Jan. 6 Committee’s Alleged Hiring of
Former ABC News President May Violate
Rules: House GOP
Epoch Times,
by
Katabella Roberts
Original Article
Posted By: earlybird,
6/9/2022 12:08:14 PM
A group of House Republicans on Wednesday requested confirmation that the former president of ABC News, James Goldston, is working for the committee investigating the Jan. 6, 2021 breach of the U.S. Capitol, and questioned whether his alleged hiring violated House rules.(snip)It comes after Axios first reported Monday that the former network news executive had joined the committee as an “unannounced adviser” and is “busily producing Thursday’s 8 p.m. ET hearing as if it were a blockbuster investigative special.”
Goldston has previously served as a producer for some of the network’s biggest news programs like “20/20,” “Nightline,” and “Good Morning America.” He left ABC in March.
Reply 1 - Posted by:
faceincrowd 6/9/2022 12:11:08 PM (No. 1180781)
I haven't watched broadcast tv since 2013 or so. And I could give less than two evacuations of my bowels about this donkey & pony show.
9 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
Starboard_side 6/9/2022 12:14:06 PM (No. 1180784)
It's been acknowledged by leading Democrats that this is an attempt to change people's minds on what happened, but they aren't looking to provide the timeline of that's detailed in a recent JustTheNews article, or offering questions from GOP leadership, which renders this thing as political.
It should trigger equal time law.
13 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
Newtsche 6/9/2022 12:18:14 PM (No. 1180791)
We don't need no stinkin' badges.
11 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
mobiusmman 6/9/2022 12:19:29 PM (No. 1180792)
By accepting this "job," James Goldston proves he's a piece of Leftist garbage like all the other pieces of garbage who makeup the "Kommittee."
11 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
Quigley 6/9/2022 12:23:22 PM (No. 1180799)
We know the dims are people of no substance positive for the common welfare.
Hence, every aspect of their agenda must be sold by the best marketing/propaganda (taxpayer) money can buy.
The Gullibles are owned by this process, a sort of mental slavery, a topic the dims are expert on.
How many Gullibles are there?
9 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
Rich323 6/9/2022 12:31:54 PM (No. 1180809)
When do Democrats ever follow rules? Never — they stole the election didn’t they?
16 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
Nimby 6/9/2022 12:41:06 PM (No. 1180825)
On tax payer's dime
9 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
TLCary 6/9/2022 12:41:08 PM (No. 1180826)
This political stunt paid for by the American Tax Payers. The DNC approves this message.
12 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
mifla 6/9/2022 12:42:06 PM (No. 1180828)
Republicans espouse rules, Democrats laugh..
6 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
LC Chihuahua 6/9/2022 12:47:04 PM (No. 1180832)
Only Democrats are allowed to create rules, and they will decide to whom they apply.
Simple, isn't it? This is tyranny.
8 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
Northcross 6/9/2022 1:11:44 PM (No. 1180858)
Ooooh! Broke house rules! Waiting for stiff penalties to be placed on Pelosi, Schiff, and Liz Cheney.
8 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
ronbet 6/9/2022 1:18:12 PM (No. 1180862)
It doesn't matter; House rules are whatever Nancy Pelosi say they are at any particular time.
8 people like this.
Court injunction possible?
3 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
MindMadeUp 6/9/2022 2:12:13 PM (No. 1180915)
Rules are for Republicans.
6 people like this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
Birddog 6/9/2022 3:12:03 PM (No. 1180972)
The guy also cannot "Donate" his services, as that equates to an In Kind/Cash contribution to the clearly partisan operation...even though there is a whole TEAM of high priced Lawyers already doing that for the "Committee".
There is NO legitimate committee or even congressional legislative prerogative to Produce and Direct a Primetime TV Series...CSPAN already covered all of those hearings, NBC/CBS/ABC/CNN/MSNBC covered daily highlights as well... this is a pretaped, edited, scripted, promotional, re-cap of prior hearings. A six to eight part "Conclusion Statement" of hearings that pre-announced what they intended to conclude before the very 1st meeting was even held.
3 people like this.
Reply 16 - Posted by:
Mad Dog 6/9/2022 4:15:48 PM (No. 1181024)
Fox should air the entire "2000 Mules" documentary, during this democrat prime time farse.
4 people like this.
Reply 17 - Posted by:
F15 Gork 6/9/2022 4:47:51 PM (No. 1181062)
Rules? We don’t need no stinkin rules......
3 people like this.
Reply 18 - Posted by:
smokincol 6/9/2022 5:49:11 PM (No. 1181108)
another full-on, frontal assault by the demcommies to deflect, diffuse and divert the American citizens on who the real criminals are, in this abomination
1 person likes this.
Reply 19 - Posted by:
danu 6/9/2022 6:02:52 PM (No. 1181126)
is it any coincidence that the murky muddy animal farm politics of today mimic those watergate/nixon era?
what greedy hog do they have in common? ....the biggest marxist sow at the trough? yup ... you guessed it....
warroom has been interviewing an expert, mr shepard , who's spent several decades chasing down the hidden documents and secret
meetings involved in the attacks on nixon, the presidency , and the executive branch.
inform yourselves on his discoveries in re: all these nat'l autoimmune diseases infecting our body politic to date
~ particularly those of us who were not around for the actual events.
1 person likes this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "earlybird"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
Comments:
Not a regular hearing (although those are bad enough) but a staged and scripted performance/production… Outrageous!