The ‘no evidence’ claim about Biden
corruption is looking increasingly ridiculous
New York Post,
by
David Harsanyi
Original Article
Posted By: Imright,
9/30/2023 6:32:46 AM
Joe Biden’s defenders have been on a wild ride this past year.
It began with them arguing that the president knew absolutely nothing about his family’s influence-peddling business to arguing that it’s no big deal that ChiCom wire payoffs happen to have Biden’s home address listed on them.
The quality of the excuses, unsurprisingly, has been deteriorating rapidly.
They largely entail repeating the words “no” and “evidence” in a perpetual loop.
But this week, when James Comer released financial records of Hunter Biden receiving two wire transfers totaling $260,000 in 2019 from Beijing with the president’s Delaware home listed as the beneficiary address,
Reply 1 - Posted by:
Aspen02 9/30/2023 6:52:06 AM (No. 1566037)
Did Biden pay taxes on his share? thought not!
6 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
Red Jeep 9/30/2023 8:16:28 AM (No. 1566066)
OK Lefties explain to me this: If there was no influence peddling or bribery happening, did foreign countries send members of the Biden family millions just to be friends with them? And why would they pay everybody but Joe?
Hmmmmmmm?
6 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
chumley 9/30/2023 8:27:22 AM (No. 1566071)
"Theres no evidence" is the communist knee jerk reaction whenever they are confronted with evidence. Its right up there with "debunked" and "Conspiracy theory". When you hear those things, you know the truth is close.
7 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
bighambone 9/30/2023 8:59:10 AM (No. 1566089)
Remember the Biden home in Delaware where Hunter was apparently “staying” and received remittances from Communist China, and who knows from where else, as a result of the Biden corrupt influence peddling conspiracies is the same place where a large amount of highly classified U.S. Government data and information was located in both the house and attached garage. Common sense will tell you that Hunter while “staying” here would have had complete access to that highly classified U.S. Government data and information and could have used that data and information to further the Biden family corrupt activities relating to foreign individuals and countries.
There is really no excuse for that highly classified information to be located in Joseph Biden’s personal home and garage for many years, as Joseph Biden before he assumed the Presidency in 2021, would not have been covered by the Presidential Records Act as was President Trump, at a place or places where Hunter would have uncontrolled access to that highly classified information without having or being able to obtain any sort of U.S. Government security clearance after he was kicked out of the Navy as a illegal drug user. The question is, since Hunter clearly had uncontrolled access to that highly classified U.S. Government how much of that data and information was used to further the Biden family run corrupt criminal conspiracies involving foreign individuals and countries? Where are the wimpy Republicans on all that?
10 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
mifla 9/30/2023 9:06:31 AM (No. 1566094)
Dem playbook 101. Deny, deny, deny, until people get tired of it. It usually works.
3 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
rikkitikki 9/30/2023 9:32:13 AM (No. 1566110)
We all knew Biden was guilty when Hunter got his first plum job managing a Chinese hedge fund...despite the fact that he had zero related experience, and it happened only days after visiting China on AF1 with the Big Guy.
The guy is slippery, though...probably learned that in the shower with his 12-year old daughter.
1 person likes this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
Strike3 9/30/2023 9:33:33 AM (No. 1566111)
They would lie that senile old Joe did not trip up and down the stairs of AF1 or crash his bicycle if it were not on video across the world.
2 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
wilemon 9/30/2023 9:42:14 AM (No. 1566122)
Republicans need to start pointing out that there is "circumstantial " evidence and there is "direct" evidence. Direct evidence is that " I saw that guy in the bank with the gun pointed at a teller " Circumstantial evidence would be that guy suddenly had a lot of money. Jury instructions generally state that jurors should evaluate all the evidence and give both equal weight. There is a ton of circumstantial evidence that Joe took bribes .Republicans need to emphasize the difference and not let the Democrats get away with "no evidence"
3 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
bpl40 9/30/2023 10:50:24 AM (No. 1566171)
If you had to wait this far to make that claim, something is wrong with your understanding of our political environment.
1 person likes this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Imright"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)