Post New Article

State looking to force gun owners to buy
liability insurance, and lawmakers are
saying it’s because… cars.

Original Article

Posted By: Hazymac, 6/24/2022 2:56:56 PM

SACRAMENTO, CA – California is seeking to become the first state in the US to require liability insurance for gun owners. “Guns kill more people than cars,” Sen. Nancy Skinner, D-Berkeley, said in a statement. “Yet gun owners are not required to carry liability insurance like car owners must. Why should taxpayers, survivors, families, employers, and communities bear the $280 billion annual cost of gun violence? It’s time for gun owners to shoulder their fair share.” [Tweet] First, the comparison by Skinner is apples and zebras. While she is technically correct, the application does not necessarily correlate. According to the CDC, more than 32,000 people die in auto-related accidents each year.

Post Reply

Reply 1 - Posted by: JimBob 6/24/2022 3:05:01 PM (No. 1195797)
Following along with Miss Nancy's reasoning, it seems to me that sellers and users of illegal drugs should also be required to purchase liability insurance. After all, a BUNCH of people die each year from using Fentanyl, Heroin, Cocaine, etc., and that's in addition to all the theft and robberies that the addicts commit to get the cash to pay for their drugs. How about THOSE people -the Seller and the Users- pay THEIR 'Fair Share'?
18 people like this.

Reply 2 - Posted by: seamusm 6/24/2022 3:06:12 PM (No. 1195798)
The Supreme Court answered this question over a hundred years ago. In "McCulloch v. Maryland - 1819", it ruled that newspapers could not be taxed because 'The power to tax involves the power to destroy'. If owning and carrying a gun is a basic constitutional right as ruled by the Supreme Court and reaffirmed just this week, then trying to limit that right via taxation is probably unconstitutional as well.
23 people like this.

Reply 3 - Posted by: Blizzard 6/24/2022 3:13:46 PM (No. 1195802)
Just a question to ponder... if own a gun(s) and move to one of these states, how will they know I own said guns? I guess if I'm ever involved in a shooting it would come out, but outside of Why would anyone admit they own guns to any state government? I'm not talking about new gun purchases, but ones that were legally or even illegally obtained before moving to such tyrannical state.
8 people like this.

Reply 4 - Posted by: GoodDeal 6/24/2022 3:18:16 PM (No. 1195806)
Guns and cars just have violent minds of their own. I think there needs to be liability insurance for owning silverware because silverware makes people fat and that puts enormous pressure on the medical system.
10 people like this.

Reply 5 - Posted by: Gordon Freeman 6/24/2022 3:22:20 PM (No. 1195813)
Do you think they're gonna be able to get the criminals to get gun insurance? I'll bet the state will subsidize their rates because of the their minority status.
13 people like this.

Reply 6 - Posted by: itsonlyme 6/24/2022 3:27:18 PM (No. 1195819)
Words spoken from Bezerkeley
8 people like this.

Reply 7 - Posted by: jalo1951 6/24/2022 3:32:43 PM (No. 1195821)
I'm sure the bros in the hood will be the first ones to line up to sign up. Stupid nonsense.
9 people like this.

Reply 8 - Posted by: Safari Man 6/24/2022 3:46:41 PM (No. 1195828)
We need liability insurance for people who wield votes for dimocrats… the damage they do with their votes is staggering.
10 people like this.

Reply 9 - Posted by: stablemoney 6/24/2022 3:58:53 PM (No. 1195837)
If you don't drive a car on road, car insurance is not required. If you own a gun, and leave it in your home, gun insurance should not be required. If you are not a robber or murderer, gun insurance would not seem to be a sought after purchase.
7 people like this.

Reply 10 - Posted by: Birddog 6/24/2022 4:00:24 PM (No. 1195838)
By all means...charge people that Illegally use a gun for the property damage, medical bills, funeral bills, and prosecution costs. Insurance isn't needed or even valid in a "Criminal Act", but making committing crime SHOULD be a verrrrrrry expensive proposition. Let s get back to a point where "Crime does not Pay". I would add the retraction, banning, of ALL Govt.benefits to any household where a criminal resides,effective immediately upon arrest(rescind-able/refundable if found innocent at trial) UNLESS..the accused perp is a Juvenile, there are other juveniles in the home that would be deprived of needed housing/food, which case the arrested Juvenile can file for "Emancipation" from the Family, stand trial as an adult, and be barred from residing at that residence for as long as they are under Judicial control(probation/parole/monitoring) "Moms" will raise better behaved children if their mal-behavior impacts the entire family. "It takes a Village" in Swahili translates to..."Those not taught in the home will be taught with the World"
2 people like this.

