(Snip)"Even if neither the trial court's stay nor the terms of the bond contemplated that the stay would remain in effect pending the 'exhaustion of all of the Defendants' appeals,'" the Ohio Supreme Court "would have the authority to extend the stay and continue the term of the bond to encompass Oberlin's pending appeal," the college argued.
Left Wing Group “Jane’s Revenge”
Announces “Open Season” on Pro-Life
Pregnancy Centers
16 replies
Posted by Harlowe 6/17/2022 10:47:14 PM Post Reply
A shadowy pro-abortion group called “Jane’s Revenge” has issued a statement declaring “open season” on pro-life centers and organizations. They have also claimed credit for related attacks that have already happened.(Snip)This is all based on the leaked opinion about Roe vs. Wade. Radicals are trying to send a message.(Snip) “Through attacking, we find joy, courage, and strip the veneer of impenetrability held by these violent institutions,” it says. Addressing allies of the group, the post says, “Go do one of your own. You are already one of us. Everyone with the urge to paint, to burn, to cut, to jam: now is the time.
The Biden Administration’s Push to Normalize
Drug Use Will Result in More Deaths
17 replies
Posted by Harlowe 6/17/2022 12:03:11 AM Post Reply
We have been covering several stories related to the escalation of drug deaths across the country, namely due to fentanyl (now the leading cause of death for young Americans). In a normal world, there would be a push to stem the recreational use of powerful narcotics. However, the Biden administration and progressives across the country are pressing to normalize drug use. For example, we reported that Biden’s Health and Human Services department provided $30 million in funding to dole out crack pipes to drug addicts as part of its ‘Harm Reduction Plan.’
Gibson’s Bakery Moves To Collect On
$36 Million Surety Bond, Oberlin College
Seeks Stay In Ohio Supreme Court
10 replies
Posted by Harlowe 6/16/2022 12:35:15 PM Post Reply
The cross-appeals of Oberlin College and Gibson’s Bakery are awaiting decision from the Ohio Supreme Court, which has the discretion whether or not to take either appeal. We covered the latest on June 13, 2022, Gibson’s Bakery Wants Ohio Supreme Court To Restore Full Punitive Damage Verdict Against Oberlin College.(Snip)There is another drama working its way though the courts, namely, Gibson’s Bakery motion to collect on an approximately $36 million Surety Bond of Zurich American Surety Company.(Snip)Oberlin College never sought a stay of the Court of Appeals mandate,
Doctors ‘baffled’ by a ‘mysterious’
new ‘sudden death syndrome’ killing
healthy young people
19 replies
Posted by Harlowe 6/14/2022 11:26:55 PM Post Reply
They’re calling it Sudden Adult Death Syndrome, or SADS for short. Just like SIDS – Sudden Infant Death Syndrome – when healthy babies die suddenly(Snip)Except it occurs in adults. And children and teens too, though the name doesn’t reflect that. Yet.(Snip)It’s as though a warp-speed developed, never-before-used on humans, powerfully immune- and gene-modulating injection that hijacks cell machinery to churn out spike proteins (now recognized as the deadliest bit of the COVID-19 coronavirus), still in clinical trials, and linked to lethal inflammatory heart diseases like myocarditis and blood clotting disorders, could not possibly have anything to do with unexplained deaths.
Gibson’s Bakery Wants Ohio Supreme
Court To Restore Full Punitive Damage
Verdict Against Oberlin College
6 replies
Posted by Harlowe 6/13/2022 11:38:34 PM Post Reply
Gibson’s Bakery filed today its response to Oberlin College’s request that the Ohio Supreme Court exercise its discretion to hear the college’s appeal from the $32 million judgment (which includes attorney’s fees and costs). That judgment resulted from the $11 million compensatory and $33 million punitive damage awards totalling $44 million, reduced by the trial court under Ohio tort reform law to $25 million. The bulk of that reduction was that over $10 million in punitive damages were eliminated by punitive damage caps.
Trump Pentagon first offered National
Guard to Capitol four days before Jan.
6 riots, memo shows
9 replies
Posted by Harlowe 6/9/2022 9:51:19 AM Post Reply
The Pentagon first raised the possibility of sending National Guard troops to the U.S. Capitol four days before the Jan. 6 riots, setting in motion a series of rejections by Capitol Police and Democrats that left Congress vulnerable as threats of violence were rising, according to government memos that validate Trump administration officials' long-held claims. An official timeline of the Jan. 6 tragedy assembled by Capitol Police shows that a Defense Department official reached out to a Capitol Police deputy chief, Sean Gallagher, on Jan. 2, 2021 to see if a request for troops was forthcoming, but the offer was quickly rejected after a consultation with then-Chief Steve Sund.
Queen Elizabeth Platinum Jubilee: What
to know about historic royal event
4 replies
Posted by Harlowe 6/1/2022 11:30:20 AM Post Reply
Queen Elizabeth II became the first British Monarch to celebrate a Platinum Jubilee earlier this year after marking 70 years of service to the people of the United Kingdom, Realms and the Commonwealth. (Snip)Buckingham Palace shared that the queen’s attendance at events throughout the Platinum Jubilee weekend will likely only be confirmed on "the day itself," and Prince William and wife Kate Middleton were tapped to lead the Jubilee celebrations as the most senior members of the royal family. (Snip)The palace confirmed that only working senior members will appear on the balcony, which means Prince Andrew, as well as the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, won’t be present.
