Appeals court triggers 90-day clock in
Trump-E. Jean Carroll case
The Hill,
by
Ashleigh Fields
Original Article
Posted By: Harlowe,
7/11/2025 11:29:46 AM
CORRECTION: The mandate starting a 90-day clock for Trump to appeal the appeals court decision from last year was issued Thursday night. The appeals court last year had upheld a jury’s verdict finding Trump liable of sexually abusing and defaming writer E. Jean Carroll. An earlier story included incorrect information. - A federal appeals court on Thursday formally closed out President Trump’s appeal of a jury’s verdict finding him liable of sexually abusing and defaming writer E. Jean Carroll.
The mandate starts the 90-day clock for Trump to appeal the case to the Supreme Court.
Post Reply
Reminder: “WE ARE A SALON AND NOT A SALOON”
Your thoughts, comments, and ideas are always welcome here. But we ask you to please be mindful and respectful. Threatening or crude language doesn't persuade anybody and makes the conversation less enjoyable for fellow L.Dotters.
Reply 1 - Posted by:
jasonB 7/11/2025 11:36:11 AM (No. 1975924)
To paraphrase Trump, "Why are we even talking about this anymore. Who cares."
17 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
Californian 7/11/2025 11:53:13 AM (No. 1975932)
Uhm yeah so I can't remember anything and there's zero evidence and whatever it might have been was decades ago but there's a lot of money and a super friendly court and State so I'm going to rob him of every penny I'm not due while lying through my teeth, cackling all the way.
I look forward to the USSC explaining to NY things like the reason there's a statute of limitations and that even people they don't like have constitutional rights and protections.
32 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
Jethro bo 7/11/2025 11:56:22 AM (No. 1975934)
Would one expect anything else from a NY based court? Of course they upheld the verdict as it would e un New Yorker to rule based on the laws and for Trump. A law is based removing the statute of limitations and a trial without a shred of evidence is conducted. 3rd world laws with a Kangaroo court. The problem is unaccountability. These Inferior Court Black Robed Activist can do whatever they desire as little unelected dictators without any consequences. A Convention of States is needed and spell out the consequences for judges that have the full force of the Executive and Legislative branches participation. We have passed in to Judgeocracy and it needs to b e stopped.
21 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
franq 7/11/2025 12:03:23 PM (No. 1975937)
Proverbs 6 contains a list of six, yea, seven things the Lord hates. Among them: a proud look, a lying tongue, and those who sow discord. Leftists in a nutshell.
27 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
DVC 7/11/2025 12:51:26 PM (No. 1975948)
Absolutely zero evidence that Trump was ever within 20 miles of this lunatic, lying female. ZERO evidence of any interaction whatsoever, and yet a TDS infected group of craze jurors found him guilty.
NO evidence. So, so wrong.
26 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
singermom9 7/11/2025 1:04:52 PM (No. 1975951)
Listen to this TOTAL IDIOT - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ldP8YNAPlTw
Here at the very end she says - women think rape is sexy and tells cooper that "he is fascinating" to talk too, when he IMMEDIATELY goes to a break. Cooper better watch out. If he has $ she may come after him and say he ENTICED her on camera. As Barney Fife said "she is a NUT".
https://www.bing.com/videos/riverview/relatedvideo?q=anderson+cooper+e+jean+carroll+rape+is+sexy+you+are+so+interesting&&mid=8D4CCF047255976355698D4CCF04725597635569&FORM=VAMGZC
9 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
Catherine 7/11/2025 1:05:14 PM (No. 1975953)
So lets see if I got this right - she was on the second floor in the fitting room of a fancy dress shop in New York. We have to believe Trump entered the store, went up to the second floor, found the dressing room she was in, and raped her. No one else in the store saw him. Now here's where it gets better, she remembers the dress she was trying on but darn it all can't remember the exact date. Here's why, because if she gave us a date Trump would just have to check his calendar and find out where he was that day. End of case for Ms. Carroll. This should have been laughed out of court.
21 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
Harlowe 7/11/2025 1:10:52 PM (No. 1975955)
#1~ “Why...who cares.” / Because an innocent person should not be accused of guilt for reasons of personal integrity, family reputation, and public perception; people of conscience should not care whether that individual dwells in poverty or wealth. To dismiss this particular litigation for this particular individual simply because of his fame and fortune as “it goes with the territory and financially not a problem” is unconscionable and abhorrent. Throughout this entire pursuit, there have been questions raised about Ms. Carroll’s integrity, her financial ability to personally sustain expensive legal counsel, that she has a wealthy benefactor financially supporting this litigation, as well as the effort being a Democrat-funded hoax. Essentially, it is perceived as “liberal lawfare".
20 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
Harlowe 7/11/2025 2:03:23 PM (No. 1975986)
#8 Addendum to #1~ FTA: “A federal appeals court on Thursday formally closed out President Trump’s appeal of a jury’s verdict finding him liable of sexually abusing and DEFAMING WRITER E. JEAN CARROLL.” / Lest anyone forget, “defamation” is “the act of communicating false statements about a person that injure the reputation of that person : the act of defaming another.” For whatever it’s worth, there is an old adage that states, “when you point your finger at someone else, three fingers point back at you. It reminds us that we are not blameless.”
3 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
LC Chihuahua 7/11/2025 2:11:45 PM (No. 1975995)
This is one of those cases with a 9-digit reward. It needs to be thrown out. I remember E. J. Carroll writing some of the nastiest hit pieces on Trump. She is hateful and biased. She says Trump assaulted her. I don't believe her. I think she is a liar. I watch how the courts and other New York agencies handle this case, and it shows how far off the rails they have gone. Don't ever confuse this with governing. It's tyranny. Meanwhile all the Trump-haters will get in everyone's face and call Trump a rapist. That makes the Trump-haters liars and fools. They either don't believe the charges but repeat them anyway because they hate Trump or their decision-making capabilities do not exist.
11 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
jasonB 7/11/2025 2:51:40 PM (No. 1976016)
#8 Why don't I care, because anyone that has the ability to do something and can look passed child trafficking and r@pe, I really don't care what happens to them. And Trump sure was dismissive of those kids but, if it's about him I'm supposed to get the vapors and give a hoot? Outta here with that.
0 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
ARKfamily 7/11/2025 2:58:48 PM (No. 1976019)
I care. A civil court is not a criminal court. Donald Trump was never allowed a criminal court case because E. Jean Carroll did not speak up until he decided to run for President of USA.
13 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
Venturer 7/11/2025 4:04:17 PM (No. 1976050)
No way in hell will I believe Donald Trump raped this woman in a department store dressing room.
IMO she made the whole case up.
I care because no man should have to pay a liar for their lie.
11 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
stablemoney 7/11/2025 5:45:29 PM (No. 1976091)
The SC will remand the case to the lower courts with instructions to try the case based on statutory law, rather than political ambush.
3 people like this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
danu 7/11/2025 7:10:46 PM (No. 1976127)
this would not be happening if the judiciary acknowledged the disgusting violations of law and justice
by these poseurs--and fined them up the yin yang for deliberate harm to their fellow americans.
1 person likes this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Harlowe"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
Comments:
Ms. Carroll’s celebratory X post reaction: “So long. Old Man! The United States Court of Appeals, 2nd Circuit, bids thee farewell.” A possible appeal to the Supreme Court may or may not concur with the federal appeals court decision rendered July 10, 2025.