Post New Article

Justice Sotomayor Upbraids SCOTUS Majority for
‘Playing a Deadly Game’ With COVID Restrictions

Original Article

Posted By: NorthernDog, 11/26/2020 8:41:08 PM

U.S. Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor issued a stinging rebuke of her conservative colleagues, calling out what she perceived as hypocrisy and false equivalencies in Wednesday’s ruling against New York Governor Andrew Cuomo’s COVID-19 restrictions. In a 5-4 decision, the court’s conservative block of justices granted a temporary injunction requested by a Catholic Diocese and two Orthodox Jewish synagogues. By so doing, the court narrowly held that Cuomo’s regulations limiting attendance at religious services likely violated the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment. It was the court’s first major decision since the staunchly conservative Justice Amy Coney Barret joined


Unwise Latinexa will be throwing lots of fits over the next few years.

Post Reply

Reply 1 - Posted by: Catherine 11/26/2020 8:44:33 PM (No. 617398)
Wanna' bet it's on orders from the magic negro? Since when does one justice chastise the others and make it public to boot.
220 people like this.

Reply 2 - Posted by: Quigley 11/26/2020 8:45:00 PM (No. 617399)
How wise she is in her ways, with this new science. For is not a stone heavier than wood? And yet a stone bridge doth remain above water. Tell us more o wise latina.
119 people like this.

Reply 3 - Posted by: JL80863 11/26/2020 8:47:49 PM (No. 617402)
Democrats always find the Constitution inconvenient Practically every Wana be tyrant is a democrat/commie.
168 people like this.

Reply 4 - Posted by: RuckusTom 11/26/2020 8:51:09 PM (No. 617404)
The wise Latina speaks.
48 people like this.

Reply 5 - Posted by: Trump'sCousin 11/26/2020 8:54:30 PM (No. 617406)
The Ignorant Latina passes gas... Everyone hears it...and it stinketh!
161 people like this.

Reply 6 - Posted by: SavageRider 11/26/2020 8:57:39 PM (No. 617407)
There is no coronavirus exception in the Constitution. The first amendment is clear. Sotomayor is a political hack.
213 people like this.

Reply 7 - Posted by: Safari Man 11/26/2020 8:57:51 PM (No. 617408)
My only qualm is that it should have been 9:0.
203 people like this.

Reply 8 - Posted by: Jethro bo 11/26/2020 9:00:59 PM (No. 617411)
An Associate Just-Us of the SCOTUS and not once did she mention the Constitution. Just that the Court should give unlimited power over We the People all based on conjecture and wishful thinking. She is everything we have come to expect from cowards to scared to run for office but power mad making laws from their Black Robed tower. Not once did she mention the Constitution. Not once!
141 people like this.

Reply 9 - Posted by: tsquare 11/26/2020 9:02:48 PM (No. 617412)
It is the FIRST amendment. There is a process to amend our does not flow through SCOTUS or any mouthy person on it.
132 people like this.

Reply 10 - Posted by: JimBob 11/26/2020 9:15:45 PM (No. 617416)
Consider if ol' Ginsburg had NOT kicked the bucket last summer. She would of course have voted the other way. It would have been 5-4 to Restrict going to Church. One of our PRIMARY, GOD-GIVEN RIGHTS would have been..... abolished. THANKS AGAIN to President Trump and Mitch McConnel for acting promptly and filling the Supreme Court seat with a Constitutionalist. Also, the court affirming people's RELIGIOUS RIGHT to attend church does NOT Mandate going to church. People have the Freedom to choose..... to attend, or stay home, as they wish.
165 people like this.

Reply 11 - Posted by: janjan 11/26/2020 9:16:30 PM (No. 617417)
They are playing a dangerous game with the Constitution. We will not stand for it.
126 people like this.

Reply 12 - Posted by: FormerDem 11/26/2020 9:19:42 PM (No. 617420)
Did she comment on COVID risks of the BLM demonstrations? If not, can she explain why overlooking those supposed risks while rebuking those of church attendance is anything other than a self-unaware bigotry that she ought to have examined by now? If she will not do the work to identify and challenge her own bigotry she ought not be a judge.
115 people like this.

Reply 13 - Posted by: mizzmac 11/26/2020 9:38:51 PM (No. 617431)
Just what SCOTUS needs: a chief-scold. "Karen" Sotomayor needs to keep it to herself.
90 people like this.

Reply 14 - Posted by: privateer 11/26/2020 9:39:02 PM (No. 617432)
FTA: Notably, the Catholic Sotomayor was joined in her dissent by Justice Elena Kagan, who is Jewish and rarely joins with her colleague’s more acerbic dissents. Correction: who is Jewish, and not a total idiot. I have more respect for a Latina that cleans motel rooms, or grinds her own corn for her 4X4 Taqueria than for this overpaid, under-qualified, opinionated Jenny.
78 people like this.

Reply 15 - Posted by: PostAway 11/26/2020 9:44:24 PM (No. 617434)
Let’s play “Are You Smarter Than a Wise Latina Supreme Court Justice?”. It’s not even hard to win. First, the job of a Supreme Court Justice is to consider the constitutionality of proposed laws and not their medical efficacy. The spirit of the Constitution is to allow American citizens to decide how to conduct their own lives. Laws that prohibit certain activities are intended to prevent anyone from recklessly or intentionally causing harm to others. The asymptomatic going to religious services in a world where humans can contract deadly viruses by going about their daily lives has not traditionally been seen as such an activity. Citizens are aware of COVID and its dangers and have the right to decide to peaceably assemble to practice their religion. Her ridiculous comparison between Jews and Christians attending services in the U.S. and the Trump administration temporarily banning visas for travel to the U.S. from Muslim countries that have openly threatened the safety of Americans smacks of activism, obtuseness or malevolence. We in the U. S. have been badgered into submission for over fifty five years and have allowed generations of immigrants to come to this country and immediately assert their preferences on the native population. This has got to stop.
88 people like this.