Reply 11 - Posted by: lakerman1 6/24/2022 4:00:45 PM (No. 1195840)
There are about one million deer hunters in Pennsylvania, and each year, a few - one or two - get shot and killed by someone else. And a few people get shot, accidentally, usually by family members, at home.. My homeowner's policy protects me if I accidentally shoot someone else. And in my 83 years, I have shot just one person - my cousin Robert, who wanted me to shoot his padded hand, to test the power of my Christmas gift at age 6 - a Red Ryder BB gun, I accommodated Robert, shot his padded hand at 20 feet, and he said it hurt, a lot. As for the California plan to require liability insurance, I suspect they would include liability for stolen guns.
4 people like this.

Reply 12 - Posted by: Zeek Wolfe 6/24/2022 4:07:35 PM (No. 1195852)
Gun ownership is a constitutional right and mandating the purchase of a good or service to enjoy this right would be in itself unconstitutional. Owning an automobile is not is not a constitutonal right but a privilidge and can therefore fall under any number of mandates. Ammunition would fall into a subcategory of 'right' in that guns are useless with out it. In post colonial days it would have been absurd to allow guns but disallow ammunition, ergo the 2nd amendment and attendant or implied rights...gun belts, holsters, specialty oils and sights, stocks and grips of various materials etc. The idea of purchasing liability insurance as a condition for a constitutional right is silly, and, more darkly, a restriction of freedom by neo-communists in the Democrat party.
5 people like this.

Reply 13 - Posted by: Venturer 6/24/2022 4:12:41 PM (No. 1195860)
Just another violation of the 2nd Amendment. It's another infringement.
9 people like this.

Reply 14 - Posted by: DVC 6/24/2022 4:16:26 PM (No. 1195867)
I have an 'all risk' umbrella policy for about $150 a year. My money and my stuff is worth that much to protect.
4 people like this.

Reply 15 - Posted by: Subsuburban 6/24/2022 4:23:11 PM (No. 1195879)
Another positive development arising from the Supreme Court's opinion is that it has exposed ALL the loony lefties out there. It's easy to spot them--they're the ones running around with their hair on fire!
4 people like this.

Reply 16 - Posted by: DVC 6/24/2022 4:40:45 PM (No. 1195899)
Apparently the new move will be to give you your concealed carry permit but make EVERTHING a "sensitive area" where guns are still prohibited. NYC is even saying that the entire CITY should be a 'sensitive area' and even with your shiny new "permit", you can't come into the city with a gun. I don't think this will last very long, it's a desperate, hysterical over reach but they might manage to delay things a bit until a case is decided and they have to "get real" with their sensitive areas definition.
3 people like this.

Reply 17 - Posted by: rememberwhen 6/24/2022 5:11:50 PM (No. 1195927)
There's a minor difference between gun ownership and cars with respect to the insurance argument. First owning a car does not trigger mandatory insurance laws. One could own a hundred cars and not be required to purchase insurance. What triggers mandatory insurance is operating a motor vehicle on public streets or highways. The owner of those streets and highways, the state or political subdivision thereof, has the right to set the conditions under which automobiles may use those thoroughfares. None of this applies to gun ownership. This is a manifestly ridiculous argument but may sound otherwise to the uninformed.
3 people like this.

Reply 18 - Posted by: bad-hair 6/24/2022 5:14:15 PM (No. 1195929)
???? So thugs may now be charged with shooting without proof of insurance ? Why do we elect stupid people ? I can hang somebody. Do i need to insure rope ?
4 people like this.

Reply 19 - Posted by: Dodge Boy 6/24/2022 6:05:05 PM (No. 1195961)
Protecting myself doesn't require liability insurance. But I would suggest anyone considering attacking me with intent to bring harm get their own liability insurance.
4 people like this.

Reply 20 - Posted by: BarryNo 6/24/2022 6:33:48 PM (No. 1195992)
I think they already had a court case on this due to California, and it has already been ruled unconstitutional by the current SCOTUS.
2 people like this.

Reply 21 - Posted by: rochow 6/24/2022 8:02:03 PM (No. 1196108)
I assume she means white people should pay for this kind of insurance. Want a bet that black gun owners will claim they never heard of such nonsense if such a silly law should be introduced?
1 person likes this.