Gibsons to court: Make Oberlin College
pay $36 million judgment
10 replies
Posted by Harlowe 5/28/2022 9:49:38 AM Post Reply
Attorneys for Gibson's Bakery in Oberlin have asked a Lorain County judge to order their clients be paid a $36 million-plus judgment they're owed by Oberlin College after the college failed to file an appropriate motion with a state appeals court.(Snip) As a result, the college should pay what a jury and court determined was owed the family bakery and its owners from a 2019 civil trial--plus interest, attorneys for the Gibsons argued.(Snip)"The bakery continues to labor under the effects of the stigma created" by Oberlin College and Raimondo, the Gibsons' attorneys wrote, "but without the relief awarded by the jury."
Oops – Gibson’s Bakery Seeks To Execute
On $36 Million Appeal Bond Since Oberlin
College Failed To Obtain Stay Of Appeals
Court Mandate
4 replies
Posted by Harlowe 5/27/2022 8:00:32 PM Post Reply
As posted recently, Oberlin College is seeking to have the Ohio Supreme Court hear an appeal from the massive $32 million judgment entered after jury trial in the Lorain County Court of Common Pleas as affirmed by the 9th District Court of Appeals. There has been an appeal bond place since trial issued by Zurich American Insurance Company securing the judgment plus future interest in the amount of $36 million, as a condition of a stay of judgment issued by the trial court.
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
Navy threatens to penalize sailors who
purposely misuse gender pronouns
34 replies
Posted by Judy W. 6/27/2022 9:49:19 AM Post Reply
The Navy is threatening to penalize sailors who purposely misuse pronouns to describe transgender service members, viewing it as a violation of the service's harassment policy. Sailors who run afoul of the policy could face administrative or judicial action under the Uniform Code of Military Justice, Navy Capt. Dave Hecht, a public affairs officer, told American Military News. "Intentional misuse of transgender service member pronouns is inappropriate and inconsistent with the Navy zero tolerance policy on harassment," Hecht told the news site. "The UCMJ prohibits provoking speeches or gestures, conduct that is of a nature to bring discredit upon the Armed Forces or is prejudicial to good order and discipline,
TikTok Trend Has Angry Leftist Women Threatening
Hookup Sex Will Die Now That Roe Is Overturned
33 replies
Posted by Beardo 6/27/2022 12:33:12 PM Post Reply
In the weeks leading up to the U.S. Supreme Court ruling on abortion, following the leaked draft in May, many women took to social media to let men know that if Roe were overturned, the habit of casual hookup sex would end. “In case you’re a man who doesn’t care about roe v wade just know that if abortion gets banned hookup culture will be absolutely decimated,” TikTok user @moneymollusk wrote in a video, which has received more than 1.2 million views in a single day. “What women would have mediocre sex with a drunk rando if he could potentially father their child,” she continued,
Manchin and Collins: 'We wuz robbed.' 32 replies
Posted by DW626 6/27/2022 6:44:06 AM Post Reply
No sooner had the Supreme Court issued its Dobbs opinion then West Virginia’s sometimes-rational-Democrat senator Joe Manchin and senior Maine-Squish-Republican, senator Susan Collins, came out expressing their combined horror and indignation over the decision. They both went to say they were aghast that both Brett Kavanaugh and Neil Gorsuch had apparently misrepresented to them, both in private meetings and during their hearings, that they would respect established precedent. The senators felt “betrayed” by the pair. Manchin was quoted as saying, “I trusted Justice Gorsuch and Justice Kavanaugh
Whoopi Goldberg Issues Warning to Clarence
Thomas, Suggests the Supreme Court will
Bring Back Slavery (VIDEO)
31 replies
Posted by ladydawgfan 6/27/2022 6:16:54 PM Post Reply
‘The View’ co-host Whoopi Goldberg on Monday issued a warning to Justice Clarence Thomas after the Supreme Court overturned Roe v Wade: The Supreme Court is going to ban interracial marriage and put you back in chains. The left escalated their vicious attacks against Clarence Thomas after he joined other conservative Supreme Court justices and overturned Roe v Wade. Abortion laws will now be decided by the states. Justice Thomas said the court should reconsider gay marriage and birth control after Roe v Wade was overturned.
