Obama’s Self-Incriminating Defense
American Thinker,
by
Jeannie DeAngelis
Original Article
Posted By: 4250Luis,
7/24/2025 5:03:05 AM
For two decades, Barack Obama has demonstrated, through words and deeds, that his deference is toward no one other than himself. This is a man who behaves as if he were ordained to deliver America from the faults of the forty-two presidents that preceded him and to straighten out any president who succeeds him. That’s why it took the former Commander-in-Chief a whole seven days of being subjected to prison memes and accusations of “treason” to manifest public indignation over being perceived as anything less than Messianic.
Barack Obama pretends that he would never levy a war against the U.S. or take up arms against the American people.
Post Reply
Reminder: “WE ARE A SALON AND NOT A SALOON”
Your thoughts, comments, and ideas are always welcome here. But we ask you to please be mindful and respectful. Threatening or crude language doesn't persuade anybody and makes the conversation less enjoyable for fellow L.Dotters.
Reply 1 - Posted by:
anniebc 7/24/2025 7:54:51 AM (No. 1981870)
obama's aim as resident was to demolish America. That old devil hitlery was supposed to finish what he started. I believe she agreed to obama's eight years then her time because she thought she would reign as queen for the rest of her life. I believe even bill wants to see her destroyed. Just me thinking.
26 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
jeffkinnh 7/24/2025 8:04:27 AM (No. 1981876)
Whatever BO says in public is meaningless. He needs to dragged into legal proceedings where what he says he can be held accountable for. No longer being President, BO CAN be held accountable for lying in any current proceedings. Then we will get some of the truth. It is amazing how being put under oath can clarify your thinking.
19 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
Strike3 7/24/2025 8:32:30 AM (No. 1981890)
If Barry Soetoro deserves an ounce of sympathy, it will be due to his alleged legal attachment to Michelle. Other than that, he brought this on himself by thinking that he was smart. It doesn't matter what he says, in Congress, in court or to the media, we had him nailed from Day One.
39 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
Kate318 7/24/2025 11:17:11 AM (No. 1981969)
“That statement is pure Barack Obama, defensive, imperious, tacitly demeaning, and a snide reiteration of truth.” That is Obama to a “T.”
26 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
dbdiva 7/24/2025 11:37:09 AM (No. 1981980)
0 is off the charts arrogant; he believes his own press. Much of that press was fake, created by a media that was more than happy to unleash this empty suit onto the country and who also pumped him up for 8+ years.
He was snatched from semi-oblivion to serve the DS's purpose but he never showed that much intelligence. As John Kass stated, 0 has no soul.
IMO, his arrogance will be his downfall both in this life and the next.
Proverbs 6:16-19
Proverbs 16:18
17 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
Geoman 7/24/2025 7:48:28 PM (No. 1982111)
FTA: "This is a man who behaves as if he were ordained to deliver America from the faults of the forty-two presidents that preceded him and to straighten out any president who succeeds him. Obama was 44 and GW Bush was 43, so I don't understand the author's point in her statement.
Treason is the only crime defined in the Constitution and in the U.S. Code (18 U.S.C. § 2381). Treason is not a matter of popular opinion or common sense. There are elements of the offense that must be met for the charge of treason, which does not appear to remotely be the case in this instance. There are two ways to commit treason: levying war against the government or providing aid or comfort to the enemy. A Party "at war with the Constitution" does not include an enemy, thus does not meet the elements of offense for Treason. Treason has been very rarely prosecuted in our Nation's history. Is the author seeking to have Obama impeached as the democrats did to Trump a week before with proceedings after he left office? It would be less of a stretch to classify and prove Obama knowingly committed High Crimes and misdemeanors, but that is more political in nature. What other legal remedy is available for acts committed while a sitting president?
6 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
DeweyCA 7/25/2025 8:02:04 AM (No. 1982226)
All the Dem witnesses coming before Congress will say a variation of "I don't recall." Hillary and Comey both said that over 250 times in their past testimonies before Congress.
8 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
janjan 7/25/2025 9:16:52 AM (No. 1982254)
There is no question here as to whether these accusations are accurate or just a political ‘distraction’. Gabbard did not come forward with assumptions or vague supposition about what might have happened. She has presented irrefutable proof. No denials, gaslighting or public whining is going to change that. What remains to be seen is whether Bondi has actual guts or just likes to talk tough.
3 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
Zigrid 7/25/2025 10:24:04 AM (No. 1982296)
The important information to absorb with all the Russia...Russia...Russia...information coming out at a podium with Tulsi is that there was a motive behind Barry's moves...he meant to install his muslim buddies in Iran...demoralize Americans by pitting them against each others....and selling out America to the highest bidder...that's how he accumulated all his wealth...and mansions....he really is...the devil...but God stepped in....
6 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
pensom2 7/25/2025 10:36:06 AM (No. 1982299)
#6 above points out: "FTA: 'This is a man who behaves as if he were ordained to deliver America from the faults of the forty-two presidents that preceded him and to straighten out any president who succeeds him.' Obama was 44 and GW Bush was 43, so I don't understand the author's point in her statement."
Perhaps it will help to remember that Grover Cleveland was both the 22nd and 24th president of the United States, serving from 1885 to 1889 and from 1893 to 1897. He was the first U.S. president to serve nonconsecutive terms. That allows GW Bush to have been the 43rd president, but the 42nd individual to serve as president.
4 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
Lawsy0 7/25/2025 8:33:57 PM (No. 1982581)
I have noticed that most people are almost over the infatuation of having a black president. HIs wife greatly helped us along in that direction. Like when everybody loved Billy Jeff, and his 1st lady was barely tolerated. Looking back now, she wasn't the one we elected. I still don't know if the feelings for Eleanor R. were adoration or fear. I still have my Mamie Eisenhower rocking chair. I bought it with S&H Green Stamps I had saved.
0 people like this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "4250Luis"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)