William, Kate Portrait Panned By Art Critics:
'Frumpy, Inanimate, Sulky'
Newsweek,
by
James Crawford-Smith
Original Article
Posted By: Harlowe,
6/26/2022 12:35:18 AM
Prince William and Kate Middleton's first official joint portrait--unveiled on Thursday in Cambridge--has been panned by Britain's leading art critics, suggesting that viewers wanting to see a truer likeness would be "better off going to Madame Tussaud's." (Snip) A.N Wilson, writing for the Daily Mail, reserved his most scathing criticism for the depiction of the duchess, who is shown looking to one side wearing a glamorous green shimmer dress by indie designer The Vampire's Wife.
Reply 1 - Posted by:
Harlowe 6/26/2022 12:37:48 AM (No. 1197170)
After observing the Duchess of Cambridge’s fashion selections for several years, it is with reluctance, but well-intentioned resolve, to comment on her fashion choices and, at the same time, prepare for the slings and arrows that will very likely be posted to this personal observation and opinion.
The Duchess of Cambridge is a beautiful, elegant, refined young woman who might do well to consider consulting with Queen Elizabeth’s senior dresser, Angela Kelly, to avoid some of the dowdy, overly fussy, and/or flouncy attire she wears from time to time. The dress chosen for this portrait is, as described elsewhere, vamperic—a Morticia Addams dress. Queen Elizabeth is always “elegant” in appearance due to the selections made for her by Ms. Kelly. With Ms. Kelly’s guidance, the Duchess would very likely look sensational with consistency rather than hit-and-miss.
19 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
Faithfully 6/26/2022 1:10:10 AM (No. 1197176)
Having heard Lady Colin Campbell's defense of this portrait, I have to say the couple look slouchy and not at all regal. JMO.
9 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
chumley 6/26/2022 1:13:52 AM (No. 1197178)
I have no thoughts about him either way, but I do adore her. Her beauty is incredible. The portrait does not do her justice. He looks like the creepy guy outside an elementary school, and she looks like AOC.
11 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
Harlowe 6/26/2022 1:28:13 AM (No. 1197188)
In defense of the artist, it may be appropriate to suggest that he was presented with a bit of a complex situation in how to depict the couple due to Prince William dressed in a business suit and the Duchess in “fancy dress.” They are mismatched in their clothing choices.
10 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
NYbob 6/26/2022 1:30:15 AM (No. 1197190)
Kate really ought to give Melania a call. This portrait is a mess for many reasons, but the weak fundamentals of William's likeness is unavoidable. He isn't the easiest subject, but that angle and the hamfisted painting of his head, make him look really weird. NOT a goal of any competent artist. Lighting is about as creative as what you would find waiting for an elevator. zero drama or interest in the color and shading of the background and her dress. For goodness sake you DON'T use one color from top to bottom and side to side and then make it darker for shadows. If you do it makes the subject look like a flat cutout, which this does. It is awful. SO many talented artists in the world and they choose this one. Every painting has critics who will attack it for one reason or another, often unfairly, but this thing fails on the basics, long before it comes up short on all the other things a good portrait conveys to the public.
16 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
Maggie2u 6/26/2022 1:39:05 AM (No. 1197194)
O.K. I looked at the picture before reading the article and I thought the dress was frumpy. The color was all right but the ruffle at the bottom was weird. Also, I agree with another poster about how Kate was wearing a fancy dress and William was in a business suit.
9 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
LadyHen 6/26/2022 2:19:56 AM (No. 1197206)
The content of their character and the good works they do should really be far more the focus than how some no talent painter portrays them. Screw fashion and pop culture mavens. Be the future King and Queen the people need. The Royals and all of us should have had enough of window dressing the corpse that should be the British Royal Family. Be relevant and you will thrive!!
8 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
DCGIRL 6/26/2022 5:19:44 AM (No. 1197225)
My opinion, this dress was not one of her best. Color, texture, etc is not her.
9 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
5 handicap 6/26/2022 6:29:49 AM (No. 1197247)
Anyone who uses the term "Frumpy" is a pompous Ass, so who cares what they think!
Kate was as gorgeous as ever!