Liz Cheney Gets a Rude Awakening 27 replies
Posted by Imright 6/27/2022 8:28:55 PM Post Reply
Last week, we learned that Rep. Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.) was sending out campaign mailers to Democrats in her district in the hopes of saving her reelection. Clearly, she assumed that her lack of viability as a Republican because she assisted in the Democrats’ witchhunt would translate into genuine support from Democrats. She certainly had reason to believe it was possible. Think about it: how many on the left pretended to “respect” Liz Cheney for her “bravery” for standing up to Trump, and yada, yada, yada? Well, Liz Cheney is learning the hard way that she was just a useful idiot for the Democrat Party
Watch: Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot Screams,
‘F*** Clarence Thomas’
27 replies
Posted by Imright 6/27/2022 7:29:47 PM Post Reply
Chicago mayor Lori Lightfoot (D-IL), incensed by Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas’ concurring opinion in the case which overturned Roe v. Wade, screamed to a crowd over the weekend, “F*** Clarence Thomas!” In his concurrence, Thomas went farther than the other conservative justices, calling for the concept of substantive due process to be thrown out and reconsidering “all of this Court’s substantive due process precedents, including Griswold, Lawrence, and Obergefell.” Griswold v. Connecticut enshrined the “right to privacy,” Lawrence v. Texas ruled that people had the right to “seek autonomy” in their private relationships, and Obergefell v. Hodges enshrined the right to same-sex marriage.
NY Times publishes vengeful Dems playbook
on how to ‘discipline a rogue Supreme Court’
24 replies
Posted by ladydawgfan 6/27/2022 12:02:34 PM Post Reply
Democrats are foaming at the mouth after the Supreme Court ruled 6-3 to overturn the landmark abortion ruling Roe v. Wade last week in a stinging rebuke to the progressive agenda and now look to wage total war against yet another of the nation’s institutions with some guidance from The New York Times which lays out the playbook for brutal revenge. In a weekend op-ed penned by columnist Jamelle Bouie entitled “How to Discipline a Rogue Supreme Court,” he urges Democrats to strike back hard against what he describes as “a reckless, reactionary and power-hungry court,” meaning the conservative justices who refused to be intimidated by the mob.
Google tells U.S. employees they can relocate
to states where abortion is legal as lawmakers
in Texas promise swift legal action against
companies that fund out-of-state abortions
23 replies
Posted by Imright 6/27/2022 9:18:40 AM Post Reply
Google has told its workers in the U.S. that they will be allowed to move to another state without having to justify it following the Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v. Wade which removed the constitutional right to abortion. But other companies who plan to help their workers travel across state lines in order to undergo terminations, may face the wrath of lawmakers who are threatening to introduce legislation to block or at least hinder such offers of support. Fiona Cicconi, the company's HR Chief said the company's benefits plan and health insurance would cover 'out-of-state medical procedures
Democrat Stacey Abrams Won't Call Abortion
up to Birth out of Bounds
23 replies
Posted by Imright 6/27/2022 7:22:04 AM Post Reply
In a stunning moment Sunday, the Democrat gubernatorial nominee for the state of Georgia, Stacey Abrams admitted exactly where her party stands when it comes to abortion. In an appearance on “Fox News Sunday,” Abrams flatly refused–twice–to reject abortions taking place up to the point of birth. (Tweet) Fox News: Abrams was pressed during a “Fox News Sunday” interview to respond to the Supreme Court ruling overturning Roe v. Wade on Friday and whether she believed there should be any limitations on abortion.
‘Hahaha!’ Juan Williams truly believes
Hillary can save Dems from midterms drubbing
22 replies
Posted by ladydawgfan 6/27/2022 12:19:36 PM Post Reply
Fox News political analyst Juan Williams is ridiculously claiming that Hillary Clinton can save the Democrats from a bloodbath in the 2022 midterms by carping about women’s rights after SCOTUS overturned Roe v. Wade. In a fevered, hallucinatory political wet dream, Williams evidently believes that Clinton is still the savior of the Democratic Party. In May, before the leak of the ruling by the Supreme Court surfaced, Clinton warned CBS News that rescinding the constitutional right to abortion “is incredibly dangerous and it is not just about a woman’s right to choose. It is about much more than that.” “Any American who says, ‘Look, I’m not a woman, this doesn’t affect me.
Cornyn, Other Republicans Push For Biden
Administration To Expand Critical Race
Theory In Schools
20 replies
Posted by GustoGrabber 6/27/2022 5:03:48 AM Post Reply
If you’re keeping an eye on what Sen. John Cornyn has in store for your Second Amendment rights, you might want to watch his other hand. He has just recently reintroduced the Civics Secures Democracy Act, which would enable the federal government to impose critical race theory (CRT) — that is, state-sanctioned racism and anti-Americanism — on public school civics courses via federal grants. Of course, the drafters of the bill are too politically savvy to explicitly endorse critical race theory.
Whoopi Warns Justice Thomas: They'll 'Come
for You,' Bring Back Slavery
19 replies
Posted by Imright 6/27/2022 11:09:27 PM Post Reply
With last Friday’s episode being prerecorded, Monday’s edition of The View was the first time the “rabidly pro-choice” coven was able to collectively shriek about the U.S. Supreme Court overturning Roe v. Wade. The tirades came with co-host Whoopi Goldberg issuing a warning to Justice Clarence Thomas that the court will take aim at his interracial marriage and possibly even rule he’s not a person again and bring back slavery. Ironically broadcasting from the Bahamas (to celebrate 25 years of The View), Goldberg proclaimed she’s “very pro-life,” has “never been anti-life,”
Post New Article