Fact Checking Trump’s Climate Claims
Issues & Insights,
by
Editorial
&
Board
Original Article
Posted By: 4250Luis,
9/30/2025 7:42:37 AM
President Donald Trump spoke at the United Nations last week in an address that the world needed to hear. It was of course picked apart, particularly his claims about global warming. He twisted facts and made “false claims,” say the gatekeepers of the Great Climate Narrative. Is this so?
Let’s look:
Trump called the global warming scare a “hoax.” Not a word we would use, but he’s closer to the truth than the climatistas. It’s obvious to those with open minds that the global warming tale is the product of academic fraud, gross exaggerations,
Post Reply
Reminder: “WE ARE A SALON AND NOT A SALOON”
Your thoughts, comments, and ideas are always welcome here. But we ask you to please be mindful and respectful. Threatening or crude language doesn't persuade anybody and makes the conversation less enjoyable for fellow L.Dotters.
Reply 1 - Posted by:
bpl40 9/30/2025 8:04:31 AM (No. 2010666)
The origin of this "consensus" business goes back to the original IPCC (Inter Parliamentary Committee on Climate) report that started it all. Those interested can dig through google shields. But here are the facts. The IPCC report was built from work of three groups Gr I, Gr II & Gr. III. total of 2500 "scientists". First summarized raw data. Second analyzed it. Third commented on the findings of Gr. II and suggested possible remedies and actions.. Strictly compartmentalized. One group could not comment on others even if they individually had the expertise. Gr. II consisted of 600 individuals who (as scientists do) restricted themselves to area of their expertise. The question of warming caused by human activity was addressed by about thirty odd experts only. Only five or six said human activity 'could' be the cause. The one or two who said it was proven had horrific conflict of interest.
In the executive summary of this report (written by UN bureaucrats, journos among others) this was twisted into a worldwide consensus of 2500 climatologists.
Once again, Trump is right. Biggest fraud in history of science.
59 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
Strike3 9/30/2025 8:18:15 AM (No. 2010676)
Trump simply followed the money and surprise! The trail went from Washington to California, all of Europe and led all the way down to Australia, the Maldives, New Zealand and Africa. Hundreds of people receiving money to fix an imaginary problem. The sad thing is, even if the scare was real, mankind can't do a thing about it except maybe to blow up the earth with nukes and end us sooner.
35 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
cor-vet 9/30/2025 9:33:42 AM (No. 2010715)
When the two most revered experts on the climate are those great scientific minds, Al Gore and Greta, you tend to believe it's all a scam. At least I do!
50 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
stablemoney 9/30/2025 9:33:49 AM (No. 2010716)
The climate scam is a hoax to gain control of your money. The hoaxers will decide how your salaries are spent, not you.
34 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
Venturer 9/30/2025 9:43:19 AM (No. 2010725)
The Don is right again.
34 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
BarryNo 9/30/2025 9:47:50 AM (No. 2010728)
Uhhh... "the product of academic fraud, gross exaggerations", IS a hoax. It's practically the definition of a hoax.
29 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
TCloud 9/30/2025 9:50:08 AM (No. 2010731)
Original Cap and Trade talk! Imagine a California Permanent $12 Tax lid on a gallon of petro for the sake of slowing smog!
12 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
DVC 9/30/2025 10:48:13 AM (No. 2010763)
It's not a hoax, it's a SCAM. A hoax is a joke, but a scam is a way to defraud people out of money, and in this case power.
The biggest scam ever run.
40 people like this.
President Trump also knows, but did not say, that there isn't a jot or tittle in the "Green Agenda" that doesn't directly weaken the West or fatten and embolden the Chinese Communist Party. That trail outlined by #2 originates in Beijing.
13 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
NotaBene 9/30/2025 11:24:32 AM (No. 2010784)
Scientists did not rise in opposition to Global Warming. A greener world is good for all and we always had glacial and interglacial periods. Bangladesh is not under the ocean as advertised. WE have the energy under our feet, use it. Now Ph.D.s and the AMA are surprised parents are reluctant to inject their children with 74 individual vaccines by age 18. President Trump is usually right because he applies common sense, also known as Human Reason.
19 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
skacmar 10/1/2025 7:24:55 AM (No. 2011063)
Why is anyone who questions 'climate change" immediately fact checked and labeled a climate deniers? Why doesn't anyone ever fact check those making the claims of climate gloom and doom which (at least in my 64 years) has never materialized. I have lived through the predicted global cooling, acid rain, ozone holes, rising ocean levels, and global warming. Probably missed a few but somehow managed to miss all of them and the world goes on just fine.
14 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
Saryden 10/1/2025 7:55:53 AM (No. 2011090)
The world goes on "just fine" as long as we have President Trump. We stand in admiration and love for this fine "Savior of the USA ".. and pray for his continuing health, strength and wise and varied executive decisions.
13 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
Rumblehog 10/1/2025 9:16:53 AM (No. 2011142)
If it wasn't a fraud, why did they change the name from "Global Warming" to "Climate Change?"
It's because they were laughed at, and scorned by perceptive citizens of the USA (only) when we had disastrous cold spells, and lack of Hurricanes, over the last 10 years, dispelling the ruminations and flat-out predictions of the, "Global Warm-mongers."
It's leftist Media elites (all in on net-zero-petroleum, except for themselves) who own the "Official Societal Definition Bank," which is the place you go when you want to redefine the "koine" English of modern society. They willingly changed the term to "Climate Change" and all their subordinates got the morning memo at 9AM, with it being all queued up before the 5PM news cycle. There was no return to the term, "Global Warming."
So, it's actually a "Three-fer," aka, "Hat-Trick," whereby:
1) Big Government assumes the role of "decider" in all things Petroleum, from subsurface to atmosphere, and everything in-between. = Control over Industry
2) Big Government decides and enforces "Carbon Footprint" mandates for the citizenry and small to large businesses with taxes intended to fund, "Climate Research." = Control over People
3) Big Education annually receives, from Big Government, "Big Grant Money," for research into "Climate Change." = Control over Educational Institutions
11 people like this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "4250Luis"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)