Post New Article

Sen. Rand Paul says Chief Justice Roberts
won’t take Trump impeach trial

Original Article

Posted By: Harlowe, 1/24/2021 2:39:58 AM

As Democrats plunge ahead with a post-term impeachment trial of President Donald Trump, a key question remains: Will Chief Justice Roberts take the case? Republican Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky says he won’t--making the exercise “a fake, partisan impeachment,” the lawmaker told Fox News’ Sean Hannity Friday. Paul claimed Roberts has “privately said he’s not supposed to come unless it’s an impeachment of the president.” According to the US Constitution, “when the President of the United States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside”--a requirement not made for any other impeachment case.


If two-thirds majority of the Senate convicts President Trump, Chuck Schumer could call for a second vote that would require a simple majority to prevent President Trump from holding elective office again; however, that vote would require a minimum of 17 Senate Republicans which may become problematic due to Senator Paul’s contention that “only a sitting president can be impeached” making it a constitutional concern.

Post Reply

Reply 1 - Posted by: Catherine 1/24/2021 3:15:44 AM (No. 672311)
I'm pretty sure you can't fire someone who no longer works for you. And they can't take away his rights as a human and a citizen of this country just because they don't like him. They're trying and lord help us they might do it, but it will be wrong, illegal and my money will always be on President Trump.
155 people like this.

Reply 2 - Posted by: NotaBene 1/24/2021 3:18:48 AM (No. 672313)
Communists have canceled US and say the election was nor stolen. We need our freedom of expression rred, but Google, Twitter, Amazon, Youtube, Apple, Bill Gates, NYT, WP, Antifa, Black Lives Matter as much as anybody’s, and Disney have taken away our free will. The Supreme Court, after all Trump did for these cowards - Coney, Kavanaugh and Gorsuch - is good to decide if your freedom of speech allows you to burn flags upside down, immolate babies after birth, or pee in ladies rooms after besting them in sports. There is a Deep State, China is our greatest enemy, and there is no justice fo Trump supporters. Commies will pay dearly because salary-earning people are wealthy after President Trump’s great presidency, while Antifas are gimme gimme with extended hands. Worse for the non-working Democrats, the wealth will have to be spread around equitably with Illegal Aliens after the robbed election.
70 people like this.

Reply 3 - Posted by: J. Arthur Brown 1/24/2021 3:25:49 AM (No. 672319)
Not so much that Chief Justice Roberts has suddenly become a hero but that Mitch McConnell has sunk so low even Roberts doesn't want to be anywhere close to him.
134 people like this.

Reply 4 - Posted by: andyboy 1/24/2021 3:28:40 AM (No. 672322)
The unconstitutionality of holding an impeachment trial for an ex-President is obvious. This is an easy decision for Roberts and will help repair his badly-damaged credibility. But it won't stop him from siding with the leftists in the next major close-call case.
95 people like this.

Reply 5 - Posted by: DVC 1/24/2021 3:46:56 AM (No. 672329)
Because it is fundamentally unconstitutional on the face of it .....the farce of it, is probably more accurate. JUST STOP THIS FARCE you stupid, hateful, hysterical hacks!
141 people like this.

Reply 6 - Posted by: OBX Pete 1/24/2021 5:23:51 AM (No. 672345)
This thing is getting crazier and crazier. Isn't it the job of the supreme court to determine if a case is in conformance with the constitution or not? How can Roberts and his flunkies make a determination without even hearing a case? Can a supreme court justice be impeached for pre determination on a case ? I know that they refuse to hear cases all the time but this case is perhaps the most important case ever presented to them. They are driving ME crazy !!!!
32 people like this.

Reply 7 - Posted by: Flyball Dogs 1/24/2021 5:28:01 AM (No. 672347)
All points re the Chief Justice are good ones. My question is with Cocaine Mitch. During the past 4 years, he has been lauded for confirming conservative judges The President nominated. I can’t square that (and those judges) with what he is doing now. Are all of the judges he confirmed compromised? Were they conservative, Constitutionalists to begin with? Or are they fake judges...
69 people like this.

Reply 8 - Posted by: anniebc 1/24/2021 5:29:41 AM (No. 672348)
They want to cancel the election and presidency of a duly elected and served President; meanwhile, we have an unduly-elected faux White House occupant forced upon US with no standing to object and no redress from the ballot box all the way up to congress. To borrow their phrase, this is not who we are. Except it is who we are, the new Amerika in search of a constitution or just tyranny.
56 people like this.

Reply 9 - Posted by: TheLadyNextDoor 1/24/2021 5:33:55 AM (No. 672350)
#5 .. Hit the nail on the head. WELL SAID.
27 people like this.

Reply 10 - Posted by: LaVallette 1/24/2021 5:38:45 AM (No. 672352)
I have a feeling that ther is is also a growing movement inside the saner elements of the Demonrat Party that having succeeded in getting rid of Trump, the wiser path now as and under the present circumstances is to let "sleeping dogs lie" and use the issue of "unconstitutionality" as the excuse "despite all our endeavors" to abandon the impeachment process in the Senate. The last thing they can afford to risk is the chance that the Senate trial could drift into the question of the motivations and the "whys and wherefores" Trump would call for an insurrection. This would blow wide open the entire Stolen Election Conspiracy, tie up the senate and therefore the implementation of the Biden agenda for months if not years on end and risk not only the fall of the criminal Biden administration but also long term jail sentences for the conspirators .
30 people like this.

