Artemis 1 moon launch is DELAYED: NASA
engineers discover leaks and CRACK in
$22.2BN rocket at Kennedy Space Center
and 'pause' 8.33am lift-off
Daily Mail (UK),
by
Sam Tonkin
Original Article
Posted By: Imright,
8/29/2022 8:28:34 AM
The countdown clock for NASA's Artemis I mission is on hold at T-minus 40 minutes due two several issues that threaten the launch of the world's most powerful space rocket to the moon.
One of the Space Launch System's (SLS) engines is struggling to get to the proper temperature, while engineers are assessing what appears to be a crack on the core stage of the $22 billion rocket.
Derrol Nail, the NASA launch commentator, said that the line of frost on the outside of the core stage appeared to be the result of a crack in the insulating foam, not the underlying 'intertank flange.'
Reply 1 - Posted by:
hershey 8/29/2022 8:32:59 AM (No. 1262212)
That's what you get from using the cheapest supplier..probably came from China...
7 people like this.
That’s disappointing, but I’m glad they found it.
7 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
Sully 8/29/2022 9:00:43 AM (No. 1262236)
Artemis, of course, is Apollos's twin sister. Hoooboy.
And of course the Artemis is hoisted into space by two giant...rockets strapped to her chest rather than one long rocket booster in the middle down below, like her brother, Apollo had...I mean, IDK what to tell you.
And now...she is going to be late getting ready....OK.
Whatever...
6 people like this.
The pictures of this rocket looks like a cross between 1960's and 1970's technology. I just saw Apollo 13 yesterday. I expect to see chain smoking people on the ground. I need a status check on systems...Go or no go Flight.
Maybe they should have checked with Elon Musk on using the most advanced systems
"Houston...We have a problem."
11 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
Birddog 8/29/2022 9:10:12 AM (No. 1262248)
yet again...now it is NASA that failed to set Kamalalala Harris up for success, she went alllll of the way down there, now has to go allll of the way home.
This delay is just another one in a loooong line of them. The Cube Satellites it is supposed to launch batteries have died because of the delays and cannot even be accessed to be recharged/replaced, they will still be jettisoned as space junk.. The boosters and fuel cells are not going to be recovered...they are just going to be more trash/pollution falling from the sky.
4 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
DVC 8/29/2022 9:11:02 AM (No. 1262250)
Crack in INSULTION....not in structure. Probably not too big of a deal.
3 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
jalo1951 8/29/2022 9:12:38 AM (No. 1262253)
Fuel? They didn't have an extension cord that was long enough to work? No charging stations? Weird.
7 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
Venturer 8/29/2022 9:15:44 AM (No. 1262263)
What is on the moon that is worth 22 Billion dollars?
6 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
downnout 8/29/2022 9:20:43 AM (No. 1262275)
They had to go to Home Depot for a longer extension cord.
4 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
red1066 8/29/2022 9:30:53 AM (No. 1262293)
Could what they want to do be done using a proven rocket system like Saturn? I'd like to know where 22 billion was spent with results being fuel leaks and cracks, and why would they go to the expense of trying to launch a rocket with cracks and a fuel leak? Don't you think that before one tries to launch a rocket, an inspection of the entire rocket and fuel system would be needed? Why were these leaks and cracks only discovered prior to launch?
5 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
mc squared 8/29/2022 9:45:57 AM (No. 1262313)
I'm no rocket surgeon but isn't this stuff tested for days before a launch? Sounds like warranty service at a car dealership: 'Oh, they all do that!'
6 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
EJKrausJr 8/29/2022 9:49:26 AM (No. 1262318)
The NASA Artemis project is in deep kaka. Not only is it behind schedule but it is way over budget. The launch towers cost a billion, yes billion, $$$ each. The tower required for the next launch hasn't been built. Congress may pull the plug on the cost overruns. What is the difference between this project and Spacex? One is a Government largess project, Spacex is a business. Government is a black hole for spending money.
5 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
Redwing57 8/29/2022 9:58:25 AM (No. 1262324)
#8 raises a good question, though the answer is pretty easy. The "goal" is never the goal.
What there IS, is $22 billion that went to a massive web of suppliers and contractors, with stock deals, kickbacks, grift, backroom deals, political contributions. Why did this mission cost $22 billion? Because it could.
As George Carlin noted, "It's a big party, and YOU ain't invited!"
11 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
MDConservative 8/29/2022 10:25:23 AM (No. 1262363)
$22 billion about to go up in smoke...
Why is government caught up in another expensive moon race? Seriously. Afraid China is going to colonize the moon before the "Leader of the Free World" does? Private enterprise is already working on its version of a moon rocket. We don't like private enterprise to do this? Really, they are in both instances - one without your tax dollars at work paying the bills.
2 people like this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
Ribicon 8/29/2022 11:02:38 AM (No. 1262391)
FTA: "... its four RS-25 engines (the same as those used on the Space Shuttle), powered by both solid and liquid fuel, provide greater thrust and a far higher top speed of up to 24,500 mph."
Are they using old engines that sat in storage for 15 years or so? Regardless, the mission of NASA is outreach to the Muslim community and to study Climate Change. By not launching, they saved the atmosphere from a lot of extra carbon.
1 person likes this.
Reply 16 - Posted by:
Califedup 8/29/2022 11:02:44 AM (No. 1262392)
NASA now stands for "No Actual Space Achievements". Needs to be disbanded and future space endeavors to be handled by private Space Companies. Sad how this once innovative Agency has now degenerated into just another incompetent and corrupt communist run Government Agency. Quick question - do the NASA rockets to nowhere have any preferred pronouns? Next up sustainable rockets fueled by cooking oil and bugs.
7 people like this.
Reply 17 - Posted by:
oldmagnolia 8/29/2022 11:10:49 AM (No. 1262399)
This program already has a two year delay like anything the government does. However, they have a phone and should dial Elon for some tips how to proceed.
3 people like this.
Reply 18 - Posted by:
Brunsong 8/29/2022 1:30:44 PM (No. 1262562)
Makes me wonder if the NASA engineers and scientists are there because of merit or the way they look.
1 person likes this.
Reply 19 - Posted by:
DW626 8/29/2022 1:47:02 PM (No. 1262577)
CRACK?! Humper biden is heading down there now as we speak.
1 person likes this.
Reply 20 - Posted by:
Hugh Akston 8/29/2022 2:06:27 PM (No. 1262593)
I'd like to know where 22 billion was spent...
$15 billion for Muslim outreach both here and overseas, $6 billion for massive cost overruns, graft, kickbacks, and circular political contributions, and 1 billion for engineering and manufacturing.
Is it sarcasm or the truth?
2 people like this.
Reply 21 - Posted by:
paral04 8/29/2022 6:11:43 PM (No. 1262699)
$2.1 Billion and they still can't get it right. This is pathetic. Why don't they subcontract to Space X and get the job done and furlough those fools?
0 people like this.
Reply 22 - Posted by:
paral04 8/29/2022 6:13:56 PM (No. 1262701)
Correction. Not $2.1 but $22 Billion
0 people like this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Imright"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)