National Review plays defense for J6 Committee,
attacks Tucker Carlson
American Thinker,
by
Thomas Lifson
Original Article
Posted By: Magnante,
3/8/2023 8:25:08 AM
I know, I know; National Review is still the outfit that published the infamous “Against Trump” issue as a last ditch effort to foil the successful 2016 candidacy that led to four years of peace, prosperity, low inflation, and disproportionate gains for the lower end of the income scale under President Trump. But still, it comes as a bit of a shock (snip) There is no hint that NR is bothered by the suppression of video evidence denied to defendants in trials for the J6 incident. Why, there’s plenty enough already available.
Reply 1 - Posted by:
GustoGrabber 3/8/2023 8:28:20 AM (No. 1420174)
Wrong link?
7 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
Mizz Fixxit 3/8/2023 8:38:13 AM (No. 1420189)
Yes, wrong link.
7 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
Quigley 3/8/2023 8:42:47 AM (No. 1420194)
First of all bad link.
FTA: “ The article chastises Carlson for using the word “murder,” which “has a legal context” to describe the killing of Ashli Babbitt when she was climbing through a broken window, unarmed, and too small in stature to conceivably pose a physical threat to the scandal-plagued Capitol Police officer who shot her.”
She was NOT climbing through a window!!! Lifson! Watch the video. She was standing beside two or more policemen with rifles at the ready, just observing, trying to calm people down if anything, when the murderer fired into the crowd and she caught the bullet. It may not be murder 1, but it’s at least reckless homicide.
As for the NR puke himself, i had no patience to parse his article. He seems to say that a lot of the video had been available which it was; i had noticed the viking shaman was escorted by police and did nothing 2 years ago. And then he goes into typical NR mode. It’s sad that this publication is still in existence.
53 people like this.
I’m old enough to remember when the National Review wasn’t owned by China.
63 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
Jebediah 3/8/2023 8:57:34 AM (No. 1420202)
National Review, fo0unded by William Buckley, USED to be a go to for me............enough said.
61 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
Calvinesq 3/8/2023 9:13:30 AM (No. 1420215)
I cancelled my own GD subscription (to quote WFB) many years ago. They've become useful idiots. Just ask Mark Steyn.
55 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
zephyrgirl 3/8/2023 9:18:16 AM (No. 1420221)
I'm surprised National Review is still in business. My hope is it will follow the Weekly Standard into oblivion.
41 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
jimincalif 3/8/2023 9:40:08 AM (No. 1420237)
NR, McConnell, Mittens, Ms Lindsey, etc. all perpetuate Republicans as the stupid party. On Jan 6, I was away from the news all day building a bannister at my daughter’s house. I got home, opened my iPad and began to read about it. Almost immediately it was apparent to me that this was a set up, virtually ALL state media outlets were already singing the same tune. They all had The Narrative memorized and were regurgitating it over and over even though the events had just happened in the last few hours. This just doesn’t happen with real news, natural disasters, war coverage, plane crashes, etc. Real stories evolve as information becomes available. If I can see it, then even DC RINOs can see it. But they would rather keep the uniparty all together than admit the truth. As Tucker pointed out, THEY ARE ALL ON THE SAME SIDE, it’s not government of the people, it’s government vs. the people.
41 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
Bob2021 3/8/2023 9:49:53 AM (No. 1420243)
NR is a sad empty husk of what it used to be. I was a multi-decade subscriber who used the information in NR for my political science classes to stimulate discussion on various views of current interest. Alas, I let my subscription run out because it is now just another mouthpiece for the left's echo chamber. NR, Good riddance. PS. What's NR's subscription numbers today?
36 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
john56 3/8/2023 10:26:37 AM (No. 1420271)
For some reason, ABC World News Tonight was on in the living room last night and they tore into Tucker's reporting, calling it highly edited, yada, yada, yada, and replaying their spoon-fed videos from Nasty Nancy and her Witch-Hunt-Committee-where-the-Witches-were-doing-the-Hunting.
He's straight over the target.
38 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
cThree 3/8/2023 10:55:52 AM (No. 1420300)
The correct link: https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2023/03/national_review_plays_defense_for_j6_committee_attacks_tucker_carlson.html
And yes, to #10, the Quisling media are on a tear, sliming Tucker (and FoxNews, and McCarthy...) as best they can
And I also remember when the NR was a go-to resource for me.
17 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
MickTurn 3/8/2023 11:34:23 AM (No. 1420339)
Oh, the National Screwed up chimes in.......
6 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
Vaquero45 3/8/2023 11:36:34 AM (No. 1420342)
If Bill Buckley were alive today, he’d be wearing a MAGA hat. And he’d be ashamed of what National Review has become.
25 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
Italiano 3/8/2023 11:58:24 AM (No. 1420362)
It's amusing to observe the NR (and former NR) eunuchs wetting themselves over the truth.
17 people like this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
DVC 3/8/2023 12:16:56 PM (No. 1420389)
Nat Review has become an intensely anti-Trump and pro-Deep State disaster. I never pay them any attention, and never trust them.
25 people like this.
Reply 16 - Posted by:
DVC 3/9/2023 1:56:37 AM (No. 1420777)
I cancelled my decades long subscription long ago, and now won't even bother going to their site. Lowry is a total jerk, and the other, unknown, authors are just as bad from the little I see occasionally.
13 people like this.
Reply 17 - Posted by:
Zigrid 3/9/2023 10:45:49 AM (No. 1421078)
The government should have made the tape available to America...at once...why did they hide it for so long....WE know why...they had a narrative they had to push for the 2022 election and they didn't care who got in the way...to include the shaman serving 4 years for walking around the capitol building....now let the nervous nancy hostages go...
8 people like this.
Reply 18 - Posted by:
czechlist 3/9/2023 3:50:29 PM (No. 1421284)
#3 yes a lot of what Tucker revealed has been out there for awhile but on the internet and not on TV. Many older Americans do not use the interwebs so this is new to them. And, Tucker only showed vids from inside the Capitol but did not show cell phone video which is available.
One thing morons on all sides are making bias accusations for not showing the violence (some which he did). I've seen nothing but the violence in the legacy media for 2 years.
2 people like this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Magnante"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)