Barack Obama Blasted for Not Codifying
Roe v. Wade: 'Dem Failure'
Newsweek,
by
Darragh Roche
Original Article
Posted By: NorthernDog,
6/25/2022 10:19:48 AM
Social media users have criticized former President Barack Obama for not passing legislation to codify abortion rights into federal following the U.S. Supreme Court's decision to overturn two landmark abortion rulings. Obama, a Democrat who served as president from 2009 to 2017, took to Twitter on Friday in response to the Court's decision to overturn 1973's Roe v. Wade and 1992's Planned Parenthood v. Casey, which had found a woman's right to abortion was constitutionally protected. (Snip) "The Dems refused to Codify Roe even when they had the power to," wrote screenwriter Thomas Cunningham. "RBG refused to retire when Obama
Reply 1 - Posted by:
Quigley 6/25/2022 10:31:46 AM (No. 1196570)
They never do anything they say is important. All they ever do is shovel money out the door to their accomplices. Even obumbum care was shoveling government paid-for insurance premiums to the likes of United Healthcare- whose stock is up some 2000% since it was enacted. With life expectancy down.
The current case was related to MS having a 90 day limit on abortion- “too short!!” They shriek and filed the case to challenge the MS law, which was a perfectly reasonable limitation. So Roe’s overturned.
And don’t doubt dimokkkrap leadership is thrilled about it being overturned. When the mob is in a frenzy the leaders don’t have to have a plan they just have to shriek incitement. And fundraising will go through the roof.
28 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
BeatleJeff 6/25/2022 10:34:36 AM (No. 1196574)
So what? Codifying Roe still wouldn't have made it constitutional. The whole point of the Dobbs ruling yesterday was that a right to an abortion has never existed in the US Constitution.
60 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
Vaquero45 6/25/2022 10:42:39 AM (No. 1196587)
Ha! Liberals always end up eating their own. Yesterday it was Ruth Bader Ginsburg; today it’s the Kenyan Lightbringer....
35 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
EQKimball 6/25/2022 10:50:20 AM (No. 1196598)
The problem is a federal statute would be unconstitutional, as the regulation of abortion (like professional licensing, vehicle codes, zoning, local law enforcement, educational curriculum, etc.) are not enumerated powers of the national government. Under the 10th Amendment, all powers not enumerated are left to the states and people. Congress simply has no authority to legalize abortion. End of issue.
41 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
LC Chihuahua 6/25/2022 11:02:51 AM (No. 1196617)
Obama left it to Biden to codify Roe vs, Wade. Obama is concerned about his reputation, so he left the dirty work to Biden. Biden slipped up. Remember what Obama said about Biden regarding messing things up.
19 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
southernboy 6/25/2022 11:06:26 AM (No. 1196626)
New term popped up: "Abortion Care!"
13 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
JrSample 6/25/2022 11:06:49 AM (No. 1196628)
They wanted an issue to exploit in elections and to use for fundraising.
RBG did not retire due to pure hubris and vanity. I read where privately she indicated that she wanted to have the ''first woman president'' name her replacement.
19 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
DVC 6/25/2022 11:16:20 AM (No. 1196637)
The whole reason that they wanted the courts to force this issue is that, like homosexual marriage and other unpopular evils, they CANNOT GET THE VOTES to have these laws passed in a huge number of states, and they also can't get the votes in the Congress.
So....after all their screetching and hysteria about "losing our democracy" (which we never had) they are HORRIFIED when issues are left up to the democratic voting processes of our Republic. They give a lot of verbal support for "democracy", but in reality, when they cannot win in the legislatures or in Congress, they want an activist court to INVENT new "law" to force things on us that they cannot get by fair votes in the national or state legislatures.
Totalitarians giving their whiny lip service to "democracy" when all they want is CONTROL.
41 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
Namma 6/25/2022 11:19:51 AM (No. 1196640)
tell the protestors to riot at his house.It's all his fault.
24 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
Starboard_side 6/25/2022 11:23:25 AM (No. 1196642)
#1 has a point, if they simply didn't determine that 15 weeks wasn't enough, and didn't file that lawsuit, it likely would not have been overturned.
But, even Alan Durshowitz mentioned he thought Roe would eventually be overturned, just didn't think they needed to do it on this particular case, but maybe another in a year or two.
And, why weren't states like Michigan who had laws still effective since 1973 changing them months, or years, ago? Maybe they knew it would be unpopular.
Do you really think most of the activists protesting really care about the people living in Oklahoma? Plus, most live in CA, NY, IL, NJ, NY, MA, OR, WA where it's still legal to have an abortion.
I predict many other states will enact some moderate version, must closer to the original Roe limits, or those in Europe which are 12-14 weeks.
14 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
czechlist 6/25/2022 11:31:50 AM (No. 1196648)
A Constitutional Amendment would be required to "codify" abortion rights nationally. Remember that half of any population is under average intelligence.
18 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
Thos Weatherby 6/25/2022 11:43:58 AM (No. 1196665)
Remember back in the beginning Obama was Pro Life.
17 people like this.
The Left always eats its own.
10 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
Vincent Vega 6/25/2022 12:13:56 PM (No. 1196686)
Exactly #7. RBG didn't retire under the jug-eared Kenyan because like so many other people, she was just absolutely sure the crooked one would win.
She miscalculated. I can't imagine what was going through her head the night Trump won.
21 people like this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
doctorfixit 6/25/2022 12:39:31 PM (No. 1196707)
Fortunately for the US , Obama is a very lazy communist.
