Democrats prepare bill limiting U.S. Supreme Court justice terms to 18 years
Reuters,
by
Andrew Chung
Original Article
Posted By: bad-hair,
9/24/2020 8:08:45 PM
Democrats in of the House of Representatives will introduce a bill next week to limit the tenure of U.S. Supreme Court justices to 18 years from current lifetime appointments, in a bid to reduce partisan warring over vacancies and preserve the court's legitimacy.. The new bill, seen by Reuters, would allow every president to nominate two justices per four-year term and comes amid heightened political tensions as Republican President Donald Trump prepares to announce his third pick for the Supreme Court after the death on Sept. 18 of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, with just 40 days to go until the Nov. 3 election..
Just another part of this Representative Republic today's Democrats don't like.
Some of their voters will actually believe this sounds like a good idea without actually thinking about it.
Think for yourself, or others will think for you without thinking of you (Henry David Thoreau)
13 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
MMC 9/24/2020 8:18:43 PM (No. 551419)
Are they this stupid? Short answer, yes.
Have they written laws to term limit the House of Representatives? How long has Wuhan NaN been in Office?
When the Democrats genuinely want to do the best for America- call me!
#wontbesittingbyphone
23 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
Lala 9/24/2020 8:19:42 PM (No. 551421)
I think, in theory, this is a good idea that I could support. But of course, it would require a Constitutional Amendment. Mark Levin proposed something similar in the Liberty Amendments.
16 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
MissMann 9/24/2020 8:21:59 PM (No. 551422)
As long as Congress determines the make up of the SCOTUS, whatever they do, they can undo, and would surely reverse this when next they were in power. I'd go for 30 years, if it were in an amendment.
2 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
MindMadeUp 9/24/2020 8:22:42 PM (No. 551425)
Pure posturing. Even if they passed it, they would make a new law allowing a president to make as many lifetime appointment as he likes if a Democrat/Marxist got in power
6 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
Italiano 9/24/2020 8:23:54 PM (No. 551427)
In recent times, how many Democrat appointees have turned on liberals?
How about Republican appointees on conservatives?
Not even close.
6 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
msjena 9/24/2020 8:24:42 PM (No. 551429)
I don’t support this and it would require a Constitutional amendment so it isn’t going to happen.
10 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
JL80863 9/24/2020 8:25:21 PM (No. 551431)
"...in a bid to reduce partisan warring..." Hey, Chung. How long have you been on the DNC payroll?
6 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
Lawsy0 9/24/2020 8:26:15 PM (No. 551432)
DNC: dumb nutty crassholes.
4 people like this.
When Dems and libs cannot win by the ballot box, they endlessly attempt to change the rules.
12 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
NYbob 9/24/2020 8:29:55 PM (No. 551436)
OK, combine that with in person voting and a heavy, mandatory prison sentence for voter fraud. Then review all educational materials that might encourage sedition or destruction of American founding principles, and we have a deal.
5 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
john56 9/24/2020 8:35:51 PM (No. 551438)
Okay. 18 years for anyone named after the amendment passes. Plus limit SCOTUS to 9.
2 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
Salt5792 9/24/2020 8:57:27 PM (No. 551456)
Ho Hum. DOA in the Senate.
5 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
hershey 9/24/2020 8:57:52 PM (No. 551457)
Smoke and mirrors...the SC is set by the Constitution...not made up every time the tide turns against the fooking liberals...methinks soon the decisions will not be 5-4 but maybe 7-2 with liberal heads exploding to symphony music...
4 people like this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
earlybird 9/24/2020 8:58:48 PM (No. 551459)
I wondered when they’d come up with this...
4 people like this.
Reply 16 - Posted by:
earlybird 9/24/2020 8:59:21 PM (No. 551461)
I think retirement at 80 could be a good idea.
8 people like this.
Reply 17 - Posted by:
iraengneer 9/24/2020 9:00:35 PM (No. 551466)
Mark me in favor. Not only SCOTUS, but *ALL* federal judges, magistrates included. All members of either house of Congress as well.