Reply 22 - Posted by: Anti_democRAT 6/24/2022 8:45:34 PM (No. 1196165)
I can see the illegal gun owners lineing up for gun liability insurance which couldnt possibly be valid if the gun is used in the commision of a crime. Now maybe the many that choose suicide by gun can buu one of those policies to enrich their surviving family members but usually suicide invalidates that too. I think this is a no brainer non starter.
0 people like this.

Reply 23 - Posted by: JHHolliday 6/24/2022 8:47:46 PM (No. 1196168)
As a retired insurance agent let me offer my humble opinion. Your homeowners policy provides liability insurance for the accidental injury by a firearm. We paid a claim where an insured dropped a pistol while he showed it to a friend. Fortunately it was a minor wound to his foot. Your HO policy excludes the deliberate use of a firearm (or a garden rake or baseball bat) to harm someone. This is just more harassment against gun owners. Don’t go to California and leave if you live there. They are fascists and want you to be obedient peasants.
1 person likes this.

Reply 24 - Posted by: DVC 6/25/2022 1:42:51 AM (No. 1196331)
Re #23, given your knowledge of the topic, would an "all liability umbrella policy" pay for lawyers to defend you if you used a gun for self defense and were charged for some unintentional error during said self defense?
0 people like this.

Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Hazymac"
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
Most Recent Articles posted by Hazymac"
State looking to force gun owners to buy
liability insurance, and lawmakers are
saying it’s because… cars.
24 replies
Posted by Hazymac 6/24/2022 2:56:56 PM Post Reply
SACRAMENTO, CA – California is seeking to become the first state in the US to require liability insurance for gun owners. “Guns kill more people than cars,” Sen. Nancy Skinner, D-Berkeley, said in a statement. “Yet gun owners are not required to carry liability insurance like car owners must. Why should taxpayers, survivors, families, employers, and communities bear the $280 billion annual cost of gun violence? It’s time for gun owners to shoulder their fair share.” [Tweet] First, the comparison by Skinner is apples and zebras. While she is technically correct, the application does not necessarily correlate. According to the CDC, more than 32,000 people die in auto-related accidents each year.
Cancelled: Lawyers Who Won Major Gun Rights
Case Forced Out of Firm
19 replies
Posted by Hazymac 6/24/2022 2:21:12 PM Post Reply
Kirkland & Ellis LLP, one of the largest law firms in the country, is dropping all Second Amendment cases after pressure from clients and other lawyers at the firm. This left the two primary attorneys who successfully argued New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. Bruen before the Supreme Court with no clients and no jobs. Former Solicitor General Paul Clement and Erin Murphy, a regular Supreme Court litigator, resigned from Kirkland & Ellis and announced they were opening their own shop in Washington, D.C. Clement has been a high-profile litigator of conservative causes since he left the administration of President George W. Bush.
The Democrat who was almost the governor
of Florida was just indicted on 21 felony
counts – and it’s as bad as it sounds
18 replies
Posted by Hazymac 6/24/2022 10:33:32 AM Post Reply
TALLAHASSEE, FL – In 2018, Andrew Gillum ran against Ron DeSantis in the race for the Florida governor’s mansion. He lost that race. Now, the former Tallahassee mayor may be losing something for more precious than an election: his freedom. According to the Daily Wire, Gillum was just indicted on 21 counts related to crimes he allegedly committed in relationship to his campaign finances. Gillum claims his innocence and says that the charges are political, but the charges are coming from the Biden Department of Justice. “A federal grand jury has returned a twenty-one-count indictment against Andrew Demetric Gillum, 42, and Sharon Janet Lettman-Hicks, 53, both of Tallahassee, Florida,”
Crews continue search for missing cave
diver after finding one dead in Hernando
County springs
18 replies
Posted by Hazymac 6/23/2022 10:11:03 AM Post Reply
BROOKSVILLE, Fla. - Buford Springs in Hernando County is known for its underwater caves, and Thursday it remained the scene after one person was found dead and another remains missing following their dive. Rescue crews were called out to the springs, located inside the Chassahowitzka Wildlife Management Area, on Wednesday. They said they were able to recover one of the divers, who died. But as for that other diver, as of Thursday morning, the individual is still missing. "It does attract a lot of open water divers," explained cave diving instructor Edd Sorenson. "It is deeper than recreational limits. So a lot of people don't realize the hazards and
How You Get the Left to Talk Honestly
About Black Crime
7 replies
Posted by Hazymac 6/21/2022 6:39:08 PM Post Reply
