'Severely damages the presidency': Trump
lawyer urges appeals court to 'reverse'
E. Jean Carroll verdict based on a factor
that SCOTUS immunity decision didn't address
Law & Crime,
by
Matt Naham
Original Article
Posted By: sunset,
6/24/2025 10:28:12 PM
After failed attempts on at least two fronts to complicate or delay oral arguments, President Donald Trump's lawyers returned to federal court on Tuesday to once again appeal the $83 million defamation judgment that longtime advice columnist E. Jean Carroll won at the start of 2024. Presiding for the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals were Senior U.S. Circuit Judge Denny Chin, a Barack Obama appointee, and U.S. Circuit Judges Sarah Merriam and Maria Araújo Kahn, both Joe Biden appointees. Following an en banc rehearing denial in Trump's appeal of a $5 million civil jury verdict(snip)the panel also declined the president's request to push back scheduled oral arguments.
Post Reply
Reminder: “WE ARE A SALON AND NOT A SALOON”
Your thoughts, comments, and ideas are always welcome here. But we ask you to please be mindful and respectful. Threatening or crude language doesn't persuade anybody and makes the conversation less enjoyable for fellow L.Dotters.
Reply 1 - Posted by:
Catherine 6/24/2025 11:01:12 PM (No. 1969076)
Hope she hasn't spent a lot of money waiting for her award. She lied. It was obvious and provable. But as with all things during the Biden debacle, Trump never got a fair hearing. He's slowly but surely chipping away at the corruption during the President Autopen years.
21 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
LC Chihuahua 6/24/2025 11:27:48 PM (No. 1969082)
Lawfare pure and simple. Democrats have practically disqualified themselves from holding office because of this. We absolutely cannot afford any more lawfare judges. This is tyranny. When you have lawfare, you no longer have the rule of law. In a real government, many of these judges would be sent packing because they have abused their authority and position.
27 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
JimBob 6/25/2025 12:21:41 AM (No. 1969088)
"Presiding for the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals were Senior U.S. Circuit Judge Denny Chin, a Barack Obama appointee, and U.S. Circuit Judges Sarah Merriam and Maria Araújo Kahn, both Joe Biden appointees."
President Trump is in the same legal environment as a black guy in the deep South during the Jim Crow era.
The common factor:
Here and Now, as There and Then, it's Democ'RATS in charge!
12 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
john56 6/25/2025 1:50:21 AM (No. 1969109)
You know, it's amazing how quickly the "lawfare" trials against Trump got heard. If it weren't for Fani and her boyfriend, the farce in Georgia would have happened. And Jack Smith couldn't litigate his way out of a paper bag.
But the folks that tried their cases ... F Jean Looneybin and her anti-Trumper benefactor, Leticia James, and Bragg, all got their cases heard on the quick. Of course, the appeal court is so delayed that most of us will be pushing up daisies before they are heard and overturned as all three cases allowed the plantiff/prosecution to present their case with the filmsiest and phoniest of evidence while restricting Trump's lawyers from ANY serious defense.
I guess there's a couple lessons here ... New York courts (where all three of these were tried) make the courts in places like North Korea and Iran look fair and impartial. And if you're gonna sue somebody, find a way to include Donald Trump among the defendants. Your case will be moved up to the front of the line and when you win, it will be years before the appelate courts even start to think about it.
10 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
ARKfamily 6/25/2025 6:20:34 AM (No. 1969125)
Why wasn't E. Jean Carroll speaking up at the time the incident occurred? I thought every citizen in the United States has the right to a fair trial? Donald Trump has to pay E. Jean Carroll for a crime that he didn't get to prove his innocence?
From the article: "After repeating the claim that Trump never met Carroll, even though there is a photo of them meeting in the late 1980s, Smith slammed the trial judge, Senior U.S. District Judge Lewis Kaplan, for rulings that "prevented" Trump from "putting on critical evidence," and asserted that Trump never actually waived his immunity defense."
Funny how they post a picture claiming he never met her and, yet, haven't there been situations where a person can be in a conversation with someone at a function but don't know their name and casually talking?
9 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
mifla 6/26/2025 7:03:23 AM (No. 1969538)
She is not going to win. Not sure if she will still be alive (81 and counting) by the time all of this drags through the courts, but either way, she will see none of Trump's money.
0 people like this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "sunset"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
Comments:
The appeal is over the fact that President Trump was not given an opportunity to refute E. Jean Carroll's sexual abuse accusations during a defamation damages trial against him.