Interesting Segment – Trey Gowdy
Discusses FBI Investigation and
The Flynn-Kislyak Transcripts He Has Read…
Conservative Treehouse,
by
Sundance
Original Article
Posted By: Ida Lou Pino,
5/23/2020 10:08:02 AM
On the topic of the FBI capture and use of the December 29, 2016, Flynn-Kislyak phone call… First we had a hunch; then it became a suspicion… that evolved into a likelihood… that has now become a strong probability. The capture of the December 29th phone call, which generated the raw “CR cuts“, was an FBI summary, modified for a specific interpretation. Much like the missing 302 there is now a very strong probability the FBI ‘CR cuts’ do not represent the actual call content. In this short interview segment Trey Gowdy alludes to one issue, and speaks directly to another.
Reply 1 - Posted by:
jinx 5/23/2020 10:31:45 AM (No. 419676)
I just hope that Gen. Flynn can and will sue the pants off of the Obama gang for the 6 million dollars it cost him to defend his name and reputation. There ought to be a law...
20 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
Readaholic 5/23/2020 10:49:31 AM (No. 419690)
Tucker Carlson has Trey Gowdy's number and so have we.
32 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
Ming 5/23/2020 11:08:27 AM (No. 419706)
So who is the most blind, stupid, and inept investigator one has ever heard about, real or fiction: Inspector Jacques Clouseau or Trey Gowdy?
Bet the over on Gowdy.
21 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
jeffkinnh 5/23/2020 11:16:44 AM (No. 419711)
"I wonder why he waited to say that…"
Because it is becoming too embarrassing to play stupid and not takes sides. In other words, he is a cowardly politician and has been waiting to see which way the wind is blowing.
Nunes, in contrast, has been out there with the truth, getting flayed by the media and countered by the psychotically lying Schiffty. He has been doing it long before it has become fashionable.
27 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
bighambone 5/23/2020 12:18:49 PM (No. 419754)
Anyone who has had any dealings with the Russians would know that all telephone calls between a high ranking member of the Russian Government such as the Russian Ambassador to the USA, and the incoming National Security Advisor to the President of the USA would have most certainly have been recorded by the Russian intelligence service.
So while it looks like the FBI may well have edited down their telephone transcript, that should be immediately publicly released, to meet the corrupt Obama political objective of ensuring that General Flynn did not remain as President Trump’s National Security Advisor, a position where Flynn would be able to upset the applecart containing corrupt and incompetent Obama Administration doings.
It is the Russians who most likely retain the unaltered and unedited version of the telephone calls in question. Since the Russians have no love lost for Obama and his cabal, someone with some go-power should ask Russian President Putin to release the Russian version of the telephone recorded conversation.
You have to figure that the Russians have to be laughing their butts off at all the problems that they have caused to the US Government and the American political establishment by giving their Ambassador the “OK” to talk with General Flynn on the telephone.
4 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
whyyeseyec 5/23/2020 12:36:37 PM (No. 419768)
Paul Ryan told Gowdy to investigate, but don't find anything. That's how it works there.
16 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
DVC 5/23/2020 1:43:59 PM (No. 419833)
I heard Gowdy say that reading the transcripts of the calls would "bore you out of your mind".
3 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
john56 5/23/2020 2:00:36 PM (No. 419852)
6 million in the civil suit of Flynn vs Comey et al? Maybe 6 billion. Flynn (and Sidney Powell, off contingency fees) are gonna be rich folks. Maybe not recompensation for the h-e-double-hockey-sticks those folks did to separate Gen Flynn and his family from their constitutionally protected rights, but it should be a decent start.
2 people like this.
Flynn pleaded guilty. DOJ says there was a crime, but now it cannot present the evidence. Flynn admitted to it, although he would like to withdraw his TWICE SWORN plea. So, let's fast forward to Flynn vs US DOJ in civil court...anyone want to guess the first question posed Flynn if he testifies? It may go to the heart of his claim...and his veracity. What would a jury think?
0 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
Sully 5/23/2020 4:04:09 PM (No. 419958)
Gowdy is of no use.
He wonders what took Wray so long??? Well. Maybe he should have ISSUED SOME SUBPOENAS WHEN HEW WAS IN CHARGE OF THAT to find out in real time.
Gowdy's good at wielding the pinata stick at a witness in the dock. Then he lets the witness go with all his candy.
Gowdy, you may leave. No, please leave.
6 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
DVC 5/23/2020 5:04:40 PM (No. 419990)
Conservative sure means something entirely different in Maryland than in Kansas and other states that I visit often.
4 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
Sully 5/23/2020 11:41:31 PM (No. 420189)
#9
Flynn's plea was coerced with a threat against his family and by withholding Brady material. This is why we have laws against coercion.
The first question will be: "Why did you lie to the court in your plea?"
To which Flynn will say, "Although I did not believe I lied during the ambush interview, because the prosecution withheld all exculpatory materials I believed at the time that i was technically in breach of the law."
A victim of perseutorial abuse cannot be held liable for a coerced plea. That is the point of laws against coercion.
0 people like this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Ida Lou Pino"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
Comments:
This Just In! Before he tackles the four-year-old Russia Hoax - - Fey Wray will conduct an in-depth investigation of the Hindenburg explosion. "We need to know exactly what happened in New Jersey in 1937 before we can begin reforming the FBI," he explained.