Discussing black crime in America isn’t easy. For decades, the FBI has collected all kinds of race and crime data from state police, so we have the information. But due to a ton of negative black disparities showing up in the data, the mainstream media pursues a policy of silence on the issue, turning it as a result into a taboo topic. But as progressives say: “silence is violence.” Like any policy area, when you refuse full and frank discussion about crime, bad policies get implemented and good people get hurt. Take as an example the reckless driving-equivalent of the “Ferguson Effect” Tucker Carlson recently revealed.
On Juneteenth, Bullets Fly From Obama
Boulevard to John Lewis Way
21 replies
Posted by Hazymac 6/21/2022 12:00:34 PM Post Reply
Over the Juneteenth weekend, 9 people were shot in Harlem. Among them was Darius Lee, an aspiring basketball player from the mostly black neighborhood, who was the only one killed in the mass shooting. The wounded included two women and six men in a shooting that began over the filming of a rap video. Over 40 shots were fired. Elsewhere in the Big Apple, a gunman ran up to three men in Queens and opened fire with a rifle, wounding two and killing one. Dwayne Whyte was arrested in the shooting. "When is enough going to be enough? When we gonna put these guns down?" a community liaison asked after the Harlem attack.
What Do 'Men Give Birth' and 'Defund the
Police' Have in Common?
5 replies
Posted by Hazymac 6/21/2022 10:48:59 AM Post Reply
Unless you are brainwashed, you regard the statements “men give birth” and “defund the police” as absurd. Why, then, do leftists (as opposed to liberals and conservatives) say these things and even believe them? I think there are two — related — explanations. One is that the Left seeks to tear down every normative institution. If men give birth, “man” and “woman” no longer mean anything. “Men give birth” means the end of the male-female distinction, the most basic distinction in the human race. Racial distinctions pale in comparison. So do national distinctions. Marxists support the obliteration of the male-female distinction because the only distinction that matters to Marxists is that of class.
Dissing DeSantis 9 replies
Posted by Hazymac 6/20/2022 9:05:33 PM Post Reply
If Donald Trump is not the Republican nominee in 2024, Ron DeSantis likely will be. So the Democratic Party knives are out. This long–just about endless, in fact–anti-DeSantis rant in the New Yorker suggests how the Democrats will attack Florida’s wildly popular governor. It goes on at length about covid, and through the first 100 pages or so you would think people were dropping like flies in Florida due to DeSantis’s lack of enthusiasm for shutdowns and masks. But if you slog through to near the end of the piece–it must be somewhere after page 300–you find the grudging admission that has Florida performed better than
Top governing swim body bans most trans
athletes from elite women's competitions
12 replies
Posted by Hazymac 6/20/2022 5:52:42 PM Post Reply
The global governing body for swimming, FINA, voted Sunday to adopt a new policy prohibiting most biological men from competing in elite women's competitions. The agency said it will also look into creating an "open category" to allow athletes to compete "without regard to their sex, their legal gender, or their gender identity." The FINA World Congress heard speeches from athletes, medical professionals and human rights authorities before voting in favor of the new policy by 71.5%. The governing body's decision will end the Olympic hopes of transgender swimmer Lia Thomas, who broke multiple women's swim records as a University of Pennsylvania student athlete. "Because of the performance gap that emerges at puberty
Renewables are going nowhere 11 replies
Posted by Hazymac 6/20/2022 9:09:40 AM Post Reply
The fundamental problem with wind and solar power is that they don’t work. Both generate electricity less than half the time, and this isn’t a question of improving technology, it is inherent in obsolete systems that depend on the weather. As a result, the ballyhooed “green revolution” has fizzled. The Germans, formerly committed to a “green” makeover, are starting to face reality, even if their politicians aren’t quite there yet: "A paltry two percentage points increase in an entire decade: In 2020, only 12.6 percent of global energy demand was met by renewable energies. In
The Mysteries of Hunter Biden’s Laptop 10 replies
Posted by Hazymac 6/20/2022 6:35:45 AM Post Reply
The whole world knows that Old Joe Biden is not really the man in charge. Biden himself has made this clear on numerous occasions, with his many oblique references to getting in trouble if he deviated from the instructions he was given. But it has never been fully clear who is running this dumpster fire known as the Biden administration; speculation has run to chief of staff Ron Klain, Barack Obama, and others. Now, however, another name must be added to the mix: that of none other than Hunter Biden. In a Dec. 3, 2018 recording that has just been