Reply 16 - Posted by: pilot222 11/26/2020 9:51:24 PM (No. 617435)
This pot is coming to a boil. God help us.
70 people like this.

Reply 17 - Posted by: JunkYardDog 11/26/2020 10:09:40 PM (No. 617437)
Hey Sonia, take off your judge's robes and resign, then try on a lab coat and do some work involving immunology, then you can talk about viruses. But as long as you are a SC Justice, stick to the law, chica.
82 people like this.

Reply 18 - Posted by: Avanti1 11/26/2020 10:16:32 PM (No. 617440)
FTA: “Justices of this Court play a deadly game in second guessing the expert judgment of health officials ..." Sotomayor contradicts her own "argument" when she refers to experts. Gorsuch is an expert on legal issues yet Sotomayor saysd he is wrong. The same applies to medical experts; some of them are wrong,
45 people like this.

Reply 19 - Posted by: Nimby 11/26/2020 10:17:54 PM (No. 617441)
Hypocrisy! Thy name is Sotomayor
45 people like this.

Reply 20 - Posted by: Laotzu 11/26/2020 10:22:00 PM (No. 617442)
So now I know Justice Sotomayor is playing a deadly game.
43 people like this.

Reply 21 - Posted by: planetgeo 11/26/2020 10:22:03 PM (No. 617443)
This woman has no business being a Justice of the Supreme Court. She has no regard whatsoever for the Constitution, but is consumed with emotion and and a false sense of what constitutes science, like pretty much all Democrats these days. THEY are the ones playing the deadly game.
83 people like this.

Reply 22 - Posted by: zephyrgirl 11/26/2020 10:23:48 PM (No. 617445)
The "Wise Latina" needs to shut her pie hole.
46 people like this.

Reply 23 - Posted by: anniebc 11/26/2020 10:30:24 PM (No. 617448)
45 people like this.

Reply 24 - Posted by: BeatleJeff 11/26/2020 10:40:10 PM (No. 617454)
Proving why it was imperative to get ACB on the Court before the election ...
84 people like this.

Reply 25 - Posted by: Shmowry1 11/26/2020 10:42:44 PM (No. 617456)
Freedom is such a stubborn obstacle for tyrants.
83 people like this.

Reply 26 - Posted by: watashiyo 11/26/2020 10:57:25 PM (No. 617461)
Boo hoo hoo!
25 people like this.

Reply 27 - Posted by: Trigger2 11/26/2020 10:57:26 PM (No. 617462)
Who died and left her supreme ruler of the Supreme Court?
40 people like this.

Reply 28 - Posted by: GoodDeal 11/26/2020 11:01:17 PM (No. 617464)
A health issue does not take away Constitutional rights. As a Supreme Court Justice it might be an idea to learn about the Constitution and Bill of Rights before going to work. Your law clerks apparently aren’t giving you solid background law.
62 people like this.

Reply 29 - Posted by: SALady 11/26/2020 11:01:54 PM (No. 617465)
"Justice Sotomayor has a major hissy fit and threatens to hold her breath until she turns blue..." There, corrected the headline to match reality!!! Nobody is forced to go to church. But if you want to practice your constitutional right to do that, no dictator-wanna-be mayors or governors have the right or power to prevent you from choosing to practice your constitutional rights!!!!! Especially over a virus with a 0.04% fatality rate!!!!!
60 people like this.

Reply 30 - Posted by: PChristopher 11/26/2020 11:04:50 PM (No. 617468)
And just think...Commucrats want to pack the SC with more Just. Like. This. Be afraid.
56 people like this.

Reply 31 - Posted by: gramma b 11/26/2020 11:08:16 PM (No. 617469)
She's a dimwit. She is what affirmative action produces.
64 people like this.

Reply 32 - Posted by: Rumblehog 11/26/2020 11:16:37 PM (No. 617470)
Hey, "wise" Latrina, don't flap your lips and pontificate, cite the U.S. Constitution, and if you can't then shut up.
45 people like this.

Reply 33 - Posted by: TheLadyNextDoor 11/26/2020 11:17:22 PM (No. 617471)
Well stated #25.
19 people like this.

Reply 34 - Posted by: Obviousity 11/26/2020 11:24:35 PM (No. 617472)
To be lectured by a sitting comorbidity . . .
39 people like this.

Reply 35 - Posted by: confused 11/27/2020 12:27:51 AM (No. 617481)
"infects a people million weekly". What does that mean? one million test positive (yes). one million have symptoms (no). one million are incapacitated (no) Remember, 99% of those million will recuperate. How many actually die? The way the MSM reports the news (1000 new cases or 1000 positive tests) does not mean 1000 new infections or 1000 newly incapacitated new patients. This does not even mention the age range for new sick patients (mostly over 75 years), Lawyers tend to read the headlines and not look at the details. The propagandists know this and grossly inflame the headlines. The lawyers and propagandists deserve each other but the rest of us deserve some common sense.
36 people like this.

Reply 36 - Posted by: CDR 11/27/2020 1:28:12 AM (No. 617482)
But not a word with regard to LIFE when any issues before the bench regarding abortion which has killed in excess of 50,000,000 little ones. Your shedding crocodile tears....."judge"
40 people like this.

Reply 37 - Posted by: RedWhite&Blue2 11/27/2020 1:34:24 AM (No. 617485)
She is what’s radically wrong with “judges”........
28 people like this.

