Ghislaine Maxwell Cleared Trump During
DOJ Interview: Report
Western Journal,
by
Randy DeSoto
Original Article
Posted By: ladydawgfan,
8/6/2025 5:14:30 PM
Ghislaine Maxwell reportedly said nothing during interviews last month with the Justice Department that would be harmful to President Donald Trump.
Maxwell was sentenced in 2022 to 20 years in federal prison for conspiring with the late Jeffrey Epstein to sexually abuse minors. She has appealed her conviction to the U.S. Supreme Court.
ABC News reported that Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche questioned her for nine hours over a two-day period last month regarding Trump and other Epstein associates.
Maxwell told Blanche that “Trump had never done anything in her presence that would have caused concern, according to sources familiar with what Maxwell said.”
Post Reply
Reminder: “WE ARE A SALON AND NOT A SALOON”
Your thoughts, comments, and ideas are always welcome here. But we ask you to please be mindful and respectful. Threatening or crude language doesn't persuade anybody and makes the conversation less enjoyable for fellow L.Dotters.
Reply 1 - Posted by:
JackBurton 8/6/2025 7:08:34 PM (No. 1987454)
Well, D'uh.
23 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
WWIIDaughter 8/6/2025 9:47:04 PM (No. 1987503)
Right now there's are huge prizes coming from Demonic donors for the first 1,000 media stories calling it Play for Pay (Maxwell lies for PDJT so he will give her a pardon). Of course, if our president was like they are (rotten to the core) he would not pardon her just to cover himself. Since he's good and honest, he will do what he believes is right.
23 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
Rumblehog 8/7/2025 5:27:23 AM (No. 1987547)
By their silence during AG Merrick Garland's, "reign of terror," the Democrats had already "cleared" him. The powers that be in the DNC circle may have tainted the Epstein evidence, but you know the original stash is somewhere to be found.... probably in one of Hillary's Chappaqua closets, next to her new Internet Servers.
By the way, why haven't Bill Clinton's Secret Service detail been called in to testify? He's a past President and most of his original detail have probably already retired. They would have a front row seat to all his heinous activities on "pedo island." They say that Bubba would occasionally "ditch" his SS detail, but could someone explain to me how a dork like him could outwit or outrun the best bodyguards in the world? And, if he was able to do it, what does tell us about the competence of SS protection? Something there smells of "fish."
27 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
Strike3 8/7/2025 6:16:06 AM (No. 1987562)
Trump was always clear. She just confirmed it. Same with the E. Jean Carroll rape, the lying old hag still has the money.
21 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
janjan 8/7/2025 7:02:46 AM (No. 1987576)
I wonder if it’s occurred to the Democrats that they could get hurt far worse than the Republicans by releasing the Epstein info.
13 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
MakingSense 8/7/2025 8:02:20 AM (No. 1987583)
This is all Dimmocrat distraction. Everyone one knows Trump is clean on this and everything else they accuse him of. Not so, however, for one William Jefferson Clinton. That’s the to watch for right now!
12 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
Kafka2 8/7/2025 8:36:29 AM (No. 1987590)
There are a lot of disappointed Democrats. This was their last best hope to smear Trump. Now that the Democrats have made such a big deal of the Epstein files, they are most likely afraid of what they might review about prominent Democrats. The painting of Bill Clinton in a blue dress comes to mind.
11 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
kdog 8/7/2025 9:13:04 AM (No. 1987596)
I have a problem using Ghislaine Maxwell's recollection of events and people going back for over 25 years. I know from experience that sometimes I remember things differently than they occured as I have kept journals most of my adult life, in some form or another. More than a couple times I have "gone back in time" in one of these spiral notebooks to find things weren't the way I recall. Add to this that she was a partier, so who knows what memories are cooked up in her head that were nothing more than vivid dreams.
6 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
Lawsy0 8/7/2025 9:21:33 AM (No. 1987603)
Here we have three blind people describing an elephant. Six different hands patting the elephant in six different places. And they dare to call it "eye witness."
4 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
Zigrid 8/7/2025 9:29:29 AM (No. 1987609)
The democrat machine is really stupid...they knew they had nothing on President Trump and Epstein...but ...they decided to get some camera time and leave some doubt with voters...so now the truth is out there...although WE MAGA knew if the democrats had "anything" on President Trump ...they would have used it years ago to try and stop him from running and winning....and now President Trump will win his law suit against Murdock and he'll have plenty to finish the ball room at the White House....
7 people like this.
This article tells us nothing about whether Ms. Maxwell provided any useful information regarding whether any individuals other than she and Epstein were involved in their crimes. Ms. Maxwell might never tell all she knows since doing so could worsen her own legal and reputational problems. Her 2021 indictment and conviction were for crimes committed thru 2004. She and Epstein subsequently pursued a high-profile social life in New York City up to Epstein's July 6, 2019 arrest. Although she was prosecuted by the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York, she wasn't charged with committing any crimes during this period.
0 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
Geoman 8/7/2025 12:57:54 PM (No. 1987720)
The headline is the first absurdity of this non-winning article, followed by an equally absurd opening sentence, implying that an imprisoned felon can "clear" anyone of suspicions or accusations of a crime, especially if the one doing the "clearing" has been convicted as a party to the multitude of felony crimes alleged by the victims. To take this article at face value, one must believe Maxwell is totally on the up-and-up and must be OK with the administration's Deputy AG and/or other DOJ sources leaking to ABC News, as if they are no longer "fake news" because their political hit journalists have decided to fly right and are now 'on the side of the Angels.' Never mind that no credible witness, victims in particular, have ever accused Trump of any Epstein-related crime. It seems that any accusations to the contrary are politically motivated and under sourced. It's not as if the Clintons admitted to being in a special Epstein presidential suite sharing their platoon of 13-14 y/o playthings and swear that Trump was their honored guest. If Maxwell had alleged that Trump was Epstein's deputy abuser in chief, would DOJ sources have leaked that to ABC News and would the Western Journal be gleefully reporting Maxwell's accusation, giving it the weight of a Grand Jury indictment? If not, then how can Maxwell essentially No-bill the president? Were Trump so inclined, he wouldn't need to fish in Epstein's toxic pond and Trump doesn't have a reputation for being recklessly stupid, like Bill Clinton deservedly has earned. From the time in the early '70s, when Trump was thrust into the media, his reputation has been more related to marrying pretty women, which some democrats undoubtedly see as a crime.
0 people like this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "ladydawgfan"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
Comments:
For Conservatives, this is not a surprise. Leftists will NEVER believe it, though.