Reply 11 - Posted by: mifla 1/24/2021 5:45:14 AM (No. 672356)
Roberts should simply announce that this impeachment is not supported by the Constitution, and therefore he will not attend or support any trial. Saying he does not want to attend is lame.
71 people like this.

Reply 12 - Posted by: nina584 1/24/2021 6:06:22 AM (No. 672366)
If it goes make Roberts preside. He will be part of the mess.
15 people like this.

Reply 13 - Posted by: bad-hair 1/24/2021 6:29:24 AM (No. 672375)
We theoretically elect you. We pay you 250,000 salary and perks to govern. Your accomplishments are investigating and impeaching each other. I'm sick to death of the lot of you and want a 3 party Congress where you can compromise or go to hell.
46 people like this.

Reply 14 - Posted by: 5 handicap 1/24/2021 6:46:55 AM (No. 672382)
The GARBAGE that is named John Roberts, will most certainly find a way to hurt Trump. He's never let the Constitution stand in his way before!
66 people like this.

Reply 15 - Posted by: WhamDBambam 1/24/2021 7:22:11 AM (No. 672403)
Only a fool would count on Roberts to do anything.
72 people like this.

Reply 16 - Posted by: Rinktum 1/24/2021 7:27:53 AM (No. 672412)
Seriously, does anyone hold any respect for the SCOTUS? The most important issue facing the country in its history and they decided to take a pass? I am steamed that these cowards had the audacity to stand with the coup plotters and by their inaction nullified the votes of 74.5 million Americans. They deserve nothing but scorn. When the rubber met the road the justices failed to do their duty because they, along with the Dark State, could not be bothered to protect the will of the people because their hatred was so great for this President. Like their fellow travelers they took it upon themselves to refuse to even look at the evidence. The stonewalling, obstruction, omission and lies of the media made it easy for these cowards to prevent any possible hearing of evidence or facts. In that one moment, they destroyed their reputation. Who would look to these fools for honesty or objective consideration? I hold them all in contempt. When their country needed an objective unbiased hearing, they collapsed under the weight of political bias. I am particularly disappointed with the three new Justices not because they are Trump appointees but because they championed their love of the Constitution and rule of law and then collapsed at the first challenge. I could accept a hearing that did not go our way but would have been bitterly disappointed, but to decline to even hear such an important matter is an act of cowardice that will forever be a stain on the Roberts Court. As far as I am concerned, the Court has proven to be nothing more than another politically driven outrage. Roberts could decide to refuse to show up but it won’t matter one bit. The die has been cast and nothing will change the fact that when the country needed a clear judicial decision, they were too invested in the Dark State to have the courage that was required. If anyone failed in their duty to protect and defend the Constitution, it was the United States Supreme Court. Roberts has destroyed the Court.
130 people like this.

Reply 17 - Posted by: Lawsy0 1/24/2021 7:44:21 AM (No. 672422)
Perhaps CJ Roberts hasn't taken leave of ALL his senses. He realizes he can't stop the Pelosi juggernaut using reason nor sound law. I wonder still what ''they'' are holding over his head. Apparently he has found a log to keep himself afloat in the river of slime in DC. Also, what #3 and #5 said!
26 people like this.

Reply 18 - Posted by: stablemoney 1/24/2021 7:59:33 AM (No. 672448)
The Republicans better not come either. Any Republican showing up, or participating in this, should be removed from office. The Republicans better walk out. Republicans have to be completely without any sense, principles, ethics, and morals to show up for this fraudulent proceeding. Any punishment is not coming for Trump, it is coming for any Republican that participates in this fraudulent trial.
42 people like this.

Reply 19 - Posted by: Ladyhawke 1/24/2021 8:03:04 AM (No. 672451)
We need a full trial in the Senate. It is the only way the massive fraud evidence will be shown to a great audience. I do not care who presides, but if gets stopped due to John Roberts, it will just add to his long and growing list of traitorous acts.
22 people like this.

Reply 20 - Posted by: F15 Gork 1/24/2021 8:14:14 AM (No. 672465)
I would think that the turn coat Roberto would jump at the chance to put another knife in Trumps back......the only thing missing on this rat are big ears and a tail....
23 people like this.

Reply 21 - Posted by: gone2pot 1/24/2021 8:14:39 AM (No. 672467)
Impeaching, removing him from office when he isn't in office, and preventing a private citizen from running for office is perfectly legal here in the United States of Dominion.
26 people like this.

Reply 22 - Posted by: WinterParker 1/24/2021 8:15:00 AM (No. 672468)
I would never count on Roberts to do the right thing. and he's simpatico with 80% of those leeches in DC.
30 people like this.

Reply 23 - Posted by: bpl40 1/24/2021 8:27:00 AM (No. 672485)
President Trump's employers were not 67 members of the Senate but the American People. They will decide if he can reapply or not. Not these partisan hacks.
32 people like this.