Bernie Sanders Wants to Tell Apple How
to Make its Phones
20 replies
Posted by Hazymac 6/19/2022 7:55:25 AM Post Reply
Senator Bernie Sanders, a socialist parasite who has never had a career or gainful employment outside politics, has thoughts on how Apple should make its phones. (Snip) If consumers want USB-C charging ports, they can buy Android-based devices. Apple is notorious for selling ridiculously overpriced devices and finding a thousand ways to gate customers in so that they're buying $2,000 monitor stands or some other nonsense. That's why I would never buy or use Apple. But clearly a whole lot of people want Apple devices. And they're willing to pay premium prices for them. If Apple were an actual monopoly,
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
The Pentagon Announces It Will Refuse
to Follow Any State Laws Restricting Abortion Access
60 replies
Posted by Imright 6/25/2022 2:35:39 PM Post Reply
The Pentagon has made the announcement that it will refuse to recognize any abortion laws springing from the Supreme Court’s decision that there is no guaranteed right to abortion in the U.S. Constitution.Secretary of Defense Lloyd J. Austin III issued a statement on on Friday regarding the Supreme Court’s ruling in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization. “Nothing is more important to me or to this Department than the health and well-being of our Service members, the civilian workforce and DOD families,” the Pentagon chief announced.
Hollywood reacts to Roe v. Wade being
overturned: 'Absolutely terrified'
41 replies
Posted by Black Conservative Voice 6/25/2022 6:24:04 AM Post Reply
The Supreme Court of the United States voted to overturn Roe v. Wade Friday. Celebrities reacted to the decision via social media with Alyssa Milano saying it will have "deadly consequences" and Elizabeth Banks calling it "devastating news." "Today’s Supreme Court ruling overturning #RoeVsWade will have deadly consequences, with the harm falling hardest on people of color who already face disproportionate discrimination in our country and grapple with a severe maternal mortality crisis," Milano wrote. "Banning abortion will disproportionately impact people of color, LGBTQ+ communities, people struggling to make ends meet, young people, and those living in rural areas."
Dick’s Sporting Goods goes to bat for
its employees on abortion issue
40 replies
Posted by GustoGrabber 6/25/2022 5:53:12 AM Post Reply
Anyone who though the nation’s biggest sports store was going to sit out one of America’s most contentious moments doesn’t know Dick’s. Dick’s Sporting Goods went to bat for its employees following Friday Supreme Court’s ruling to strike down abortion rights. The bold move knocked stock prices out of the ballpark. “Dear teammates,” begins an open letter from company chairman Ed Stack and CEO Lauren Hobart. “You are the heart of our business, and we are committed to protecting your health and well-being.”
Bill Maher Says Donald Trump Will Easily
Win In 2024 If He ‘Can Just Let Go’
Of 2020
29 replies
Posted by Imright 6/25/2022 2:33:33 PM Post Reply
Bill Maher thinks Donald Trump can cruise to a win in 2024 if he just lets the 2020 election go. Right now, people around the country are wondering whether or not Trump will run for President again after losing last time, and the host of “Real Time with Bill Maher” thinks he will crush Democrats if he can just stop talking about 2020. Why? Well, Drag Queen Story Hour might be enough to propel Trump to a victory, according to Maher.
Rep. Liz Cheney Soliciting Votes From Democrats 28 replies
Posted by earlybird 6/25/2022 1:12:46 PM Post Reply
Rep. Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.) is starting to ask Democrats to switch parties and vote for her, as she faces a tough primary battle with a candidate endorsed by former President Donald Trump. Cheney’s campaign website recently added a section that asks and answers questions about voting. It notes that voters must be registered as a Republican to vote for Cheney in the Aug. 16 primary. “How do I change my party affiliation to register as a Republican so I can vote for Liz?” the website states, before telling voters how to change their affiliation. Under Wyoming law, voters can submit an application by mail to change their party up to 14 days before an
Mayor Adams speaks on abortion with girlfriend
at 15 after Roe v Wade overturned
23 replies
Posted by NorthernDog 6/25/2022 8:57:52 PM Post Reply
NEW YORK -- In response to the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Roe v. Wade, the 1973 ruling that enshrined to the right to abortion in the United States, Mayor Eric Adams spoke about how abortion prevented his life from being derailed when he and his girlfriend accidentally got pregnant when he was 15 years old. During a press conference in front of City Hall on Friday, the mayor described his experience, called for Democrats to expand the Supreme Court and pledged New York City would provide aboritons for those who don’t have access traveling from out of state.
