Scientist warns it might be too late to
deflect ‘city-killer’ asteroid heading
toward Earth
New York Post,
by
Ben Cost
Original Article
Posted By: Ida Lou Pino,
2/12/2025 10:54:19 AM
What a rock-block. An award-winning UK scientist warns that it might be too late to deflect the “city killer” asteroid that’s headed toward Earth. Deflection efforts “might not be able to stop 2024 YR4,” cautioned Dr. Robin George Andrews, a London-based volcanologist and author, in a chilling X post blowing up online. Discovered hurtling through our galaxy in December 2024, the building-sized space rock is reportedly at the top of NASA’s watch list when it comes to deep space dangers, boasting a 1-in-43 chance of striking Earth in 2032.
Post Reply
Reminder: “WE ARE A SALON AND NOT A SALOON”
Your thoughts, comments, and ideas are always welcome here. But we ask you to please be mindful and respectful. Threatening or crude language doesn't persuade anybody and makes the conversation less enjoyable for fellow L.Dotters.
Reply 1 - Posted by:
Knotwyrkin 2/12/2025 11:00:55 AM (No. 1894740)
Let me go WAAAY out on a limb here - and guess the only thing that could possibly stop it is MASSIVE increases in taxes
31 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
Jethro bo 2/12/2025 11:02:16 AM (No. 1894742)
Oh Hades. All that money and effort to save Mother Earth from Global warming and now a little old rock from outer space is gonna wipe out all that effort. Bet the leftist judge shop and find a lack robed deity in the US called an inferior federal judge to place and restraining order on the astroid, though. That should fix it!
19 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
Safari Man 2/12/2025 11:10:56 AM (No. 1894744)
We have plenty of deserving cities. Bring IT on.
6 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
earlybird 2/12/2025 11:18:18 AM (No. 1894750)
Time for him to make tea. Brit remedy in any crisis.
6 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
Quigley 2/12/2025 11:22:14 AM (No. 1894752)
Too unfit for ordinary porn, robin goes for sciency end of the world porn.
The scientific community as a whole has no credibility. I hope the wolfe doesn’t show up, but i just don’t believe these Grants Grabbers.
7 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
MarkTwain 2/12/2025 11:25:48 AM (No. 1894757)
Yet another publicity-needy so called scientist screaming that the wolf MIGHT be at the door. Oh, if only there was more funding to study the perilous wolf at the door (maybe) problem...
So, is that going to happen before or after the climate kills us all? It makes a difference.
Yeah, and I MIGHT take you more seriously if you'd refrain from the sensationalism and stick to the science.
4 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
philsner 2/12/2025 11:32:10 AM (No. 1894761)
The only way to stop it is to put communists in power, right?
6 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
LWGII 2/12/2025 11:32:46 AM (No. 1894762)
I, for one, am voting for the giant asteroid.
6 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
philsner 2/12/2025 11:33:30 AM (No. 1894763)
The question is moot. Climate change will have killed us all by 2030.
5 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
wilarrbie 2/12/2025 11:44:21 AM (No. 1894769)
God deflected a bullet from Trumps head. Presuming He's not finished yet. Not worried about this.
5 people like this.
We are no longer impressed with the words "scientists" or "experts".
14 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
Kate318 2/12/2025 12:03:52 PM (No. 1894778)
UK scientists are known for coming to conclusions for which they are paid. I’m going to file this in the same box as climate change, bird flu and the next pandemic.
6 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
DVC 2/12/2025 12:16:21 PM (No. 1894781)
1 in 43 chance is 2.3% probability.
A better way to say it is 97.7% chance it will miss the planet entirely.
But, in they rare chance it hits, then 75% chance of landing in an ocean. If it lands anywhere in the HUGE Siberian wasteland, like the last one did, or in the Canadian subarctic emptiness, or in one of the many great, uninhabited deserts like Sahara or Gobi, nothing much is hurt beyond a whole lot of trees or sand.
If it lands in an ocean, cities around the shores of that ocean are going to get one hell of a tsunami. The largest ocean, so, statistically the most likely, is the Pacific. Islands in the Pacific could be wiped clean if they don't have substantial mountains. If I lived in any coastal city anywhere in the world, I'd be 50-100 miles inland on that day.
I'd say island nations and coastal cities are at the greatest risk.
But it's 7 years out. No hurry in getting ready.
3 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
cor-vet 2/12/2025 12:25:11 PM (No. 1894787)
7 years means I'll be 89 or 90 years old, so most likely, I'm probably going to miss the fireworks, if it even happens.
4 people like this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
konocti95 2/12/2025 12:26:38 PM (No. 1894790)
I called NASA. They said they have Roy Flemming in charge of the diversion mission and scheduled the launch for 2035.
5 people like this.
Reply 16 - Posted by:
jalo1951 2/12/2025 12:42:07 PM (No. 1894804)
Andrews is currently writing a manifesto on how climate change is the cause and more of my money is the key to solve the situation.
2 people like this.
Reply 17 - Posted by:
texaspast 2/12/2025 12:47:12 PM (No. 1894810)
Elon can throw a Tesla or two at it and deflect it just enough . . .
2 people like this.
Reply 18 - Posted by:
kono 2/12/2025 12:48:32 PM (No. 1894811)
"Scientists." The same ones who have foisted the globalwarmingclimatechange hoax on us for 50+ years? Or maybe those who exploited the recent covid hysteria to shove us further down the road to globalist socialism? Seems like the main science in the news any more is POLITICAL science.
3 people like this.
Reply 19 - Posted by:
czechlist 2/12/2025 1:04:59 PM (No. 1894828)
geological records indicate Earth undergoes a planetary wide disaster every 6000 years (how long can you tread water, Noah?).There is something galactic at work and we are on schedule for another and there is nothing we can do to prevent it.
2 people like this.
Reply 20 - Posted by:
Son of Grady 2/12/2025 1:06:59 PM (No. 1894830)
Please send Neil deGrasse Tyson and
Bill Nye The Science Guy to stop it. One way trip please.
5 people like this.
Reply 21 - Posted by:
seamusm 2/12/2025 1:38:45 PM (No. 1894848)
I can't decide whether I'd prefer it to hit DC or San Fran.
3 people like this.
Reply 22 - Posted by:
h24015 2/12/2025 3:03:29 PM (No. 1894920)
And here I was worried about which pronoun to call someone.
3 people like this.
Reply 23 - Posted by:
JSanders 2/12/2025 3:12:11 PM (No. 1894928)
Any way we can guide it to a certain city? Asking for a friend.
1 person likes this.
Reply 24 - Posted by:
chumley 2/12/2025 4:05:49 PM (No. 1894976)
Any chance it could hit all the junky cars in my neighbor's yard?
3 people like this.
Reply 25 - Posted by:
FLCracker 2/12/2025 5:59:22 PM (No. 1895057)
So what are the chances that the dust and/or water vapor (particulate matter) blown into the atmosphere by the collision will counter "climate change" (aka "global warming?)
1 person likes this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Ida Lou Pino"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
Comments:
Human dwellings occupy less than 3% of the Earth's surface - - so there's only 1 chance in 35 that the rock would strike a place where people live. But if it does strike an inhabited area - - I nominate Martha's Vineyard, Rehoboth Beach, and Berkeley as candidates.