CNN Legal Analyst on Stormy Daniels: “Her
Responses Were Disastrous” (Video)
Gateway Pundit,
by
Margaret Flavin
Original Article
Posted By: Imright,
5/8/2024 2:13:38 PM
Stormy Daniels’s testimony on Tuesday was such an absolute disaster that even CNN was forced to admit it.
CNN legal analyst Elie Honig said that, although Daniels’ testimony about a sexual encounter with Trump in a hotel room in 2006 was “plausible,” her responses while under cross-examination by Trump’s legal team called her credibility into question.
Referring to the moment Daniels admitted she hates President Trump, Honig said, “Her responses were disastrous.”
Adding, “That’s a big deal.”
Post Reply
Reminder: “WE ARE A SALON AND NOT A SALOON”
Your thoughts, comments, and ideas are always welcome here. But we ask you to please be mindful and respectful. Threatening or crude language doesn't persuade anybody and makes the conversation less enjoyable for fellow L.Dotters.
Reply 1 - Posted by:
thefield 5/8/2024 2:21:38 PM (No. 1714366)
THe last week and a half CNN has been very dispondent. If thy notice how bad it is, you know the truth is much worse, for the DA case.
17 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
DVC 5/8/2024 2:45:25 PM (No. 1714386)
Questioning the credibility of a whore? Gee.....who'da thunk it?
She has ZERO credibility to start with.
25 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
stablemoney 5/8/2024 3:16:57 PM (No. 1714410)
Really? Stormy did exactly what the Democrats wanted. Describe sex acts for the media. And they plan to do it for as many weeks as they can, keeping Trump in court, and gagged. The court system sits and have their dinner, not caring one whit that the justice system is being destroyed, and their reputation in the dirt -- but they don't care.
18 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
john56 5/8/2024 3:20:27 PM (No. 1714413)
I'm not there yet but it would be a hoot to see Bragg and his clown car of persecutors get beat in a trial where he got an indictment on less-than-a-ham-sandwich, a jury that he wanted, a judge that does everything but hand the prosecution his gavel, making every ruling to his advantage and discouraging defense counsel from objecting -- and then complain that they didn't object when the trial went obviously over the line -- and still LOSE the case in trial (yes, he'll lose it on appeal, but that's not their goal)..
Not sure that will happen, but it's very possible.
8 people like this.
I guess even legal analysts at CNN can't hide the truth when it's plan to see.
I sure hope Trump's legal team comments about how even if you don't like someone, or agree with their politics, you can't just try to "get" him when there aren't facts of the crime the DA is alleging. Remind them he has done a lot of good for New York City over the years. How some even viewed him as the Prince of NYC. And, not to let the prosecution fool them with the made-up charges.
5 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
Venturer 5/8/2024 3:32:20 PM (No. 1714415)
She owes ho $130,000 dollars----------probably what Bragg paid her to testify.
She says she and the Donald had sex , but she hates the guy.
This female white trash is about as credible as the garbage that claims she was raped in the department store.
Well at least in her claim they had a nice room.
11 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
rytwng 5/8/2024 4:17:13 PM (No. 1714435)
Was she in a porn movie with Pete Buttboy?
2 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
snakeoil 5/8/2024 4:42:58 PM (No. 1714450)
Her responses were what the persecution wanted. They drug President Trump though the mud.
4 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
smokincol 5/8/2024 5:02:15 PM (No. 1714462)
"“Her Responses Were Disastrous”" - how can that be???, with her reputation???
5 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
padiva 5/8/2024 5:33:39 PM (No. 1714468)
Does she remember the details of EVERY encounter she has had?
7 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
Scribelus 5/8/2024 5:40:07 PM (No. 1714471)
I understand that she is again up to bat tomorrow. I’m rooting for the pitcher.
2 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
joew9 5/8/2024 5:58:49 PM (No. 1714476)
Forget these trivial developments in this trial.
Here's how it actually works -
Any NYC prosecutor: "OK New York City jury, this Republican hasn't done anything wrong at all except be a Republican but I want you to find him guilty."
NYC jury: "Guilty! Guilty! Guilty!"
5 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
ronbet 5/8/2024 8:17:50 PM (No. 1714524)
The court was not in session today. Lawyers and Stormy Daniels were probably busy cooking up more lies to hang around Trump;s neck. I think their plan for Thursday is for Daniels to accuse Trump of rape!!!
Don't doubt me on this. That is where this is headed.
1 person likes this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
bighambone 5/8/2024 8:41:37 PM (No. 1714532)
In this modern era an incident that occurred in 2006 is considered to have been in the dark ages. The leftist and progressive Democrats are using their Banana Republic style law-fare processes to attempt to embarrass Trump by calling in a sex worker to testify regarding a tryst that may or may not have taken place sometime in 2006 between her and Trump.
2 people like this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
mifla 5/9/2024 5:30:55 AM (No. 1714678)
The defense should cross exam her:
"What do you charge for various sex acts?"
"Are you available for frat parties?"
"How many STDs have you had?"
"How many marriages have you broken up?"
0 people like this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Imright"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)