Reply 38 - Posted by: Mushroom 11/27/2020 1:55:48 AM (No. 617489)
Madam Justice, Your task is not to act as a medical professional, but only as you were appoint to do..That very narrow topic is the contents of the US Constitution. You are to evaluate items brought to your attention and determine if they meet the set restrictions on government action against the people the contract covers, citizens of the US. Your source document is the US Constitution as amended. You are not to read 'between' the lines, nor interpret the meaning of what, in your opinion, it should have said (Looking at you Roberts) but WHAT was presented. Simple example. The 1st Amendment limits the government. In case you forgot it is: Amendment I Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. So, Since these fine people are exercising their religious requirements, and for that matter peaceably assemble. The government isn't allowed to limit that. (I would note that permits are unconstitutional, but that's another matter). Do you see any exceptions? I don't. And I didn't even take out a student loan to go to law school ( a Training Institution). There is no Federal limitation period. So IF it's not *specified* in the Constitution, who has the say so on that? Well golly gee, someone added that (you might have not read that far once you decided abortion was a right).. It's the 10th Amendment, the last of the original limitations on government. It says: Amendment X The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people. Ok, so did you understand the word 'delegated'? Ok so it falls to the individual State or the People. So the State can say No! You can't assemble! , Well wait a sec there is that second phrase.. Nor *prohibited* by it to the States. What is "it", well our contract. And any decent lawyer should understand basic contract law. This is the 'clean up' of a very well defined document, it says " Hey, if the world changes or we missed something it's is a right of the State or the People,(key phrase) UNLESS, we already told you 'No.' Ok, So 'Justice' Sotomayor, I jumped out of my comfort zone of fixing things for people to try to help you do your job, I'm sorry if my words don't match yours, but I know and have read the document my forefathers (ok, I'm an immigrant that had NO rights here until my grandparents jumped through the legal hoops to BE citizens..) So be it the founders/representative of the REAL power (the States and People) signed this contract and I understand the simple words. It doesn't say 'Oh, you must look at Black's sithxth edition to learn what a term of art is, these words are in black and white before Black was a twinkle in his father's eye. You are lying. Flat out. It may not be a bother to you, but your ilk ten to reuse bad judgement as 'fact' This needs to stop. Signed, A party to our contract, and proud Citizen. Addendum: My apologies and thanks to Mrs Goldburg and crew , I promised to drop more in the collection box next time it comes round. (consider that 'cup of coffee' thing..I kinda like that) Bless you all and I am happy we had the money to cook the dinner we always wanted.
44 people like this.

Reply 39 - Posted by: smokincol 11/27/2020 2:46:27 AM (No. 617498)
it's a shame that, over the years, the Supreme Court has gotten so political. I don't think that our Founders had that in mind in the construction of our government.
28 people like this.

Reply 40 - Posted by: Timber Queen 11/27/2020 4:02:43 AM (No. 617508)
#39 - They were political from the beginning. Look up Marbury v. Madison (1803).
22 people like this.

Reply 41 - Posted by: DCGIRL 11/27/2020 4:34:25 AM (No. 617516)
If I remember correctly, she bragged about creating law not interpreting the law. We have five justices that are on our side.
28 people like this.

Reply 42 - Posted by: judy 11/27/2020 5:36:44 AM (No. 617535)
The dems & media stole the election with covid ... now they think they can bully the SC toooo!!! Did they object to Biden's so called victory rallies, Ginsberg's week long viewing, DC protests...
26 people like this.

Reply 43 - Posted by: dst4life 11/27/2020 6:59:05 AM (No. 617562)
She's upset over inadvertent COVID transmissions, a disease with a survival rate of 99.6% But completely unfazed over abortion, a deliberate act of killing, and with a survival rate of 0%. Just as a reminder, with the exception of only a few who survive a botched abortion, the batting average is as follows: Abortionists 61,000,000, unborn children 0.
33 people like this.

Reply 44 - Posted by: philsner 11/27/2020 7:32:12 AM (No. 617589)
Go pound sand.
19 people like this.

Reply 45 - Posted by: Rinktum 11/27/2020 7:43:26 AM (No. 617594)
Quite frankly, I question the expert judgment of many health officials. They have driven this train wreck and the country has suffered by listening to their expertise. Clearly, the only truth she seeks comes from the opinion of medial experts who agree with her philosophy of government control while she ignores the basic fundamental right of every American to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness regardless of what else is going on in the country. Those rights are given to us by God and are not to be trifled with by SCOTUS. Their job is to affirm those rights, not to impede them in any way. Once again, the left is driven by feelings and believe they are entitled to rule over the rest of us and ignore the Constitution.
27 people like this.

Reply 46 - Posted by: michimatician47 11/27/2020 7:44:23 AM (No. 617596)
Why did Roberts join this dissent? What Constitution is he looking at?
26 people like this.

Reply 47 - Posted by: Venturer 11/27/2020 7:47:35 AM (No. 617599)
Justices on the Supreme Court are supposed to Judge a case on the law. Not their personal opinions, and they are never to chastise the other Justices, If they have a complaint on a case they should write their complaint bearing on the law. Neither Kagan or Sotomeyer belong on the highest court in the land.
32 people like this.

Reply 48 - Posted by: Edgelady 11/27/2020 7:53:01 AM (No. 617605)
Let’s hear from all four dissenters - that’s fine, it’s all written on record. Point being in all this, people have a right to choose whether they want to go to church, synagogue, etc., and pray. They have a right to weigh the evidence according to where they live, where they worship and their own physical conditions, just like the choices they make when going to grocery stores. There’s something sinister afoot when denying people’s religious rights.
24 people like this.

