Left’s Lunatic Embrace of Infanticide
Helped Kill Roe v. Wade
Breitbart,
by
John Nolte
Original Article
Posted By: Beardo,
5/5/2022 11:14:50 AM
If the obscenity that is Roe v. Wade is overturned, you can blame Democrats for two reasons. The first is that for 50 years — despite countless opportunities — Democrats did nothing legislatively to legalize abortion. (Why would they when solving the issue would dry up fundraising and ginning up the base?) Secondly, rather than agree to limits on abortion, limits a vast majority of Americans see as reasonable, Democrats instead demanded the legal right to commit straight-up infanticide. (snip) The only way to describe the left’s tone around abortion today is demonic.
Reply 1 - Posted by:
jimboscott 5/5/2022 11:24:18 AM (No. 1147277)
Demonic is the perfect word. Demented might also apply.
Where else can one find someone who marches in the streets in the morning to celebrate a 'woman's right' to poke a hole in the skull of her partially born child and suck its brains out... then 10 hours later that same person can be seen at a late night candle light vigil to save the life of a convicted mass murderer who is scheduled for execution?
Only two words can apply where the life of innocents are slaughtered wholesale while the life of a criminal is seen as precious. Demonic and demented.
28 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
columba 5/5/2022 11:34:59 AM (No. 1147290)
An embrace of infant killing by the Left indicates that the Left does not support the Republic, especially in that the Left does not look toward LIFE as is mentioned in the Republic's foundation based on Life Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness.
Thus all leftists should be disqualified from any and all elective positions in the Republic.
9 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
bamapreacher 5/5/2022 11:38:23 AM (No. 1147294)
At what age is abortion no longer permissible for democrats? A couple of nut cases have argued that even a baby who has actually been born is still a candidate for abortion if that is what the birthing person (you can't call her a mother so I throw the left's terminology back at them) desires. If a living, breathing full term baby outside the womb is abortable, then are adults abortable? If so maybe it is time to abort a few of them, arguing that it is legal, and let that go to SCOTUS.
10 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
bighambone 5/5/2022 11:40:19 AM (No. 1147295)
Not too many Americans who have been paying attention will agree with Biden’s characterization that the great religions of the world support “aborting a child”.
16 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
jalo1951 5/5/2022 12:13:29 PM (No. 1147333)
Ever hear of birth control? Sounds like more people need to become more familiar with it. Way too many people use abortion as BC. I don't think much of abortion but I do not think it should outlawed. Under this decision (if this is the decision) it won't be. Plain and simple. The thought of a child (yes, it is a child) being killed (yes they are killed) hurts my soul. But I cannot ask an 11 year old who was abused by her uncle to carry a child to term or a woman who has been raped. I realize that an innocent will be killed but I have to think of the person who is here, in the now. We know these cases are few and far between but they do happen. And it is sad and it hurts. But the thought of a child who has his head crushed to make the abortion delivery simpler, or a knife or pair of scissors thrust in the back of their neck or any other barbaric procedure is evil. They talk about these babies as if they are merely blobs of tissue resembling mucus. I suggest that if you have doubts that abortion harms no one please do some visual research. If these pictures do not break your heart you might not be human. This is a state issue. Give it back to the states. I have no doubt CA and NY will offer an exciting vacation package. Come have an abortion, visit San Francisco or the Empire State building. Bring a friend with the printable BOGO coupon.
4 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
Trump'sCousin 5/5/2022 12:25:22 PM (No. 1147347)
You gotta be a very special kind of evil ftard and Kwirdo to be a demoncrap of any kind.
Real special.
Stand out special.
Attention drawing special.
When do we start aborting Ftards and Kwirdoz? Late term!
2 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
lakerman1 5/5/2022 12:55:20 PM (No. 1147390)
A black woman in Pennsylvania is running for the Republican nomination for U.S. Senate who is the product of rape of an eleven year old girl.
Would you extinguish her life? Was her mother wrong to not abort her??
2 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
SkeezerMcGee 5/5/2022 2:01:01 PM (No. 1147493)
Partial Birth Abortions must be much better prohibited by Congress by amending Chapter 18 U.S. Code § 1531, a federal statute titled "Partial-birth abortions prohibited," Introduced by Senator Rick Santorum (R-Pennsylvania).
Perhaps few people know that this statute exists. It was enacted in 2003 (signed by President George Bush). and on April 18, 2007, the U.S. Supreme Court in a 5–4 decision, Gonzales v. Carhart, held that the statute does not violate the Constitution.
One major problem is that the current statute is directed to only one specific method of abortion. Thus, 0many abortion providers adopted the practice of inducing "fetal demise" ("killing the fetus") before beginning late-term abortions. Typically, a solution is injected directly into the fetal heart. Also, to statute can be avoided by caesarian section.
The statute does not apply to a partial-birth abortion that is necessary to save the life of a mother whose life is endangered by a physical disorder, physical illness, or physical injury, including a life-endangering physical condition caused by or arising from the pregnancy itself.
Under this law, any physician "who, in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce, knowingly performs a partial-birth abortion and thereby kills a human fetus shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 2 years, or both." The scope of the statute needs to be amended to include any individual who performs a prohibited partial-birth abortion.
As Congress did in the current statute, Congress should include at least the following in the amending statute:
"(1) A moral, medical, and ethical consensus exists that the practice of performing a partial-birth abortion ... is a gruesome and inhumane procedure that is never medically necessary and should be prohibited."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Partial-Birth_Abortion_Ban_Act
0 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
bobn.t 5/5/2022 9:05:57 PM (No. 1147765)
Left’s Lunatic Embrace of Infanticide (and selling body parts) Helped Kill Roe v. Wade
0 people like this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Beardo"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)