Trump administration pushes back on NJ
town moving to seize 175-year-old family
farm via eminent domain
New York Post,
by
Aislinn Murphy
Original Article
Posted By: mc squared,
6/27/2025 10:23:04 AM
A longtime family farm in Cranbury, New Jersey, is at risk of being seized by the town through eminent domain.
The situation with the farm owned by brothers Christopher and Andy Henry, which has been in their family for 175 years, recently drew notice from US Department of Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins.
Rollins said on X last week that she was “looking into this situation immediately,” adding, “We must protect family farms at all costs. [snip] Cranbury Township is looking at possibly building state-mandated affordable housing
Post Reply
Reminder: “WE ARE A SALON AND NOT A SALOON”
Your thoughts, comments, and ideas are always welcome here. But we ask you to please be mindful and respectful. Threatening or crude language doesn't persuade anybody and makes the conversation less enjoyable for fellow L.Dotters.
Reply 1 - Posted by:
agility 6/27/2025 10:40:59 AM (No. 1969977)
Eminent domain should not be used to assist developers. It should only be for the explicit real needs of the municipality
81 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
Phantomll 6/27/2025 11:06:03 AM (No. 1969986)
"Affordable housing" = the projects and will become slums.
68 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
kono 6/27/2025 11:06:45 AM (No. 1969988)
We knew the Kelo decision would pave the way for things like this. smh
30 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
Ragman73 6/27/2025 11:14:32 AM (No. 1969993)
"Affordable Housing" possible synonym(s): Section 8 housing, Project, Slum, Ghetto... Evidenced by Chicago, NYC, Philadelphia, LA
Newark, Camden, Memphis, etc.
49 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
marbles 6/27/2025 11:19:44 AM (No. 1969998)
The Mt Laurel NJ housing decision was passed in 1975. It requires " affordable housing " to be built in towns all over NJ because the heavy hand of the state SAYS SO. It's social engineering at it worst. It wrecks towns.
Take note that this doesn't go on in Saddle River, Alpine, Far Hills, Peapack and all the rich towns that can legally buy their way out of it.
49 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
VietVet68 6/27/2025 11:36:41 AM (No. 1970010)
Be thankful Trump won the last election. If we had a feckless democrat in office they would never even look at the unfairness of this situation. Liberals are evil.
52 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
Venturer 6/27/2025 11:51:25 AM (No. 1970020)
The little town close to me was a pleasant place, They had Carnivals for the Fire Department and it was a safe place to live.
The Carnivals are gone now the folks in the low cost housing project could not behave like civilized human beings , they fought and bullied people away and destroyed the atmosphere of good times. The area has turned into a trash pile, the value of people's homes went down they moved out. No matter where you put low cost housing the property values turn bad.
Now they wish to steal the property of these men and fill it with trash. Sometimes you wonder what the hell the authorities who come up with these insane ideas are thinking.
63 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
itsonlyme 6/27/2025 12:06:08 PM (No. 1970027)
The pukes that run Cranbury Township will seal your fate if you don't comply with their demands over you. Next could be book-burning and rewriting history to their satisfaction. They have VAYS to make you adhere to their iron-fist directives.
26 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
red1066 6/27/2025 12:18:03 PM (No. 1970037)
No wonder NJ is considered the armpit of the country. High taxes, loads of regulations, lousy roads, and even the inability to pump one's own gas. There are no self-serve gas stations in New Jersey.
27 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
mobyclik 6/27/2025 3:01:54 PM (No. 1970126)
Poster #7 asks: '' Sometimes you wonder what the hell the authorities who come up with these insane ideas are thinking.
Very large kick-backs? After all, it IS Joisey.
29 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
danu 6/27/2025 3:26:19 PM (No. 1970137)
iirc, the Kelo decision was the grievous fault of holy joe lieberman, who took big pfarm money to push out the family.
the property was festooned with chain-link fencing and left to sit, as an empty eyesore.
24 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
Kafka2 6/28/2025 9:26:32 AM (No. 1970334)
Re: 11
In Kelo the people were paid a rock bottom price for their home that would not pay for a replacement home effectively leaving them homeless. The property was sold to a developer who promptly bulldozed the home making it impossible to undo the injustice. This was an abusive taking of private property by government. Hopefully, Kelo will be overturned. It will be a crime to replace productive farmland with a slum.
15 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
Zigrid 6/28/2025 10:11:02 AM (No. 1970354)
Ask me about "affordable housing"...I'm from Chicago...originally...until obama came on the scene....then I flew the coup ....the high-rise buildings in Chicago are run by professional politicians and they are beyond disgusting....developers are waiting to have some politician to demand they be torn down...sooooo then a crafty developer can buy up the land next to Lake Michigan...a perfect spot for high priced condos....with a view of the lake....
7 people like this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "mc squared"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
Comments:
Eminent domain is getting out of control. Note the town has said "possibly building affordable housing.." Possibly - or not? Developers are salivating regardless.