Post New Article

House PASSES bill to codify same-sex marriage:
47 Republicans including Liz Cheney and
Elise Stefanik join Democrats to send
bill to Senate - where it faces a tougher passage

Original Article

Posted By: Ribicon, 7/19/2022 7:17:08 PM

The House on Tuesday night voted 267 to 157 to pass a bill that would recognize same-sex marriage in federal law. Forty-seven Republicans joined all Democrats in sending the Defense of Marriage Act to the Senate where it faces a tougher challenge of getting through. The vote came amid concerns that the Supreme Court ruling overturning Roe v. Wade abortion access could jeopardize other rights.(Snip)Liz Cheney, GOP conference chair Elise Stefanik and NRCC chair Tom Emmer were among members of their party to cross the aisle. Scott Perry of the Freedom Caucus and Nancy Mace, who is facing a tough midterm, also sided with Democrats.

Comments:

This is not a federal issue.

Post Reply

Reply 1 - Posted by: FL_Absentee_Voter 7/19/2022 7:25:44 PM (No. 1221754)
Indeed. States' rights. The only way to federally codify it would be an amendment to the Constitution.
46 people like this.

Reply 2 - Posted by: bamapreacher 7/19/2022 7:45:51 PM (No. 1221784)
I don't know that any Christian church bans interracial marriages, but some churches do ban same sex marriages, notably 4 of the 5 largest denominations in the U.S. Try to force them to accept same sex marriage and they will either have to break the law or fold, and as much as liberals want to destroy Christianity I don't think people will stand for forcing churches to close. Civil wars have been fought over things like that.
50 people like this.

Reply 3 - Posted by: Michaelus 7/19/2022 7:49:42 PM (No. 1221788)
It can never be legal to force us to pretend that a man can marry a man. They might as well make a Federal law declaring that Pete Buttigieg's rectum shall henceforth be called his uterus.
67 people like this.

Reply 4 - Posted by: Jesuslover54 7/19/2022 7:50:15 PM (No. 1221789)
Is this same-sex or same-sex as self-identified?
24 people like this.

Reply 5 - Posted by: BarryNo 7/19/2022 7:51:29 PM (No. 1221791)
We need to make them unwelcome. Very unwelcome.
30 people like this.

Reply 6 - Posted by: jimboscott 7/19/2022 7:55:31 PM (No. 1221798)
I do not believe in same sex marriage as a religious institution but it IS a state's rights issue and, there has to be some form of reciprocity involved. That brings issues of interstate commerce or equal protection into the equation as the legal status, and financial state of a 'married' gay couple could change as they travel to or pass through other states. Let's say New York recognizes social security benefits for a 'married' gay man that are based upon a deceased spouse. What happens to that benefit if the 'widower' moves to a state in which gay marriages are not recognized? There needs to be either NO gay marriages allowed OR some means by which the benefits afforded by one state are in some manner recognized by all other states. I think this is a legitimate question that has to be dealt with through the legislative process.
17 people like this.

Reply 7 - Posted by: Submariner 7/19/2022 7:57:06 PM (No. 1221800)
Stefanik's vote is a surprise disappointment
53 people like this.

Reply 8 - Posted by: Anti_democRAT 7/19/2022 8:15:28 PM (No. 1221825)
It just sounds wrong.
21 people like this.

Reply 9 - Posted by: enemyofthestate 7/19/2022 8:19:27 PM (No. 1221829)
Two men----- typically not monogamous, their dirty little secret they don't want you to know about---- playing house.
19 people like this.

Reply 10 - Posted by: Zeek Wolfe 7/19/2022 8:23:15 PM (No. 1221837)
This vote will be useful in weeding out the RINOs and putting them on unimportant committees after the November election. RINOs in house leaderships roles? Bounce them out, we do not need any Hasterts, Boehners or Ryans in the next session of congress.
38 people like this.

Reply 11 - Posted by: padiva 7/19/2022 8:33:09 PM (No. 1221848)
It appears that these stupid dems have the memory of a gnat. The 10th Amendment applies to lots of things. Grow up and read the Constitution. Don't wait for the SCOTUS to make you behave.
25 people like this.

Reply 12 - Posted by: wakeupcall 7/19/2022 8:46:09 PM (No. 1221857)
Lucifer loving political helpers of all that is evil forcing Lucifer's evil onto everyone.
15 people like this.

Reply 13 - Posted by: DVC 7/19/2022 8:47:38 PM (No. 1221859)
Nutty, Nasty Nancy's House has passed a lot of gas that is just like regular old passed gas. They stink a lot, but quickly dissipate.
14 people like this.

