Donald Trump Has Supreme Court Justices
on 'Speed Dial', Sotomayor Says
Newsweek,
by
Sophie Clark
Original Article
Posted By: earlybird,
7/7/2025 11:24:34 AM
In a dissent of a Supreme Court ruling, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor said: "Today's order clarifies only one thing: Other litigants must follow the rules, but the administration has the Supreme Court on speed dial."
Justice Sotomayor made this statement in her dissent from the ruling allowing for migrants to be deported to countries they are not from.
In her dissent, which she wrote with Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, she said that this would result in the government "deporting noncitizens to potentially dangerous countries without notice or the opportunity to assert a fear of torture."Those
Post Reply
Reminder: “WE ARE A SALON AND NOT A SALOON”
Your thoughts, comments, and ideas are always welcome here. But we ask you to please be mindful and respectful. Threatening or crude language doesn't persuade anybody and makes the conversation less enjoyable for fellow L.Dotters.
Reply 1 - Posted by:
DVC 7/7/2025 11:27:56 AM (No. 1973914)
I wouldn't believe the Wide Latina if she reported that the sky was blue and water was wet.
25 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
Vaquero45 7/7/2025 11:28:36 AM (No. 1973918)
Every time the Wide Latina opens her big mouth, she says something dumber than she did the day before.
34 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
RuckusTom 7/7/2025 11:41:21 AM (No. 1973926)
The President of El Salvador should make its prison system a national commodity and keep building more of them. Any country in the world could send their worst prisoners there with guaranteed guards 24/7 and lock down 23 hours a day, 3 meals a day and medical care (when necessary) ... for a large $$$ price.
12 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
WhamDBambam 7/7/2025 11:43:27 AM (No. 1973929)
The Wide Latina says lots of things.
11 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
jalo1951 7/7/2025 11:46:15 AM (No. 1973933)
The Supreme Court Justice who cannot define what a woman is is not the only DEI member.
22 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
volksford 7/7/2025 11:46:19 AM (No. 1973934)
This is the result of democrats having every woke federal district judge on speed dial.
20 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
Rumblehog 7/7/2025 11:48:19 AM (No. 1973937)
That's because HE is the President of the United States and HE speaks for all of US.
19 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
JunkYardDog 7/7/2025 11:49:48 AM (No. 1973940)
In a dissent of a Supreme Court ruling, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor said: "Today's order clarifies only one thing: Other litigants must follow the rules, but the administration has the Supreme Court on speed dial." You're godd@m right he does! When has any President ever had to endure the non-stop onslaught of radical activist district court judges with their nation-wide injuctions, or the kangaroo-court antics in NY with Letitia "Fat Ass" James and Fat Alvin Bragg? Even Sotomayor, Kagan, and Joke Jackson engage in lawfare against this administration. Looks like Amy Coney Barret should've included Sotomayor in her blistering takedown of Jackson. Soon though, Sotomayor will either retire or pass away and then Trump will install another conservative, Constitution-abidong judge on SCOTUS, not a liberal whack job like "I can't define what a woman is" Jackson.
13 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
cThree 7/7/2025 11:55:33 AM (No. 1973943)
Wide? I guess then they’s a wide Latinx birthing person.
Progressives always crush the ones they champion.
2 people like this.
When it comes to expediting the agenda the electorate voted for being disrupted and delayed by penny ante judicial tyrants I would hope the administration gets some degree of priority.
4 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
singermom9 7/7/2025 12:04:36 PM (No. 1973949)
Maybe you FEEL like he has you on speed dial because you so called judges really SUCK and you are NOT ruling through the LAWS but your TDS symptoms. BTW NO ONE wants to hear from you re this. He is the elected Pres and YOU are NOT
12 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
FLCracker 7/7/2025 12:10:25 PM (No. 1973954)
As the Supreme Court should be.
8 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
Bur Oak 7/7/2025 12:12:06 PM (No. 1973955)
That's very judicious of Justice Sotomayor, well, no.
2 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
preciosodrogas 7/7/2025 12:20:32 PM (No. 1973959)
Wow! Does she want any facts to go along with that speculation? That was in no way, except title, a reasoned opinion. I particularly liked the personal shots at President Trump and the other members of the Court. She sounds like a defense lawyer rather than an arbiter on high handing down the law.
Oh well, no one has accused her of knowing what she is doing. There is a silver lining, she and her buds serve as excellent examples of the destructiveness of DEI.
7 people like this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
Hermit_Crab 7/7/2025 12:20:50 PM (No. 1973960)
I bet 0bama & Co. has Sotomayor, Kagan, Jackson, and maybe Roberts on Speed dial too. Or maybe they have him on speed dial and are required to call in daily for their instructions.
9 people like this.
Reply 16 - Posted by:
jeffkinnh 7/7/2025 12:22:53 PM (No. 1973961)
Sotomayor and Jackson in a race to the bottom.
