No! Jack Smith and Merrick Garland –
The State Farm Late Night Ballot Stuffing
Video Was Not Debunked – And Gateway
Pundit Plans on Proving This in Court!
Gateway Pundit,
by
Jim Hoft
Original Article
Posted By: FlyRight,
8/2/2023 10:07:02 PM
Once again, President Trump was indicted on Tuesday – the DAY AFTER Hunter Biden’s best friend and business associate Devon Archer testified that the Joe Biden was included on 20 calls when his son was sitting with foreign officials arranging influence peddling deals for the family.
Archer also testified that Joe Biden met with Russia’s Yelena Baturina who invested $40 million into Hunter Biden’s real estate ventures. And she also paid Hunter Biden $3.5 million in consulting fees. Joe Biden later excluded Baturina from his Russian sanctions list.
So what happened next? President Trump was indicted by Special Counsel Jack Smith.
Reply 1 - Posted by:
PrayerWarrior 8/2/2023 11:25:45 PM (No. 1526211)
"Jack Smith and Merrick Garland are hoping to make speech illegal with this indictment. They are hoping to make challenging elections “won” by Democrats a crime in America."
This is very scary indeed. Speak up against this regime and you will find yourself in jail. Goodbye First Amendment if Jack Smith and Merrick "Snake" Garland prevail in court. Pray, people, for our Republic. Difficult times are ahead for God Fearing Patriotic Americans. We're praying for President Trump to win over-whelmingly and bring down this tyrannical government with God's help.
69 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
judy 8/3/2023 6:06:02 AM (No. 1526328)
Trump now has the opportunity to air the J6 tapes , expose emails & bring out the security correspondence!
58 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
NancyD 8/3/2023 7:02:52 AM (No. 1526349)
Jonathan Turley has said that Jack Smith is notorious for over charging and I believe that this is indictment is SO absurd that he has shot himself in the foot. Trump's defense is going to be amazing and a HUGE opportunity to expose once and for all, to see just exactly what the Deep State has done to the American people.
35 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
Rinktum 8/3/2023 7:13:15 AM (No. 1526355)
My fear is that although the defense would have the right to bring to the court all the evidence of fraud and thievery, through some legal wrangling and a sympathetic judge, that evidence would be deemed inadmissible. If the evidence would be admitted, Smith would dismiss the charges before he would allow that evidence to be heard in court. Maybe, just maybe, Jack Smith in his zeal to bring down Trump may just have given him the opportunity he has wanted since 2020 to have a court hear how democrats stole the election. Wouldn’t it be ironic that vindication is on the horizon because of the hubris of a democrat partisan political hack posing as an officer of the court? Sweet.
52 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
SouthernYankee 8/3/2023 10:46:42 AM (No. 1526519)
I hope discovery reveals the capitol police, fbi, pelosi as co conspirators in an assault on free speech. Also gets a murder indictment against the officer Byrd and police officer shown beating an unconscious ms. Boyland on the ground.
17 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
Zigrid 8/3/2023 11:12:04 AM (No. 1526550)
The government lawyers are not stupid...so..I'm thinking they have a back up plan...but what...they seem to have put themselves in a rather tight spot...now that voter fraud matter can come into the court for review...not only by the judge...but by WE the people...will this finally mean the freeing of the Pelosi hostages...I sure hope so....
11 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
Geoman 8/3/2023 11:49:41 AM (No. 1526588)
When Trump goes to trial, any competent attorney will first address the specific charges against the former president in order to keep him out of jail with no felony convictions. Doing so may not be the time or occasion to try and litigate the 2020 election. It is unreasonable, given the judge selected, to assume that the 2020 election itself will be on trial.
5 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
Hermit_Crab 8/3/2023 12:33:35 PM (No. 1526644)
Over the last few years, the corrupt Judicial system has proven beyond a doubt that that the U.S. Constitution, and the Constitutions of most States have no power and no meaning to the Black-Robed Judiciarchs and shyster Prosecuting Lawyers; and that very few Lawyers for Defendants have the guts to even argue against the unConstitutional edicts of the corrupt courts, even if they have the requisite knowledge to do so..
Even in most 'red-states' it is nearly impossible to get a fair trial due to leftist- globalists who run the 'Just-Us' Departments, and the mostly ignorant and passive juries whose primary motive in giving a verdict is to 'get even' with the defendant for interrupting their personal lives with Jury Duty.
3 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
nerdowell 8/3/2023 1:26:13 PM (No. 1526696)
Tanya Chutkin is the judge. She has handed out the harshest sentences against the Jan 6 patriots.
She dismissed the charges of theft and espionage against the three Pakistani Awan brothers who had copied files
from the server they managed for the Democrat caucus. She ruled against the American people's free access to
building and fire codes in ASTM vs Public Resource.
https://fairuse.stanford.edu/case/american-society-for-testing-v-public-resource-org-inc/
, later struck down by the DC Court of Appeals. She ruled against Trump over the sham House Jan 6 Hearing Committees' demands for documents.
I'm sure she loves America her sugar daddy, but she holds the American people in contempt.
She'll twist the law into a pretzel to give Jacksmith a win, perhaps out of fear that he'll indict her if she doesn't.
3 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
skacmar 8/3/2023 2:49:26 PM (No. 1526743)
Everyone is assuming that Judge Chutkin will be fair enough to allow Trump to even put on a defense. I envision her ruling things like State Farm Arena as irrelevant and not allow them to be presented at trial. She will shut down Trump's defense team at every corner. If Trump's defense tries to bring up other election deniers who should also be charged with the same crimes based on their past statements (Hillary, Stacy Abrams, every Democrat), the judge will also rule that their denials are "different" and irrelevant to this case. She will not give Trump the benefit of the doubt or leeway regarding anything while giving Jack Smith free reign to say and do what ever he wishes. I hope this farcical trial will be televised for all to see.
1 person likes this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "FlyRight"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)