House GOP’s ‘Big, Beautiful’ Bill
Blocked in Key Committee Vote as Party
Splinters over Spending Cuts
National Review,
by
Brittany Bernstein
Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought,
5/17/2025 1:36:04 AM
Republican spending hawks dealt a significant blow to President Trump’s domestic agenda on Friday, blocking his “big, beautiful” bill from advancing through the House Budget Committee.
The measure failed in a 16-21 vote, with five Republicans voting no: Representatives Chip Roy of Texas, Ralph Norman of South Carolina, Josh Brecheen of Oklahoma, Andrew Clyde of Georgia and Lloyd Smucker of Pennsylvania.
The party could only lose the support of two of its members and still pass the legislation.
The fiscal hawks who voted down the 1,116-page bill argue the measure doesn’t include enough spending cuts
Post Reply
Reminder: “WE ARE A SALON AND NOT A SALOON”
Your thoughts, comments, and ideas are always welcome here. But we ask you to please be mindful and respectful. Threatening or crude language doesn't persuade anybody and makes the conversation less enjoyable for fellow L.Dotters.
Reply 1 - Posted by:
Nimby 5/17/2025 2:22:01 AM (No. 1951123)
We voted for Trump to cut the waste and fraud! If the GOP clowns cannot deal with it, RESIGN
40 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
itsonlyme 5/17/2025 2:53:52 AM (No. 1951125)
The Democrats have lunatics, the GOP has RINO wannabe's. Surfacing to see the light and diving back into the Deep Swamp. Chip Roy has always been a hard-core ultra conservative ready to pick a fight. Time to re-evaluate.
19 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
FJB 2022 23 24 5/17/2025 4:15:39 AM (No. 1951126)
100% agree with poster 1. If they don't get this bill passed then they have betrayed the voters. Primary any of them who vote against, because a NO vote on this bill is a vote for the Dems who want it and Trump to fail.
31 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
JackBurton 5/17/2025 7:15:03 AM (No. 1951173)
I'm with the guys who voted no.
They're right. Now is the time for bigger spending cuts. Don't be timid.
14 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
bpl40 5/17/2025 7:42:02 AM (No. 1951180)
We have come a long way from the dark, hopeless days of the 0bama/Biden cabal's misrule. A lot more ground to cover. Don't let the perfect be the enemy of the good.
15 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
hoopsfan 5/17/2025 7:51:05 AM (No. 1951188)
Democrats understand tribal warfare.
Republicans do not.
In this case, simple instructions to the House R's -- go with what the President wants.
12 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
Msquared112 5/17/2025 7:52:02 AM (No. 1951191)
There are no clean words I have for the GOP members who won't get with the program THE VOTERS wanted Trump to enact. Everybody's a comedian.
11 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
Msquared112 5/17/2025 7:52:43 AM (No. 1951192)
Vote yes now. Tinker later.
16 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
Strike3 5/17/2025 8:12:41 AM (No. 1951202)
There you have it. Holding out for more spending cuts is not such a bad thing on the surface but doing it would lose other supporters who lean toward the spending side. Make the cuts and git 'er done.
13 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
PChristopher 5/17/2025 8:47:57 AM (No. 1951227)
I swear...the Congessional Republicans could screw up a one car funeral! You guys need to get your heads out of your gastrointestinal cavities! NOW!!!
14 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
DVC 5/17/2025 9:13:47 AM (No. 1951244)
Spending cuts promised in 5 years are worth precisely, exactly NOTHING, and are NOT 'spending cuts'.
12 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
proximo 5/17/2025 9:14:56 AM (No. 1951246)
Keep repeating, "$37 trillion in debt, $2 trillion per year spending deficit."
Questioning all spending is the right approach. Question everything, in fact.
There will be negotiation but first the terms have to be established.
9 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
sw penn 5/17/2025 9:20:59 AM (No. 1951249)
All government spending chunks exist
because some large group struggled and fought for it.
Having got it, they will fight to the last breath to keep it.
And pass it on to their kids...
3 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
Avikingman 5/17/2025 9:21:28 AM (No. 1951250)
My senator, Chris Murphy- D, CT will NOT vote for the big beautiful bill with or without his ugly beard.
CT is a circular firing squad.
