‘Magnets for crime’: How one Seattle
politician’s views shifted on homeless encampments
Seattle Times,
by
Danny Westneat
Original Article
Posted By: Ron_lfp,
4/10/2022 11:07:11 AM
Recently the freshman Seattle City Councilmember Andrew Lewis was listening to a discussion on the extreme rise in gun violence in the city, and some simple questions were raised that he realized he didn’t know concrete answers to.
Who’s doing the shooting, and where? (snip) What Lewis found is that more than 18% of all shots-fired incidents in Seattle last year were associated with homelessness, according to police records. (snip) Probably nobody on his committee would have guessed that homelessness and the encampments were a bigger associating factor with Seattle’s shooting epidemic than gang activity
Reply 1 - Posted by:
bighambone 4/10/2022 11:20:29 AM (No. 1124665)
No kidding!
10 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
DVC 4/10/2022 11:33:29 AM (No. 1124683)
They really have to be stupid to fall for all this Democrat hogwash, and they prove it, time after time. We repeatedly elect the stupidest people in this country. But, Mr. Lewis is showing faint signs of being able to learn. He'll probably get over it and go back to the destructive, stupid "feel good" approach.
8 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
Strike3 4/10/2022 11:47:51 AM (No. 1124698)
Oh, C'mon man, how can packing a bunch of drug-addicted, unsanitary, mentally ill parasites into small spaces possibly cause trouble? Surely, the sounds of sexual intercourse, arguments, yelling and screaming through tent walls and peeing on the sidewalk outside of tents would create a sense of peace and relaxation. What are you people, Homelessophobic?
18 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
Right Time 4/10/2022 12:23:15 PM (No. 1124727)
No Duh!
3 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
mc squared 4/10/2022 12:45:52 PM (No. 1124756)
FTA: 'We need more shelter — tiny house villages, tent cities, motel rooms, safe parking lots, FEMA facilities — so that the city can end the unsanctioned camps and provide safer, managed places for people to go'.
I don't know about the efficacy of the other suggestions, but there is this:
Oakland: Fire in tiny homes for homeless residents raises safety concerns
https://www.mercurynews.com/?returnUrl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.mercurynews.com%2F2022%2F03%2F21%2Foakland-fire-breaks-out-at-tiny-homes-community-built-for-homeless-residents%2F%3FclearUserState%3Dtrue
Irresponsible people, WHATEVER THE REASON, can not be counted on to protect themselves nor others.
9 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
snowoutlaw 4/10/2022 1:20:35 PM (No. 1124772)
And the mostly peaceful burning the city had nothing to do with any shootings?
4 people like this.
My mom, who was raised during the 30s and 40s always told me there was nothing more worthless or destructive than an unmarried man.
She told stories where as a kid (I’m sure told to her by my grandmother), bums and hoboes would ride the train cars into town, rob everyones chicken houses, pig lots and smokehouses empty and leave townspeople with nothing for meat afterwords. There was nothing amusing or romantic about the harm they caused. People really loathed those single, excess men and nothing has changed over the years has it.
9 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
mc squared 4/10/2022 1:30:14 PM (No. 1124777)
#7; WW II took care of many of them. Many ( majority?) young and unmarried.
5 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
cor-vet 4/10/2022 1:47:53 PM (No. 1124784)
Why is he upset? They're just 'peaceful' shooters, like the 'peaceful' protesters of the past summer!'
4 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
bad-hair 4/10/2022 1:54:26 PM (No. 1124787)
Polls will do that. Shift his sorry butt to the unemployment line. Elect ANYBODY else.
3 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
cactus 4/10/2022 1:56:00 PM (No. 1124788)
And what is he expecting from all the young, single male “illegal migrants” being allowed to cross our birders and spread across the country?
6 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
janjan 4/10/2022 2:20:58 PM (No. 1124798)
No mention in the article, or any article about homelessness, about getting these people cleaned up and employed somewhere so they can take care of themselves. That’s obviously not the goal.
4 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
Omen55 4/10/2022 2:59:18 PM (No. 1124816)
And H2O is still wet!
4 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
DVC 4/10/2022 2:59:52 PM (No. 1124817)
What they really need is a nice, BIG mental ward in a prison. A huge number of these folks need to be locked up for OUR safety, and many for their own safety.
Sorry, the feel good foolishness which pretends that leaving the mentally ill to forage like wild animals in the feces strewn, violent urban hellscape is "kind and loving" is just actually mean and nasty. A large fraction, perhaps 50-90% of these folks need some sort of custodial care, and often it must be against their will. I agree that locking up some 'crazy person' against their will can seem to be "harsh and cruel" at first glance, but if they kill or maim themselves or someone else....how is that a good outcome?
These "homeless" encampments are clearly totally unworkable, and stupid things like hotels and such, or giving them "tiny homes" is all just eyewash. It sounds good to the kind hearted souls who don't think too clearly, but it has been repeated proven to not be good for ANYONE.
Bring back locked mental wards, and the legal processes to put the people who need to be there in them.
6 people like this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
stablemoney 4/10/2022 3:57:15 PM (No. 1124835)
Also magnets for filth and disease.
3 people like this.
Reply 16 - Posted by:
Luandir 4/10/2022 5:12:23 PM (No. 1124877)
Mini-kudos for the observation that "gun crime" means someone is actually doing the shooting. May he continue to find his way out of the woods.
2 people like this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Ron_lfp"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
Comments:
Signs of the woke waking up. One of their princes admits that crime is associated with "homeless" camps. Wow! (But of course they still only look at very, very expensive housing, rather than behavior and values.)