Reply 14 - Posted by: deerejon 7/19/2022 8:57:45 PM (No. 1221873)
Well, we now know where Elise Stefanik's values are.Right along side with Democrats.She just lost her credibility with Me.
42 people like this.

Reply 15 - Posted by: Venturer 7/19/2022 8:59:20 PM (No. 1221875)
These 47 people are not Republicans.
34 people like this.

Reply 16 - Posted by: Muguy 7/19/2022 10:27:58 PM (No. 1221938)
There used to be a “Defense of Marriage Act” This is nothing more than a “just play gay” effort. Stefanick just lost a great deal of respect over this farce
19 people like this.

Reply 17 - Posted by: mifla 7/20/2022 4:31:59 AM (No. 1222068)
Pelosi has obviously learned nothing from the recent Supreme Court ruling. Here we go again.
10 people like this.

Reply 18 - Posted by: Rinktum 7/20/2022 5:55:35 AM (No. 1222101)
Democrats and evidently some Republicans are determined to push this issue to the forefront. Now, why would that be? It is designed to divide the Republican Party and it looks like it has been a success. Are we going to codify every sexual proclivity from here on out? Marriage is an act between one man and one woman and a vast amount of voters in this country believe this. Codifying gay marriage into federal law is not only unconstitutional, see Roe v. Wade, but it is a religious belief. Democrats are desperately trying to stir the pot of divisiveness and make this an issue right before the mid terms. Because of the definition of marriage that I hold to, I cannot support this. Put a Christian up against the wall on any moral issue and they will, most likely make a decision based upon their religious beliefs. I guess the days of tolerance is over. Now, we are going to be forced to take a stand. I cannot support a federal codification of gay marriage.
29 people like this.

Reply 19 - Posted by: LaVallette 7/20/2022 6:05:00 AM (No. 1222106)
Total waste of time and just a bit of woke VIRTUE SIGNALLING by the Demonrats and the few "holier than thou" RINOS. Either the issue is permitted under the US Constitution and therefore no need for separate legislation, or NOT PERMITTED under the US Constitution and the law is rendered immediately futile as "unconstitutional" and goes to the States to determine. SIMPLES. BTW: Any law that is in conflict with Natural Science and the Natural Order is called a "legal fiction" and regardless of its intent it is an outright intellectual Fraud. Well may legislatures bring down a law that says "the earth is flat" or "the sun rises in the west", each is intellectually absurd and an offends human sensibilities. "Same sex marriage" is such a legal fiction, but INTERRACIAL MARRIAGE is not.
14 people like this.

Reply 20 - Posted by: Historybuff 7/20/2022 6:26:24 AM (No. 1222122)
Up next? Polygamy!
16 people like this.

Reply 21 - Posted by: ARKfamily 7/20/2022 6:27:24 AM (No. 1222123)
#2, close a church? No, churches will just have to become smarter. If a couple wants to get married at a church, they must be members of the church and go through 6-12 months of premarital counseling. . .
10 people like this.

Reply 22 - Posted by: msjena 7/20/2022 8:06:00 AM (No. 1222222)
Congress has no authority to regulate marriage. It isn't a Commerce Clause issue. But will the Supreme Court strike it down?
12 people like this.

Reply 23 - Posted by: bigfatslob 7/20/2022 8:15:46 AM (No. 1222234)
The world's on fire and this is what our government tackles as important. We don't have a government just rich nitwits navel gazing idiots with a fraud president.
21 people like this.

Reply 24 - Posted by: msjena 7/20/2022 8:17:08 AM (No. 1222236)
Which Democrat Senator will vote against it? And they will need more than one, because Murk and Collins and maybe even Romney are likely to vote for it.
8 people like this.

Reply 25 - Posted by: lakerman1 7/20/2022 8:20:24 AM (No. 1222240)
Stefanik's congressional district is such that sh,e has to take certain positions, to stay in office. Senator William Fulbright, the Arkansas liberal, voted against the 1964 Civil Rights Act. He explained that he had to do that, to get reelected. As for the question about one state recognizing another state's law, there is a 'full faith and credit' clause in the U.S. Constitution, where states are required to do so.
9 people like this.

Reply 26 - Posted by: Right Time 7/20/2022 8:20:55 AM (No. 1222241)
Do these Leftist Democrats not read the US Constitution?...Or think that you didn't? There is this little thing called "enumerated powers." And the 10th Amendment. Ready for another SCOTUS Slapdown, Dems?
5 people like this.