Reply 24 - Posted by: Bazi 1/24/2021 8:36:23 AM (No. 672494)
If Roberts won't take the trial, it's because the CiC (Commies in Charge) gave him permission. We know that the CiC are holding him hostage because of a transgression.
14 people like this.

Reply 25 - Posted by: FunOne 1/24/2021 8:51:54 AM (No. 672512)
President Trump accomplished what was almost impossible by going to the wall for Coney, Kavanaugh and Gorsuch. He invested a large degree of his political capital to fight for the outcome that set these three up with an envious income for life. Yet, when confronted with the decision to JUST HAVE A HEARING on the issues of a corrupt election, they morphed into Benedict Arnold mode. The reality is, there are only two American patriots committed to the Constitution on the Supreme Court.
37 people like this.

Reply 26 - Posted by: udanja99 1/24/2021 8:53:42 AM (No. 672513)
OP, since the trial itself is unconstitutional, any vote stemming from that trial would also be unconstitutional. The very fact that the whole charade is unconstitutional means that PDT CAN run again and the congress would have no power to stop him. I’m not jumping on the pro-Roberts bandwagon yet - those who have been blackmailing him since he joined the court will surely pressure him into taking the case.
15 people like this.

Reply 27 - Posted by: Dodge Boy 1/24/2021 8:59:08 AM (No. 672519)
My wife and I are off to the Big Island to relax and warm up so won't be posting or commenting for a few weeks. Keep your chins up, all. Breitbart lives and so does L.Com.
22 people like this.

Reply 28 - Posted by: Jebediah 1/24/2021 9:12:02 AM (No. 672529)
If Roberts had done his job all along (recall his twisting and turning to validate Obamacare?) we wouldn't be in the mess we are in now. 76 million voters question how Trump won the 2020 election by midnight, followed by JUST ENOUGH questionable votes in four swing states to make a win for a man who spent his time in his basement and is obviously in the early stages of dementia....and just plagiarized Bill Clinton in his acceptance speech the other day. Peter Navarro, on his own, did an extensive study on the mathematical probabilities of Biden's win and Joe came up way short, algorithm and other wise. The end result is a country in turmoil and a Presidency where the weary man reads what is written on the pages he is given. I am sure he is still asleep this Sunday morning past 9 a.m. as I write this, and that most of his pronouncements are either news to him or the uproar and consequences unknown to him. It is only a matter of time before the Dems push Joe out and we end up with THE most Progressive woman in the Senate, a woman so unpopular she was the first to leave in the primary. And a LOT of this can be put at the feet of John Roberts, more concerned with his image in history than sorting out what is sort-outable. Someone should take him aside, at one of the D.C. cocktail parties, and let his know what that image already is. (And by the by, he should also be prepared for an antitrust suit against Twitter and Facebook---or will he dodge that as well?)
21 people like this.

Reply 29 - Posted by: Laotzu 1/24/2021 9:23:52 AM (No. 672543)
Done out of laziness, not out of honor.
6 people like this.

Reply 30 - Posted by: starboard 1/24/2021 9:52:44 AM (No. 672579)
Punting is cowardly. He should assign Thomas or Alito.
14 people like this.

Reply 31 - Posted by: Zigrid 1/24/2021 9:53:41 AM (No. 672582)
I read somewhere that an impeachment article from the house is just an accusation... the senate must find him guilty.... so... then the first impeachment by the pencil neck schiff was not classified as an complete impeachment... President Trump was NOT found guilty by the senate... so then... WHERE is the "second" impeachment baring him from running again..the swamp is really frightened by President Trump... to much sunlight on their criminal in point... hunter biden and the biden crime family...I'd like to see nervous nancy's financial records... or are they all in banks off shore..
10 people like this.

Reply 32 - Posted by: rsgonner 1/24/2021 9:56:10 AM (No. 672587)
Since when has the Constitution ever entered Roberts' mind? Maybe his first year as Chief Justice. But whatever the left has on this guy, it must be a doozy. He will do whatever they tell him to do.
12 people like this.

Reply 33 - Posted by: Strike3 1/24/2021 10:03:54 AM (No. 672606)
Hopefully, Roberts' cowardice is consistent.
9 people like this.

Reply 34 - Posted by: DVC 1/24/2021 10:11:14 AM (No. 672627)
Any laws that they try to make against Trump will be bills of attainder and are specifically made unconstitutional in the original words of the document. Any "impeachment" is just a removal from office, and since he is not in office, is impossible, and illegal. Even a slug like Roberts won't be part of this unconstitutional freak show. Let it GO, you damned Corruptocrats!
11 people like this.

Reply 35 - Posted by: Thegranddanny 1/24/2021 10:14:34 AM (No. 672635)
If the Senate can try, convict and sentence one private citizen (Donald Trump), they can do it to any private citizen. And the only legal rules in the process are what the majority decided.
9 people like this.

Reply 36 - Posted by: smokincol 1/24/2021 10:24:32 AM (No. 672652)
roberts will still not consider the legal arguments of this matter which makes him totally invalid.
6 people like this.

