The Colorado Supreme Court 4-3 Decision
Is Pure Nonsense and Can Be Laughed At,
They Even Admit It on Page 9
Conservative Treehouse,
by
Sundance
Original Article
Posted By: Ruhn,
12/19/2023 10:22:04 PM
Three main points before getting to the substance.(snip)As long as President Trump appeals the decision to the Supreme Court, the appeals court stays their own ruling – essentially indefinitely. The Colorado primary ballots printed, and the primary election will be over, before the Supreme Court puts this on their docket. In addition to the virtual guarantee the high court will overrule this political nonsense, SCOTUS can make the entire issue moot before them by following their own normal schedule for submissions, arguments, deliberation and opinions delivered by the court.
Post Reply
Reminder: “WE ARE A SALON AND NOT A SALOON”
Your thoughts, comments, and ideas are always welcome here. But we ask you to please be mindful and respectful. Threatening or crude language doesn't persuade anybody and makes the conversation less enjoyable for fellow L.Dotters.
Reply 1 - Posted by:
itsonlyme 12/19/2023 10:40:02 PM (No. 1620786)
Yes, the Knotseez are comfortable wearing black robes.
59 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
Northcross 12/19/2023 10:46:03 PM (No. 1620787)
I think those four jurists are guilty of insurrection, and should be removed from office under the 14th amendment. See, I can have opinions that don't matter too.
108 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
Dodge Boy 12/19/2023 10:52:02 PM (No. 1620788)
My state's lefty judicial and government in general continues to disgust me. Unfortunately, these are the outcomes that the Peoples Republic of Denver keep pushing for. The left markets itself evil better than the right markets its God-given values. We must press on and beat this evil...for good.
69 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
Quigley 12/19/2023 11:22:16 PM (No. 1620792)
FTA: “ I pledge to *withdraw* from the Colorado GOP primary unless Trump is also allowed to be on the state’s ballot, and I demand that Ron DeSantis, Chris Christie, and Nikki Haley to do the same immediately – or else they are tacitly endorsing this illegal maneuver which will have disastrous consequences for our country.”
This is the correct response. Trying to exploit this breach of duty coup like desantis is the wrong approach.
69 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
Newtsche 12/19/2023 11:38:34 PM (No. 1620795)
drip
drip
drip...
22 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
skacmar 12/20/2023 1:30:25 AM (No. 1620809)
The Judges were too cowardly to sign their own opinion. They also seem so sure that it will be overturned that it will not be effective and will be essentially suspended indefinitely. The political motivations of this ruling have nothing to do with any law or the Constitution. It is just blatant partisan lawfare.
67 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
Rinktum 12/20/2023 3:31:20 AM (No. 1620818)
#4, Vivek had the only comment worth anything. Why is it he is the only one of the candidates besides Trump that gets it?
66 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
mifla 12/20/2023 3:51:30 AM (No. 1620819)
OK red states, time to start throwing Biden off of your ballots.
Don't worry about coming up with a reason, it is not needed.
58 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
Krause 12/20/2023 6:04:13 AM (No. 1620866)
A State Supreme Court that is not a serious panel. Wow.
32 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
ARKfamily 12/20/2023 6:17:45 AM (No. 1620869)
And Democrats/liberals want me to believe that there was no cheating in the 2020 election. In my humbled opinion, the actions they are NOW taking convicts them.
65 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
5 handicap 12/20/2023 6:19:02 AM (No. 1620870)
Time to introduce these Jurists to Mr Molotov in the residences around 0300...
16 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
bpl40 12/20/2023 7:36:49 AM (No. 1620908)
These same judges (or ones similar to them) will sit in judgement when claims of ballot/vote fraud are brough forth next November. Only a rope and a lamp post will fix this rot!
23 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
snapper451 12/20/2023 7:39:51 AM (No. 1620909)
I predict that Nikki is out there saying that the CO decision is the correct one and she and Krispy Creme will remain on the CO ballot, because you know, they are "holier than thou".
20 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
Clinger 12/20/2023 7:44:27 AM (No. 1620912)
Hat tip to #4, that is the only acceptable response from the GOP.
23 people like this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
Lizzyboo 12/20/2023 7:48:26 AM (No. 1620913)
Apparently I will simply have to write President Trump’s name onto my ballot. The Denver/Boulder Liberals continue to screw up our State. If you look up the Justices on the Colorado Supreme Court all of them claim Nonpartisan as their political party affiliation. Does anyone here believe that nonsense?
22 people like this.
Reply 16 - Posted by:
skacmar 12/20/2023 8:00:19 AM (No. 1620921)
#15. The ruling also barred write in votes for Trump from being counted as a further layer of ridiculousness.
24 people like this.
Reply 17 - Posted by:
TCloud 12/20/2023 8:18:52 AM (No. 1620931)
A Royal Tar and Feathering is in order!
14 people like this.
Reply 18 - Posted by:
LLAMA 12/20/2023 8:18:58 AM (No. 1620933)
Surely there is some provision in Colorado law that deals with judicial incompetence and/or blatant political interference from the bench? This would be the time and place for that, if so.
17 people like this.
