Democrat Lawyers Object to Durham Asking
Potential Jurors if They Have Links to
Hillary Clinton’s Promotion of Russian
Collusion Hoax
Gateway Pundit,
by
Christina Laila
Original Article
Posted By: Imright,
3/26/2022 6:32:21 PM
Special Prosecutor John Durham wants to ask potential jurors if they have any links to Hillary Clinton’s promotion of the Russian collusion hoax. Recall, Hillary Clinton hatched the Trump-Russia plot in 2016 to distract from her emails transmitted over a private server while she was the head of the Department of State. John Durham wants to know about any links to Hillary Clinton’s promotion of the Russian collusion canard in a questionnaire to potential jurors.Attorneys for Clinton’s campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann however are
Reply 1 - Posted by:
formerNYer 3/26/2022 6:48:11 PM (No. 1110963)
Tell them to pound sand, there should be no conflict of interest with jurors.
DemocRATs lie.
59 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
Chiritwo 3/26/2022 6:49:41 PM (No. 1110966)
I really object to this being called a hoax. It affected the mid term elections and because of this lie, President Trump was impeached. This is called treason.
79 people like this.
Delay, delay, delay for any reason.
38 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
JunkYardDog 3/26/2022 7:23:48 PM (No. 1110994)
The evil cabal is slowly being forced into a corner-Hunter Biden will soon be indicted, Durham is moving ahead slowly but still moving...eventually there has to be a breaking point.
50 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
john56 3/26/2022 10:08:33 PM (No. 1111086)
I guess I would too, if I was a Democrat lawyer. Gee, the case is going to be heard in DC. Talk about a friendly jury pool to start with... This should easily exclude the nine conservatives in DC.
19 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
pixelero 3/26/2022 11:52:09 PM (No. 1111122)
Something going on and Durham knows it. And the Dem lawyers know he knows it. Everybody’s potentially paid off. Think Epstein's guards.
27 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
Trigger2 3/27/2022 3:35:23 AM (No. 1111178)
These pathetic lawyers will object to anything that puts Sussman and the b***h in a bad light.
19 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
5 handicap 3/27/2022 5:34:50 AM (No. 1111206)
I still feel that all the problems America has today can be laid at the feet of John Durham...Partly. Why, you ask? Had he done his job the way he should have the information he had prior to the election should have been put before the electorate and the "Steaming Pile of Used Alpo" wouldn't be stinking up the Oval Office. Nor would we be on the brink of WWIII! So thanks John!
7 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
DCGIRL 3/27/2022 5:59:12 AM (No. 1111211)
This is ridiculous. Durham is laughing his a## off with this democrat lawyer's request. Of course he has every right and it is his responsibility that no juror has links to the clintons at all.
19 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
WhamDBambam 3/27/2022 7:24:27 AM (No. 1111238)
Would the democrats or the Clintons try to wire the jury?
9 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
Rinktum 3/27/2022 7:48:37 AM (No. 1111266)
Expect any and every dirty trick and Courtroom stunt in the book from these democrat lawyers. They are going to push into high gear anything they can do to protect themselves and Hillary Clinton. Even getting a fair trial in Washington DC is going to be difficult if not impossible. They will attempt to get to the jurors and even the Judge if they believe that is possible. Sadly, the judge will, no doubt, be a democrat with deep Washington connections. It is going to be an uphill slog all the way and I believe it will take divine intervention to get get this heard by an impartial jury or judge. Unfortunately, that is the way of politics in this country. I do hope and pray that Durham has seen and now knows things that will compel him to fight this case like he has never fought another. It absolutely sickens me to know there is so much corruption in and around our government that the power they wield is able to get a guilty person acquitted. If, however, unbelievably this one conviction has the power to trickle down to the rest of the scum that considers themselves above the law, it just may be the impetus we need to restore justice in this country. It, at least, would be a start. God bless and protect John Durham and his team, they are charging the very gates of hell by taking on this case. If he and his team are successful, the debt of gratitude that this country will owe them will be immeasurable.
19 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
skacmar 3/27/2022 8:11:02 AM (No. 1111283)
Seems to me that this is something that might be important to know about a potential jurors. Of course I don't expect most to answer honestly out of loyalty to Hillary and Democrats,and fear of becoming a Durham target.
9 people like this.
Just reiterating my perspective: Durham is as deep state as they come. His job is to take Hillary (and Bill) out of the political picture. The #JhiadJunta (BHO, Susan Rice, ValJar, Ahmed Brennan, and the rest of those cretins) hate Hillary and her “machine..” so Durham’s job is to take her out without messing up the ruse.. Once she is toast, he goes no farther and the Junta is free to accomplish their hideous goals.
3 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
snowoutlaw 3/27/2022 9:57:51 AM (No. 1111415)
The Democrat Lawyers are assuming the Russian collusion was Hillary Clinton’s Promotion. Durham does not mention Clinton. Just asking if they know anyone connected to any group that investigated or made inquiry into Russian interference with the 2016 election or “the federal government’s investigation of Donald Trump’s relationship with Russia.
3 people like this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
little guy 3/27/2022 10:04:39 AM (No. 1111429)
The judge needs to take the same pledge!
7 people like this.
Reply 16 - Posted by:
Zigrid 3/27/2022 10:49:09 AM (No. 1111475)
If the democrats object...then there's a concern from the democrats about the integrity of the jury pool...they want every advantage they can get...even if it's illegal...and...in this case brings out the truth...
5 people like this.
Reply 17 - Posted by:
PrayerWarrior 3/27/2022 11:39:09 AM (No. 1111517)
We know our demon-RATS here. Of course.... seems to be the operative word today. Rats do what they do. Corner one and watch!
We would pay for view for a Durham/Hillary Clinton, et al trial. Anyone?
7 people like this.
Reply 18 - Posted by:
jasmine 3/27/2022 11:48:12 AM (No. 1111527)
FTA:
But Sussmann’s team said it objected to the Durham prosecution request to ask the jury pool the same question related to any links to groups that have looked at or been tied to “the Clinton Campaign and/or the Democratic National Committee’s promotion of the Trump/Russia collusion narrative.”
Why is the important? Because the Trump Russia narrative relied on the Steele "dossier," paid for by the Clinton Campaign and the DNC.
Asking potential jurors to disclose any links or ties related to the Clinton Campaign and/or the DNC seems like a no-brainer. Durham's goal is to seat an impartial jury, proving once again that he is meticulous in his search for justice. I expect to learn far more from his investigation than our disgraceful MSM ever got around to telling us.
5 people like this.
Reply 19 - Posted by:
whyyeseyec 3/27/2022 8:10:10 PM (No. 1111835)
Remember when we thought Jeff Sessions was going to get to the bottom of the Hillary Russian Hoax?
Remember when we thought Bill Barr was going to get to the bottom of the Hillary Russian Hoax?
Remember when we thought John Durham was going to get to the bottom of the Hillary Russian Hoax?
0 people like this.
What trial do the democrats think the jurors are going to be sitting through? I have no problems finding the hidden Hillary supporters and tossing them.
0 people like this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Imright"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)