Biden at Human Rights Campaign Dinner:
‘Who in God’s Name Needs a Weapon
with 100 Rounds in the Chamber?’
Breitbart 2nd Amendment,
by
AWR Hawkins
Original Article
Posted By: Imright,
10/15/2023 9:49:25 PM
While speaking at the Human Rights Campaign National Dinner on Saturday night, President Joe Biden pushed for an “assault weapons” ban and asked, “Who in God’s name needs a weapon with 100 rounds in the chamber?”
Biden did not provide an example of a gun that holds 100 rounds in the chamber, but simply added, “That weapon’s only meant for one thing…to kill people.” (Video) Biden emphasized that an “assault weapons” ban was enacted once at the federal level and declared, “As long as I’m in office I’m not going to stop until we get it done again.”
He then transitioned to talk about the 1,000+ Israelis who were killed
Post Reply
Reminder: “WE ARE A SALON AND NOT A SALOON”
Your thoughts, comments, and ideas are always welcome here. But we ask you to please be mindful and respectful. Threatening or crude language doesn't persuade anybody and makes the conversation less enjoyable for fellow L.Dotters.
Reply 1 - Posted by:
cmardh 10/15/2023 10:00:31 PM (No. 1578193)
Ummmm……this horse’s a** never fails to disappoint.
34 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
bighambone 10/15/2023 10:06:59 PM (No. 1578198)
Obviously when it comes to modern firearms Biden does not have a clue, as there is not a semi-automatic firearm in the world that can chamber 100 rounds at the same time. All that Biden and the Democrats know is to refer to modern handguns, rifles, and shotguns by their Democrat made up key words “assault weapons” to unknowing Democrat audiences. Banning such firearms is just a favorite political issue for him and the Democrats.
33 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
rochow 10/15/2023 10:11:33 PM (No. 1578201)
What do you expect from a 5x draft dodger??
24 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
Birddog 10/15/2023 10:16:34 PM (No. 1578204)
"No one 'needs' a weapon that holds 100 rounds of ammo"....he then transitioned to talking about the thousands of unarmed Israelis slaughtered in their homes, in the streets...defenseless"
Made no mention of the millions of unarmed Americans who watched as thousands marched in THEIR streets praising the mass murders taking place in Israel, and promising to bring it here.
You do not NEED it until you NEED it...but when you NEED it? You need it NOW.
36 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
bighambone 10/15/2023 10:21:13 PM (No. 1578207)
It’s pretty bad when Biden refers to the Hamas terrorist organization as “a group of people” during a national TV interview that will be watched all over the world.
24 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
Catherine 10/15/2023 10:45:28 PM (No. 1578214)
For starters, the Israeli. Hundreds of babies and small children would be alive today.
26 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
snakeoil 10/15/2023 10:55:21 PM (No. 1578221)
If you live on the same planet as Fuzzie Wuzzie Muzzies you need everything you can get. Listening to Old Yeller discuss firearms is like listening to AOC discuss tensors. How can we take another year and two months of this low grade moron?
19 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
Lawsy0 10/15/2023 11:30:52 PM (No. 1578238)
Makes me wonder if Biden knows anything about God's name, even though he takes it in vain a lot.
12 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
DVC 10/15/2023 11:33:32 PM (No. 1578239)
Aside from the normal Traitor Joe stupidity about guns, and his impossible claim.....if we assume he meant to say "Who needs a gun with 100 rounds in the magazine".....that is ANYONE fighting terrorists, like the poor Israeli civilians. They NEEDED these, but their government actually DID prevent them from owning them - so they are dead.
Our 2nd Amendment say "The right of The People to keep and bear arms SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED".
Limiting magazine capacity is a clear infringement. And the taking of modern semi-auto rifles away from Israeli citizens got a lot of them killed. If they'd been able to own some AR-15 rifles with NORMAL capacity magazines - many would still be alive to day, with their children.
33 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
Jethro bo 10/15/2023 11:50:41 PM (No. 1578246)
How about a mother or father trying to defend their infant child from being beheaded by Joe Bien financed terrorist?
26 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
Old Army Vet 10/16/2023 12:29:06 AM (No. 1578255)
Biden is such a moron. His mind is gone and he needs to be removed from office. The only problem with that is that his VP is a bigger moron than he is. How did we get ourselves into this mess, oh I know, the dimocRATS did it.