31 people like this.
Reply 16 - Posted by:
DVC 6/25/2022 1:09:04 PM (No. 1196738)
They never could get the votes to pass this. This is exactly why they pushed it into the twisted leftist courts, to be able to get what they cannot obtain via their "cherished" (they say) democratic process.
The do NOT value a fair vote in a legislature or Congress, because they cannot win. So they move to by pass the legislative process via activist courts. This is undoing the crooked work of activist judges who invented a "right" from NOTHING.
16 people like this.
Reply 17 - Posted by:
Strike3 6/25/2022 2:19:51 PM (No. 1196790)
C'mon, man, you voted for the big-eared kenyan because he promised to "fundamentally change America" through his big Hopey-Changy programs. You're still out there hoping, aren't you? How did keeping your doctor work out?
17 people like this.
Reply 18 - Posted by:
anniebc 6/25/2022 4:13:17 PM (No. 1196869)
I think those who are angry with nothingness for not codifying abortion rights for infinity should punish him severely. This has to make him worse than those innocent babies in the womb they hate so much.
8 people like this.
Reply 19 - Posted by:
paral04 6/25/2022 5:54:03 PM (No. 1196926)
Those of you who want to kill the unborn should go to a state that will let you and do it there. In the meantime, shut up about it.
11 people like this.
Reply 20 - Posted by:
DVC 6/25/2022 6:21:24 PM (No. 1196941)
Re, #11, no, only a federal law would be required.
4 people like this.
Reply 21 - Posted by:
mifla 6/26/2022 5:26:51 AM (No. 1197227)
They can play let's pretend all they want. If they had passed the law, the Supremes still would have ruled it unconstitutional.
3 people like this.
Reply 22 - Posted by:
Krause 6/26/2022 6:32:34 AM (No. 1197249)
Too busy looking in the mirror.
5 people like this.
Reply 23 - Posted by:
ARKfamily 6/26/2022 7:24:34 AM (No. 1197270)
"My Body, My Choice"
In reality, it is not the women's body being aborted, it is someone else's body being aborted. A precious baby that cannot speak for itself at that point in their life.
Very sad.
14 people like this.
Reply 24 - Posted by:
little guy 6/26/2022 8:51:44 AM (No. 1197341)
They had almost 50 years to add an abortion amendment to the Constitution. They never even tried. Why? Because it would never pass due to a lack of support!
This is NOT the big issue the Demo-rats think it is. I dare any politician in any Red State --- at any level --- to publicly demand that abortion be as free as it is in NY or California. They will lose 60/40
5 people like this.
Reply 25 - Posted by:
Zigrid 6/26/2022 10:59:50 AM (No. 1197455)
King barrack sure loves the limelight...doesn't he...go away to your mansions and let WE the people live in peace....nothing can be done now...you flubbed it...with each edict from the king...he gets more negative press...kinda like harry and his tart...Ruth Bader Ginsburg didn't retire when the king was on his throne...because she knew he wasn't about justice...he was always about himself...
2 people like this.
Reply 26 - Posted by:
jeffkinnh 6/26/2022 1:33:24 PM (No. 1197609)
How disingenuous BO is. When he was president there was no reason to codify it. Progressives had already won and the SCOTUS was safely in Progressive control. No alternative law was going to be passed or get through the SCOTUS. Also, the REASON it was pushed through the SCOTUS was because the dems COULDN'T muster the votes to codify it in the first place.
Further, the court didn't reject Roe because the COURT didn't have the power to pass laws on abortion. The SCOTUS states that the Constitution states that the FEDERAL GOVERNMENT does not have such a right. Thus, if Congress codified abortion rights, the SCOTUS would strike such law down as unconstitutional. That right, as clearly stated in the ruling, belongs to the states. Liberals, of course, consider the federal government all powerful. They must to impose their agenda on us. If Progressives had to go State to State to accomplish their ends, they would fail. largely because progressive states have BIG problems caused by their choices and are less successful than Conservative states. When the action is taken at a federal level, there are no winners and losers to compare. We are all losers in misery and progressives declare victory in getting what they wanted and brush aside the painful outcomes and failure to actually accomplish what they claimed they wanted.
This is the terror awaiting progressives. The Country was doing well under Trump. It is a disaster under Brandon. If we get a Conservative in 2024, we will do well again. The blatant evidence that progressives = disastrous failure will not be possible to ignore for any with half a brain.
1 person likes this.
Reply 27 - Posted by:
Omen55 6/26/2022 3:32:49 PM (No. 1197710)
Well #14 I can.
RBG: "I can't die!"
0 people like this.
Reply 28 - Posted by:
bobn.t 6/26/2022 8:33:50 PM (No. 1197966)
It's laughable the way the democrap hypocrits scream for gun control to prevent shootings but demand full legitimacy to murder a child at any time.
Gun righs bad
All abortions good.
Hypocrits
Hypocrit idiots.
0 people like this.
Reply 29 - Posted by:
mifla 6/27/2022 5:31:01 AM (No. 1198152)
The Obamas are rich and live in luxury. They probably laugh every night at the sheeple who made it possible.
0 people like this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "NorthernDog"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
Comments:
I thought the Anointed One was perfect in every way? Obama didn't try to 'codify' Roe Vs. Wade because it would be an unpopular decision. At the time there were still pro- life Democrats. And besides, Dems like using abortion as a battering ram political issue. They never want the issue to go away.