Top Intelligence Officials Contradicted
Brennan: ‘No Intelligence’ To Support
Key Russia Hoax Claim

This is extremely important that people realize that there was nothing directly connecting Russia but was demanded by Brennan, without evidence. FTA: The senior intelligence officials pointed out the lack of evidence to substantiate the claim. “We have no intelligence to directly support this ‘aspiration’ point,” said one member of the small group of individuals working with Brennan, FBI Director James Comey, and Director of National Intelligence James Clapper on the assessment of Russian activity in the lead-up to the 2016 election. The official worried that the inclusion of the claim would “open the IC to a line of very politicized inquiry that is sure to come up when this paper is shared with the Hill.” A recent CIA analysis of the inclusion of this disputed “key judgment” noted the risks of including poorly supported judgments since skeptical readers are inclined to “reject an entire analysis if a single judgment appears exaggerated, biased, or unsupported.” The experts did not disagree that Russia had continued its practice of attempting to sow chaos in presidential elections. They believed the intelligence indicated Russia sought to weaken presumptive winner Hillary Clinton and those efforts may have indirectly helped Trump. But they were concerned about the lack of evidence for the claim that became a cornerstone of the Russia collusion narrative, in which Trump was accused of conspiring with Russia to steal the 2016 election. “Can you really prove Moscow was trying to get Trump elected?” the official asked in late December 2016. Brennan called the dissenting individuals into his office on Dec. 30, 2016, and had a lengthy meeting in which they articulated their serious concerns. “The assessment will stay the same,” Brennan reported at the end of the meeting. The paper trail about this dispute posed a problem for Brennan, who had presented the information as being universally held with a high degree of confidence. The CIA review noted that the key judgment was given a “higher confidence level than was justified.” It further noted the ICA had been drafted under an unusually rushed timeline, had been preceded by leaks to The Washington Post and New York Times improperly claiming “definitive conclusions” had already been reached, and had indications of a “potential political motive.” Brennan later threw the dissenting officials under the bus when he recounted the events. Explaining his decision to ignore the concerns of the career intelligence experts, he said, “I came to the conclusion that the two officers had not read all the available intelligence,” Brennan wrote in his 2020 book Undaunted, of his decision to keep the key judgment despite the concerns. Imagine that last paragraph, "I CAME TO THE CONCLUSION"..... The whole article is very informative and illustrates the conspiracy. Imagine Trump admin folks ignoring evidence and how the media would treat the story.

People like Brennan do not go rogue. If he had, Obama would have been furious for Brennan going out on his own. Obama would likely have fired him. That's how we can tell Russia collusion goes all the way up to Obama. Obama approved Brennan's actions.

John Owen Brennan A puppet of Hussein