Reply 37 - Posted by: msjena 1/24/2021 10:26:35 AM (No. 672655)
The Senate will have to vote on whether Roberts must preside. Roberts won’t make the decision on his own. The impeachment process has many flaws. I love the Constitution for the most part but the framers granted Congress too much power in the impeachment process. For over 200 years, that power was not abused. It is being abused now.
14 people like this.

Reply 38 - Posted by: little guy 1/24/2021 10:28:37 AM (No. 672658)
When someone as feckless as Roberts won't take your side, you know you're flapping in the wind. They cheated at the pool game in our favorite saloon. We called them out on it but for the sake of peace --- and not wishing to destroy our favorite place to hang out --- we let it go. Then they picked up their pool cue and swung it at us! We ducked. Then they said: "Okay --- Let's step outside and settle this!" Keep saying that & threatening us and we will finally accept the duel & step outside ... but only ONE of us will be coming back in! Hint: It won't be them.
8 people like this.

Reply 39 - Posted by: planetgeo 1/24/2021 10:40:13 AM (No. 672668)
First, it's not just John "Kangaroo" Roberts that's the problem, it's the entire Supreme Court. They are completely worthless as an objective arbiter and protector of the Constitution. The selection process for justices has become absurdly partisan with blatant litmus test issues that essentially result in rubber stamp decisions on certain issues regardless of what the Constitution says. In effect the Supreme Court has evolved into a super-committee of Congress. But one we can't vote out. And even worse, we have now been culturally conditioned to accept their decisions as the final word no matter how much we despise it. Sorry, I'm no longer going along with that...#NotMySupremeCourt.
11 people like this.

Reply 40 - Posted by: jimkata 1/24/2021 10:50:35 AM (No. 672682)
Be careful for what you wish. It was said during the Obama Care Supreme Court arguments that Roberts stand was to signal that the Court was independent and a Roberts Court like a Marshall court. He is quickly going down in history as a Roberts court but in the manner of Taney
4 people like this.

Reply 41 - Posted by: MDConservative 1/24/2021 10:51:28 AM (No. 672685)
#19 - The charge is inciting insurrection. There will be no discussion of any election fraud as it is irrelevant to the charge, whether true or not. Secondly, any "trial" will do two things: 1) Lend legitimacy to the notion that Congress is not bound by the Constitution anymore, that the Supreme Court is not a co-equal branch of government. And, 2) A trial will lead to the near-immediate end of the national Republican Party, which will disrupt the UNIPARTY's profiteerig worse than PDT ever did. The UNIPARTY needs the conflict between Dems and GOP to bring in the suckers' cash. No conflict means no money to fight fascism/racism/whatever-ism. It's like All-Star 'rasslin'...only it truly affects our lives.
10 people like this.

Reply 42 - Posted by: Trapper 1/24/2021 11:31:15 AM (No. 672729)
The Senate cannot conduct legislative hearings tarted up as a sham trial of a private citizen for the purpose of prohibiting him from holding office. It’s a bill of attainder and is specifically prohibited under Article I section 9 of the Constitution. This is first year law school stuff, grade school math, civics 101. If the Senate votes to remove a sitting President it may THEN vote to bar him from office in the same proceeding. But after the President’s term has ended the Senate has no jurisdiction to conduct a “trial” of private citizen Trump. It is unconstitutional on its face.
15 people like this.

Reply 43 - Posted by: Speedy2 1/24/2021 11:33:31 AM (No. 672731)
If they can try to impeach Trump then Marjorie Taylor Greene should impeach Obama. Marjorie is the only one who has any guts.
9 people like this.

Reply 44 - Posted by: sherlock1 1/24/2021 12:09:08 PM (No. 672778)
If there is a silver lining to an unconstitutional trial / conviction of Trump, it could be a near-complete turnover of the Congress at the next election. Of course, a lot of people might come to the conclusion that it would be foolish to wait for an election.
7 people like this.

Reply 45 - Posted by: Historybuff 1/24/2021 12:24:15 PM (No. 672794)
The more I hear from Roberts, the more I am convinced that his intellect has been greatly exagerated.
5 people like this.

Reply 46 - Posted by: sherlock1 1/24/2021 12:42:58 PM (No. 672820)
I'd say after the Roberts-led SC "called in sick" on most critical election issues, and after the Roberts-supervised FISA Court was allowed to collaborate in a coup against Trump, the SOB damn well better NOT show up!
5 people like this.

Reply 47 - Posted by: udanja99 1/24/2021 12:47:59 PM (No. 672830)
#31, impeachment is basically an indictment. PDT has been impeached twice but has been acquitted in the senate once and probably will be again. Being impeached does not mean convicted or removed from office.
6 people like this.

Reply 48 - Posted by: Sorosisbehindit 1/24/2021 1:06:45 PM (No. 672851)
Neither Roberts or McConnell will be comfortable venturing out among the public when this is over. #3 chief justice Roberts is no hero!!!!!!! (Antonin Scalia would agree with me.)
4 people like this.