Reply 49 - Posted by: edgar 11/27/2020 7:59:51 AM (No. 617608)
How dare you over rule a dictator!
18 people like this.

Reply 50 - Posted by: WhamDBambam 11/27/2020 8:00:56 AM (No. 617609)
The Fat Latina burps.
16 people like this.

Reply 51 - Posted by: franq 11/27/2020 8:31:47 AM (No. 617629)
Why, #47? Roberts will never again issue a conservative opinion. Another Bush failure.
28 people like this.

Reply 52 - Posted by: Patchy Groundfog 11/27/2020 8:41:07 AM (No. 617637)
Leftist judges are already untethered from the Constitution or even the plain meaning of English words but their greater sin may be their weather-vane adherence to groupthink. Covid is not a threat. We have nearly a year of evidence, not that we needed it. The gloom and doom routine is so artificial and hollow that not even leftists believe it.
15 people like this.

Reply 53 - Posted by: franq 11/27/2020 8:43:58 AM (No. 617641)
Who gives a hoot what this floozy says or thinks? Do we really think 9 people are going to change the way this country is going? Even if Trump wins, which I fervently pray happens, the left never rests. Tom Wolf and his drag queen will still run PA into the ground. Many other examples could be given.
14 people like this.

Reply 54 - Posted by: MickTurn 11/27/2020 8:45:56 AM (No. 617644)
AND YOU are a COMMUNIST! Your Reply?
11 people like this.

Reply 55 - Posted by: Jebediah 11/27/2020 8:51:41 AM (No. 617648)
There is NO question in my mind that Sotomayor is on the Court because she is a Hispanic female, and probably gay. She is a quota, and did/does NOT have any kind of sterling qualifications. She has also, not more than a brief handful of times, ever voted after considering a case constitutionally but ALWAYS votes along Democratic party lines. The Republicans, in their unerring deferment to a President's choice, allowed her in. When are we going to wise up.....this is no longer, it is so obvious you could trip on it, an ethical, play by the rules society anymore............there is no question that there was widespread fraud in the Presidential election and now we are trueing to lock the barn door after the horse has been stolen. (And as to John Roberts, what a disgrace, given us by the President who also refused to pardon Scooter Libby!)
24 people like this.

Reply 56 - Posted by: Dodge Boy 11/27/2020 9:02:07 AM (No. 617666)
Justice Sotie, if you are now choosing to politicize things, then you don't belong in the SCOTUS. Resign from the bench now so the President can nominate someone of stature. McConnell and team should be able to confirm your replacement by the end of December.
15 people like this.

Reply 57 - Posted by: bigfatslob 11/27/2020 9:18:04 AM (No. 617680)
So the Supreme Court has moved from dissenting arguments to scolding. Are we going to hear from the 'wise Latina' on every judgement by the SCOTUS this could get tiring? Justice John Bater Roberts gave his dissent so shut up Justice Chacita.
14 people like this.

Reply 58 - Posted by: LC Chihuahua 11/27/2020 9:27:59 AM (No. 617688)
Butt she's the wise Latina! We must prioritize her opinion over the rest of the Supreme Court. We would be unworthy not to do so. (/sssssss) Sotowhatever is just another partisan hack masquerading as a professional, and that is precisely what Obama wanted when he appointed her to the Supreme Court. The rule of law be damned which is Obama's belief in damning America. Obama believes in 'God damn America', and he made that his policy for 8 long years.
13 people like this.

Reply 59 - Posted by: Red Ghost 11/27/2020 9:34:37 AM (No. 617693)
I worked with Sonia Sotomayor. She is way, way over her head sitting on the Supreme Court. She is probably the most public and best example of why affirmative action hires are unwise. But then, she is a Democrat. What else needs to be said.
29 people like this.

Reply 60 - Posted by: Kafka2 11/27/2020 9:38:09 AM (No. 617695)
Sotomayor shows her contempt for the Constitution she swore to defend. The Constitution does not say the right to gamble at a casino or go to liquor stores is protected. Yet this is allowed, while the right to worship, that is in the Constitution, is to be prohibited.
16 people like this.

Reply 61 - Posted by: udanja99 11/27/2020 9:49:48 AM (No. 617706)
Want to do something about Covid19, Sonia? May I suggest that you do something about your own comorbidity? Put down the fork and get off the sofa.
15 people like this.

Reply 62 - Posted by: pmcclure 11/27/2020 10:12:37 AM (No. 617724)
So our Constitution should be overridden when the end - unchallenged tyranny - justifies the means? She is yet another illustration that evil and supernatural stupidity are inextricably linked.
11 people like this.

Reply 63 - Posted by: swarfer 11/27/2020 10:18:41 AM (No. 617729)
SCOTUS has ruled and that’s all there is to it. They reaffirmed the Constitution says what it says and that petty dictators cannot pick and choose to whom and when it applies. Typical of the left to try to try to subvert the Constitution by using “experts” to deprive some people but not others of their rights. There is no end to this type of logic and it stopped with this ruling. This is far more significant than most people realize. For example “experts” could say that gun owners are more likely to be mentally disturbed than non-gun owners therefore they have to have annual mental health examinations to keep their gun permits and if they refuse they loose their rights. With a little imagination you can see how this could be used against any group of people to deprive them of their rights.
14 people like this.

Reply 64 - Posted by: Strike3 11/27/2020 10:21:03 AM (No. 617731)
Sotomayor is simply worried because her body type is in the high-risk category - fat and stupid.
12 people like this.

