Trump Isn't Starting a War, He's Ending One
PJ Media,
by
A.J. Christopher
Original Article
Posted By: FlyRight,
2/28/2026 7:43:37 AM
As of this writing, the United States and Israel have begun what I can only assume to be the first round of military strikes on Iran. I also assume that the eventual goal is regime change, effected by the United States, but driven by the Iranian people. And I'm not alone. Over the past few days, the so-called “think” tanks are falling all over themselves to be the first to prophesy a quagmire, a “trap,” a “forever war,” and Iraq 3.0. The dregs at Foreign Policy took a break from clamoring for a post-American world order to demand we not bomb Iran precisely to more quickly usher in said order.
Post Reply
Reminder: “WE ARE A SALON AND NOT A SALOON”
Your thoughts, comments, and ideas are always welcome here. But we ask you to please be mindful and respectful. Threatening or crude language doesn't persuade anybody and makes the conversation less enjoyable for fellow L.Dotters.
Reply 1 - Posted by:
Rumblehog 2/28/2026 9:26:23 AM (No. 2074129)
This must be why up-Chuck Schumer and Hhhaack-heem Jeffries were looking like they'd just seen a ghost right after the Gang of Eight received that mysterious WH briefing by Marco Rubio prior to the SOTU.
9 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
JimBob 2/28/2026 9:26:57 AM (No. 2074130)
OK, L-Dotters...... Fire up the Wayback Machine!
First thought:
If my memory serves me correctly, the Iranian 'mullets' declared war on the United States many years -decades- ago.
Just 'big talk' on their part? -or- is it that they have done everything in their power to try to hurt America and Americans, but they are so impotent that we have not really taken notice? They have backed a number ot terrorist groups and caused a lot of trouble, but have, at least until now, not had the ability to mount enough of an attack on America to provoke the American government into really serious military action, action aimed at 'regime change' in Iran.
Second thought:
The Iranian 'mullets' have been working for decades on building atomic explosives, and the missiles to place those warheads on Israel and America. They have also said, over and over, that as soon as they have such atomic weapons, they will USE them.
Should we wait until they actually destroy a city -and kill everyone in it- before acting?
It seems to me that President Trump is taking the unpleasant but necessary action now, to avoid at outright Catastrophe later.
If I recall my history correctly, France and England could have acted to eliminate Hitler and his National Socialists before the NAZIs gained much power, but instead France and England -with the memory of WWI still in many people's mind- watched, and talked, and worried, and wrung their hands until Hitler decided his army was strong enough and overran Poland, finally kicking off World War II, which took the full and combined efforts of France, England, the Soviet Union, the United States, and a host of other countries to win. (I know- it's complicated, but Hitler, the NAZI's and Germany were the lead outfit.)
What do y'all think? Am I correct, or am I off base?
14 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
felixcat 2/28/2026 9:33:00 AM (No. 2074134)
Obama tried to buy the Mullahs' love but failed miserably. Trump is indeed ending what started under Jimmy Cater (D)... and about time.
14 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
mc squared 2/28/2026 11:16:23 AM (No. 2074168)
Thank you poster #2.
3 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
Vaquero45 2/28/2026 11:59:48 AM (No. 2074197)
Kill them all. Leave nothing standing in Tehran.
1 person likes this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
DVC 2/28/2026 12:24:40 PM (No. 2074214)
The headline makes an excellent point.
Iran has been at war with US, Israel and much of the rest of the world for 40 years. Time to end the regime.
3 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
jeffkinnh 2/28/2026 12:28:35 PM (No. 2074219)
There is one more thing that absolutely MUST happen. The Iranian people that oppose the Islamic rulers MUST, MUST, MUST take over rule of the country and set it on a solid path away from the last 50 years of insanity. We can pound the Islamic military into fragments but we DO NOT want to manage their country. We don't want any significant presence there because it just makes us a sitting duck target. The Middle East countries are not like America. They have completely different beliefs and views and trying to "Americanize" them is foolish. All we need from new leaders is a clear commitment not to attack the US or Israel in any way and not to allow terrorists groups to take root in Iran.
If we can have a friendly relationship with Iran, that would be nice and we should seek that if possible. But that is up to new Iranian leadership to work out, not for us to force. Should we expect to have a military presence in the area until things stabilize? Probably, especially if requested by a new government. But NO bases in the country. Our goal should be to prevent any Islamic militants from regrouping into a significant force. If they have Islamic terrorist cells, the new government should deal with them, possibly with some US support.
5 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
Dodge Boy 2/28/2026 2:55:04 PM (No. 2074275)
Just another reminder to the radical muslims - never ever cross The Donald, Bebi and the sovereign nation of Israel. Getting the idea now?
I know. It's been a few thousand years but better late than never to understand that God, our Heavenly Father and Creator is in charge, not your fraud, Mohamed.
1 person likes this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
mifla 3/1/2026 9:18:10 AM (No. 2074662)
Iran's next leader must not be a cleric or a member of the military or Shah Jr.
I hope someone the Iranians can trust steps up soon.
0 people like this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "FlyRight"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)