Reply 49 - Posted by: 901AtTheRiver 1/24/2021 1:54:16 PM (No. 672895)
A couple of observations: The word "standing" does not appear in the Constitution. Roberts' refusal to hear ANY of the voter fraud cases on the basis of standing has no merit. Roberts has failed to uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States. Roberts should be impeached for his failure. The Congress of the United Sates OWES us, We The People, honest elections in which each eligible living citizen is provided the opportunity to vote once and once only, and that a true and accurate count of the votes is required.
7 people like this.

Reply 50 - Posted by: Harlowe 1/24/2021 4:06:24 PM (No. 673020)
A variety of reasons for why the United States Supreme Court refused to hear President Trump’s cases over the 2020 presidential election results have been bandied about that include suspicions of bias, blackmail, and cowardice—all speculative. What needs to be considered is the serious and frightening possibility of intimidation through threats of violence to self and/or family as has been underscored by President Trump, on January 18, 2021 having signed an “Executive Order on Protecting Law Enforcement Officers, Judges, Prosecutors, And Their Families.” FTEO: “Section 1. Purpose. Under the Constitution and Federal law, our Government vests in judges, prosecutors, and law enforcement officers the power to make decisions of enormous consequence. Because of the importance of their work, these public servants face unique risks to their safety and the safety of their families. Some who face or have received an adverse judicial decision have sought to intimidate or punish judges and prosecutors with threats of harm. Moreover, judges, prosecutors, and law enforcement officers are symbols within our communities of law and order and may be targeted for that reason alone. And at times, family members of public servants have become victims. Last year, a former litigant before a Federal judge in New Jersey tragically murdered the judge’s 20-year-old son and critically wounded her husband. Judges, prosecutors, and law enforcement officers’ resiliency in the face of the danger they regularly face is an inspiration for all of us in public service.” (Snip) Link follows. In President Trump’s farewell speech at Joint Base Andrews on January 20, 2021 he said, “One of the things we’re very, very proud of is the selection of almost 300 federal judges and three great Supreme Court justices. That’s a very big number, that’s a record-setting number.” A gracious and conciliatory statement that should suggest President Trump’s supporters keep in mind as legal issues unfold. Although devastated with the Supreme Court’s rejection of President Trump’s election results cases thus far, “Deplorables” would do well to not be foolish and to keep in mind the admonition of walking a mile in someone else’s shoes to understand that person’s experiences, challenges, and thought processes. “Be not quick in your spirit to become angry, for anger lodges in the heart of fools.” (Ecclesiastes 7:9)
3 people like this.

Reply 51 - Posted by: Harlowe 1/24/2021 4:32:24 PM (No. 673039)
#37- “The Senate will have to vote on whether Roberts must preside. Roberts won’t make the decision on his own.” A concern being expressed if Chief Justice Roberts does not preside, is whether or not Kamala Harris’ “authority” as “President of the Senate” would come into play.
1 person likes this.

Reply 52 - Posted by: Salt5792 1/24/2021 4:48:30 PM (No. 673049)
Simple. If they can't get the chief justice to preside, then there can't be a trial.
1 person likes this.

Reply 53 - Posted by: 4Justice 1/24/2021 4:50:46 PM (No. 673052)
Is there really absolutely nothing that WE citizens can do to to get redress for the blatant election fraud? I know all the court opinions made it look like all that was presented was just speculation and hearsay, but the evidence truly IS out there and is overwhelming. I want to see the full court transcripts to see what really happened. Either the judges found loopholes to shoot down everything or the attorneys were too disorganized and ill-prepared. Another possibility is some of the attorneys really were not working to win. Still, there is a lot of obvious evidence. Just look at the website... There has to be something...maybe a class action suit brought by the millions of us who have been wronged? If I had obtained the law degree as I had wanted, I would certainly do it. What about a petition with tens of millions of signatures? We cannot just sit by and let this LIE continue.
4 people like this.

Reply 54 - Posted by: clipped wings 1/24/2021 6:47:24 PM (No. 673207)
#42: Your analysis of this ridiculous situation is spot-on. Folks look up “bill of attainder” There are doubtless those in leftist ranks who are aware that such an action is unconstitutional, but they’re going to try anyway. Anything, to smear President Trump.
2 people like this.

Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Harlowe"
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
Most Recent Articles posted by Harlowe"
CDC Bends COVID Rules to Allow Migrant
Shelters to Operate at Full Capacity
17 replies
Posted by Harlowe 3/6/2021 8:08:42 PM Post Reply
All over the country, there are businesses, schools, and churches that are still not allowed to reopen, but it’s a different story at migrant shelters. The CDC is now bending the rules to allow these shelters to operate at full capacity. Stef W. Kight reports at Axios: CDC lets child migrant shelters fill to 100% despite COVID concern. The Centers for Disease Control is allowing shelters handling child migrants who cross the U.S.-Mexico border to expand to full capacity, abandoning a requirement that they stay near 50% to inhibit the spread of the coronavirus, Axios has learned.
While Republicans Slept, Democrats Stole the
2020 Election – Like Communists, They Are Working
to Lock In Their Lawless Third World Voting Rules
9 replies
Posted by Harlowe 3/4/2021 1:19:01 PM Post Reply
It’s the end of the world as we know it…This is so serious and Republicans and Big Media do and say nothing. Now the Democrats are taking their lead from the communist playbook, elections in America will soon be over if they get away with this. A select few members of the Democrat Party will decide who wins each and every election going forward.(Snip)Now that their steal is complete, their first move they made was to change election laws forever. Last night the Democrat House voted to lock in communist elections in the US for generations. Republicans were too weak to counter the move.
Trump, Giuliani Served In Civil
Rights Lawsuit Over Capitol Riot
14 replies
Posted by Harlowe 3/4/2021 12:59:37 PM Post Reply
Former President Donald Trump and his longtime lawyer Rudy Giuliani have been served in a civil rights lawsuit that claims Trump conspired with Giuliani and far-right extremist groups in an attempt to stop Congress from certifying the results of the 2020 election. Lawyers for Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-MI), who serves as chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee, and the NAACP delivered(Snip)“The Defendants conspired to prevent, by force, intimidation and threats, the Plaintiff, as a Member of Congress, from discharging his official duties to approve the count of votes cast by members of the Electoral College following the presidential election,” the lawsuit alleges.
Kathryn Speaks at CPAC’s
Ronald Reagan Dinner
7 replies
Posted by Harlowe 3/1/2021 11:17:58 PM Post Reply
Matt Schlap: It’s our great honor to bring somebody out who honors us with her presence. Kathryn Limbaugh. Kathryn, will you come out? Kathryn: I’ll show you this. (Holding up The Limbaugh Letter) This is the Limbaugh Letter and it says “God is with me.” And Rush is on the cover. (Applause) Thank you very much for this recognition in honor of our wonderful Rush. And thank you for all the prayers we’ve received throughout this year. Rush’s passing is not only a loss for me and our family. It is a significant loss for our nation. (Applause)
Kathryn Will Be Here Tuesday to Share
How the Family Said Goodbye to Rush
3 replies
Posted by Harlowe 3/1/2021 11:07:29 PM Post Reply
BRETT: Now, something very special is going to happen tomorrow. Kathryn’s going to join us tomorrow to share details about the private family gathering remembering Rush, as he was laid to rest in St. Louis this past Wednesday. She’s also gonna be taking calls from you. It’s gonna be a very special broadcast. Todd Herman’s gonna be in. You’re not going to want to miss that, not a moment of it.
Rush Limbaugh laid to rest 42 replies
Posted by Harlowe 2/26/2021 11:51:32 AM Post Reply
A statement from Kathryn Limbaugh and family said Rush Hudson Limbaugh III was honorably laid to rest Wednesday in St. Louis, with close immediate family in attendance. There will be additional celebrations of Rush's life to come both virtually and in his home town of Cape Girardeau, the statement said.
Equality Act Expected to Advance in
Congress This Week: 'It Treats People
of Faith as Second-Class Citizens'
29 replies
Posted by Harlowe 2/23/2021 2:32:42 AM Post Reply
WASHINGTON – The Equality Act is expected to advance in Congress this week. It's a controversial bill designed to overhaul the nation's civil rights laws to include LGBT Americans, but many worry it will trample on the rights of women and people of faith. Under the Equality Act, disagreement is considered discrimination. It includes gay marriage, biological males competing in women's sports, and doctors performing procedures--like gender reassignments--that go against their conscience.(Snip) Under the bill, Christian beliefs are unlawful. Churches could be prevented from requiring employees to abide by their biblical beliefs about marriage and differences between men and women.
Trump lashes out after Supreme Court
decision on his financial records
20 replies
Posted by Harlowe 2/22/2021 4:08:24 PM Post Reply
Former President Trump on Monday lashed out after the Supreme Court declined to block the Manhattan district attorney from obtaining his financial records, blasting the probe as politically motivated and pledging to "fight on." "The Supreme Court never should have let this 'fishing expedition' happen, but they did," Trump said in a statement. "This is something which has never happened to a President before, it is all Democrat-inspired in a totally Democrat location, New York City and State, completely controlled and dominated by a heavily reported enemy of mine, Governor Andrew Cuomo."
Unbelievable, SCOTUS Refuses to
Hear PA Election Challenge AFTER
Previously Granting Injunction
23 replies
Posted by Harlowe 2/22/2021 2:48:51 PM Post Reply