Reply 65 - Posted by: LC Chihuahua 11/27/2020 10:26:08 AM (No. 617734)
The dissenters were Sotomayor, Kegan, Breyer, and ROBERTS. Not much comment on that yet. Our big government Republicans are starting to show their hands. Rather than hiding behind the Democrats, they are publicly siding with them. With regard to that, we may well be reaching a tipping point in our country. We will either follow the rule of law or the rule of tyrants.
13 people like this.

Reply 66 - Posted by: Zigrid 11/27/2020 10:27:50 AM (No. 617738)
This is not a surprise.... she's throwing a hissy fit because lefties are always angry.... wait till the court has to decide the election finals... she'll have a stroke...
13 people like this.

Reply 67 - Posted by: MDConservative 11/27/2020 10:31:28 AM (No. 617743)
"“Justices of this Court play a deadly game in second guessing the expert judgment of health officials about the environments in which a contagious virus, now infecting a million Americans each week, spreads most easily.” What "expert judgement"...the judgement and pronouncements that change from day to day? Judgements based from the beginning on false data and premises? The simple fact, Madam Justice, is that there is no expert consensus. People should have enough brains and sense to act responsibly as they see the threat. The whole idea was never to STOP the illness, but to "flatten the curve". Thank you for your panic on my behalf.
11 people like this.

Reply 68 - Posted by: DennisM 11/27/2020 10:39:31 AM (No. 617754)
Hypocrisy at it's finest she is. Want's to restrict attendance at churches but not at retail stores riots and terrorist demonstrations. Who's controlling her.
9 people like this.

Reply 69 - Posted by: Italiano 11/27/2020 10:44:27 AM (No. 617759)
The Affirmative Action-propelled Wide Latina is far and away the dumbest Justice in Supreme Court history.
13 people like this.

Reply 70 - Posted by: Arby 11/27/2020 10:48:56 AM (No. 617763)
She was never as wise as she thought she was.
12 people like this.

Reply 71 - Posted by: Highvoltage 11/27/2020 10:56:42 AM (No. 617770)
The sinful nature of tyrants to rule others exists in all but some more than others. Now Sotto sit down and shut up!
8 people like this.

Reply 72 - Posted by: iraengneer 11/27/2020 11:58:55 AM (No. 617820)
Detestable and vile beast. First appointed to a federal bench by the equally worthless George H. W. Bush. It figures. But, when the nomination to SCOTUS sent by Ovomit was being considered, what of the "stalwarts" of the Republicrat cabal?? Well, consider the "yea" votes, from low down skunks sporting an (R) sweater: Lamar Alexander (spit, spit) Kit Bond Susan Collins ( spit, spit, spit) Lindsey Graham (spit, spit) Judd Gregg Richard Lugar Mel Martinez Olympia Snowe (retch) George Voinovich Never again should the creeps in the RNC and that gang of creeps and treasonous illegitimate seek systemic support. Hang them next to the Dumbocraps. A murrain upon them all.
9 people like this.

Reply 73 - Posted by: cold porridge 11/27/2020 12:13:14 PM (No. 617834)
Sotomayor's job is not to decide cases based on her feelings about disease or exaggerations of disease. Her job is to decide cases based on the constitution. I hate leftists more and more as time goes by.
8 people like this.

Reply 74 - Posted by: TennDon 11/27/2020 12:32:15 PM (No. 617848)
inJustice Sodakracker should resign or learn what the Constitution really says. Since Xhe will not do so resignation in extreme disgrace— as should all libtards.
6 people like this.

Reply 75 - Posted by: DVC 11/27/2020 12:58:59 PM (No. 617868)
Freedom trumps your inexpert "experts", every single time, you foolish woman.
7 people like this.

Reply 76 - Posted by: Connor 11/27/2020 1:21:28 PM (No. 617885)
Sotomayor is out of order.
8 people like this.

Reply 77 - Posted by: lakerman1 11/27/2020 1:36:51 PM (No. 617895)
The two cunning linguists are now speaking to each other and themselves, after the appointment of Barrett to the Court. When Sotomayor was nominated for the 3rd circuit, she brought her beard to the Judiciary hearing. She didn't even bother to do that, when she was nominated for the Supreme Court. I had hoped for some rationality from Sonia, and I was proven wrong. Now as she awaits the consequences of her morbid obesity - bad for everyone, but especially lethal for a Type I diabetes sufferer - I will hope she has an epiphany, on her road to perdition. Elena Kagen is unworthy of an insult.
10 people like this.

Reply 78 - Posted by: msjena 11/27/2020 1:38:25 PM (No. 617896)
She makes these statements in her dissent, not in an out-of-court statement. She apparently doesn't understand the Constitution because she compares the strict scrutiny given in free exercise of religion cases to lack of heightened scrutiny given to the so-called Muslim ban. People trying to enter the United States do not have Constitutional protections. They are not entitled to claim discrimination at all.
10 people like this.

Reply 79 - Posted by: DCGIRL 11/27/2020 3:15:44 PM (No. 617968)
Justice Sotomayor is the justice that said she believes in making law not interpreting law. She needs to be removed as soon as possible along with Roberts.
7 people like this.

Reply 80 - Posted by: Luandir 11/27/2020 3:22:24 PM (No. 617973)
#2, if she weighs the same as a duck...
3 people like this.

Reply 81 - Posted by: Lawsy0 11/27/2020 5:19:20 PM (No. 618044)
This gynattorney baby murderer needs to shut her pie hole. Doesn't she have any law clerks who have passed the bar? (Dittos on the Affirmative Action hire!)
2 people like this.

Reply 82 - Posted by: Hugh Akston 11/27/2020 6:54:51 PM (No. 618092)
I could have 'liked' most of the comments, but I did 'like' #78 for this... Elena Kagen is unworthy of an insult.
4 people like this.