Reply 27 - Posted by: Right Time 7/20/2022 8:25:30 AM (No. 1222248)
Stefani's vote is disappointing, but no surprise. I don't trust her and she plays both sides of the street. She is too tight with McConnell
12 people like this.

Reply 28 - Posted by: chillijilli 7/20/2022 8:41:39 AM (No. 1222270)
It ISN'T marriage. Just call it something else, like "Same Sex Partnership Agreement" and be done with it. The problem most people have is that words mean something and they vigorously resist redefining a word that has been acceptable and used worldwide to mean one man and one woman since 2350BC.
19 people like this.

Reply 29 - Posted by: CivilServant 7/20/2022 8:46:40 AM (No. 1222279)
Expanding on #6, the exact same arguments apply to my CCW.
3 people like this.

Reply 30 - Posted by: udanja99 7/20/2022 9:04:55 AM (No. 1222306)
I’m not the least bit surprised that Mace voted for it. She is persona non grata among my friends. I will probably write in a vote for Katie Arrington in November. #20 beat me to it. If same sex “marriage” is legal and being codified, how can the congress and SCOTUS ban polygamy? And after that…….
6 people like this.

Reply 31 - Posted by: Dodge Boy 7/20/2022 9:09:25 AM (No. 1222314)
What #3 said.
3 people like this.

Reply 32 - Posted by: Blue-Z-Anna 7/20/2022 9:09:28 AM (No. 1222315)
Read the 10th amendment and then get back to me.
2 people like this.

Reply 33 - Posted by: PrayerWarrior 7/20/2022 9:12:50 AM (No. 1222318)
When we lived in California, we had a vote (proposition) many years ago on same sex marriage. The citizens voted it down. Even the Black Community democrats voted against same sex marriage. What did the Left do? They went to the courts. The CA Supreme Court ruled against the citizens of CA and said same sex marriage would be the law of the land, even though the people voted against it. That's how the U.S. Supreme Court ruled against the American people in the States violating the 10th Amendment. The Supreme Court's ruling was not based on the Constitution, but "found" same sex marriage in some convoluted twisted thinking there. You can thank Justice Kennedy for that.
11 people like this.

Reply 34 - Posted by: PrayerWarrior 7/20/2022 9:20:33 AM (No. 1222331)
We regret sending money several times to Elise Stefanik. We won't do that again.
7 people like this.

Reply 35 - Posted by: moebellini3 7/20/2022 9:38:05 AM (No. 1222361)
Ah yes, gay marriage, where diseases like Hiv/Aids and monkeypox flourish. It's a civil union not a marriage. Since the beginning of time, amongst every species on the planet marriage is between a man and a woman, a male and a female. You see the gay community and it's ring leader, Barack Hussein Obama would not settle for a civil union because they had to demean and cheapen marriage in the face of the church. From that time on their sick perverted agenda has invaded our school systems and destroyed our society. Wake up...
10 people like this.

Reply 36 - Posted by: GoodDeal 7/20/2022 10:17:56 AM (No. 1222409)
Codifying immorality and sin. Those Republicans will have a special place in line at the bottomless pit and lake of fire.
5 people like this.

Reply 37 - Posted by: MDConservative 7/20/2022 10:34:53 AM (No. 1222442)
FTA: "...top Republican leaders did not whip lawmakers to hold the party line against the bill." LOL! It's called politics, folks. Misdirection, lies and broken promises litter the landscape. Today's "heroes" are tomorrow's traitors, betraying this or that great principle with a vote or two. There is no honor in politics, only survival and seniority. When will folks wake up that there is no trustworthy politician, none whatsoever. This proposal and vote did exactly what the Dems expected. Flushed out those RINOS, some so highly thought of by "real conservatives". And now the RINOS can be flushed out of the system...you think. Realize, Republican leadership allowed a "free vote" on this. All RINOS...right? Go primary them. You can bet virtually all will be re-elected, the only exceptions might be weak sisters running for a second term in a normally Dem district.
6 people like this.

Reply 38 - Posted by: ironchefw 7/20/2022 10:55:36 AM (No. 1222470)
I understand the theater of this action, but if SCOTUS were to overturn the gay marriage case with similar logic to Dobbs, then why wouldn't this "codification" be immediately nullified, too? As in, this law isn't as strong as its supporters think or want their voters to think.
2 people like this.

Reply 39 - Posted by: Zigrid 7/20/2022 10:58:06 AM (No. 1222475)
Who really gives a flying doodle...it's not a constitutional right...but if you want validation for this move...I really don't care...I know in my heart what is right and will conduct myself accordingly...this "in your face" move doesn't mean a thing to me....cheney has lost all credibility with Americans...so let her do her huff and puff for the cameras...if this an attempt at closing the christian churches...give US your best shot...my church gets fuller every Sunday...so I'm thinking it's not working...
4 people like this.