4 people like this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
Dodge Boy 5/17/2025 10:17:31 AM (No. 1951287)
Pubbies and dims, have a look at Usdebtclock.org and tell me everything is just fine. It isn't.
8 people like this.
Reply 16 - Posted by:
LC Chihuahua 5/17/2025 10:18:26 AM (No. 1951289)
Have you wondered how much support Trump has in Congress? Well now you know. Couple that with the courts and Trump has no support in Washington. Just like his first term. Trump kicked some spending cuts five years down the road to get what he thought would be the necessary support to pass the bill. Didn't work out. It was never going to work out. Why? Because Congress opposes Trump! They won't give him anything he proposes. Watch Congress pass some worthless bill and pass it on to Trump demanding he sign THEIR BILL. Trump will sign it to avoid a shutdown. Congress wins either way. Btw, this doesn't end well. Just keep watching the debt and deficit numbers. It's unsustainable. Washington doesn't care. All they support are the people that installed them and nobody else.
7 people like this.
Reply 17 - Posted by:
Bob2021 5/17/2025 10:20:44 AM (No. 1951291)
WTH?!? The Art of the Deal: Take what you can get with incremental improvements and work for more later. Some of the Republicans can really be shortsighted. I'd like to be at a Townhall with Andrew Clyde and see how his constituents react. The Repubs are famous for screwing things up. BTW, I'm an Independent, not a Dem or Repub Uniparty follower.
5 people like this.
Reply 18 - Posted by:
danu 5/17/2025 10:28:56 AM (No. 1951298)
perhaps perspective will help: do some presidentially-approved defunding in their districts,
until their vision improves..
4 people like this.
Reply 19 - Posted by:
commonsence 5/17/2025 10:50:55 AM (No. 1951314)
These morons don't understand if this doesn't pass, they won't get reelected. It's time for Johnson to make it very painful for the jerks opposing this.
5 people like this.
Reply 20 - Posted by:
jasonB 5/17/2025 11:04:05 AM (No. 1951322)
Good. Now do some of the real work you losers CAMPAIGNED ON.
Just because Trump wants it doesn't mean it's a good deal. STOP with the it's the best we can do for now. The Dem's burned their slim majority to get Obamacare passed. This garbage bill STILL FUNDS IT. Same with the Green New Deal. All funded!
How many of you were on here when the last CR was passed, with absolute certainty proclaiming, "Trump and Congress are REALLY going to get it's act together when they do the next budget. Gotta give it time. Rome wasn't built in a day". Aaaaaand here we are again. "Now just isn't the time to fight. Best we can do. blah blah."
Please stop accepting the slop they keep feeding you.
9 people like this.
The bill is "big" alright -- an un-beautiful porker that fails to even codify the limited cuts achieved by DOGE. Moody's downgrade of America's debt rating unfortunately seems to be a wakeup call that only an ornery cuss like Chip Roy can hear.
7 people like this.
Reply 22 - Posted by:
earlybird 5/17/2025 12:50:20 PM (No. 1951368)
It seems to me that "power of the purse" Congress should be working on spending cuts. Great critics. Precious little work product. They are the problem rather than the solution.
5 people like this.
Reply 23 - Posted by:
JimBob 5/17/2025 10:26:48 PM (No. 1951583)
I'm with the budget cutters.
Here's why.
From what I understand, this 'bill' has NO spending cuts for the coming year.
It is NOT what President Trump wants, but is instead the 'Crap Sandwich' put together by the Pubbies and RINOs in Congress.
Any so-called 'budget cuts' are FIVE YEARS DOWN THE ROAD and will be ignored and irrelevant by NEXT YEAR.
This is the SAME OLD CRAP that Congress does every year..... at least on those years that they DO pass a 'budget' and not a 'Cromulus' ('cram everything the 'Rats want into an Omnibus Continuing Resolution') bill.
0 people like this.
Reply 24 - Posted by:
Geoman 5/18/2025 1:12:54 AM (No. 1951616)
FTA: "The fiscal hawks who voted down the 1,116-page bill argue the measure doesn’t include enough spending cuts..." Espousing the cutting of taxes and spending, spending that adds to the deficit in particular, are core conservative values, values not well represented in the so-called Big Beautiful Bill.
0 people like this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Dreadnought"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)