Former US Military Pilot Admits He Spied
For China, Sold US Secrets
23 replies
Posted by Ribicon 6/25/2022 12:38:31 PM Post Reply
A former U.S. Army helicopter pilot admitted to serving as a paid agent of the Chinese government, the Department of Justice (DOJ) announced Thursday. Shapour Moinian pleaded guilty to making false statements during security background checks and also admitted to accepting payment in exchange for passing aviation secrets obtained from his defense contractor employer to Chinese agents, the DOJ announcement stated. Moinian now faces 15 years in prison and a fine up to $500,000 for his crimes at his August 29 sentencing.(Snip)After serving in the U.S. Army between 1977 and 2000, Moinian worked for the Department of Defense and various defense contractors, according to the DOJ announcement.
Truck plows into pro-abortion activists
in Iowa and troopers fire tear gas in
Arizona while LA erupts in protest after
SCOTUS overturned Roe v. Wade
22 replies
Posted by Imright 6/25/2022 7:40:12 AM Post Reply
A pickup truck has plowed into pro-choice protesters in Iowa as demonstrations turned violent after the Supreme Court's bombshell Roe v Wade ruling. The black vehicle drove through the group of activists in Cedar Rapids despite them screaming at it to stop and hammering the hood and window. One appeared to get caught in front of it and narrowly avoided being run over before the driver sped off during the shocking exchange on Friday night. Another had her foot run over and was left howling in pain. And a third was flung to the floor as he drove away, suffering bruises and scrapes.
Dem Rep. Speier: ‘I Don’t Have Any
Evidence’ But I Think SCOTUS ‘Tipped
Off’ Pro-Life Protestors about Dobbs Ruling
20 replies
Posted by Imright 6/25/2022 12:06:22 PM Post Reply
During an interview on MSNBC on Friday, Rep. Jackie Speier (D-CA) said she thinks that the Supreme Court “tipped off” pro-life protestors about how it was going to rule in the Dobbs decision. Because when she went over to the Supreme Court, there were only pro-life protestors. She later admitted, “I don’t have any evidence” for the claim the court tipped off pro-life protestors. Speier stated, “I went over to the Supreme Court early, and the only people that were there were the protestors who were pro-birth, not pro-life, and I thought they had been tipped off.” Host Stephanie Ruhle then followed up on Speier’s claim that pro-life protestors were
Barack Obama Blasted for Not Codifying
Roe v. Wade: 'Dem Failure'
20 replies
Posted by NorthernDog 6/25/2022 10:19:48 AM Post Reply
Social media users have criticized former President Barack Obama for not passing legislation to codify abortion rights into federal following the U.S. Supreme Court's decision to overturn two landmark abortion rulings. Obama, a Democrat who served as president from 2009 to 2017, took to Twitter on Friday in response to the Court's decision to overturn 1973's Roe v. Wade and 1992's Planned Parenthood v. Casey, which had found a woman's right to abortion was constitutionally protected. (Snip) "The Dems refused to Codify Roe even when they had the power to," wrote screenwriter Thomas Cunningham. "RBG refused to retire when Obama
Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin Makes Ridiculous
Pledge in Response to Roe Ruling
19 replies
Posted by earlybird 6/25/2022 6:48:41 PM Post Reply
It comes as no surprise that Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin has issued a statement all but condemning Friday’s overturn of Roe — by pledging that the United States military “be all that it can be” [sarcasm] and will do all it can in support of “seamless access to reproductive health care [on-demand abortion].” What is a bit of a surprise — Austin’s apparent ignorance of federal law — is laughable.(snip) There is no “federal law,” Mr. Secretary. The Roe overturn correctly returned abortion decisions to the states. Besides, the Hyde Amendment already begs to differ: The Hyde Amendment Codification Act —Prohibits the expenditure for any abortion of funds authorized
Chaos in Los Angeles as Violent Leftists
Riot Over Roe v. Wade Being Overturned (Videos)
19 replies
Posted by Imright 6/25/2022 7:25:44 AM Post Reply
Chaos and mayhem took over in Los Angeles on Friday night as pro-abortion activists rioted over the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Roe v. Wade and hand control of abortion laws back to the states.(Tweet/Video) Several officers were hit with “what appeared to be fireworks and projectiles,” according to a report from ABC 7. Less-lethal munitions were used in an attempt disperse the crowd, but many of the protesters seemed determined to fight the police. (Tweet/Video) There were multiple protests across Los Angeles, including in Downtown and Hollywood.
Post New Article