Reply 40 - Posted by: Mass Minority 7/20/2022 11:34:43 AM (No. 1222528)
This actually is a federal issue. The argument is about extending federally granted priveleges to same sex couples, most obvios those in the federal tax code. This is how this issue should have been dealt with at the outset. The supreme court should never have been involved in the first place. Marriage is NOT a right, not for you, not for me and not far anyone else, same sex or not. the real argument is the insistance on calling it marriage and trying to force the idea that it is the same as the normal definition of mariage. Leave the sexes of the participanta out of the discussion for the moment. Marriage, as historically understood in the western sense is a religious institution, it is a covenant between two adults and God and is sanctified by a religious leader inside the church. In all Western religions the two adult participants have been required to be one man and one woman. The fed cannot change this, thats a first amendment right for the churched to be independant from gov interference. The priveleges married couples have enjoyed were initiated to protect and nurture children. To support stable and long lasting families to uphold the social order. They can be revoked at any time by a simple majority vote in congress. They cannot annul your marriage, that is a religious act, but they can take away all of the legal protections, the tax status, the inheritance issues, the medical care issues, all of it. The only issue at hand is if we as a people feel that an altered definition of a familial unit is good for societal stability and should the definition of who is eligable for these government priveleges be expanded. Thats it. The term marriage should be reserved for the religious institution it is. In the eyes of government all of our marriages are simple civil contracts, a contract whose terms can be arbitrarily changed by gov alone at any time and for any reason. The intransigent insistence of the use of the term marriage by the left has nothing to do with codifying government privleges and everything to do with exerting power over their opponents. They argue it's just a word and we should give it up yet call the argument that it is just a word and they should give it up as facetious and stupid. They want to use this argument not as a simple redefinition of government privlege but as a means of government endorsement for a lifestyle the vast majority of Americans can tolerate but do not wish to celebrate. Ultimately it is a means to further divide us and to provide a political talking point of derogation of the opposition party. And that is an abuse of power.
3 people like this.

Reply 41 - Posted by: Rumblehog 7/20/2022 12:16:46 PM (No. 1222564)
To "codify" does not make it Constitutional, as the Supreme Court will soon enough have a chance to determine. These homosexuals are depraved degenerate deviants and should not have ANY laws passed in their behalf, especially when it comes to one of our sacred institutions of marriage, which is ONLY between a man and a woman. Guess what Demonrats? We'll do you one better by passing a Constitutional Amendment establishing "Marriage" as being between a biological MALE and a biological FEMALE!
5 people like this.

Reply 42 - Posted by: whyyeseyec 7/20/2022 12:32:39 PM (No. 1222583)
Dems always do this close to an election in an effort to back the GOP into a corner on an issue. Vote NO and you're vilified as as homophobic. Let's see if the GOP cave or hold their ground. I'm betting they'll cave for votes.
3 people like this.

Reply 43 - Posted by: kiwinews 7/20/2022 2:01:07 PM (No. 1222666)
If this is to be done this is the way it should have been done in the first place. Legislated by the People's representatives, not judicial fiat.
1 person likes this.

Reply 44 - Posted by: Safari Man 7/20/2022 2:48:34 PM (No. 1222702)
So now a man can marry his father and bypass inheritance taxes?
1 person likes this.

Reply 45 - Posted by: davew 7/20/2022 7:58:14 PM (No. 1222936)
There is no mention of "a right to marriage" in the body of, or any of the 25 functional amendments to the US Constitution. This was the same argument that was applied to overturning Roe v. Wade. The only statutes of anti-discrimination legislation not in the Constitution that have been upheld over many years are the 1964 and 1968 Civil Rights acts. The legal foundation of these acts was the Constitutional provisions to regulate interstate commerce which require "public accomodations" for all citizens. Since secular marriages are licensed and regulated under each state's law there is no possible interstate commerce interpretation that would apply. This is actually a moot point since on June 26, 2015, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down all state bans on same-sex marriage, legalized it in all fifty states, and required states to honor out-of-state same-sex marriage licenses in the case Obergefell v. Hodges. The legislation is virtue signalling and a political stunt in an election year.
0 people like this.

