The Invisible Asylum: Olympia, Washington,
is a microcosm of the problems created
by the emptying of mental hospitals
City Journal,
by
Chrisopher F Rufo
Original Article
Posted By: Ron_lfp,
4/13/2021 10:20:43 PM
The story of American deinstitutionalization has become familiar. In a long arc—from President Kennedy’s Community Mental Health Act of 1963 to the present (snip) In the absence of the old asylums, Olympia’s mentally ill are now crowded into a city-sanctioned tent encampment, then shuffled through the institutions of the modern social-scientific state: the jail cell, the short-term psychiatric bed, the case-management appointment, the feeding line, and the needle dispensary. In the name of compassion, we have built a system that may be even crueler than what came before
Reply 1 - Posted by:
itsonlyme 4/13/2021 10:27:11 PM (No. 753987)
Yet the ruling elitists have great pensions.
18 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
bamapreacher 4/13/2021 10:44:10 PM (No. 753995)
In the late 1970’s and early 1980’s hospitals for mental patients, variously called asylums or state hospitals were basically forced to close by the courts. So-called “bleeding heart” liberals were at the forefront of lawsuits claiming atrocious conditions. The truth of the matter is, conditions were indeed atrocious in many places, notably in two of Pennsylvania’s hospitals, Pennhurst and Byberry. The problem arose when most of the patients were released to their families, families who in most cases didn’t really want them. Some threw them out, some simply allowed them to go wherever they wanted. In those cases, the patients generally ended up on the streets. Now the homeless problem has grown exponentially, especially in major cities. With mentally ill people homeless and loose on the streets, crime has also increased, ranging from beatings to murders, mostly of innocent, everyday people.
Meanwhile, most federal prisons and many state prisons house inmates who are given amenities like recreation rooms and gyms, decent food, medical care, and educational facilities, etc. It would seem to me that if out and out criminals get decent treatment, so, too, could mentally-challenged people. Just because the mental hospitals of the 70’s and 80’s were hellholes doesn’t mean new institutions couldn’t be built where these people could be housed in humane conditions. Unfortunately liberals seem to think these people are better off on the streets rather than locked away because housing them in mental hospitals, no matter how nice, is, in their twisted minds, like imprisoning them even though they are mostly not criminals.
23 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
DVC 4/13/2021 10:54:46 PM (No. 754002)
The "horrible" old asylums were better than living under a bridge and self medicating with illegal drugs and alcohol.
29 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
lakerman1 4/14/2021 12:34:14 AM (No. 754068)
Governor Rockefeller bore some of the blame by shutting mental facilities in New York State. Drug companies, with reported miracle meds for mental patients, bore some of the blame, as well.
7 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
chumley 4/14/2021 3:11:44 AM (No. 754106)
There is an old asylum not far from where I live, and you can take tours. It was a truly wretched place where all sorts of abuse were commonplace, to include sexual assault, beatings, medical experimentation (some by the us government), and mass drugging. If it had been a prison it would have been shut down for being cruel and unusual punishment.
The place is loaded with unmarked graves because nobody cared about the patients enough to come and get their bodies. The tour guides tell stories of the horrors that took place there and it is hard not to leave the place depressed.
Plus the cost of running the place had to be enormous. Staff salaries, utilities, maintenance, food, clothing and all the etceteras, even if spartan, would have broken the bank.
I dont like seeing nuts running around either, and we have a few locals that are pretty bad. But I'm not sure the institutions are the right answer. Certainly not the humane answer.
1 person likes this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
Edgelady 4/14/2021 10:32:03 AM (No. 754433)
Texas lost their case in the Supreme Court in 1984 after years of legal wrangling. There’s still a few state hospitals and state schools left for the most severe. There were only plans put together they hoped would work, most families were simply not capable of dealing with the problems. Homes were bought to be group homes, in many cases neighborhoods got wind of it and protested, not wanting groups homes or halfway houses next door. There was really no good working options. Many things sounded good on paper, but not in real life. At least with having mentally ill housed there’s far better chances of them remaining consistently on medication, on the street they self-medicate and it’s a continuing path downhill.
0 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
JimJr 4/14/2021 10:59:46 AM (No. 754470)
The unintended (?) consequences of the bleeding heart.
Some years ago, Reader's Digest (remember that?) published an article looking into homelessness and found that approximately 1/3 were hard core societal dropouts, 1/3 were mentally ill and 1/3 were intermittently homeless, usually due to low work skills and poor management skills.
0 people like this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Ron_lfp"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)