Justice Kagan’s Own Words Come Back
to Haunt Her on Nationwide Injunctions
PJ Media,
by
Matt Margolis
Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought,
6/28/2025 10:02:16 AM
The Supreme Court’s 6-3 decision in Trump v. CASA, Inc., released Friday, finally put the brakes on the reckless abuse of nationwide injunctions by lower courts—and has Democrats in full meltdown mode. The left’s favorite judicial weapon just got neutered, and the hypocrisy is impossible to ignore.
The liberal wing of the court didn’t do itself any favors, either. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson’s dissent was so horrible that Justice Amy Coney Barrett felt compelled to call it out in the majority opinion.
But Justice Elena Kagan’s credibility also took a direct hit. In a stunning display of judicial flip-flopping, Kagan’s own words from 2022 have come back to haunt her,
Post Reply
Reminder: “WE ARE A SALON AND NOT A SALOON”
Your thoughts, comments, and ideas are always welcome here. But we ask you to please be mindful and respectful. Threatening or crude language doesn't persuade anybody and makes the conversation less enjoyable for fellow L.Dotters.
Reply 1 - Posted by:
Lazyman 6/28/2025 10:09:55 AM (No. 1970353)
Just like that, she proves herself to be unfit as a political partisan in an institution that demands integrity.
38 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
WhamDBambam 6/28/2025 10:15:42 AM (No. 1970356)
I respected her legal abilities although I did not agree with many of her opinions. Now, I see that she was just another political hack. Too bad.
31 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
bpl40 6/28/2025 10:29:45 AM (No. 1970368)
I am always reminded of the lefty 'judge' in Hawaii who, during Trump 1.0 put an injunction on the order controlling immigration from 'Muslim' countries. His reasoning was very peculiar and a harbinger of things to come. He accepted that immigration rules were withing the Constitutional powers of the presidency. But not if the president's name was Trump. Did he say that.? Well not exactly, but might as well have. Nothing has changed since 2017, except that the boil was fully ripened and had to be lanced.
17 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
rikkitikki 6/28/2025 10:32:59 AM (No. 1970369)
Based on her own words, Kagan is either terribly incompetent, criminally negligent, or hopelessly partisan.
Not exactly the kind of person that should be on the SCOTUS, no matter which description is accurate.
32 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
clayusmcret 6/28/2025 11:29:35 AM (No. 1970421)
Jackson repeatedly demonstrates that she is unqualified to serve on SCOTUS, and she, Kagan and Sotomayor repeatedly reveal that they believe leftist opinions and emotions must override Constitutional law.
18 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
DVC 6/28/2025 11:30:26 AM (No. 1970422)
"It can't be right" if Biden is doing something if a judge has a nationwide injunction, but if it is Trump....then, OF COURSE, nationwide injunctions are a good thing.
Kagan is purely, totally political, has zero interest in the law or the Constitution, only in POLITICAL rulings from her lofty perch.
16 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
marbles 6/28/2025 11:56:58 AM (No. 1970442)
Nathan Lane in pearls...................is always on the wrong side of reality.
8 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
danu 6/28/2025 12:04:33 PM (No. 1970450)
global injunctions for meee-but not for thee. reeeee
7 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
Hazymac 6/28/2025 2:21:57 PM (No. 1970494)
Barney Rubble. When Ubama nominated Kagan for the SCOTUS, a mother and her young son were watching the news. When Kagan appeared on television, the boy asked, "Mommy, why is that man wearing earrings?"
3 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
anniebc 6/28/2025 2:43:45 PM (No. 1970503)
Kagan's another DEI hire. Come on, let's hear it!
4 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
Dodge Boy 6/28/2025 3:28:43 PM (No. 1970520)
Always amazes me how these lefty fruitcakes solemnly swear to uphold the Constitution of the United States of America, then turn right around and do the exact opposite.
8 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
jeffkinnh 6/28/2025 4:41:23 PM (No. 1970532)
"Consistency, after all, used to be a virtue."
Consistency is the ESSENCE of the law. It tells us HOW to call balls and strikes. Imagine a baseball game where the definition of a ball or strike varied according as to WHO was at bat. That would be unfair and insane. (Of course children sometimes play the game this way.)
The Left cannot deal with life this way so they want to make things up as they go along. The rest of us want to be treated the same as our neighbors.
It also shows us how to stay out of trouble. Don't do things the law prohibits. But also, if you do things the law does not prohibit, you should not get in legal trouble later for having done something. This is how they went after Trump, by making up new law by fiat and then retroactively applying it. It's insane. Law applied in an insane manner leads to anarchy and disrespect for the law in general. This is what the liberals on the SCOTUS are doing and we lose respect for their version of the law, and THEM, everytime they speak.
They are no better than Whoopi Goldberg, Joy Behar, and company who think they are the arbiters of how the country should be run.
4 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
Strike3 6/28/2025 6:57:56 PM (No. 1970572)
Don't you just hate it when the truth is recorded in both sound and video forever?
3 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
Strike3 6/28/2025 7:02:30 PM (No. 1970574)
The Supreme Court should enact a practice much like Jack Welch did in the 1980s when he ran GE and recommended unloading the bottom ten percent performers in your work force every year. The SC should choose one justice to dismiss every four years instead of letting their mistakes be a curse upon them for a lifetime.
3 people like this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
MickTurn 6/29/2025 12:36:06 AM (No. 1970650)
Proving a blind squirrel finds an acorn every once and a while...........
1 person likes this.
Reply 16 - Posted by:
nwcudagal 6/29/2025 9:23:17 AM (No. 1970744)
Lifetime appointment should be abolished. The can serve terms like other lawmakers.
0 people like this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Dreadnought"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)