Reply 46 - Posted by: davew 7/20/2022 9:37:34 PM (No. 1222994)
Obergefell v. Hodges overturned the state's bans on same sex marriage based on the equal protection language of the 14th Amendment. Discrimination based on sex is explicitly banned by the amendment although it could be argued that the states allowed men and women equal protection to get "married" as defined as a union between people of the opposite sex. I've always believed the opinion had the effect of banning states from defining legal terms that liberals didn't agree with but...this ship has sailed and the fact that Stefanik signed on further proves it was meaningless virtue signaling. Nice to know the Congress has done so well with illegal immigration, inflationary energy policy, national defense, and fiscal responsibility that they have time for the really important stuff like virtue signaling.
0 people like this.

Reply 47 - Posted by: jerrodmason 7/21/2022 1:39:26 AM (No. 1223145)
It's not cut-and-dried. Legitimate federal interests may arise from the tax code and social security.
0 people like this.

Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Ribicon"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
Most Recent Articles posted by Ribicon"
Migrants sent to NYC amid homeless shelter
crisis have no local ties, were directed
here by Biden admin
6 replies
Posted by Ribicon 7/21/2022 12:28:22 AM Post Reply
Some of the migrants who Mayor Eric Adams says are overloading the city’s homeless shelters have no ties to the Big Apple—but were still directed here by President Biden’s administration, The Post has learned. Outside a city Department of Homeless Services intake center in The Bronx, Veronica Prada, 28, said Wednesday that she, her husband and their four kids left their native Venezuela on April 26 and crossed the US-Mexico border into San Antonio, Texas, on July 11. They were greeted by Border Patrol agents who took them and other migrants to a processing facility where immigration officials gave the family information on how to apply for asylum
Inside Provincetown’s ‘Herculean’
effort to save the summer from monkeypox
5 replies
Posted by Ribicon 7/21/2022 12:10:53 AM Post Reply
Provincetown–Dr. Andy Jorgensen knew he was in a race against time. By early June it was clear the outbreak of monkeypox, a relative of smallpox that is rarely fatal but causes a painful rash that can last for weeks, was spreading through the gay community.(Snip)Gates had trawled through Instagram, individually messaging people to invite them to town halls and to get vaccinated. Community leaders enlisted bartenders and drag queens to spread information further, Gates said. Now, during Bear Week, when thousands descended on Provincetown to celebrate the culture of the bearded and burly gay men known as “bears,” officials and activists exuded a clear-eyed calm
Defense bill directs Pentagon to end costly
search for extremism in military ranks
4 replies
Posted by Ribicon 7/20/2022 11:05:36 PM Post Reply
Senate lawmakers want the military to end a program created after the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol to eliminate White nationalists and other extremists from its ranks. The language calling for an end to the effort is contained in a report accompanying the Senate’s annual defense policy bill, and it cites a Pentagon analysis showing that the military has spent hundreds of thousands of dollars and devoted millions of hours searching for extremism in its service branches, even though it is exceedingly uncommon. “The committee believes that spending additional time and resources to combat exceptionally rare instances of extremism in the military is an inappropriate use
Children up to four years old were just
as likely to die from the flu or a stroke
as Covid at the height of the Omicron
wave, data shows - and those aged 5 to
14 were FOUR TIMES more likely to die
from cancer
3 replies
Posted by Ribicon 7/20/2022 10:20:56 PM Post Reply
Children up to four years old were just as likely to die from flu or a stroke as COVID-19 during the final months of 2021—the start of the Omicron wave, a DailyMail.com analysis of official statistics has revealed. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) published its estimates for the fatality rate for leading causes of death over October to December last year on Wednesday. Data showed that despite the surge in infections at the time, fatalities caused by Covid remained minimal among American children less than 15 years old—with the disease not becoming the leading cause of death. Among children aged one to four years cancer
Florida school board candidate says doctors
who treat trans kids ‘should be hanging
from the nearest tree’
9 replies
Posted by Ribicon 7/20/2022 10:14:00 PM Post Reply
A Florida school board candidate said at a forum earlier this week that doctors who offer gender-affirming treatment to kids should be lynched—and the shocking remarks were received with enthusiastic applause. Alisabeth Janai Lancaster—who introduced herself as a “mother and a grandmother of three” who’s a conservative with “Christian values”—is running in Santa Rosa County School District 3, in northwestern Florida.(Snip)“These doctors that are going along with mutilating these children and prescribing hormone blockers to these kids, in my opinion, they should be hanging from the nearest tree,” she said. Lancaster started off by saying that she would “love to see prayer reinstated [in schools]
