What I’ve Seen in the Last Two Years
Is Unprecedented’: Physician on COVID
Vaccine Side Effects on Pregnant Women
Epoch Times,
by
Enrich Trigoso
Original Article
Posted By: GustoGrabber,
4/28/2022 5:35:24 AM
Dr. James Thorp is an extensively published 68-year-old physician MD board-certified in obstetrics and gynecology, as well as maternal-fetal medicine, who has practiced obstetrics for over 42 years.
Thorp told The Epoch Times that he sees 6,000–7,000 high-risk pregnant patients a year and has seen many complications among them due to the COVID vaccines.
Reply 1 - Posted by:
planetgeo 4/28/2022 5:52:38 AM (No. 1140403)
In time it will become evident that it's the "vaccine" not the virus that was the kill shot.
25 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
franq 4/28/2022 6:02:16 AM (No. 1140406)
Yet there are true believers where I work who have voluntarily gone back to their N-95 masks.
They will wear them until they die.
18 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
IowaDad 4/28/2022 6:03:18 AM (No. 1140407)
To deserve our reading, this article should tell us what complication in pregnancy can be attributed to COVID vaccination and at what rate, and whether patients who are vaccinated do better than unvaccinated patients.
There are lots of publications concerning vaccination during pregnancy. For instance "the rates of adverse pregnancy outcomes of 133 women who received at least 1 dose of the COVID-19 vaccine in pregnancy were similar to that of unvaccinated pregnant women (P>.05 for all): stillbirth (0.0% vs 0.2%), fetal abnormalities (2.2% vs 2.5%), postpartum hemorrhage (9.8% vs 9.0%), cesarean delivery (30.8% vs 34.1%), small for gestational age (12.0% vs 12.8%), maternal high-dependency unit or intensive care admission (6.0% vs 4.0%), or neonatal intensive care unit admission (5.3% vs 5.0%)".
Reader can go to Pubmed.com and search for pregnancy and vaccination to read all they want.
5 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
NancyD 4/28/2022 7:17:53 AM (No. 1140446)
In Michigan the Gov runs and ad featuring doctors that state the covid "vaccine" in safe for pregnant mothers and the unborn babies. I think the docs who made those ads need to be held liable.
25 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
Penelope27 4/28/2022 7:33:24 AM (No. 1140461)
How many patients a DAY does he see? Is this him or clinics….?
4 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
lakerman1 4/28/2022 8:49:07 AM (No. 1140546)
I no longer trust the federal government's pronouncements on medical matters.
Two days ago, 'a government panel' said taking aspirin to prevent heart disease and strokes is a bad idea.
Unfortunately, I don't trust them.
And that's sad.
14 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
Heil Liberals 4/28/2022 8:54:51 AM (No. 1140551)
Population control.
11 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
bighambone 4/28/2022 9:06:58 AM (No. 1140570)
It’s not surprising what Biden said, because people who perpetrate corrupt criminal activities usually try to cover up or deny that they perpetrated such criminal activity. That’s just common sense!
3 people like this.
The obstetricians and pediatricians should be in line for their Nuremberg trials right behind the virologist and researchers at the CDC. By pushing these vaccines, they did more damage to innocents than any other doctors.
7 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
Maggie2u 4/28/2022 9:13:36 AM (No. 1140580)
Think of the tens of thousands of children, boys and girls, who have been vaccinated and now have this ticking time bomb in their bodies. In a few short years, we will be hearing about young men who are sterile and young women who can't carry a baby to term or if they do, the infant will have some sort of handicap.
9 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
Rinktum 4/28/2022 9:15:14 AM (No. 1140583)
How can anyone trust numbers coming out of anywhere today? I certainly do not. Medical professionals, scientists, and government bureaucrats have been lying to use since January 2020. Now they expect us to trust anything they say? Not going to fly. These people have destroyed the public’s trust in them and that is not going to change.
7 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
RuckusTom 4/28/2022 9:40:55 AM (No. 1140614)
Sorry. What's a "high risk pregnant patient"?
2 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
OZZCAR 4/28/2022 10:03:27 AM (No. 1140641)
Thalidomide II.
9 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
Hermoine 4/28/2022 3:27:43 PM (No. 1140983)
Poster #3 clearly wants to believe whatever the CDC feeds him. Otherwise, he would've found his answer in the article. They can't provide the information he requests because the powers that be continue to withhold the information. FTA:
Thorp explained that although he has seen an increase in fetal death and adverse pregnancy outcomes associated with the COVID-19 vaccination, attempts to quantify this effect are hampered by the imposition of gag orders on physicians and nurses that were imposed in September 2021, as reviewed in the publication “Patient Betrayal: The Corruption of Healthcare, Informed Consent and the Physician-Patient Relationship” (pdf).
At the beginning of January, the FDA was ordered to release its first large batch of documents related to Pfizer’s COVID jab trials, of which over 10,000 of about 450,000 pages have been made public so far.
AND
Yeadon had hoped, back then, that their concerns were paid attention to, since they had already seen the tragedy of thalidomide, a sedative drug that caused congenital malformation, over 60 years ago.
“During 2021, I came across two further pieces of evidence which made it much more likely that there’d be adverse effects on pregnancy from COVID-19 ‘vaccines.'”
“It looked like someone had tried to dismiss our concerns by testing for evidence of the particular problem we’d warned about in Dec. 2020. Unfortunately, all they did is to reinforce our concerns. We’d envisioned the risk that, in responding to the synthetic piece of virus spike protein, women’s immune systems would also make an immune response to their own placental protein,” Yeadon said. “That’s exactly what was reported in the pre-print paper.”
“Based on this concern alone, all of these experimental products as a class should have been completely contraindicated in women younger than menopause.”
5 people like this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "GustoGrabber"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)