FDA adds warning about rare heart inflammation
to Pfizer, Moderna COVID vaccines
Reuters,
by
Staff
Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought,
6/26/2021 11:10:11 PM
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on Friday added a warning to the literature that accompanies Pfizer Inc/BioNTech and Moderna COVID vaccine shots to indicate the rare risk of heart inflammation after its use.
For each vaccine, the fact sheets for healthcare providers have been revised to include a warning that reports of adverse events suggest increased risks of myocarditis and pericarditis, particularly after the second dose and with onset of symptoms within a few days after vaccination, the FDA said. As of June 11, more than 1,200 cases of myocarditis or pericarditis
Reply 1 - Posted by:
Fireboy 6/26/2021 11:48:38 PM (No. 827662)
Rare risk?? it’s a new vaccine how freakin rare can it be. It’s a problem!!
32 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
Jesuslover54 6/26/2021 11:54:10 PM (No. 827667)
When is somebody in the media going to report that it's a terrible dangerous gene therapy and not a vaccine at all and that its side effects hugely outweigh its value as a therapy, since its only beneficial effect, if any, is to somewhat mitigate the symptoms of Covid, BUT NOT TO PREVENT IT!
And Ivermectin will do all that -- and with a 50-year safety history.
These companies have their money already and they should just stop.
34 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
LadyHen 6/27/2021 12:24:53 AM (No. 827682)
What is really scary is that these side effects are disproportionately effecting young healthy boys and men, a group whose cost benefit ratio doesn't even indicate vaccination as the healthier choice. It would be one thing in over 60's but 20 year olds suffering irreparable heart damage or even dying!!? That this is even still be recommended for that demographic is just a money and power grab.
What I want to know is when will employers and schools start being sued because they demand those under their thumb get vaccinated and then those people die.
39 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
Safari Man 6/27/2021 1:07:43 AM (No. 827695)
I’d rather have covid than the vaccine
48 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
BirdsNest 6/27/2021 4:58:26 AM (No. 827721)
I'm with #4.
23 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
Bluefindad 6/27/2021 7:31:44 AM (No. 827774)
Every time we see an ad on TV for a drug it includes a long list of potential side effects. The advertisers are required to provide the list and sometimes the description of side effects seems as long as the ad segment. We are carpet-bombed by PSAs beckoning us to take the COVID jab. Somehow, they have escaped the mandatory requirement to list side effects. Why?
30 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
udanja99 6/27/2021 7:46:19 AM (No. 827782)
Ditto, #’s 4 and 5.
14 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
Strike3 6/27/2021 8:00:42 AM (No. 827800)
After thousands of doctors and healthcare personnel have seen this problem, the "FDA warns." Late to the party, as usual.
12 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
Strike3 6/27/2021 8:02:35 AM (No. 827803)
A liberal friend of mine wants me to take the shot before I visit her. I would rather not visit her.
42 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
jacksin5 6/27/2021 8:13:11 AM (No. 827813)
These are the "side effects" of rushing an experimental drug to market. Add to this the reported red blood cell damage, causing clotting, and the effect of sterility on women of child-bearing age, these "life-saving" vaccines should be pulled from the market.
17 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
Dodge Boy 6/27/2021 8:41:13 AM (No. 827856)
Come on, Rooters. How can a side effect produced from receiving a so-called vaccine that promotes dangerous gain-of-function characteristics in a corona virus produced as a bioweapon be considered as "rare"?
8 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
Rather Read 6/27/2021 9:10:31 AM (No. 827900)
I got the Pfizer in May. So far, so good. And I swear to God, if they even hint of another lockdown because of the delta, epsilon, gamma or whatever variant I will not comply. I am done with masks.
12 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
dolphin 6/27/2021 9:45:31 AM (No. 827956)
Cheaper and neater than bullets if you want to have a coup d'etat. You don't even have to clear the battlefield. The shutdowns kill the economy. The vaccine clears out the excess population. The masks remind people who has power.
9 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
jimkata 6/27/2021 10:47:33 AM (No. 828066)
Isn't this the same reason HCQ was suppose to be not prescribed because It could cause heart problems!
Therefore the vaccine should now be banned . Right???
10 people like this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
DVC 6/27/2021 12:29:32 PM (No. 828190)
Here are the data from the CDC's own Vaccine Adverse Effects Reporting System (VAERS), which experts estimate under-reports these events, only capturing anywhere from 1% to 20% of the totals due to the voluntary nature of the reporting system. So, reality is 5 to 100 times higher, is what experts expect.
Scroll down a bit and look at the chart on the right. Myocarditis is inflammation and damage to heart muscle, pericarditis is inflammation and damage to the membrane which covers the heart. And multiply by your choice of the uncertain correction factor from 5 to 100 to get the true number of these events. Heart attacks more in older folks, heart muscle damage more common in younger people.
https://www.openvaers.com/covid-data/cardiac
2 people like this.
Reply 16 - Posted by:
DVC 6/27/2021 12:41:02 PM (No. 828201)
Also, a point that is rarely discussed . Anywhere from 30 to 50% of all Americans are estimated by many experts to have pre-existing natural resistance to the Wuhan virus, they hypothesize it is from exposure to and recovery from other coronaviruses (colds, mainly) over their lifetimes.
This was first seen on the 'first Wuhan experiment', the cruise ship Diamond Princess, with 2,000 passengers and 1,000 crew, which docked early in Hawaii in March of last year. One of the important facts was that with no knowledge that Wuhan flu existed, and NO efforts to contain it on a closed environment, with a LOT of close social contact, ---- 65% of the people on board did not get Wuhan flu. That seemed important to me at the time, and was not much noted in the media.
That was an early indication that a large portion of people have pre-existing natural immunity. So, about 1/3 of people, roughly are at risk, based on that unintended "experiment". This is one reason that I have not been very much worried about this stuff from the beginning, even in my 7th decade.
4 people like this.
Reply 17 - Posted by:
stablemoney 6/27/2021 3:22:14 PM (No. 828323)
Before the shot, the person gets this warning. So if you decide it is not a good risk for you, why is the government not respecting that decision, and urging everyone to get the vaccine? It is not about the vaccine. It is about the database of your personal information. I wonder how much data they are getting from the swab tests and your DNA, and putting into their databases? You don't need the vaccine. If you start feeling sick, use hyrdrochloroquine or ivervectim to take care of the problem early. Quit lying about Covid, Why has the cold, flu, and pneumonia no longer listed as an occurrence? Old people were dying from pneumonia by the thousands each year before Covid. Really because of other issues that reduced their strength to such an extent that a feather would be the final straw.
1 person likes this.
Reply 18 - Posted by:
MickTurn 6/27/2021 6:20:39 PM (No. 828495)
AND this is after how many young men have been MURDERED????
0 people like this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Dreadnought"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)