Unvaccinated Novak Djokovic will NOT play
the US Open after tournament confirmed
it will follow US government advice and
not admit citizens who have not had their shot
11 replies
Posted by Ribicon 7/20/2022 5:08:36 PM Post Reply
Novak Djokovic's hopes of playing in the US Open suffered another blow after the tournament said it would respect the United States government's rules on the Covid-19 vaccine. The US require non-citizens to be fully vaccinated against coronavirus to enter, meaning Djokovic, who has made it repeatedly clear that he will not take the vaccine, will not be allowed entry. Djokovic was hopeful of competing in the US Open next month but won't risk a repeat of the deportation furor he went through in Australia. The unvaccinated tennis star was booted out of Australia ahead of the Melbourne Slam back in January after the government decided he'd broken strict
Brooklyn Public Library Advertises Pornographic
Books to Teens
12 replies
Posted by Ribicon 7/20/2022 1:32:30 PM Post Reply
The Brooklyn Public Library (BPL) is holding a campaign that seeks to share controversial, sexually explicit books with teens. The library’s campaign, called “Books Unbanned,” specifically seeks to give teens access to books that showcase pornographic material. On the Books Unbanned page, the Brooklyn Public Library points out that “Most targeted books were for a teen audience and were by or about Black or LGBTQIA+ persons” but does not reference the sexually explicit and often graphic nature of many of the titles.(Snip)Even more jarring, Jonathan Evison’s Lawn Boy is not only sexually explicit, but features a sexual encounter between fourth graders. Other books on the list discuss masturbation.
‘The Great Globalist’ vs ‘Theresa
May 2.0’: Final Contestants For Next
UK PM Will See W.E.F. Win Either Way
2 replies
Posted by Ribicon 7/20/2022 1:01:12 PM Post Reply
The next Prime Minister of the United Kingdom will either be former Chancellor Rishi Sunak or Foreign Minister Liz Truss, both long-term allies of outgoing leader Boris Johnson, associates of the World Economic Forum, and representing a basic status-quo position rather than one of change.(Snip)Both candidates represent a basic continuity position with outgoing Prime Minister Boris Johnson, albeit with less charisma and public recognition, which may ultimately leave some Conservatives wondering why they bothered to go through this damaging competition to replace Johnson at all. There is some deviance in their vision though. While neither proposes any important change to the program of government,
'Look, the border is secure': Alejandro
Mayorkas makes stunning claim with more
than 200,000 migrants passing every month
for three months, the most crossings in
a year in history and as DC and New York
say they are feeling the strain'
20 replies
Posted by Ribicon 7/20/2022 12:42:35 PM Post Reply
The Biden administration continues to assure that the southern border is 'secure' despite record-setting numbers of illegal crossings and proliferation of the crisis over the last few months. 'Look, the border is secure,' Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Alejandro Matorkas insisted during remarks at the Aspen Security Forum in Colorado on Tuesday. But he added that the administration is still 'working to make the border more secure.' 'That has been a historic challenge,' Mayorkas said, adding that there is a difference between the words 'safe' and 'secure.'(Snip)The last quarter's figures show that 200,000 migrants passed through the southern border every month for the last three months.
‘Glad to have a president who can ride
a bicycle’: Buttigieg dismisses Republican
claims about Biden’s health
23 replies
Posted by Ribicon 7/20/2022 12:35:00 PM Post Reply
Pete Buttigieg fended off a Republican who used a transportation hearing to ask if Joe Biden’s cabinet had discussed using the 25th amendment to remove the president from office, saying: “I’m glad to have a president who can ride a bicycle.”(Snip)Amid discussion of policy, the Texas representative Troy Nehls decided to go in a more partisan direction. “We now see the mainstream media questioning President Biden’s mental state, and for good reason,” Nehls said. “Sadly, he shakes hands with ghosts and imaginary people, and he falls off bicycles. Even at the White House Easter celebration, the Easter Bunny had to guide him back into his safe place.”
Man confesses to fatal stabbing after
random hookup in Prospect Park
7 replies
Posted by Ribicon 7/20/2022 12:21:55 PM Post Reply
A Yonkers man confessed to fatally stabbing a homeless man after a random sex hookup in Prospect Park early Monday, police sources said. Anthony Dejesus, 28, called 911 at 2:30 a.m. allegedly admitting he knifed his partner in an area called the Vale of Cashmere—known as a cruising spot. Miguel Andrews, 37, was found clinging to life with stab wounds to his arms and upper body.(Snip)Dejesus, of Yonkers, was charged with murder and criminal possession of a weapon. Andrews was homeless, police said. The Vale, a lush patch of the park that attracts bird-watchers, has been a dangerous spot for years.
