Clarence Thomas' wife Ginni 'urged Trump's
chief of staff Mark Meadows to overturn
the election' and wanted Sidney Powell
to be the face of the legal team, series
of text messages sent between the election
and January 6 show
Daily Mail (UK),
by
Elizabeth Elkind
Original Article
Posted By: Imright,
3/25/2022 12:10:02 AM
The wife of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas pushed 2020 election fraud conspiracy theories in dozens of text messages with ex-White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows, reports revealed on Thursday.Conservative activist Virginia 'Ginni' Thomas urged Donald Trump's former aide to make controversial lawyer Sidney Powell the face of the ex-president's legal defense and appeared to frequently promote QAnon beliefs in texts obtained by the Washington Post.The 29 messages are reportedly part of the vast tranche of documents Meadows handed over to the House select committee
Reply 1 - Posted by:
Ketchuplover 3/25/2022 12:29:43 AM (No. 1109337)
It's nice to know that the spouse of at least ONE USSC Justice loves the country and is a patriot.
144 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
BarryNo 3/25/2022 5:15:46 AM (No. 1109406)
If the story is true, she may be vindicated across the board. So may QAnon, after the DOJ's litle "oopsie" when they released a list of over 100 sexual perverts in government they were protecting. We all saw indications that the election was stolen, and where actual investigation was done, it has been HUGE. Then we have entities like the PA supreme court trying to quash any investigation.
65 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
Rinktum 3/25/2022 6:05:59 AM (No. 1109423)
The Daily Mail is trying to make Ginnie Thomas out to be a kook. It is a tried and true strategy of the leftist media. Democrats know the facts and evidence of November 3rd will stand up under scrutiny which is why any mention of them is immediately met with “conspiracy theory”. My fear is the left will use these texts to impeach Justice Thomas. They will infer that Mrs. Thomas has too much influence on him and that he cannot be trusted to decide cases impartially and therefore, he is compromised.
Clearly, these people are evil. They got what they wanted and their boy is destroying our beloved country while half, if not more of us, believe Joe won nothing and the results were manipulated by big tech and the democrat party. The media jumped in afterwards to put a lid on any possible objection. Even the judiciary failed in its duty. The powers behind this abomination did not want the evidence brought into a Court of Law and the judges complied. We have experienced a bloodless coup d’etat in this country and those committed to it are not going to allow anyone or anything to upset it. While we may be confident that the country wants Joe and democrats out, they are committed to staying regardless. Can you say with any certainty that these same people will not do anything to remain in power. Look what they have already done.
While the country is focused on the Supreme Court, it is no coincidence that these emails surfaced now. Democrats are on a mission to gain a majority on the Court by any means possible. Forcing Justice Thomas out would be one way of upsetting the balance of the court. With their nominee all but confirmed, they are setting up another outrageous scenario. Never underestimate the democrats opportunity to seize power even if they have to lie, cheat and steal to do it. These people are committed to staying right where they are. Having the Court tipped in their favor is just another step and the consolidation of their power will be complete. Democrats do not intend to lose this election and just may need the SCOTUS in the future.
91 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
skacmar 3/25/2022 6:25:14 AM (No. 1109428)
Yeah, so what. Gunny Thomas sent some tweets that Democrats don't like because of Jan 6. She is not the one on the court. If the Democrats want to explore tweets , maybe we need to explore Hillary's, Obama"s Pelosi's, Schiff's and a whole bunch of others relating to Jan 6 and the last election.
86 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
rusino 3/25/2022 8:01:37 AM (No. 1109489)
Thank You #3....your comment was insightful and informative. WELL DONE! 🇺🇸
29 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
Trapper 3/25/2022 8:28:42 AM (No. 1109516)
"overturn" the election? I think they mean reverse the fraud and "reinstate" the actual winner, Trump.
50 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
philsner 3/25/2022 8:30:11 AM (No. 1109517)
George Orwell, please contact the Ministry of Truth.
23 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
NamVet70 3/25/2022 8:57:13 AM (No. 1109534)
And why were those messages made public without the permission of either the sender or the recipient? Someone on that committee must be violating the law. Just the fact they were available to anyone is evidence that there was illegal surveillance of US citizens.
33 people like this.
Disputing an apparently fraudulent vote count is the opposite of "overturning an election.:
23 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
Pammie 3/25/2022 9:15:55 AM (No. 1109553)
The Pseudo Daily Mail is fake news....GEEZE!
9 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
bighambone 3/25/2022 9:18:13 AM (No. 1109556)
As a U.S. citizen Mrs. Thomas has a right to her opinion, even on issues such as a fraudulent election. Neither she or Mark Meadows has been shown to have done anything that is a violation of any law.
