Trump was right not to want a second strike
theAspenbeat.com,
by
Glenn Beaton
Original Article
Posted By: Big Bopper,
12/3/2025 11:38:38 AM
The facts are still emerging through the fog of war (or is it the fog of law enforcement, or the fog of antiterrorism?). Sometimes people (including myself) draw conclusions on the basis of incomplete information, so let’s start with what’s really known.
Our military launched another missile attack on a drug-smuggling fast boat. The boat burst into flames and was dead in the water but did not immediately sink. On-scene surveillance showed that not all of the 11 crew members were killed. One or two men were seen moving in the water.
Post Reply
Reminder: “WE ARE A SALON AND NOT A SALOON”
Your thoughts, comments, and ideas are always welcome here. But we ask you to please be mindful and respectful. Threatening or crude language doesn't persuade anybody and makes the conversation less enjoyable for fellow L.Dotters.
Reply 1 - Posted by:
chance_232 12/3/2025 11:48:19 AM (No. 2036885)
If its still floating, its still a target.
21 people like this.
Personally, I’d rather die by missile strike than getting eaten by a shark…
9 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
Bur Oak 12/3/2025 11:56:54 AM (No. 2036889)
So, the logic is you get to shot at any target only once. Doesn't make sense.
20 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
davew 12/3/2025 12:04:18 PM (No. 2036893)
The critics of the killing of the drug terrorists are conflating the laws of war that evolved between nations at war with the actions used to prevent a chemical attack by criminals not part of a uniformed state military. We observe reciprocal obligatios as part of state combatants in a war, but these don't apply when dealing with criminals outside a military structure.
13 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
mc squared 12/3/2025 12:24:58 PM (No. 2036903)
So next time let them swim as long as they can. During wartime, a damaged enemy ship was always' finished' off. This is a drug war.
14 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
Vaquero45 12/3/2025 12:30:27 PM (No. 2036908)
Stop with this rap about the “rules of war”. The only rule here is “kill them”. They’re not uniformed soldiers - they’re criminals and terrorists. What should the U.S. have done? Sent a boat out to pick them up, advise them of their rights, and get them a lawyer?
This is nothing new. One of my uncles was an Army infantryman in Europe; he landed at Omaha Beach. After the Malmedy massacre, they stopped taking SS prisoners. If they surrendered, they were shot. After they got across the Remagen bridge, they pretty much stopped taking ANY prisoners. It was the right thing to do then, and it’s the right thing to do now.
13 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
red1066 12/3/2025 12:39:09 PM (No. 2036910)
The democraps and media are once again on the wrong side of everything. One needs to ask these people why killing drug smugglers in a boat carrying hundreds of pounds of illegal drugs headed for the U.S. is wrong. Why all the hand wringing over killing drug runners?
19 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
philsner 12/3/2025 12:59:15 PM (No. 2036921)
The idea of a second strike will anger the same crowd that claims you should shoot to wound rather than kill. In other words, give your attacker another chance to do what you are trying to keep him from doing, rather than eliminating the threat. What, do you think if the narco terrorists survive they will quit and become school teachers?
11 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
Sunhan65 12/3/2025 1:17:12 PM (No. 2036933)
FTA: "But the President also knows that to murder them as they flail wounded in the water, well, that would make him worse than them."
No. It would not. He would still be the President of the United States defending his country and trying to save American lives, and they would still be a bunch of drug dealers. They don't even exist in the same moral universe.
However, I agree with the broader point both he and President Trump are making. If the goal is to stop drugs from coming into our country, blasting the boat did the job. I don't like to see our armed forces killing survivors in the water.
Having said that, #6 offers a useful perspective here. I'm deeply grateful to his Uncle and that entire generation. They did what was necessary and right and helped save civilization in the process.
I would add only this: Like or not, Waffen SS were uniformed soldiers and were, in theory, supposed to be taken prisoner. However, as he correctly points out, the Waffen SS (and, for that matter, the Japanese military) forfeited that privilege by massacring American prisoners. They were irredeemably evil and deserved no better.
4 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
BarryNo 12/3/2025 1:24:08 PM (No. 2036936)
Stuff it. Decision was made in theater by the Commander of the battle group - not Trump.
I would have held back a second strike only to allow the survivors to destroy the morale of their fellow druggies if they got back to home base.
6 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
LC Chihuahua 12/3/2025 1:30:22 PM (No. 2036943)
Been waiting for Trump's opponents to criticize these boatstrikes. It was only a matter of time. So predictable. Smugglers have families too! Show the crying children! Show the weeping parents! Show the wailing wives!
6 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
earlybird 12/3/2025 3:15:27 PM (No. 2036979)
Keaton should focus on cleaning up Colorado and its corruption. On rhis issue he is talking through his hat. Clueless.
5 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
David Prosser 12/3/2025 3:24:14 PM (No. 2036981)
If it moves, shoot it. If it doesn't move, shoot it until it does move. Job done.
2 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
DVC 12/3/2025 3:32:04 PM (No. 2036987)
The correct legal term is PIRATES, and the standard procedure for pirates is DEATH. No exceptions. The second strike was proper.
4 people like this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
DVC 12/3/2025 3:36:44 PM (No. 2036989)
Beaton has been living in Aspen too long. The native insanity and extreme leftism is rubbing off on him.
4 people like this.
Reply 16 - Posted by:
danu 12/3/2025 4:04:58 PM (No. 2037004)
if 1 or 2 are still moving, it suggests they are clinging to floating hunks of speed boat--and slow bobbing drugs,
whilst being nibbled on by the local flora, fauna, and an upcoming frenzy of sharks.
3 people like this.
Reply 17 - Posted by:
NYbob 12/3/2025 6:26:39 PM (No. 2037042)
Illegal aliens DON'T have the rights U.S. citizens have, and TERRORISTS, Drug traffickers, and pirates are NOT uniformed armed forces. The emotional, stupid, left does not care. They believe an evil media who is fanning this lie, thanks to the usual demonic bosses.
3 people like this.
Given all the IR footage we've seen of these boats (basically, long skiffs with huge outboard motors and probably cans of extra fuel onboard) erupting into raging infernos when directly hit with guided bombs, it's remarkable that anyone could survive such a strike at all.
2 people like this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Big Bopper"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)