NYC Mayor Adams floats nationwide guns
database before anti-gun summit of mayors
at Gracie Mansion
21 replies
Posted by Ribicon 7/20/2022 11:38:39 AM Post Reply
Mayor Adams is meeting with several other mayors from around the country Wednesday at Gracie Mansion to discuss how to better tackle gun violence and to “send a strong message on the national level and the state level.” Before the confab at the mayor’s official residence, Adams and three other mayors—St. Louis Mayor Tishaura Jones, Buffalo Mayor Byron Brown and Little Rock, Ark. Mayor Frank Scott Jr.—spoke on Good Morning America to lay out some of their goals. “We’re dealing with the same problem, a $9 billion industry that’s profits are turning profit into pain in our communities,” Adams said.(Snip)The mayors who are meeting on Wednesday are
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
Durbin: Climate 'Emergency' Is 'More Important
Than' Current Economy, Inflation
43 replies
Posted by Dreadnought 7/20/2022 12:31:56 AM Post Reply
On Tuesday’s broadcast of MSNBC’s “The Beat,” Senate Majority Whip Sen. Dick Durbin (D-IL) responded to Sen. Joe Manchin’s (D-WV) inflation concerns on climate legislation by stating that climate is “an emergency” that “We have to do everything that we can” about, and this is “more important than any current economic statistics” like inflation. Host Ari Melber asked, “Is the global macro inflation a reason not to do something on climate right now? How do you work with your colleague there when sometimes his reasons don’t really match what’s happening?”
Biden Blasts Republicans for Failing to
Recognize Climate ‘Emergency,’ Vows
to Use Executive Action
41 replies
Posted by Dreadnought 7/20/2022 3:29:33 PM Post Reply
President Joe Biden called climate change an “emergency” during a Wednesday speech and vowed to use executive powers to bypass Congressional Republicans opposed to his sweeping agenda. “Since Congress is not acting as it should, and these guys here are, but we’re not getting any Republican votes, this is an emergency,” Biden said from the podium in Somerset, Mass., apparently gesturing at Democrats around him. The president stopped short of issuing a national climate emergency, but said he would use executive powers to address the issue. “As president I’ll use my executive powers to combat climate crisis in the absence of Congressional action,” Biden added.
AOC's amateur-hour publicity stunt 36 replies
Posted by PageTurner 7/20/2022 4:58:50 AM Post Reply
Yesterday, most mainstream media outlets reported that a number of Democrat representatives — including "Squad“ members, were arrested outside the Supreme Court following protests against the Court's recent decision to overturn Roe v. Wade. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., a.k.a. AOC, was among those arrested for blocking traffic. Reps. Barbara Lee of California, Rashida Tlaib of Michigan, Cori Bush of Missouri, Jan Schakowsky of Illinois, Nydia Velazquez of New York, Madeleine Dean of Pennsylvania, and Andy Levin of Michigan were among the other legislators arrested. The Capitol Police said they had arrested 35 people, including 17 members of Congress, for "crowding, obstructing or incommoding."
Joe Biden: ‘I and so Damn Many Other
People I Grew Up with Have Cancer’
35 replies
Posted by Imright 7/20/2022 5:42:40 PM Post Reply
President Joe Biden indicated that he has cancer, during an alarming speech delivered on Wednesday to promote clean energy. The president spoke at the site of a shuttered coal plant in Massachusetts, vowing that one day, it would be the site of clean energy programs fueled by windmills off of the East coast. During his remarks about the dangers of pollution, he recalled how he grew up in Claymont, Delaware, not far from a host of oil refineries across the state line in Pennsylvania. He recalled how after the first frost, residents of Claymont had to turn on the windshield wipers to get the oil slick off the windshields
Former Clinton Advisor Announces Hillary
Clinton WILL RUN Against Trump In 2024
35 replies
Posted by MAGA Might 7/20/2022 11:01:20 AM Post Reply
Long-time political strategist Dick Morris, formerly of the Clinton camp before coming to the light some years ago, penned a piece for Newsmax yesterday that predicted a 2016 rematch pitting twice-failed presidential candidate Hillary Clinton against former president – and America’s most popular politician – Donald Trump. Clinton just can’t give it a rest. She has rested her entire legacy on one day sitting in the Oval Office as this nation’s first female president. Of course, her party can’t define the term “woman” anymore, and then there’s the fact that she hates this country and most of the deplorables living in it.
Major Poll Shows Liz Cheney Going Down 28 replies
Posted by ladydawgfan 7/20/2022 1:32:21 AM Post Reply