25 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
judy 3/25/2022 9:43:10 AM (No. 1109597)
I wonder if they will bother to expose the correspondence from other SC justice's families????
13 people like this.
Glad she loves this country, but she could be the reason her husband gets impeached if democrats decide to move against Justice Thomas. They have hated his love of the constitution since he took his seat on the court. Only people in the country who cannot see the smoke or the fire of corruption are the ones in the Swamp. I have always liked Ginni. Rush was a big fan of hers as well back in the day.
13 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
Zigrid 3/25/2022 9:57:57 AM (No. 1109627)
I believe that President Trump was spot on...when he said...the Supreme Court needed courage to do what was right for the country...unfortunately...they didn't't step up..and now thanks to biden/obama..WE have thousands of Ukrainians dead and wounded...high gas prices...empty grocery shelves..and illegals invading our country...
18 people like this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
MDConservative 3/25/2022 10:20:06 AM (No. 1109658)
Everyone is entitled to an opinion. So is she. She's not on the bench. She's a private citizen. So what?
12 people like this.
Reply 16 - Posted by:
Edgelady 3/25/2022 10:24:26 AM (No. 1109667)
This was actually very stupid on her part. While I truly appreciate where her heart lies, if this ever made it to the Supreme Court in a law suit, Justice Thomas would have to recuse himself. Not wise for a wife of a supreme court justice to get involved in things politically.
7 people like this.
Reply 17 - Posted by:
bighambone 3/25/2022 10:25:22 AM (No. 1109670)
Any wimpy congressional Republican or RINO who would vote to impeach Justice Clarence Thomas because of his wife’s opinion on anything would be committing political suicide.
9 people like this.
Reply 18 - Posted by:
cobieone 3/25/2022 10:52:05 AM (No. 1109700)
More importantly, we all need to be praying for Clarence Thomas to fully recover from his illness. First, for his personal well being , of course. Second, this nation can't lose him or we are in deep trouble.
13 people like this.
Reply 19 - Posted by:
stablemoney 3/25/2022 10:59:26 AM (No. 1109710)
Is it legal to steal and publish private emails?
10 people like this.
Reply 20 - Posted by:
PrayerWarrior 3/25/2022 11:06:36 AM (No. 1109724)
Mark Meadows shouldn't have handed over his e-mails.
This is what you get when you cooperate with an unconstitutional J6 committee, whose only motive is to find dirt on anyone that's their political enemy and publish it. That's why many have refused like Steve Bannon to give them their e-mails, etc. These evil J6 committee people have even twisted/made up the words in these e-mails to make the Republicans look bad, which I believe is a felony.
Jim Jordan was yelling to the high heavens about their lying about his e-mails and others recently. Check it out!
My question is why is McCarthy, Minority Leader, is being so quiet about this corrupt J6 committee? He's the Republican leader in the House and is letting Liz Cheney and Adam Kinzinger stay on this committee when he could remove them? Is he so weak that he can't do that?
11 people like this.
Reply 21 - Posted by:
dman 3/25/2022 11:08:58 AM (No. 1109725)
Of course we must draw the "obvious" moral equivalence to the personal beliefs of Ketanji Brown Jackson. /s
Now, can SOMEONE define what is a woman ??????
3 people like this.
Reply 22 - Posted by:
jasmine 3/25/2022 12:04:46 PM (No. 1109768)
As #3 noted, to understand Dems will do anything to stay in power, we need only look at what they have already done.
Does anyone believe the release of this nasty hit piece on Mrs. Thomas was anything other than a gratuitous provocation, perfectly timed to reach a hospitalized Justice Thomas and his worried wife?
Some of us remember that in 1994, journalist Julianne Malveaux publicly shared her hope that Justice Thomas would suffer an early death. She hoped Mrs. Thomas would feed her husband lots of eggs and butter so "...he dies early like many black men do, of heart disease. . . He is an absolutely reprehensible person."
2 people like this.
Reply 23 - Posted by:
udanja99 3/25/2022 6:20:55 PM (No. 1110080)
#16, where is the proof that her husband knew anything at all about these texts? My husband certainly doesn’t know about 99% of mine.
This is a huge nothing burger.
1 person likes this.
Reply 24 - Posted by:
anniebc 3/25/2022 6:43:22 PM (No. 1110101)
Smart woman, if true.
0 people like this.
Reply 25 - Posted by:
Starboard_side 3/25/2022 7:00:05 PM (No. 1110117)
So, I guess she is not entitled to her own opinion. And, that everyone must agree with whatever the democrats say as the truth.
Unfortunately, they have been proven wrong on far too many occasions in just the past couple years to just believe them any longer without questioning what they say.
They did this to themselves, and by fighting every opportunity to review the prospects of voter irregularities, machines, etc... they only add to the questioning.
1 person likes this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Imright"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)