I’m a Proud Member of the Rebel Alliance

To put another knot in this rabbitt hole, Elon Musk has been a buddy and fledging member of Klaus Schwabs little mud hole WEF since 2008, along with other world thinkers like Trudeau DiCaprio.

If in fact the federal government or for that matter any governmental entity within the United States is subsidizing Twitter the argument that they can censor because they are a private business and not the government is mute. In this case both Twitter and the government are blatantly violating the first amendment. I am anxiously awaiting to see some actual evidence of this. In addition, as a publicly traded entity all financial statements have to be available to the shareholders. These statements should show all income sources. If they are hiding this then they are also guilty of tax fraud. Has the IRS done audits on Twitter? I am not a financial expert of any kind and may be incorrect with my thoughts. But?

communists only fight against other communists to gain political and societal power against them and if anyone thinks Penn is doing this for the good of mankind, they were born either under a rock of last night - he's a commie sympathizer and is only exposing himself in this way to advance his agenda, whatever it might be but it's probably not good for the Ukrainians

Clarice, perhaps writing two articles would have been better. The first should have been limited to the Ukraine tragedy and the other to Elon's attempt to buy tweeter. IMO, giving Ukraine one paragraph then pivoting with lots of text describing Musk's attempt to buy tweeter makes the loss of life in Ukraine look cheap.

Someone only read the first paragraph.

As usual, this perceptive lady is spot-on. Obama is the secret benefactor in the woodpile for Big Tech. It was too difficult to hide the lines of Google executives, Gates, Zuckerberg and others frequent visits to the White House during his well-funded and illegal attempts to change this country. She is correct about the economics because advertising alone can not be supporting these behemoths. The government also supports the Washington Post and the New York Times because nobody buys their weekly rantings and many of their "scoops" are leaks directly from the White House and its supporting tentacles. CNN could no longer hide their pathetic viewership but found it difficult to block our access to the ratings but these others can. They were all anti-Trump during four years of endless impeachment attempts. Conservatives were systematically blocked as users. We have a fully supported propaganda arm, paid for by the American taxpayers and used to create an alternate version of the truth for them. It's not only the First Amendment that is the target, it is the entire Constitution. That is our payback for allowing a foreign entity to be awarded the presidency of the United States and for allowing an extremist bunch of radicals to steal the 2020 election. Prepare for much more of the same in the coming years unless we find the courage to attack the Death Star directly.

Many of us might be surprised to learn that most people prefer ignorance. It requires nothing, and the costs are generally disregarded.

If the US government is subsidizing Twitter, that is the dictionary definition of fascism. Benito Mussolini, the twentieth century's most enthusiastic fascist, stated that fascism is the combining of government and corporate power.

I knew the George W. Bush story reported by Dan Rather was a lie from the get-go. Because: 1) I was a clerk in the Army Reserve, so I knew how the Reserve/National Guard actually worked. (Don't ask the Regular Army or Air Force; they don't know.) 2) I know what typing done on the typewriters of the time looked like in comparison to some produced by a word processing program (and so should have Dan Rather - he used them enough).

Interesting point about how Twitter cannot actually be profitable....must be subsidized by someone, and is that someone the US Crooked Government? It Twitter actually THE Deep State control mechanism for stopping free speech?