Joshua trees growing for over 100 years
will be cleared for solar farm in California
Just the News,
by
Kevin Killough
Original Article
Posted By: sunset,
5/31/2024 1:59:37 PM
Century-old Joshua trees in the California desert will be cleared to make way for clean energy. The 2,300-acre solar project is going up near near Boron, in Southern California, according to the Los Angeles Times. The area of Kern County from which the project is slated has a poverty rate twice that of the state’s average. The solar farm will generate intermittent power for 180,000 homes in wealthier coastal neighborhoods. Besides the destruction of old trees, the residents living near the project say county and state officials who approved the project have ignored their other concerns about construction dust and impacts to endangered desert tortoises have been ignored
Post Reply
Reminder: “WE ARE A SALON AND NOT A SALOON”
Your thoughts, comments, and ideas are always welcome here. But we ask you to please be mindful and respectful. Threatening or crude language doesn't persuade anybody and makes the conversation less enjoyable for fellow L.Dotters.
Reply 1 - Posted by:
Northcross 5/31/2024 2:31:18 PM (No. 1728556)
If they were cutting down these trees to build a refinery, the environmentalists would already be chained to them, but since it is a solar farm, no problem.
46 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
VietVet68 5/31/2024 2:34:32 PM (No. 1728557)
So where are the tree huggers when we need them? Nothing say liberalism like cutting down majestic living trees to build an eyesore like a solar farm.
42 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
seamusm 5/31/2024 2:34:37 PM (No. 1728559)
Destroy the planet - to save it. Gotta be a special kind of stupid to believe that. Or simply evil.
38 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
Tusker 5/31/2024 2:34:45 PM (No. 1728560)
Never, ever, attempt to justify insanity.
California fools, idiots, mentally defective, i.e.: DEMOCRAPS!
15 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
franq 5/31/2024 2:45:17 PM (No. 1728564)
Money. Pure and simple.
14 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
Highlander 5/31/2024 2:45:18 PM (No. 1728565)
“Clean energy” trumps all. Chopped birds, roasted birds; displaced tortoises, razed 100-year-old Joshua Trees; no problem.
25 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
Peregrine 5/31/2024 2:47:19 PM (No. 1728567)
I am watching, in a suburban area, where they are cutting down mature trees, which shade houses from the sun, to place ugly solar panels on the roof.
15 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
stablemoney 5/31/2024 3:08:01 PM (No. 1728576)
I hope solar farms fare better in California than Texas, which are being destroyed by hail.
8 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
Quigley 5/31/2024 3:12:04 PM (No. 1728580)
No one has told the environmentalists to protest. They don’t know it’s a problem unless they are told by the “authorities” that it’s a problem. Until they get their pavlovian signal they will be eating frozen pizza and playing video games. Then they will emerge enraged.
16 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
voxpopuli 5/31/2024 3:25:33 PM (No. 1728582)
may as well..
the poor trees are probably STARVING for C02
7 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
Flyball Dogs 5/31/2024 3:31:21 PM (No. 1728585)
I don’t know if we can fix an exact date our country died.
I’m going with the Lightbringer’s “election.”
And, I’m thinking we’re done. I don’t see how we can crawl back from the abyss.
(Glad Lucianne and Rush don’t have to see this.)
19 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
downnout 5/31/2024 3:41:25 PM (No. 1728589)
How perfect. In order to provide solar power to rich coasties, the leftists are going to destroy a unique desert habitat. I am really beginning to despise those people.
17 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
WV.Hillbilly 5/31/2024 3:47:14 PM (No. 1728592)
Voodoo energy can never meet the needs of the baseload.
8 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
DVC 5/31/2024 3:55:57 PM (No. 1728602)
And if I cut one down.....I'd probably go to jail for a year in Crazyfornia. Yet the solar scammers can nuke almost 4 square MILES and get their hands into the public treasury to steal money while destroying the landscape.
17 people like this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
MOBeef4u 5/31/2024 3:59:52 PM (No. 1728604)
And the most important word here is “intermittent”; the biggest Achilles heel of the whole green energy movement. These people are idiots.
10 people like this.
Reply 16 - Posted by:
jhpeters2 5/31/2024 4:04:02 PM (No. 1728606)
They talk the talk. But they never hold themselves to that standard. And guess what? If you ignore environmentalists they hold their breath until the turn democrat blue.
3 people like this.
Reply 17 - Posted by:
LadyHen 5/31/2024 4:07:45 PM (No. 1728609)
Disgusting. Killing the earth to save it.
Hail, tornadoes, and/or ghastly winter weather in most of the country make all this large scale solar panel and windmill stupidity financially ruinous, as many of these pie in the sky idiots are finding out not that any of the eco-grifters will go without a meal thanks to our tax payer funded hand out bail outs.
6 people like this.
Reply 18 - Posted by:
subman47 5/31/2024 5:05:00 PM (No. 1728638)
Sounds like a very smart policy. We have to cut down the hundred year old trees to save them.
3 people like this.
Reply 19 - Posted by:
skacmar 5/31/2024 5:09:43 PM (No. 1728642)
Remember when an owl, salamander, or some moss was enough to stop a highway, dam, or new housing development? Apparently the environment does not matter anymore as long as what they are doing is in the name of saving the environment. Guess you have to destroy the environment to save it these days.
6 people like this.
Reply 20 - Posted by:
formerNYer 5/31/2024 5:19:00 PM (No. 1728647)
The People's Republic of Kalifornia is leftist stupidity at it's finest. By the way how's that high speed railway project going? What has it cost you 3 billion so far???
2 people like this.
Reply 21 - Posted by:
joew9 5/31/2024 10:29:56 PM (No. 1728774)
Don't be fooled by "intermittent power for 180,000 homes". "Intermittent" could mean any amount no matter how small and insignificant. They could have said intermittent power for a billion homes.
That facility is nearly 4 square miles(640 acres per sq. mile). It will produce the equivalent amount of energy as a 50 megawatt fossil fuel or nuclear power generator. BUT! fossil fuel/nuclear plants have turbines that usually produce 1,000 megawatts each and not some meager 50 megawatts. And a typical US state uses about 50,000 megawatts or 50 of those turbines. SO to produce the energy equivalent of 50,000 megawatts it will take about 1,000 more of those solar facilities. Or 4000 to 5000 sq miles of solar in each state. And for each solar facility all plant life must be extinguished. Covered in some kind of sand and gravel and aggregate to prevent plants from growing up into the solar panels. Once solar has inevitably failed and someone wishes to return that land to viably grow plants then all that aggregate will have to be scooped off. And if the solar panels leach any chemicals into the ground it will likely have to be plowed up several feet deep and viable soil replaced. You don't have to be a fanatic environmentalist to find that objectionable.
3 people like this.
Reply 22 - Posted by:
privateer 6/1/2024 10:52:27 AM (No. 1729040)
Commiecrats have always been the 'something for nothing' party. Because the sun doesn't send out utility bills, they figure that its electricity is free.
1 person likes this.
Reply 23 - Posted by:
Italiano 6/1/2024 11:22:53 AM (No. 1729061)
And they destroyed Imperial and Central Valley farmers to save a stupid fish.
1 person likes this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "sunset"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
Comments:
Lots of environmentalists complain about urban sprawl. This is rural sprawl.