Reply 83 - Posted by: web 11/27/2020 7:50:57 PM (No. 618120)
She may be wise, but she isn't too bright, if she believes all this COVID hype.
1 person likes this.

Reply 84 - Posted by: PrayerWarrior 11/27/2020 10:54:03 PM (No. 618197)
This is what "Ruling by Emotion" looks like. Get another job, you are no lawyer! You are acting like an out of control emotional liberal female. Who picked you for this position? Oh, Obama. That explains everything.
3 people like this.

Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "NorthernDog"
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
Most Recent Articles posted by NorthernDog"
LA teachers warned to not share
vacation pics as union seeks safe
return to classrooms: report
8 replies
Posted by NorthernDog 3/9/2021 11:26:48 AM Post Reply
UTLA teachers have been warned not to post vacation pictures on social media as the union continues to seek a safe return to in-person instruction amid the coronavirus pandemic, according to a report Monday. The teachers were urged to keep spring break pictures off social media because it could hurt the union's argument that it's currently unsafe to return to the classroom, according to a screenshot that appeared to be from a roughly 5,700 member Facebook group titled, "UTLA FB GROUP- Members Only." (Snip) The warning comes after UTLA members voted overwhelmingly to reject what the union called an "unsafe"
Nevada Democratic Party Staff Quits En
Masse after Socialists Win Leadership Roles
6 replies
Posted by NorthernDog 3/9/2021 11:16:13 AM Post Reply
Every Nevada Democratic Party staff member quit after Democratic socialists won party leadership roles, according to a new report. Alana Mounce, the party’s executive director, reportedly notified the newly elected party chair, Judith Whitmer, that she and other staff members were resigning, according to The Intercept. The party’s operations director, research director, communications director and finance director all resigned after the left-wing candidates of the “NV Dems Progressive Slate,” which was run by the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) and the Left Caucus, beat out the Democratic Party’s “Progressive Unity Slate” on Saturday. All but one of the winning candidates
Student loan forgiveness may become
tax-free under Covid relief bill.
Here’s what that means for borrowers
15 replies
Posted by NorthernDog 3/8/2021 1:48:12 PM Post Reply
A significant provision making any student loan forgiveness tax-free has been included in the $1.9 trillion federal coronavirus stimulus package that’s working its way through Congress and will likely soon be signed into law. Currently, any student loan debt canceled by the government can be considered taxable and levied at the borrower’s normal income tax rate. For example, if someone earns $50,000 a year, and was at a 22% tax rate, and received $30,000 in student loan forgiveness, they might be slapped with a $6,600 bill from the IRS. Soon, borrowers may be off the hook from these payments. What
George Floyd Trial: Judge Postpones Jury
Selection As Murder-Charge Question Looms
8 replies
Posted by NorthernDog 3/8/2021 12:09:52 PM Post Reply
Hennepin County Judge Peter Cahill postponed the start of Derek Chauvin's trial in the killing of George Floyd on Monday, after an appeals court ordered him to reconsider his original decision to dismiss a third-degree murder charge against the former Minneapolis police officer. The decision came as a pool of potential jurors waited to start the selection process. The delay comes as Chauvin's defense attorney, Eric Nelson, said he is finalizing an appeal asking the Minnesota Supreme Court to review the question of whether Cahill should consider reinstating the murder charge. "We're prepared to try this case. It is not
'It Was A Sham' Piers Morgan slams
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s
£32m wedding as a ‘scam’ because
they got hitched three days before
9 replies
Posted by NorthernDog 3/8/2021 10:50:54 AM Post Reply
The Duke and Duchess of Sussex shared the revelation that they married in secret three days before their wedding at Windsor Castle. Bringing up the "bombshell that has been lost in all of this", Piers said on Good Morning Britain today, "I didn't even know you could do that twice in three days". "So the vows they made on national TV were not real vows? So everything we saw was a sham. "Also who has the Archbishop of Canterbury in their back garden to get married? And they claim to be 'people of the people'. "The Archbishop of Canterbury wouldn't
Yemen's Houthis attack Saudi oil
heartland with drones, missiles
5 replies
Posted by NorthernDog 3/8/2021 10:41:08 AM Post Reply
SANAA - Yemen’s Houthi forces fired drones and missiles at the heart of Saudi Arabia’s oil industry on Sunday, including a Saudi Aramco facility at Ras Tanura vital to petroleum exports, in what Riyadh called a failed assault on global energy security. The Saudi energy ministry said there were no casualties or loss of property from the attacks. The defence ministry said it intercepted an armed drone coming from the sea prior to hitting its target at an oil storage yard at Ras Tanura, site of a refinery and the world’s biggest offshore oil loading facility. Shrapnel from a ballistic
Out-of-Control College Party in
Colorado Met by SWAT Team, Tear Gas
9 replies
Posted by NorthernDog 3/8/2021 8:53:43 AM Post Reply
On Saturday, students at the University of Colorado, Boulder, fought for their right to party. Literally. The university and the city’s police department are investigating after hundreds of maskless students showed up to a mid-pandemic rager-turned-riot in the city’s University Hill neighborhood on Saturday night, injuring three SWAT responders and damaging city and private property, authorities said Sunday. Video showed one student's car, its windows already shattered, being overturned by a throng of partygoers. “Any student who is found responsible for engagement in acts of violence or other egregious acts connected to the events—including damage to property and not dispersing
First Challenge in George Floyd Murder
Trial: Finding an Impartial Jury
13 replies
Posted by NorthernDog 3/7/2021 8:04:55 PM Post Reply