The supreme court has taken a knee…let me explain why it is so evident: In a 6-3 ruling today the U.S. Supreme Court has refused to grant writ to hear the Pennsylvania election challenge cases(Snip).While the majority of media will likely celebrate this decision; and while the court has refused to hear the case(s) based on their position the issues are “moot”; there appears to be an underlying motive not discussed.(Snip)In essence the Robert’s Court is saying they will allow any/all methods and manipulations of election law within states, and only look to the state outcome. This is very troublesome.
Report: President Trump Set
to Trigger Big Ugly in March,
Will Pre-Screen Candidates
for 2022 Mid-Term Support
44 replies
Posted by Harlowe 2/21/2021 12:35:23 AM Post Reply
A very interesting article from Politico notes that President Trump is positioning himself to screen candidates for 2022 who support the MAGA initiatives. This would essentially be considered a hostile move by the professional republican elites. As we previously mentioned, no republican is going to win any nomination, primary or general election without the MAGA endorsement of President Donald J Trump. This is the leverage that begins the “Big Ugly”, the destruction of the DeceptiCon wing of the UniParty bird.(Snip)Trump already has received dozens of requests from prospective candidates seeking to introduce themselves and nab his endorsement,
Three Decades of Rush, Flying Across
the Galaxies Now and Forever
8 replies
Posted by Harlowe 2/20/2021 12:19:27 AM Post Reply
MARK: Yes, America’s Real Anchorman is away, as I’ve said at the start of all these guest hosting stints for 15 years now, America’s Real Anchorman is away, playing among the stars on that great radio set in the sky for all eternity, because those radio waves never stop. So, three decades of Rush are flying across the galaxies now and forever. And all those early disc jockey shows are up there somewhere too.(Snip)And I’m not a theological scholar, so I do not know how it works in the great hereafter or whether they need bumper music of the spheres up there, but I hope Rush’s hearing is also restored
How A U.S. President And A
Former Slave Who Sometimes
Disagreed Became Friends
5 replies
Posted by Harlowe 2/19/2021 1:16:12 AM Post Reply
The two men came from extremely modest means, one even more than the other. Primarily because each understood the rare power of self-education and the gift of books, both went on to have lives of remarkable celebrity, accomplishing extraordinary things for our nation.(Snip)In the presidential election of 1860, as the Democratic Party was famously pro-slavery, Douglass publicly endorsed the Republican candidate. This candidate, of course, was Abraham Lincoln, who won the White House with less than 40 percent of the popular vote, but successfully earned the majority of Electoral College votes. Writing a month after Lincoln’s election in 1860, Douglass half-heartedly celebrated the would-be Great Emancipator’s victory:
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
Biden's Incoherence Just Hit Critical Mass,
This Is Scary Awful
48 replies
Posted by Dreadnought 3/8/2021 11:45:49 PM Post Reply
As we reported two days ago, Joe Biden completely made no sense when he was trying to explain the Wuhan coronavirus relief bill. It was really bad and it explains why they’re afraid to have him deliver an address to Congress or do any kind of a real solo press conference, because at this point they have to be afraid this is all going to fall apart if he does anything live and this all becomes too obvious to the American people. But there’s only so long that they can hold this off. And it’s getting worse, as video today revealed. Biden was holding an event to announce the nomination
‘Huge Development’: Democrat Sen. Joe
Manchin Starts To Crack On Filibuster,
Signals Openness To Change
41 replies
Posted by Imright 3/8/2021 12:32:41 AM Post Reply
Democrat Senator Joe Manchin (WV) appears to have started to shift his views on the filibuster with remarks that he made on two news shows on Sunday morning.The shift from Manchin comes after he has repeatedly stated that he would not vote to end the filibuster, despite pressure from the far-Left. During the interviews on Sunday, Manchin repeatedly claimed that he was not open to ending the filibuster because he did not want to strip the minority party of their power in the Senate, but signaled that he was open to changing it.Fox News host Chris Wallace asked Manchin if he would consider “reforming the filibuster” if “Republicans
Evangelicals For Biden ‘Feel Used And Betrayed’
By Biden Fulfilling His Radical Abortion Promises
37 replies
Posted by Calvinesq 3/8/2021 10:37:51 AM Post Reply
In an open letter released Sunday, Pro-Life Evangelicals for Biden urged him to “honor his commitment” and include the Hyde Amendment in Democrats’ $1.9 trillion COVID-19 spending package, writing “we feel used and betrayed.” The letter states: We are very disappointed about the COVID-19 relief package’s exclusion of the Hyde Amendment, a longstanding bipartisan policy that prevents taxpayer funding for abortion. [snip] As pro-life leaders in the evangelical community, we publicly supported President Biden’s candidacy with the understanding that there would be engagement [with] us on the issue of abortion and particularly the Hyde Amendment
Meghan Markle reveals her true
self in Oprah interview
32 replies
Posted by Imright 3/8/2021 9:11:10 AM Post Reply
If you had any doubts that Meghan Markle is a manipulative piece of work, her bombshell Oprah interview Sunday night dumping on the British monarchy would set you straight. Prince Harry’s American wife accused his family of hateful racism against her baby, claimed they refused to protect her and drove her to the point of suicide.She made the incendiary and implausible charge that when she was pregnant with Archie, the royal family decreed that her unborn son would be denied the title of “prince” because her mixed race meant he might have dark skin.
Biden’s German Shepherds Shipped Back
to Delaware After ‘Biting Incident’
Involving White House Security
31 replies
Posted by Imright 3/8/2021 11:38:50 PM Post Reply
