Gun Rights Groups File Amicus Brief in
NFA Challenge
Bearing Arms,
by
Tom Knighton
Original Article
Posted By: Mercedes44,
4/3/2026 7:53:32 AM
When the NFA was sold to the American public, it was defended not as an infringement of the Second Amendment, but as an action stemming from the federal government's taxation authority in the Constitution. It wasn't gun control, just a tax. The registry itself was simply a listing of everyone who had paid the tax. Easy peasy lemon squeezey.
With President Donald Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill, the tax on short-barreled long guns and suppressors came to an end. However, the DOJ says it should keep the registry.
To say it's being challenged is an understatement, and the groups fighting this just filed an amicus brief in the challenge.
Post Reply
Reminder: “WE ARE A SALON AND NOT A SALOON”
Your thoughts, comments, and ideas are always welcome here. But we ask you to please be mindful and respectful. Threatening or crude language doesn't persuade anybody and makes the conversation less enjoyable for fellow L.Dotters.
Reply 1 - Posted by:
felixcat 4/3/2026 9:13:35 AM (No. 2088385)
Another example of the Federal Government, even under Trump, having more information aka more restrictions, on legal gun owners than on illegal aliens running roughshod throughout this country.
7 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
cor-vet 4/3/2026 10:26:01 AM (No. 2088423)
You can buy and sell long guns across sta/e lines, but not handguns. You can buy a suppressor without the former required tax and tax stamp, but not across state lines and you still have to be fingerprinted. All that's changed, that I can see, is the tax, over and above the sales tax. And any homemade suppressor is still illegal, so they still want to know who the 'legal' owners are. It's control, plain and simple.
5 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
DVC 4/3/2026 10:31:20 AM (No. 2088424)
The efforts to retain the registration scheme in absence of any tax on these guns proves that the taxing was just a ruse to 1) make the guns tremendously more expensive and 2) register the gun owners.
And in case you don't think a $200 tax is 'too oppressive', the tax was placed on guns which might have retailed in the 1934 era for $25-50, so a $200 tax was far, far more than the guns cost. Now that the tax is gone, the registry requirement should be gone, too.
6 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
DVC 4/3/2026 10:32:39 AM (No. 2088426)
Actually, #2, home made suppressors have always been and still are legal....as long as you register it and pay the tax. Now it's just register it ....before building it.
3 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
JimBob 4/3/2026 11:16:07 AM (No. 2088449)
I remember, as a little guy, my Dad, who was a US Marine staff sergeant on Kwajalein in WWII, telling me, regarding guns, that:
"Registration is ALWAYS followed by CONFISCATION!"
Isn't that what is happening in Canada as we speak?
I read that the 'Mandatory gun buy-back' was not going well, with something like "97% Non-participation", and so the Canadian government was planning to conduct door-to-door searches and confiscation.
Evil people.
Last month, we saw in Iran what happens when the Citizens are disarmed.
The Iranian people protested against the Mullets, and the Iranian government Thugs murdered -the figure I keep reading is- THIRTY SIX THOUSAND PEOPLE!
The Founders knew in the 1700's what Chicom Chairman Mao said in the mid-20th century:
"Political Power comes from the Barrel of a Gun".
Each Armed Citizen has a piece of the Political Power.
Disarming the Citizens removes their Power, and places all the Power in the hands of those who ARE Armed.
When those who ARE Armed are Evil, then Disaster is the outcome.
4 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
mc squared 4/3/2026 12:58:03 PM (No. 2088503)
Canada to send cops to your house so you can voluntarily surrender them. That's what registration does.
"According to the Canadian government, only about 2.5% of affected firearms were declared out of an estimated two million. That’s not a slow rollout. That’s a flat-out rejection. But rather than scrapping the plan, authorities signaled they’ll lean on law enforcement. Potentially including off-duty and even retired officers to go door-to-door and take possession of those firearms."
Which raises a pretty obvious question: If it’s voluntary… why is anyone showing up at your house?
https://gunsamerica.com/digest/canada-gun-confiscation-next/
2 people like this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Mercedes44"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)