Time to relegate all segments of the federal government to the small, limited role which was intended by the Founders.
11 people like this.
Reply 18 - Posted by:
chance_232 9/24/2020 9:02:54 PM (No. 551471)
Section 1.
The judicial power of the United States, shall be vested in one Supreme Court, and in such inferior courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The judges, both of the supreme and inferior courts, shall hold their offices during good behaviour, and shall, at stated times, receive for their services, a compensation, which shall not be diminished during their continuance in office.
Sounds to me like a lifetime appointment. Had the founders envisioned the life expectancy that we have today, they may have re-thought that.
Instead of term limits, I would prefer an age limit or a requirement to step down for health or mental incapacitation. Ginsberg should have stepped down years ago.
4 people like this.
Reply 19 - Posted by:
anniebc 9/24/2020 9:16:33 PM (No. 551494)
You first, House.
4 people like this.
Reply 20 - Posted by:
Penney 9/24/2020 9:20:34 PM (No. 551500)
This crop of dems couldn't hold a candle to the Wisdom of America's Founders! They and their pawns would intimidate, corrupt & destroy everything in sight if they could! They are trying right now.
5 people like this.
Reply 21 - Posted by:
Mizz Fixxit 9/24/2020 9:30:08 PM (No. 551504)
Count me in —- term limits for congress critters. 18 years total. No switching back and forth between House and Senate for extra time. Switch if you like, but when cumulative 18 years is reached you are out!
7 people like this.
Reply 22 - Posted by:
Jennie C. 9/24/2020 10:04:10 PM (No. 551526)
Wouldn't that require a Constitutional amendment?
4 people like this.
Reply 23 - Posted by:
whyyeseyec 9/24/2020 10:17:40 PM (No. 551531)
This article is garbage. This cannot be done by law alone. It has to be done with a constitutional amendment passed by Congress and ratified by 38/50 states - or via an Article V convention of states.
3 people like this.
Reply 24 - Posted by:
padiva 9/24/2020 10:45:32 PM (No. 551549)
And term limits for the congress critters first. 12 years for either the house or the senate.
5 people like this.
Reply 25 - Posted by:
monster 9/24/2020 10:47:17 PM (No. 551552)
Let's have term limits for Congress first. Then we'll talk.
5 people like this.
Reply 26 - Posted by:
24tea@Mag 9/24/2020 11:27:19 PM (No. 551570)
Let’s limit Dims to no years and say goodbye to the Party of Hate and Greed.
3 people like this.
Reply 27 - Posted by:
ussjimmycarter 9/25/2020 12:08:24 AM (No. 551591)
We can’t win...quick change the rules!!! What? We can’t do that? Awwwww!
1 person likes this.
Reply 28 - Posted by:
LC Chihuahua 9/25/2020 12:15:13 AM (No. 551595)
Congress could always try what was done to Andrew Johnson in 1866. They reduced the number of Supreme Court judges from 10 down to 7, and Johnson could not appoint any judges. Once Johnson was out of office, Congress increased the number of judges up to its current number (9).
The Democrats would first have to retake the Senate for this to work however.
1 person likes this.
Reply 29 - Posted by:
Trigger2 9/25/2020 3:19:54 AM (No. 551639)
I prefer a bill to limit the terms of Congress critters.
2 people like this.
Reply 30 - Posted by:
DVC 9/25/2020 1:36:36 PM (No. 552063)
They dream of getting rid of all the inconvenient rules which block their current power grabs.
The bill is DOA.
2 people like this.
Reply 31 - Posted by:
franq 9/25/2020 4:42:40 PM (No. 552239)
Yawn. I do agree with #16. But it requires proper Constitutional amendment process. THEN pass something really meaningful. Congressional term limits with matching 401k. No pension.
0 people like this.
Reply 32 - Posted by:
doctorfixit 9/25/2020 5:36:29 PM (No. 552271)
Make all federal judges elected positions with a 5 year limit.
1 person likes this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "bad-hair"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
Comments:
There's this little thing called a constitution and some parts can't be amended. Like this one. They are actually this stupid or they think we are. Guess which.