Harry and Meghan's latest act was nauseating
- I can't recall anything more miscalculated
Daily Mail (UK),
by
Amanda Platell
Original Article
Posted By: Harlowe,
2/12/2025 12:41:20 AM
Who is Harry to lecture anyone on ‘weak moral character’? [Snip] He made the thinly-veiled criticism about ‘weak moral character’ in front of an audience of 40,000 at the opening of the Invictus Games, [Snip] Insiders at the Games were reportedly angry and upset, complaining the Duke and Duchess of Sussex ‘continuously insert themselves into the spotlight’ at the Games. [Snip] We had a fawning Meghan making doe eyes while looking up at him, clutching his arm and grabbing his face for a very public kiss. No photo-op went unmissed. Megs was determined that she and their love affair would take centre-stage,...
Post Reply
Reminder: “WE ARE A SALON AND NOT A SALOON”
Your thoughts, comments, and ideas are always welcome here. But we ask you to please be mindful and respectful. Threatening or crude language doesn't persuade anybody and makes the conversation less enjoyable for fellow L.Dotters.
Reply 1 - Posted by:
JimBob 2/12/2025 12:44:33 AM (No. 1894462)
Meghan.... How can we miss you if you won't go away?
37 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
judy 2/12/2025 5:23:43 AM (No. 1894489)
The ole saying..You don't miss what you got until what you got is gone...sad part she won't go away..
20 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
jinx 2/12/2025 5:27:41 AM (No. 1894491)
Megan Markel is always acting. She uses her husband as a prop to get attention for herself. He is what we call hen-pecked and has no control over her. She is a bully and a snob. He shows signs of mental illness. I do wish they both would just fade away.
40 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
FJB 2022 23 24 2/12/2025 6:38:20 AM (No. 1894531)
Are they still around?
19 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
chumley 2/12/2025 7:19:01 AM (No. 1894550)
It must be a miserable existence when your every action is planned through the lens of a photo op. Sure, the millions of dollars would make that a little easier to take, but when she looks at the dark ceiling at night she cant possibly like who her mind shows her.
21 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
JHHolliday 2/12/2025 8:06:27 AM (No. 1894587)
Re #3. We have another expression we use down here instead of "hen-pecked" but it's not repeatable on a polite forum like this.
29 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
Venturer 2/12/2025 8:43:05 AM (No. 1894627)
Never doubt the power of a piece of tail on the weak minded.
24 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
JHHolliday 2/12/2025 8:43:37 AM (No. 1894628)
These two are the reincarnation of Eddie and Wallis. There is a book published years ago titled "Gone With the Windsors" that details what worthless grifters those two were. Edward gave up the Crown as war with Germany was imminent for "The Woman I Love" and left it to his brother to lead the country. All in all, it was probably a good thing as George proved to be a far better leader than the feckless Eddie would have been.
29 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
Samsquanch 2/12/2025 9:03:09 AM (No. 1894644)
Cutey-pie needs to go back to her suitcases.
12 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
udanja99 2/12/2025 9:17:31 AM (No. 1894658)
Didn’t I just read somewhere a day or two ago that these two grifters got cash for their supposed “charity foundation” from USAID? If that truly is the case, they should just shut up, go home and wait for Elon’s knock on their door.
16 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
JimBob 2/12/2025 9:42:26 AM (No. 1894678)
I like Trump's comment on these two, a couple of days ago.
19 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
Aubreyesque 2/12/2025 9:48:36 AM (No. 1894686)
Has Invictus received USAID? Harry Bolz should find out.
There IS a connection between USAID and CCDH - which is a partnership between the US and the UK.
Now we should not only be asking "What Did Harry Know About J6?" but also "What Did King Charles Know About Harry and USAID?"
8 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
Jesuslover54 2/12/2025 10:09:21 AM (No. 1894703)
Is he even a spare?
7 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
bighambone 2/12/2025 10:12:37 AM (No. 1894704)
Remember Harry is an alien and is presently outside the USA in Canada. Under those circumstances it was not smart for Harry to throw an insult at the President of the USA. Since Harry is an alien, he is subject to the US immigration laws. To get back in the USA, Harry must first be inspected by US Immigration officers and be found to be admissible in all respects to the USA as provided in the immigration laws. If the inspecting Immigration officers were to find that Harry was an illegal drug user during that immigration inspection, Harry could be found to be inadmissible and excludable from the USA. If that were to occur Harry could be stuck in Canada. Chances of that happening are slim as Trump and King Charles are said to get along very good and the UK is the closest allie to the USA. But who knows for sure!
5 people like this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
cor-vet 2/12/2025 10:30:37 AM (No. 1894719)
I know what you're saying #6, that's the phrase I would use!
8 people like this.
Reply 16 - Posted by:
Ida Lou Pino 2/12/2025 10:38:16 AM (No. 1894726)
Making a series of public appearances - - in front of huge crowds - - is just a part of their Worldwide Privacy Tour.
Can't anyone leave them alone - - as they tour the planet and make public pronouncements? They're just begging us for privacy.
12 people like this.
Reply 17 - Posted by:
FLCracker 2/12/2025 11:41:55 AM (No. 1894767)
#3, #6, & #16:
That IS the expression the President used, the first word is understood.
Meghan: "If you don't DO something big and flashy to defend me from that mean ole President, you're not GETTING ANY!
Harry: "Yes, dear."
See? Same word, understood.
4 people like this.
Reply 18 - Posted by:
DVC 2/12/2025 12:31:42 PM (No. 1894793)
I refuse to read anything about these grifters.
5 people like this.
Reply 19 - Posted by:
zephyrgirl 2/12/2025 2:56:01 PM (No. 1894912)
As #8 says, they're our century's version of Wallis and the Duke of Windsor. The longer they stay out of royal circles, the less important they become. They'll always be able to find people who will suck up to them for their royal connection, but it won't be A-listers who can consort with the real thing - King Charles and William, Prince of Wales.
1 person likes this.
Reply 20 - Posted by:
DVC 2/12/2025 3:31:27 PM (No. 1894943)
Re #6, that wouldn't be the less polite version of 'Cat whipped' term would it? LOL! Yep, I grew up mostly in the south, and that is a common phrase.
1 person likes this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Harlowe"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
Comments:
Prince Harry’s snide comment about “weak moral character” was assumed to be directed at President Trump for characterizing Meghan as being a terrible wife. A volunteer accurately described the behavior of the couple as “overshadowing the veterans who should be at the center of it all—about veterans and ‘not a royal spectacle’ and how they have ‘dominated the narrative.’” Ms. Platell’s observation and conclusion describe the reality of their behavior: “Harry and Meghan’s latest act was nauseating - I can’t recall anything more miscalculated.” ~ “Vanity keeps persons in favor with themselves who are out of favor with all others.” (William Shakespeare)