19 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
ramona 6/26/2022 6:31:26 AM (No. 1197248)
I like the portrait. It is an almost photographic likeness. Kate is a mom, and rather modest. She is not a slave to the fashion industry pimps.
I was glad that Lady Colin Campbelll agreed with me.
With a hug to Poster #3,
Ramona (the Pest)
14 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
Petronius 6/26/2022 6:48:28 AM (No. 1197257)
I think the subjects are ok (not great) other than William's hand being in his trouser pocket. The painting's strange background gives it a somewhat odd and surealistic look in contrast with Kate and William.
3 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
BarryNo 6/26/2022 7:43:45 AM (No. 1197283)
The critic is probably a Harry/Meghan supporter. Nothing like politics to sour the whole day.
I'm an artist, and I think it looks fine.
16 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
padiva 6/26/2022 8:27:47 AM (No. 1197318)
Looks fine to me.
Why is William wearing a boring tie?
4 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
udanja99 6/26/2022 9:02:09 AM (No. 1197352)
The only issue I have with it is the glitziness of the dress. I wonder if the dress really was glitzy or if the artist painted it that way to liven up the portrait. As far as official portraits go, I’ll take this one any day over the monstrosities which were painted of 0bama and Mooch.
13 people like this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
konocti95 6/26/2022 9:18:54 AM (No. 1197374)
John Singer Sargent call your office.
3 people like this.
Reply 16 - Posted by:
DVC 6/26/2022 9:20:03 AM (No. 1197378)
The heads look great....but don't seem to scale properly to the bodies. And the bodies seem to have been done by understudies.
Heads looked "photoshopped on". I see nothing wrong with the faces, but overall......substandard, IMO.
3 people like this.
Reply 17 - Posted by:
marbles 6/26/2022 10:11:58 AM (No. 1197422)
If you want a photographic likeness you take a photograph.Their posture is awkward as is their gaze. And that dress is awful. As painted it looks like cheap crushed velvet.
2 people like this.
Reply 18 - Posted by:
Gordon Mills 6/26/2022 10:43:16 AM (No. 1197446)
The painting does not do justice to either. They are much better looking in person and should have nixed the approval or release.
7 people like this.
Reply 19 - Posted by:
earlybird 6/26/2022 12:19:09 PM (No. 1197510)
It’s an OK likeness that is very much like a photo snapped as they were talking to each other and something caught their attention. Kate’s photo in the dress is also in the article. Odd-looking fabric, but a different green and not so satiny-shiny The designer should have skipped the flounce,, although it added a flare at the bottom of the actual dress while simply hanging limply in the portrait.
I am wondering about the fuss about their clothes. Her dress is not “fancy dress” which in England means a costume party. It is a cocktail dress. His suit is OK with that. A tux would have looked pretentious.
1 person likes this.
Reply 20 - Posted by:
Citoyen 6/26/2022 12:24:42 PM (No. 1197515)
As usual these days the public is far more discerning than the critics. Today’s critics hate and mock any work of art that is traditional. The couple looks great and, yes, they are, with their position and looks, glamorous.
The critics would love it if Kate had blue hair and a nose ring and was wearing an orange skin tight dress that exposed her breasts. William, with a wool cap, ugly facial hair and tattoos from wrist to armpit, would delight the critics.
1 person likes this.
Reply 21 - Posted by:
happywarrior 6/26/2022 12:26:34 PM (No. 1197517)
I would prefer them to be looking straight ahead at the artist but I do like it.
1 person likes this.
Reply 22 - Posted by:
ussjimmycarter 6/26/2022 12:32:11 PM (No. 1197525)
Kate is a beautiful woman! She can wear anything and make it sparkle! Only fashion snobs would care…and we don’t care about what is “in”! Enjoy life, Kate and let the jealous critics chatter! It means NOTHING!
1 person likes this.
Reply 23 - Posted by:
udanja99 6/26/2022 1:23:29 PM (No. 1197598)
Unless you’ve been shopping for a party dress lately, you might not know that flounces at the hem are in style right now, as are sleeves which are puffy at the shoulder. I wore a dress with a flounce at the bottom to my daughter’s wedding a few weeks ago.
0 people like this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Harlowe"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)