Joe and Jill Biden’s German Shepherds were shipped back to Delaware after a “biting incident” involving White House security, CNN reported.Major was adopted by Joe Biden and his handler wife Jill in 2018 from an animal shelter.Major and Champ moved into the White House in January and they’re already gone. The condition of the victim was not disclosed but it was serious enough to remove both dogs from the White House.CNN reported: The two German Shepherds belonging to President Joe Biden and first lady Jill Biden were returned to the Biden family home in Delaware last week
Pelosi’s HR1 bill a blatant power grab for Democrats 30 replies
Posted by FlyRight 3/8/2021 5:28:52 AM Post Reply
Nancy Pelosi’s top priority is to turn America into a one-party nation ruled by Democrats. Her bill HR 1 trashes the U.S. Constitution in an attempt to rig the system and make it virtually impossible to elect a Republican president or Congress again. It’s a power grab. The bill eviscerates state voting laws and forces all the states to conform to a set of rules that includes automatic voter registration. Anyone who goes to a DMV or applies for food stamps, Medicaid or other social services, or attends a public college will be automatically enrolled to vote. Noncitizens are obligated to identify themselves and opt out,
Biden seems to forget defense
secretary’s name, calls him
'the guy who runs that outfit'
29 replies
Posted by Ribicon 3/8/2021 8:37:17 PM Post Reply
President Biden on Monday seemed to forget Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin’s name at a White House event—calling the Pentagon chief “the guy who runs that outfit over there.” Biden was announcing the nomination of two female generals to lead US military combatant commands. “And I want to thank the sec—the, the, ah former general. I keep calling him general, but my, my—the guy who runs that outfit over there,” Biden said.(Snip) Earlier at the event, Biden mentioned the Defense Department leader by his name, “Secretary Austin,” while appearing to read from a teleprompter.
Oprah interview bombshells: Meghan claims
she was suicidal when she was five months
pregnant, Kate made HER cry and Royals
refused to make Archie a prince because
they were worried how 'dark' he would be
27 replies
Posted by Imright 3/8/2021 8:21:02 AM Post Reply
The Royal Family was left reeling this morning after Meghan Markle tearfully revealed that the stress of royal life made her suicidal when she was five months pregnant, claimed Archie was denied the title of prince because he is mixed-race and said Kate Middleton made her cry before she married Harry in a bombshell interview with Oprah Winfrey.The couple also chose to reveal that they are having a baby girl to the tens of millions of people watching the CBS show broadcast in the US before accusing the Royal Family of racism and revealing the deep rift 'Megxit' has caused with Prince Charles and Prince William.
Meghan Markle openly
accuses the Royals
of racism
26 replies
Posted by Magnante 3/8/2021 5:26:07 AM Post Reply
I’m probably second to none in my dislike for Meghan Markle. There’s something unattractive about a mature woman marrying into the British Royal family with one of the world’s most expensive weddings, hanging out with the Queen, living in insane luxury…and then whining non-stop about the horror of her life. There’s something even less appealing when that woman accuses the Royal family of race hatred. And the problem is that, when it comes to that left-wing diva, Meghan Markle, it’s hard to believe most of what she says. After weeks of hype, CBS finally televised Meghan Markle and Prince Harry’s interview with Oprah.
Watch: John Solomon Gives Stunning Update
in Durham’s ‘Russiagate’ Investigation
24 replies
Posted by Imright 3/8/2021 4:56:55 PM Post Reply
Without question, the vast majority of Americans who support former President Donald Trump were angry and frustrated throughout 2020 passed with barely a mention of then-U.S. Attorney John Durham’s criminal investigation into the FBI’s fraudulent “Russiagate” counterterrorism operation directed at his 2016 campaign.In the weeks before the November election, word got out that then-Attorney General William Barr wasn’t going to announce any indictments or even a report on Durham’s investigation because he did not want to influence the outcome.So far, in fact, the only indictment to come out of the Durham probe is that of former FBI lawyer Kevin Clinesmith, who essentially got a slap on the wrist
Democrats renew calls to remove
J. Edgar Hoover's name from FBI building
24 replies
Posted by Ribicon 3/8/2021 2:56:29 PM Post Reply
Rep. Steve Cohen vowed to renew the push to remove former FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover’s name from the bureau’s downtown Washington headquarters, according to an interview released Monday. Appearing on Yahoo! News’ Skullduggery podcast, the Tennessee Democrat said the effort is getting a fresh look after the release of a new movie highlighting the FBI’s secret program to discredit civil rights activists. The Washington Times in 2019 first reported Democrats’ bid to strip the longtime FBI director’s name from the bureau’s headquarters. Mr. Cohen said the impetus to revive the bid is the new movie, “Judas and the Black Messiah.” The movie details
Jill Biden, the Meghan Markle
in the WH, is egregiously
guilty of elder abuse
23 replies
Posted by Magnante 3/9/2021 4:40:38 AM Post Reply
“There must have been a moment, at the beginning, when we could have said –-no. But somehow we missed it.” Tom Stoppard The millions of Americans who were paying attention throughout the 2020 election campaign all became painfully aware of the fact that Joe Biden’s cognitive abilities were slipping and slipping fast. His wife, as the person closest to him, should have been the one to call the campaign quits in order to reduce stress on the man. Instead, apparently so anxious to become the First Lady by any means necessary, Mrs. Biden continued to push her failing husband’s campaign forward as if he were mentally qualified.
Post New Article