We've been saying for months now that Rep. Liz Cheney (R-WY) is not likely to retain her seat when facing Harriet Hageman, a primary challenger backed by former President Donald Trump. What polls there have been indicate as much, as does CNN's Harry Enten. On Friday, what looks to be the most comprehensive poll yet was released, and it shows Cheney going down. The poll comes from the Casper-Star Tribune and was conducted by Mason-Dixon Polling & Strategy. Hageman has 52 percent support, while Rep. Cheney has 30 percent. No other candidate has more than 5 percent. Just 11 percent are undecided.
‘He broke the law!’: Harpies on The
View attack good Samaritan who took down
IN shooter
27 replies
Posted by Imright 7/20/2022 5:47:48 PM Post Reply
Elisjsha Dicken, the 22-year-old who saved countless lives on Sunday after neutralizing a mass shooter with his handgun, is by all sane measures a true hero in a country that desperately needs one. But since his heroic actions contradict the carefully-cultivated left-wing narrative, a number of prominent voices have immediately risen up to demonize the young man. Case in point: the majority of the hosts on ABC’s “The View,” whose considered opinion is that Dicken just got “very lucky,” and was probably as bad as the mass shooter since he “broke the law” when he carried his gun into the mall. It all started, naturally, with co-host Joy Behar,
Meghan Markle acted like ‘a princess’
while dining at NYC restaurant with Prince Harry
27 replies
Posted by Lets Go Brandon 7/20/2022 8:54:58 AM Post Reply
Meghan Markle may not be royalty in the US, but she acted like “a princess” while dining at hip eatery Locanda Verde with Prince Harry Monday night, a spy said. “[She] asked the people at Locanda Verde to have the entire inner outdoor courtyard – which seats 50 – for herself and four people, including Prince Harry,” a source told Page Six. “The owners told her it had been reserved for a birthday party for 15 people and refused to bounce the party out of the space
God Is More Committed to Gender Equality
Than We Are | Opinion
25 replies
Posted by Beardo 7/20/2022 12:06:52 PM Post Reply
As the United States continues to come to grips with the Supreme Court decision to overturn Roe v. Wade, I cannot stop thinking about how the court used a legal system built entirely by men to diminish women — once again — into nothing more than a vessel for producing babies. I am a rabbi in a legal system that excluded women for thousands of years, much like the legal system that the Supreme Court relied on in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization. But unlike the American legal system, the Jewish tradition, in certain respects, including abortion, found a way to craft laws grounded in equal dignity for women.
Indiana police say 'Good Samaritan' took
out mall shooter in 15 seconds, landed
8 of 10 shots
24 replies
Posted by DVC 7/20/2022 4:39:44 PM Post Reply
Police say it took Elisjsha Dicken just 15 seconds to neutralize a man who opened fire on shoppers at an Indiana mall — quick action they believe saved countless lives. "The time lapse between the moment that Jonathan Sapirman exited the restroom and began shooting, and when he was shot by the civilian was only fifteen seconds, not two minutes," Greenwood Police Chief James Ison said Tuesday in a statement. "The surveillance video shows Sapirman exit the restroom at 5:56:48pm. He was neutralized by Dicken at 5:57:03 pm." The statement corrects a previous police timeline in which authorities said the incident lasted two minutes.
Federal investigation of Hunter Biden
reaches critical juncture, sources say
23 replies
Posted by Imright 7/20/2022 7:03:33 PM Post Reply
Washington -The federal investigation into Hunter Biden's business activities is nearing a critical juncture as investigators weigh possible charges and prosecutors confront Justice Department guidelines to generally avoid bringing politically sensitive cases close to an election, according to people briefed on the matter. While no final decision has been made on whether to bring charges against President Joe Biden's son, sources say the probe has intensified in recent months along with discussions among Delaware-based prosecutors, investigators running the probe and officials at Justice Department headquarters. David Weiss, the US Attorney in Delaware, is leading the probe, which dates back to as early as 2018.
Bidens Bombing! Joe’s Not The Only One
With Tanking Poll Numbers… Take A Look
At Jill’s
23 replies
Posted by PeterWolosin 7/20/2022 4:59:47 PM Post Reply
In the past fifty years, we’ve had precisely ten different First Ladies in America. Some of them spent their time in the White House mostly under the radar, with Rosalynn Carter and both Laura and Barbara Bush falling into this category. Others such as Nancy Reagan with her fondness for astronomy and Betty Ford with her personal challenges were somewhat quirkier, but they were likeable and mostly unremarkable. Both Hillary Clinton and Michelle Obama could be outspoken and controversial, but at least they were mostly clever and competent. And then we have Jill Biden. The adage “opposites attract” may be true in some cases,
Post New Article