MINNEAPOLIS — Late last year, a 14-page questionnaire began to arrive in mailboxes across Minneapolis and its suburbs. It asked if the recipient had watched the video of George Floyd dying under a police officer’s knee. What about the protests against police brutality, it wanted to know — did you go? How do you feel about Black Lives Matter? It asked respondents to list their education level, any martial arts training, even their favorite podcasts. And then there was the essay prompt, followed by a daunting expanse of blank paper: Tell us everything you have heard about the death of
LA County may return a beachfront
property seized from a Black family
nearly 100 years ago that could be
worth $75 million
20 replies
Posted by NorthernDog 3/7/2021 6:04:05 PM Post Reply
LA County is considering returning a beachfront property to the descendants of its original owners who were the first Black landowners in Manhattan Beach, California. As KABC-TV reported, Willia and Charles Bruce's property was taken away when the city council used eminent domain in 1924. According to the outlet, the couple's property, which is now a lifeguard building, served as a beach resort for Black families at the time amid racial tension and discrimination. "The property that was once the Bruce's is now owned by the County, and I want LA County to be part of righting this wrong," Los
Berkeley home where VP Kamala Harris
grew up may become historic landmark
31 replies
Posted by NorthernDog 3/7/2021 10:03:09 AM Post Reply
BERKELEY, Calif. -- The East Bay home where Vice President Kamala Harris grew up may become a historic landmark. Berkeley leaders will consider a resolution on Tuesday that would allow for homes of historic residents to be given landmark status. Harris was born in Oakland and spent most of her childhood in Berkeley. She attended Berkeley's African American cultural center almost every week and she was part of the city's first voluntary school integration program. "Her election as the first woman, African-American and South Asian American to be elected to the second highest position in the country are historic achievements that
The sign said 'men working,' but
girls told city council 'we've seen
plenty of women doing construction'
25 replies
Posted by NorthernDog 3/7/2021 9:50:58 AM Post Reply
CARMEL, Ind. – Two sharp-eyed young sisters were hailed as change agents and champions of equality by the Carmel City Council Monday. While passing Carmel construction zones on their school bus, Blair Babione, 11, and Brienne Babione, 9, saw something that seemed wrong: signs that read “Men Working.” (Snip) Finkham introduced a resolution to enforce the gender neutral guidelines on Carmel construction projects. It passed unanimously. “’Men Working” or ‘Men At Work’ signage communicates the false and unacceptable message that women cannot or should not work in the construction trades or other related fields,” the resolution reads. "Having been alerted
Families of those killed by police
demand justice for George Floyd in
former officer Derek Chauvin's trial
31 replies
Posted by NorthernDog 3/6/2021 8:54:21 AM Post Reply
They came as siblings, parents, spouses, and friends. Families of more than a dozen Minnesotans killed by police gathered Friday before the trial of Derek Chauvin to demand a murder conviction in the death of George Floyd. If guilty, Chauvin would be the first former police officer to be convicted of murdering a Black man in Minnesota. The state's only ex-cop currently in prison for murdering a civilian is Mohamed Noor, who in 2019 was sentenced to 12 years in prison for fatally shooting Justine Damond after she called 911 to report a possible rape. "We have to be brutally
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
Biden's Incoherence Just Hit Critical Mass,
This Is Scary Awful
48 replies
Posted by Dreadnought 3/8/2021 11:45:49 PM Post Reply
As we reported two days ago, Joe Biden completely made no sense when he was trying to explain the Wuhan coronavirus relief bill. It was really bad and it explains why they’re afraid to have him deliver an address to Congress or do any kind of a real solo press conference, because at this point they have to be afraid this is all going to fall apart if he does anything live and this all becomes too obvious to the American people. But there’s only so long that they can hold this off. And it’s getting worse, as video today revealed. Biden was holding an event to announce the nomination
‘Huge Development’: Democrat Sen. Joe
Manchin Starts To Crack On Filibuster,
Signals Openness To Change
41 replies
Posted by Imright 3/8/2021 12:32:41 AM Post Reply
Democrat Senator Joe Manchin (WV) appears to have started to shift his views on the filibuster with remarks that he made on two news shows on Sunday morning.The shift from Manchin comes after he has repeatedly stated that he would not vote to end the filibuster, despite pressure from the far-Left. During the interviews on Sunday, Manchin repeatedly claimed that he was not open to ending the filibuster because he did not want to strip the minority party of their power in the Senate, but signaled that he was open to changing it.Fox News host Chris Wallace asked Manchin if he would consider “reforming the filibuster” if “Republicans
Evangelicals For Biden ‘Feel Used And Betrayed’
By Biden Fulfilling His Radical Abortion Promises
37 replies
Posted by Calvinesq 3/8/2021 10:37:51 AM Post Reply
In an open letter released Sunday, Pro-Life Evangelicals for Biden urged him to “honor his commitment” and include the Hyde Amendment in Democrats’ $1.9 trillion COVID-19 spending package, writing “we feel used and betrayed.” The letter states: We are very disappointed about the COVID-19 relief package’s exclusion of the Hyde Amendment, a longstanding bipartisan policy that prevents taxpayer funding for abortion. [snip] As pro-life leaders in the evangelical community, we publicly supported President Biden’s candidacy with the understanding that there would be engagement [with] us on the issue of abortion and particularly the Hyde Amendment
Meghan Markle reveals her true
self in Oprah interview
32 replies
Posted by Imright 3/8/2021 9:11:10 AM Post Reply
If you had any doubts that Meghan Markle is a manipulative piece of work, her bombshell Oprah interview Sunday night dumping on the British monarchy would set you straight. Prince Harry’s American wife accused his family of hateful racism against her baby, claimed they refused to protect her and drove her to the point of suicide.She made the incendiary and implausible charge that when she was pregnant with Archie, the royal family decreed that her unborn son would be denied the title of “prince” because her mixed race meant he might have dark skin.