My bet is that Trump is VERY careful in dealing with the courts. He has his representatives do the talking for him. That's what they are there for. The Leftist judges are just infuriated that no one is listening to them because they are idiots. Then they turn around and confirm that assessment by acting like spoiled brats and abandoning any attempts to work through the law. To these judges, THEY are the law.
Older courts used to work by torturing existing law into supporting what they wanted to do. Roberts calling a penalty that the government had no right to enforce, a "tax" that they could to enforce BOCare was such an action. It was a fig leaf but at least they pretended to work within the law.
But Sotomayor and Jackson have abandoned established law all together. 250 years of established law? Too annoying to plod through. The same amount of precedent to deal with inconsistencies in the law? Doesn't matter. Sotomayor and Jackson want to be able to make stuff up on the fly. Further, it's retroactive so that the issue at hand can be held against someone who violated the issue before the "wise ones" spoke up about it. The US Constitution, specifically the Fifth Amendment (due process clause) and the Article I, Section 9 (prohibition of ex post facto laws), provides protections against retroactive application of laws, especially in criminal matters. But heck, the Constitution is just another moldy document that the "wise ones" can't be bothered to read.
These morons should be impeached for terminal stupidity. That probably won't happen. We had a senile president and no one seemed to care about it. Who's to worry about two cabbage heads on the SCOTUS?
13 people like this.
Reply 17 - Posted by:
franco 7/7/2025 12:24:44 PM (No. 1973963)
As usual, the liberal bench-legislators on the Supreme Court dissemble and divert attention from what is actually happening. Most of us who are paying attention know that well-placed liberals have John Roberts' number on speed dial, and when they call they always remind Roberts of certain uncomfortable facts.... such as his affiliation with Jeffrey Epstein and certain suggestive group photos taken of him during his law school years in the 1970s. It's that access to Roberts' amygdala that has given us decisions on things like the "Affordable" Care Act, among others.
7 people like this.
Reply 18 - Posted by:
StrikingViking 7/7/2025 12:32:19 PM (No. 1973968)
Maybe SCOTUS is acting with unaccustumed haste because several dozens of Democrat-appointed district judges are staging a judicial coup aimed at the Executive Branch.
8 people like this.
Reply 19 - Posted by:
Venturer 7/7/2025 12:45:26 PM (No. 1973978)
What she is doing is questioning the veracity and integrity of the other members of the court who disagree with her.
Petty historical in a court like SCOTUS.
IMO there are 3 justices there that should not be.
11 people like this.
Reply 20 - Posted by:
john56 7/7/2025 12:55:12 PM (No. 1973983)
I hope and pray that President Trump has the opportunity to appoint three justices to the SCOTUS during his second term.
1. To replace Justice Sotomayor.
2. To replace Chief Justice Roberts
3. To replace Justice Thomas (last one) near the end of the term with the thanks of a grateful nation.
5 people like this.
Reply 21 - Posted by:
NorthernDog 7/7/2025 1:20:57 PM (No. 1974001)
Speaking of speed dial, SotoLatina has a medic on call at all times due to her shaky health (Type 1 diabetes). She also appears to be wearing a wig, which is pulled down tighter to her scalp than her hair used to look.
4 people like this.
Reply 22 - Posted by:
Starboard_side 7/7/2025 2:14:09 PM (No. 1974018)
What she's really saying is the Democrats that have used and abused the Court system with their "speed dialing" judge shopping to thwart and delay the Trump / Republican agenda isn't working any more.
Trump sure learned from the 4 years of false Democrat attacks during his first term.
Sure hope most Republicans have too and seeing the true colors of today's Democrat party.
1 person likes this.
Reply 23 - Posted by:
danu 7/7/2025 3:33:52 PM (No. 1974046)
and this is important news because.....? such ding-bat-tery
1 person likes this.
Reply 24 - Posted by:
3XALADY 7/7/2025 5:53:55 PM (No. 1974080)
What is she talking about? It took almost 6 months to get the Supremes off their duff to do much of anything to help President Trump. In the meantime, the dhims have been keeping the lower court judges busy trying to stop him at every turn. Talk about speed dial!!!
0 people like this.
Reply 25 - Posted by:
LC Chihuahua 7/7/2025 6:32:19 PM (No. 1974097)
More importantly, who has Sotomayor, Brown, (and Kagan) on speed dial.
2 people like this.
Reply 26 - Posted by:
MickTurn 7/7/2025 7:19:00 PM (No. 1974113)
All 3 of the Leftist Clown SCOTUS Judges, and I use the Judge term extremely LOOSELY, need to RESIGN and find jobs picking up trash as that is all they are qualified for!
0 people like this.
Reply 27 - Posted by:
mifla 7/8/2025 6:34:43 AM (No. 1974258)
She just insulted the conservatives on the Court, calling them Trump sycophants.
This year's SC Christmas party is going to be a riot.
0 people like this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "earlybird"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
Comments:
Those being sent to Sudan were te worst of the worst. Sotomayor and Jackson do not belong on ghe court.