Empathy in the wake of violence
Chronicle-Telegram [Elyria, OH],
by
Rini Jeffers
Original Article
Posted By: Harlowe,
9/13/2025 12:54:21 PM
I didn't agree with Charlie Kirk, but I respected his First Amendment right to speak, though it's the Second Amendment he often spoke of so keenly. It will be a match race now to see which amendment will be the one most closely tied to his legacy, and that should grieve every American. (Snip) Trump did not order flags lowered in June, when Minnesota State Rep. Melissa Hortman, a Democrat, was assassinated alongside her husband ... Kirk once said gun deaths were worth the right to bear arms. (Snip) I don’t think his life, or anyone’s, is worth losing just so I can own a gun.
Post Reply
Reminder: “WE ARE A SALON AND NOT A SALOON”
Your thoughts, comments, and ideas are always welcome here. But we ask you to please be mindful and respectful. Threatening or crude language doesn't persuade anybody and makes the conversation less enjoyable for fellow L.Dotters.
Reply 1 - Posted by:
bpl40 9/13/2025 1:06:27 PM (No. 2003440)
The mistake Leftists make about the 2nd Amendment ( out of ignorance or deliberately) is that it is about firearms. It isn’t. It is about the basic, natural and God given right of self defense. If you will not fight for that what will you fight for?
13 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
philsner 9/13/2025 1:10:01 PM (No. 2003442)
Don't like "disclaimer first" articles.
6 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
earlybird 9/13/2025 1:17:53 PM (No. 2003446)
Thanks to OP for their usual wisdom.
I wonder how this woman, obsessed with the guilt of guns, feels about the pocket knife used to murder the Ukrainian woman on the Charlotte light rail?
17 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
Harlowe 9/13/2025 1:34:52 PM (No. 2003455)
“In the early 1900s, ‘to have empathy’ was to enliven an object or to project one’s own imagined feelings onto the world.” Sympathy “is a feeling of sincere concern for someone who is experiencing something difficult or painful” whereas “empathy involves actively sharing in the emotional experience of the other person.” Charlie Kirk was correct in his interpretations and comparisons.
Indeed, Ms. Jeffers is correct in “no good comes from the sewing of...bitter harvests, and we will eat the bitter fruits for generations.” The problem stems from the stem of the fruits being sewn by what appear to be leftist/liberal “empathies” that run the gamut: abortion, alcohol/drug abuse, American revisionist history, child abuse, Christian apathy, disregard for human life, entertainment industry, human trafficking, lack of proper parenting, mainstream media sins of omission/commission, moral decadence, transgenderism, etc. Evil has always hated/reviled what is good/true as evidenced throughout Scripture. Until the reality and acceptance of truth, law and order, are restored to this country, peaceful accord may be a long time coming.
6 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
Rather Read 9/13/2025 1:44:15 PM (No. 2003460)
Traffic deaths are inevitable when people own cars. As for gun ownership, evidently in Canada you can't own a gun, knife, bear spray or have your security camera range any further than your immediate residence. I suspect they will ban door locks next.
8 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
czechlist 9/13/2025 1:56:58 PM (No. 2003475)
Virtue signalling,incongruent comparisons, misinterpretations and even some projection.
Charlie was openly exercising his Constutional Rights and was murdered for it. He knew he faced that possibility each time he spoke and discussed his beliefs in unfriendly public forums. Be brave like Charlie. Get off your keyboard and engage and debate in person with those who disagree and convince us how we are wrong.
8 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
CactusStar 9/13/2025 2:35:57 PM (No. 2003499)
His life was about free speech as will be his legacy.
6 people like this.
Democrats thought the deaths of American citizens (Laken Riley, Jocelyn Nungary, Rachel Morin and many others) was worth it just to have open borders to increase their census numbers for congressional seats and electoral college votes.
3 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
JoElla Bee 9/13/2025 6:12:03 PM (No. 2003557)
Excellent comments, as always, OP.
Rini Jeffers writes:
“Two weeks ago I wrote that guns are the leading cause of death for our children. In America, 125 people a day are killed by guns.”
“Kirk’s death is being treated as a national tragedy.”
———
I don’t remember hearing of her. She doesn’t appear to be a hater in this particular piece, but her convoluted attempts at reasoning lead to the same flawed rationale as haters who have swallowed the purposeful leftist propaganda for taking away guns and eliminating the 2nd Amendment.
Responsible gun owners and supporters of the 2nd Amendment know that guns may be a leading method of violent death, but they are not the cause.
Charlie Kirk’s death is not being treated as a national tragedy because of the method of his death. It was not the gun that caused Charlie’s death. It was the deliberate motivation, mindset and heart of the person who used the gun to kill him. Common sense should tell us that guns, just as anything else, can be used for good or bad. Charlie supported the rights provided by the 2nd Amendment, not the abuse of it, or murder. Simply put, people, who deliberately choose to murder, use different methods; but, the cause is a choice that comes from within the heart (mind). That’s why the solution is punishment for the murderer and not elimination of rights to protect the innocent. Sadly, people blinded by irrational emotions, on the spectrum from love to hate, aren’t likely to change their minds, and guns are here to stay. That’s why their opinions must be defeated to prevent all of us from becoming victims to a dictatorship that controls us at the point of a gun.
2 people like this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Harlowe"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
Comments:
Here she is again with another emotional rather than intellectual perspective setting focus on guns while forgetting/ignoring that Scripture appears to permit circumstances of self-defense and that in Biblical times guns did not exist so guns may possibly have been an acceptable means of self-defense had guns been available. (Exodus 22:2, Luke 22:36) Further, the “boo-hoo” reference of flags not being lowered for a Democrat couple is so typical of envy/immaturity/pettiness.