Biden’s German Shepherds Shipped Back
to Delaware After ‘Biting Incident’
Involving White House Security
31 replies
Posted by Imright 3/8/2021 11:38:50 PM Post Reply
Joe and Jill Biden’s German Shepherds were shipped back to Delaware after a “biting incident” involving White House security, CNN reported.Major was adopted by Joe Biden and his handler wife Jill in 2018 from an animal shelter.Major and Champ moved into the White House in January and they’re already gone. The condition of the victim was not disclosed but it was serious enough to remove both dogs from the White House.CNN reported: The two German Shepherds belonging to President Joe Biden and first lady Jill Biden were returned to the Biden family home in Delaware last week
Pelosi’s HR1 bill a blatant power grab for Democrats 30 replies
Posted by FlyRight 3/8/2021 5:28:52 AM Post Reply
Nancy Pelosi’s top priority is to turn America into a one-party nation ruled by Democrats. Her bill HR 1 trashes the U.S. Constitution in an attempt to rig the system and make it virtually impossible to elect a Republican president or Congress again. It’s a power grab. The bill eviscerates state voting laws and forces all the states to conform to a set of rules that includes automatic voter registration. Anyone who goes to a DMV or applies for food stamps, Medicaid or other social services, or attends a public college will be automatically enrolled to vote. Noncitizens are obligated to identify themselves and opt out,
Biden seems to forget defense
secretary’s name, calls him
'the guy who runs that outfit'
29 replies
Posted by Ribicon 3/8/2021 8:37:17 PM Post Reply
President Biden on Monday seemed to forget Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin’s name at a White House event—calling the Pentagon chief “the guy who runs that outfit over there.” Biden was announcing the nomination of two female generals to lead US military combatant commands. “And I want to thank the sec—the, the, ah former general. I keep calling him general, but my, my—the guy who runs that outfit over there,” Biden said.(Snip) Earlier at the event, Biden mentioned the Defense Department leader by his name, “Secretary Austin,” while appearing to read from a teleprompter.
Oprah interview bombshells: Meghan claims
she was suicidal when she was five months
pregnant, Kate made HER cry and Royals
refused to make Archie a prince because
they were worried how 'dark' he would be
27 replies
Posted by Imright 3/8/2021 8:21:02 AM Post Reply
The Royal Family was left reeling this morning after Meghan Markle tearfully revealed that the stress of royal life made her suicidal when she was five months pregnant, claimed Archie was denied the title of prince because he is mixed-race and said Kate Middleton made her cry before she married Harry in a bombshell interview with Oprah Winfrey.The couple also chose to reveal that they are having a baby girl to the tens of millions of people watching the CBS show broadcast in the US before accusing the Royal Family of racism and revealing the deep rift 'Megxit' has caused with Prince Charles and Prince William.
Meghan Markle openly
accuses the Royals
of racism
26 replies
Posted by Magnante 3/8/2021 5:26:07 AM Post Reply
I’m probably second to none in my dislike for Meghan Markle. There’s something unattractive about a mature woman marrying into the British Royal family with one of the world’s most expensive weddings, hanging out with the Queen, living in insane luxury…and then whining non-stop about the horror of her life. There’s something even less appealing when that woman accuses the Royal family of race hatred. And the problem is that, when it comes to that left-wing diva, Meghan Markle, it’s hard to believe most of what she says. After weeks of hype, CBS finally televised Meghan Markle and Prince Harry’s interview with Oprah.
Watch: John Solomon Gives Stunning Update
in Durham’s ‘Russiagate’ Investigation
24 replies
Posted by Imright 3/8/2021 4:56:55 PM Post Reply
Without question, the vast majority of Americans who support former President Donald Trump were angry and frustrated throughout 2020 passed with barely a mention of then-U.S. Attorney John Durham’s criminal investigation into the FBI’s fraudulent “Russiagate” counterterrorism operation directed at his 2016 campaign.In the weeks before the November election, word got out that then-Attorney General William Barr wasn’t going to announce any indictments or even a report on Durham’s investigation because he did not want to influence the outcome.So far, in fact, the only indictment to come out of the Durham probe is that of former FBI lawyer Kevin Clinesmith, who essentially got a slap on the wrist
Democrats renew calls to remove
J. Edgar Hoover's name from FBI building
24 replies
Posted by Ribicon 3/8/2021 2:56:29 PM Post Reply
Rep. Steve Cohen vowed to renew the push to remove former FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover’s name from the bureau’s downtown Washington headquarters, according to an interview released Monday. Appearing on Yahoo! News’ Skullduggery podcast, the Tennessee Democrat said the effort is getting a fresh look after the release of a new movie highlighting the FBI’s secret program to discredit civil rights activists. The Washington Times in 2019 first reported Democrats’ bid to strip the longtime FBI director’s name from the bureau’s headquarters. Mr. Cohen said the impetus to revive the bid is the new movie, “Judas and the Black Messiah.” The movie details
Jill Biden, the Meghan Markle
in the WH, is egregiously
guilty of elder abuse
23 replies
Posted by Magnante 3/9/2021 4:40:38 AM Post Reply
“There must have been a moment, at the beginning, when we could have said –-no. But somehow we missed it.” Tom Stoppard The millions of Americans who were paying attention throughout the 2020 election campaign all became painfully aware of the fact that Joe Biden’s cognitive abilities were slipping and slipping fast. His wife, as the person closest to him, should have been the one to call the campaign quits in order to reduce stress on the man. Instead, apparently so anxious to become the First Lady by any means necessary, Mrs. Biden continued to push her failing husband’s campaign forward as if he were mentally qualified.
Post New Article