Report: Dress E. Jean Carroll Claims She
Wore DuringAlleged Trump Assault Did Not
Exist at the Time
Breitbart,
by
Hannah Bleau Knudsen
Original Article
Posted By: JoElla Bee,
1/25/2024 5:54:25 PM
The dress that E. Jean Carroll — the woman who has sued former President Donald Trump for defamation for denying her claims that he sexually assaulted her in a Bergdorf Goodman dressing room in the early 1990’s — claims she wore during the alleged attack did not exist at the time, Trump’s lawyer pointed out. Carroll’s second defamation trial against Trump is underway. Notably, Trump is not facing criminal charges in these cases. Carroll first went public with her story in 2019, posing for a cover of New York Magazine in the Donna Karan blazer dress that she claims she was assaulted in.
Post Reply
Reminder: “WE ARE A SALON AND NOT A SALOON”
Your thoughts, comments, and ideas are always welcome here. But we ask you to please be mindful and respectful. Threatening or crude language doesn't persuade anybody and makes the conversation less enjoyable for fellow L.Dotters.
Reply 1 - Posted by:
Imright 1/25/2024 5:58:13 PM (No. 1644451)
FTA: "Trump added that “E. Jean Carroll was forced to change her story on the ‘Monica Lewinsky-type’ dress.”
“She originally claimed that the ‘event’ happened in 1994, and that she wore the Donna Karan dress on that day. The problem is that New York Times Fact Checkers found the dress wasn’t even made by Donna Karan until long after 1994,” Trump said on Truth Social.
“The truth is that she doesn’t know the day, month, season, year, or decade — because it did not happen. End this Witch Hunt now!’ he exclaimed": (Truth)
30 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
franq 1/25/2024 6:02:40 PM (No. 1644459)
No problem, they'll just make up another lie and Rachel Maddow will cover.
25 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
EJKrausJr 1/25/2024 6:05:05 PM (No. 1644462)
She can't even remember which wildest dream her assault took place, so she picked the wildest dream with a date stamp of 1994. Her consumption of magic mushrooms appear to be catching up with her. She brought a bogus charge with which she got a payment out of 45. Unfortunately, she went back for another bite of the apple. Only to eat the worm.
17 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
Philipsonh 1/25/2024 6:09:18 PM (No. 1644471)
Facts do not matter to NYC judges or DA's; GET TRUMP is their mantra.
24 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
udanja99 1/25/2024 6:12:03 PM (No. 1644472)
Why isn’t PDT counter-suing her for defamation for calling him a rapist?
29 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
john56 1/25/2024 6:18:25 PM (No. 1644475)
Kinda like ... in reverse, where OJ said he never wore those ugly shoes....and later, photos were found of him wearing those shoes (after the criminal trial but before the civil trial).
But if Trump wants a fair trial, he needs a change of venue. In his case, Tehran might be a fairer locale.
14 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
ThreeBadCats3 1/25/2024 6:23:38 PM (No. 1644479)
It is disappointing and demoralizing that the “justice system” we depend on to be Blind has supported a 30 year old accusation that is unfounded in objective fact.
24 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
JoElla Bee 1/25/2024 6:39:24 PM (No. 1644490)
The familiar ML scandal style of dress she chose for her fantasy is another indication that it is just a way of gaining attention, $$$$, and feeding the narcissistic need to keep herself connected to incessant stories about POTUS Trump, & in the public limelight.
Not so hard to see how much she is enjoying it by the tabloid photos.
9 people like this.
If her story is true, did she scream or cry out during the assault so that staff and other customers could hear her distress?
19 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
hershey 1/25/2024 9:45:00 PM (No. 1644585)
Hmmm, I have to wonder if she knows which way Trumps manhood is bent...seems like that came up in some other high profile rape trial way back....
2 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
jar 1/25/2024 10:51:41 PM (No. 1644603)
Judging from the picture, E Jean's jacket, shoes and pantyhose would have to be removed for her to be raped. Were there a shred of truth to her story, she would had to have been fully cooperative, in which case it could not have been rape but mutual consent. However, even that defies credibility.
4 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
Trigger2 1/25/2024 11:37:13 PM (No. 1644613)
Fake dress; fake accuser. She's nothing more than a mney grabber.
2 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
DVC 1/26/2024 1:24:13 AM (No. 1644641)
She's a psycho and a paid liar. Nothing that she claims ever happened.
4 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
DVC 1/26/2024 2:42:00 PM (No. 1645075)
More lies proven from this psycho liar. She's a genuine nutso, and working for money to smear Trump.
This has to get tossed from the first reasonable court that hears the appeal.
0 people like this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "JoElla Bee"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
Comments:
Notice the similarities in E.Jean Carrol’s “rape dress” and Monica Lewinsky’s stained blue dress. (https://www.gettyimages.com/detail/news-photo/photograph-showing-the-blue-dress-worn-by-former-white-news-photo/1149633?adppopup=true)