New Docs Reveal Jack Smith Intentionally
Violated Congressional Republicans Constitutional Rights
The Federalist,
by
Margot Cleveland
Original Article
Posted By: J. Arthur Brown,
12/2/2025 8:31:31 PM
The Biden Administration okayed Special Counsel Jack Smith's subpoenaing congressional phone records knowing the subpoenas were unconstitutional, emails released last week revealed. That same trove of documents also established the illegality of the nondisclosure orders issued by the courts to prevent the telecommunication providers from alerted [sic.] the members of Congress of the unconstitutional seizure of their toll records.
Post Reply
Reminder: “WE ARE A SALON AND NOT A SALOON”
Your thoughts, comments, and ideas are always welcome here. But we ask you to please be mindful and respectful. Threatening or crude language doesn't persuade anybody and makes the conversation less enjoyable for fellow L.Dotters.
Reply 1 - Posted by:
DVC 12/2/2025 8:58:25 PM (No. 2036638)
Sounds like Smith needs to be indicted for violating the Constitutional Rights of each and every Congresscritter.
50 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
Krause 12/2/2025 10:00:51 PM (No. 2036660)
Sounds like ‘illegal orders!’
37 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
rochow 12/2/2025 10:19:35 PM (No. 2036665)
Stick this piece of filth into an orange suit and throw the key away. However, let's not forget the even smellier dirt that is behind him.
29 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
seamusm 12/2/2025 10:22:13 PM (No. 2036667)
'Tis a shame that public hanging isn't the punishment for this crime.
20 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
Strike3 12/3/2025 5:26:14 AM (No. 2036711)
Smith deserves the guillotine. Everything he did was crooked and underhanded.
13 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
anniebc 12/3/2025 6:29:51 AM (No. 2036733)
So when does Smith pay for his crimes? When? When? When?
37 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
DCGIRL 12/3/2025 6:45:09 AM (No. 2036741)
I'm with #6. Mike Johnson when are we going to see Jack Smith indicted??? WHEN? When are we going to see Boasberg's impeachment??? WHEN?
27 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
felixcat 12/3/2025 8:04:47 AM (No. 2036756)
C'mon #7 - Jim Jordan has to hold his share go oversight hearings, then another committee has to hold their oversight hearings and ...... Let's face it. Dems wage politics as if it's war. Republicans, wage politics as if it's tea time.
19 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
janjan 12/3/2025 9:37:46 AM (No. 2036789)
While these Congress members do seem slightly more outraged over what Smith did to them than what he did to Trump, I don’t see much action besides strongly worded cable news appearances and conservative news articles. While I appreciate Grassley’s attempts to make this public, I’m afraid we’re not going to be able to help him in his quest for accountability. Like every other unconstitutional, criminal, or unethical act liberals commit, half the country will roll their eyes and the other half will cheer.
7 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
mc squared 12/3/2025 10:16:39 AM (No. 2036813)
FTA: "The Biden Administration okayed ......". Who really did?
6 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
JHHolliday 12/3/2025 10:24:48 AM (No. 2036823)
Re #10. Biden was so cognitively diminished in his last two years that I doubt he had a clue what his socialist/communist inner circle was doing. What those people did was actually treason but they will never pay the price for it.
6 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
cor-vet 12/3/2025 10:37:19 AM (No. 2036829)
This should be the perfect time to remove Boasberg. At least, all the affected congress critters should mount civil suits and take him for every penny he's worth!
8 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
billa57 12/3/2025 11:42:06 AM (No. 2036881)
Jack Smith and the rest of the democrats in Washington seem to think the Constitution is for suckers and that they are above all that. They need to be shown differently.
6 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
Lawsy0 12/3/2025 12:33:36 PM (No. 2036909)
Jack Smith is the current iteration of Mephistopheles; a literary device which stands for all evil at any time. Did you ever hear your grandpa say that "hanging is too good for some people and a flagrant waste of rope"? Don't waste good electricity on a chair for the likes of Jack Smith--if that's his real name. Above all, don't waste an orange jumpsuit or a polyester one made of black & white stripes.
3 people like this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
Omen55 12/3/2025 2:56:46 PM (No. 2036970)
Unless they are arrested & convicted this will always happen.
4 people like this.
Reply 16 - Posted by:
Rumblehog 12/3/2025 5:06:19 PM (No. 2037023)
And this is the person the Demonrats were hoisting up as the "champion of justice?"
Can Americans finally begin to see that the Demonrat Party of today, aka "Soros Inc.," is nothing like the Democrats of their parents' or grandparents' days?
We know why Jack(ass) Smith won't be speaking to Congress, or at his DOJ Trial, but where in the world is Merrick Garland these days? Of all of Bidet's Secretary's, Garland is the most "invisible," and is nowhere to be found, and never gets subpoenaed! I've never seen anything like it... even Janet "Waco Kid" Reno is more visible than Merrick Garland, and she's been deceased for nearly 10 years!
1 person likes this.
Reply 17 - Posted by:
whyyeseyec 12/3/2025 5:42:43 PM (No. 2037030)
@#7 - The GOP would require 70+ republican senators to find guilty an impeached judge. It takes 67 total senators. Also, the House impeaches, then the Senate tries the case. They vote either guilty/not guilty.
1 person likes this.
Reply 18 - Posted by:
MickTurn 12/3/2025 10:12:23 PM (No. 2037121)
Sounds like Jackazz Smith is grass and the Law is a Lawnmower! Wait for it Criminal!
0 people like this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "J. Arthur Brown"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
Comments:
In a better world Smith, Boasberg et. al. would be personally liable for these violations.