15 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
bighambone 10/16/2023 12:37:57 AM (No. 1578257)
As an 17 year old infantryman near the DMZ in Korea I was assigned to carry a Browning Automatic Rifle (BAR). At the time the basic load of ammunition for a BAR was seven magazines each loaded with 20 rounds of 30 caliber ammunition. As I remember 6 loaded magazines were carried on an ammunition belt and one magazine was loaded in the weapon. As I also remember that the BAR itself weighed in at over 20 pounds and with all the loaded magazines plus a loaded backpack was darn heavy. I can’t imagine carrying a so-called “Assault Weapon” as Biden attempted to describe that had 100 rounds of ammunition “chambered” in it” plus a supposed basic load of like 700 additional rounds carried on an ammunition belt, as even for an experienced in shape infantry soldier used to “Humping the Yamas” of Korea that would be damn tough. Obviously when it comes to firearms, Biden does not know what he is talking about!
18 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
smokincol 10/16/2023 2:32:00 AM (No. 1578274)
it sounds like the bidenistas juiced him up really good for this speech
9 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
DiegoDude 10/16/2023 5:05:41 AM (No. 1578297)
That would be called a gross overfeed. What a dumb@$$. I guess the Israelis would beg to differ on having a lot of ammo.
6 people like this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
WhamDBambam 10/16/2023 6:35:51 AM (No. 1578334)
Sounds like an awesome gun, but probably has a significant kick.
5 people like this.
Reply 16 - Posted by:
Nimby 10/16/2023 6:48:24 AM (No. 1578340)
Hey genius!! The citizens of the USA need them to protect themselves from the criminals you are letting roam free
9 people like this.
Reply 17 - Posted by:
Hazymac 10/16/2023 6:56:32 AM (No. 1578345)
Complete effing idiot. And totally ignorant to boot. He knows nothing that's true, nothing about firearms.
4 people like this.
Reply 18 - Posted by:
homefry 10/16/2023 6:59:44 AM (No. 1578348)
HMMM??? Israel maybe? And the U.S. is next.
1 person likes this.
Reply 19 - Posted by:
Hazymac 10/16/2023 7:01:37 AM (No. 1578350)
FTA: "On June 21, 2022, Breitbart News noted there were nearly 25,000 AR-15 and AK47-style rifles in circulation in the U.S." That's off by a factor of a thousand. There are about 25,000,000 (twenty-five million) ARs and AKs in the hands of American citizens.
6 people like this.
Reply 20 - Posted by:
gusman 10/16/2023 8:54:07 AM (No. 1578417)
JOe only one round in the chamber at a time. 100 round mag? Isreali citizen right off the top of my head!!!
1 person likes this.
Reply 21 - Posted by:
WV.Hillbilly 10/16/2023 10:01:41 AM (No. 1578477)
Why did Rosa Parks need to sit in the front of the bus?
In a free country, there is no requirement to show need to exercise a right.
0 people like this.
Reply 22 - Posted by:
FLCracker 10/16/2023 10:55:43 AM (No. 1578519)
Ah, more weaponry advice from Mr. "Get Yourself a Shotgun; a Double-Barreled Shotgun." [Forget that. My shotgun has a magazine, for when just two shots won't do.]
Forget the magazine, for home defense in Israel you need a belt-fed weapon.
And #7, why do you denigrate good dog Ole Yeller like that?
1 person likes this.
Reply 23 - Posted by:
Strike3 10/16/2023 11:21:55 AM (No. 1578547)
Nobody because there's no such thing.
0 people like this.
Reply 24 - Posted by:
NYbob 10/16/2023 11:23:00 AM (No. 1578548)
Who needs a knife? Who needs a case of beer? Who needs a swimming pool? Who needs a riding lawnmower? YOU don't get to decide what a law abiding citizen owns. A criminal can and has murdered innocents with a rock. Careless people die from all kinds of things that are usually safe. Your ONLY job is to see that the constitution is adhered to, not diminished by nibbling around the edges.
The only difficult question here is, when does society confine and forcibly treat citizens with potentially harmful mental illness? While we decide on the trip wire for that problem, lock up criminals who commit gun crimes instead of plea bargaining with them.
0 people like this.
Reply 25 - Posted by:
RayLRiv 10/16/2023 11:42:15 AM (No. 1578577)
You can't stop me if I want a weapon with 100 rounds in the chamber - if I can afford it and I pass all the stringent rules. You can't stop me if I want to buy a tank or F-16 - if I can afford it and I pass all the stringent rules.
The 2nd Amendment was written to stop fools like Possum Faced Joe from preventing me from obtaining what I want. He does not decide what I own.
1 person likes this.
Reply 26 - Posted by:
broken01 10/16/2023 12:55:49 PM (No. 1578640)
The Joetato's statement reminds to of fellow democrat idiot former NY governor Andrew Cuomo. Remember when he famously asked, who needs 500 bullets to kill a dear? Someone had to remind that schmuck not every gun owner hunts. Even if they did what business is it or the Joetards or anybody in that fleabag regime.
1 person likes this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Imright"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)