Six Things We Learned From The Kyle Rittenhouse Trial

Was just thinking last night, Alec Baldwin should send Kyle Rittenhouse a thank-you letter. Right?

Don't you dare bring up the innocence of OJ. If the police had properly obtained a search warrant, enough evidence to convict him would have found on day one (which it was but it was not admissable) and the trial would have been a slam dunk on that final .01% of guilt. Only a sick animal kills viciously like that and that's what he is. The jury was a joke.

The left including Biden and his minions believe that you have no right to self defense from the mob, the mob that they direct. Only the 2nd Amendment protects you from this belief. And that protection is non-infringeable.

Agree with everything, except it's not a vaccine, and you don't "take" it. Also, you're less likely to die from CoVid-19 than you are from getting the "clot shot"!

We just learned these things? C'mon, man. Mobs have always tried to circumvent trials, and governments have always used them to their advantage to "teach" the common man. (Alex, what are show trials?) Newspapers have always "lied". "Objectivity" in reporting is a recently adopted fiction, now being abandoned. The press has always been suspect - watch the original "Mr. Smith Goes to Washington"...made almost 80 years ago. Television is worse in that it depends on visuals and breathless reporters for drama to attract eyeballs...like those fake takes in hurricane winds and flood waters. Our justice system is "flawed"...who knew? I suspect just about everyone understands that the law is in the hands of a judge and/or jury, both of whom are often the end results of 'shopping" and "selection". The jury is generally the 12 most pliable (maybe gullible) that the pool offers. Big money is spent on shaping juries. I doubt none was spent by Rittenhouse. Binger didn't bring the charges. That's the job of the Kenosha County DA Michael D. Graveley - an elected official. Binger works for Gravely, and prosecutes with what evidence he has. Did he play dirty? Every lawyer does when he can on behalf of his client, and sometimes even against his client. Shaping evidence to the benefit of your case is expected. Binger had nothing to shape except grotesquely. Nothing new there. And he lost. And we just learned all this? My goodness, people need to get out more into the real world.

Earlier in the month, Republicans were acting like a 51/49 election was a tsunami. At the end of the month, conservative commentators are treating a perfectly normal verdict from a white jury in a midwestern State like a revolution. I was here 20 months ago when these same people let thugs burn down their cities without a word said. Sorry, but I don't think anything has changed. When offered a choice, normal will choose normal. That's all you're witnessing. Normals will still not get out of their EZ Boys to fight for normal.

#5, a prosecutor is in a search for truth. Defense counsel is in a search for victory. I'm surprised you don't know that.

I know the Patton Oswald Jr's, George Takei's etc. would come out against the Rittenhouse verdict, but what surprises me is that people I thought would know better also have found the verdict irredeemable: Patti Le Pone, Rita Moreno (who still thinks the Kavnaugh trial was a set up, it would seem) etc. People who have not watched the trial, seen the evidence, watched the prosecution break all constitutional rules for a win and still think a 17 year old who was asked to help protect a dealership, did not cross state lines (and what if he did, one might ask) and who had a legal long gun still think that BLACKS were killed, that it was a "mostly peaceful protest" with flames in the background, and that the kid was "asking for it" and shot one man (a pedophile, I might add, who had annaly raped up to 11 young boys) in the back. They have not seen the evidence and yet are more than willing to go with the flow. It refines not only brainless but laziness.

I learned that those two persecutors need to be in jail themselves.

#7 - That's a joke, right? If not, okay, believe that if you will. That's what the Bar Association says. What's that line from the greatest prosecutor in modern times, Lavrentiy Beria? "Show me the man and I'll show you the crime."

The socialist media lies. ...Repeat six times. That should sum up the facts!

The jury tampering attempt should be pursued. Morrison admitted to the police that he had been sent to follow the jury's bus on orders from NBC producer Irene Byron.

No justice, no country. The jury is still out on that one. One case that the jury got right does not mean justice is alive and well in this country. Look around at the crimes committed by this administration and tell me you see any justice there? It doesn’t matter what we learned from the Rittenhouse trial. If we cannot bring criminals to justice where is the justice in that? If we are holding political prisoners in DC, where is the justice in that? I think we have learned nothing. We won one battle but the war rages on.

Obviously, Binger should go the way of Nifong; and would if there was any integrity in the State (House) of Wisconsin

Even a 17 year old Patriot that is out helping people, has a right to self defense.

I want to congratulate the jurors who had the courage to stand up for justice....no amount of intimidation could sway them from their appointed task...they looked at the facts and made a judgment based on the material presented to them...and the blm and antifa mobs could not frighten them...and the judge was spot on...he managed his courtroom based on law...not political intimidation....

The jury was not like the gutless jury in Minneapolis, thank God

We also learned that the msm, court of public opinion, and dim prosecution treats you a lot more harshly if you lack sufficient melanin.

All Hail to the Number 1 point made in the last paragraph. And amen.