Reply 19 - Posted by:
LC Chihuahua 12/20/2023 8:19:07 AM (No. 1620934)
How does this represent the people of Colorado? How many registered Republicans wanted Trump removed from their primary ballot? Most likely a very small minority. So, the Colorado Supreme Court ignores the wishes of the majority in favor of a minority. BS! The Colorado Republican Party should cancel their primary if this ruling stands.
20 people like this.
Reply 20 - Posted by:
nwcudagal 12/20/2023 8:29:28 AM (No. 1620942)
Playing politics is not in their job description . . .or is it?
13 people like this.
Reply 21 - Posted by:
Lazyman 12/20/2023 8:58:07 AM (No. 1620970)
More proof that the legalization of marijuana has consequences.
21 people like this.
Reply 22 - Posted by:
janjan 12/20/2023 9:19:45 AM (No. 1620987)
These judges are making a mockery of the judicial system and beclowning themselves in the process. Based on their ruling that the decision will be stayed if there is a US SC appeal this looks more like a prank than a serious process. How dare they play with the SC’s time like this.
18 people like this.
Reply 23 - Posted by:
rikkitikki 12/20/2023 9:26:58 AM (No. 1620995)
Which only serves to highlight that to liberal judges, their own opinions always, always, always, supersede the actual law itself. Just make up a ruling to suit your political goals, the law be damned, because your liberal electorate chose you for that specific task.
As unelected officials, their partners in crime are also using the same flawed logic to rewrite the US Constitution...the public be damned.
17 people like this.
Reply 24 - Posted by:
Ruhn 12/20/2023 9:36:41 AM (No. 1621007)
Just to reiterate, the CO SC ruling removing Trump from the ballot goes nowhere. It has no teeth because it's not enforced. The court knows the ruling is on VERY shaky Constitutional ground as it is. IOW, why would the CO SC stay its own ruling? And it will stay indefinitely on the assumption that Trump will appeal (which he will) NLT 4 Jan. When the appeal goes before the USSC they will shoot it down. At that point it doesn't really matter because Trump will be on the CO primary ballot anyway.
All of this is just plain lawfare smoke and mirrors. As Sundance puts it: "Lawfare is a construct for media consumption intended to manipulate public opinion."
12 people like this.
Reply 25 - Posted by:
uforabin 12/20/2023 9:43:50 AM (No. 1621015)
Right #8. The court decided to keep Donald Trump off the ballot for participating in an insurrection when, by definition, there wasn’t an insurrection; nor was he even charged with that, let alone convicted. By the same token, attorneys in every state should be able to challenge Biden’s name appearing on the primary ballot simply based on all the evidence piling up for treason, bribery, and corruption whether he has been convicted of those things or not.
16 people like this.
Reply 26 - Posted by:
Zigrid 12/20/2023 10:21:40 AM (No. 1621052)
It's amazing just how twisted the democrats are...this judgement is just another nail in their coffin...Americans are p--sed off and their attempt at undoing the constitutional protections is out there for all to see...the FBI must have some information on the justices to make them call this play at this time of the election joke called the presidential election of 2024....
14 people like this.
Reply 27 - Posted by:
broken01 12/20/2023 10:45:39 AM (No. 1621066)
This is beyond unconstitutional from a rouge leftist Colorado kangaroo court. I'm trying to remain in the Christmas spirit, but the dopey left is making it very, very hard. Before my blood pressure goes up, I'll just say that I agree with #8 one hundred percent. It's pass time to fight fire with fire. The Child Sniffer-in-Thief aka Creepy, Sleepy, Gropy, Sloppy Joe needs to be kick off EVERY Red State Ballot. For his callous disregard for the safety of We the People due to our Southern border being open wider that Chris Christie's mouth at an all you can eat buffet. That's reason enough to do what the Kooky Colorado supreme court did.
8 people like this.
Reply 28 - Posted by:
NotaBene 12/20/2023 12:04:57 PM (No. 1621113)
Finally the US Supreme Court will have to decide an election case. They let the last presidential be stolen and now we are stuck with Illegitimate Biden and his War.
Democrats are giving lawyers a bad name.
4 people like this.
Reply 29 - Posted by:
mc squared 12/20/2023 12:05:35 PM (No. 1621114)
Just think of the possibilities if this is allowed to stand. A friendly court could bar a whole slew of candidates they don't like. Essentially selecting a POTUS by unelected toadies.
5 people like this.
Reply 30 - Posted by:
earlybird 12/20/2023 12:31:49 PM (No. 1621127)
Did anyone read Page 9?
As long as President Trump appeals the decision to the Supreme Court, the appeals court stays their own ruling – essentially indefinitely. The Colorado primary ballots printed, and the primary election will be over, before the Supreme Court puts this on their docket.
7 people like this.
Reply 31 - Posted by:
singermom9 12/20/2023 12:50:17 PM (No. 1621137)
OK so if we get all the red states to eliminate ALL dems from the ballot so only repubs win-sounds fair-The dems set the rules.
6 people like this.
I never thought I would say this ...but a big thanks to Blue State, CO...for putting our main candidate...Trump...over the top. Your unsigned opinion
of banning Trump from your ballot. will galvanize even never-Trumpers to put our guy into the WH. So Thank-you...Thank-you.
2 people like this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Ruhn"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)