Jury says Donald Trump must pay an additional
$83.3 million to E. Jean Carroll in defamation case
Associated Press,
by
Jake Offenhartz
&
Larry Neumeister
Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought,
1/26/2024 4:58:38 PM
NEW YORK — A jury has awarded an additional $83.3 million to former advice columnist E. Jean Carroll, who says former President Donald Trump damaged her reputation by calling her a liar after she accused him of sexual assault.
Friday’s verdict was the second time in nine months that a jury addressed Carroll’s claim that Trump assaulted her in a New York City department store in 1996. Another jury last May found Trump liable for sexual abuse and ordered him to pay $5 million. This defamation trial was over things Trump said about Carroll while he was president. Trump continues to insist he was falsely accused.
The verdict was
Post Reply
Reminder: “WE ARE A SALON AND NOT A SALOON”
Your thoughts, comments, and ideas are always welcome here. But we ask you to please be mindful and respectful. Threatening or crude language doesn't persuade anybody and makes the conversation less enjoyable for fellow L.Dotters.
Reply 1 - Posted by:
Califedup 1/26/2024 5:02:16 PM (No. 1645159)
Appalling, Disgusting, a travesty of Justice, and a direct threat to each and everyone of us.
138 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
Phantomll 1/26/2024 5:10:06 PM (No. 1645165)
YGBSM!!
23 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
marbles 1/26/2024 5:10:55 PM (No. 1645166)
Appeal.
76 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
seamusm 1/26/2024 5:11:50 PM (No. 1645167)
This is an egregious wrong and grotesquely demonstrates that Trump has the deck stacked against him in Blue jurisdictions with injudicious courts and judges. That said, why won't Trump learn to keep his opinions to himself? Is he trying to lose?
50 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
DVC 1/26/2024 5:12:05 PM (No. 1645168)
Fraud, garbage, and NY hate.
89 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
montwoodcliff 1/26/2024 5:16:34 PM (No. 1645169)
The woman is a liar and fruitcake. She'll never see a dime of it! A real jury would have awarded her a dollar and told her to go away.
100 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
Rinktum 1/26/2024 5:19:07 PM (No. 1645170)
I would say this is a disgusting miscarriage of justice, but justice left the building in January 2021. Our country’s founding fathers must be rolling in their graves. Can you begin to imagine the crowing that is going on in the media now? The judicial branch of our government has been taken over by this illegitimate administration and is running wild. This kind of lawfare is warfare and is directed at Biden’s opposition. This is not coincidence, this is by design. When you have lost justice, you have nothing, no recourse and apparently far too many Americans are okay with this. This may be directed at President Trump but this heinous administration is pushing us to the breaking point through him. They are showing the strength of their power. No one crosses them because the consequences will be inescapable and harsh. Oh, how I long to see this ever present evil get what is coming to it.
119 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
JunkYardDog 1/26/2024 5:20:07 PM (No. 1645171)
This doozy of a "case" will set a new land speed record for fastest appeal. So, someone can accuse you of something, be unable to back it up with evidence, be proven to have made things up....and a jury awards 83MM for charges conjured up out of thin air? Oh, there was a CRIME alright, but it was committed by the Deep State.
99 people like this.
A political show trial.
61 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
Krause 1/26/2024 5:26:57 PM (No. 1645174)
One of the all time great railroad jobs.
62 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
janjan 1/26/2024 5:29:27 PM (No. 1645175)
The best evidence is common sense. With Trump’s money he would have never given this unattractive whack job the time of day.
58 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
Mofongo 1/26/2024 5:30:42 PM (No. 1645176)
I used to say that New York is a choice, not a requirement, but I was wrong. What kind of choice!!! What a despicable place!
36 people like this.
This is federal. It’s not slander by black letter law.
The federal circuit will not permit any of this to stand, even Obama judges.
27 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
Birddog 1/26/2024 5:39:16 PM (No. 1645179)
The other jury already gave her $5Million... in what UNIVERSE is she worth $ 85 Million to anyone?
What career did he "Ruin" that could have possibly "Earned" her anything near that?
What was her highest earning year ever?
At least this is sooo egregious it will clearly be granted an appeal.
What do they expect him to do..GIVE her Trump Tower?
The other NYC judge already stated that Mar a Lago wasn't worth anywhere near $85 million, handing her the title to that wouldn't cover 1/4th this "Award".
32 people like this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
Birddog 1/26/2024 5:41:10 PM (No. 1645180)
"Pound of Flesh" awards are illegal.
32 people like this.
Reply 16 - Posted by:
LC Chihuahua 1/26/2024 5:44:53 PM (No. 1645181)
Lawfare.
Trump - 83 million
Rudy - 148 million
Fox News - 890 million
This isn't law or justice. It's tyranny.
77 people like this.
Reply 17 - Posted by:
MissMann 1/26/2024 5:47:19 PM (No. 1645182)
Do you want to be in a country with people who do this? I don't. And I'm starting think we need to be more formal about the separation. This is OUTRAGEOUS!
37 people like this.
Reply 18 - Posted by:
Venturer 1/26/2024 5:52:51 PM (No. 1645184)
Not a bad scam for this purveyor of untruths.
I will never believe that Donald Trump was so horny that he would go in a store dressing room and have sex with this doggy looking woman.
41 people like this.
Reply 19 - Posted by:
Historybuff 1/26/2024 5:55:38 PM (No. 1645186)
Let's hope all that money helps her remember what year this "traumatic" event happened to her. The dress she claims she was wearing wasn't made yet.
37 people like this.
Reply 20 - Posted by:
Starboard_side 1/26/2024 6:04:16 PM (No. 1645189)
Just shows the utter bias and lack of any reasoning to set aside such biases to render a fair verdict.
Excessive jury awards are regularly appealed and later mitigated.
29 people like this.
Reply 21 - Posted by:
Scribelus 1/26/2024 6:07:23 PM (No. 1645191)
I have ignored this recent fabrication, and ask for help. What objective evidence exists that this alleged attack actually occurred?
28 people like this.
Reply 22 - Posted by:
daisey 1/26/2024 6:07:34 PM (No. 1645192)
This woman is a disgusting piece of trash. If you’ve ever listened to her, you know she’s crazy as a loon. Disgusting and vile teash
33 people like this.
Reply 23 - Posted by:
Heraclitus 1/26/2024 6:15:12 PM (No. 1645194)
I daresay that Carroll has defamed Donald Trump by way of false testimony and a stupid book. And to add to the clown show, the entire NYC court system has been exposed as a farce.
Today I saw a brief interview with Peter Navarro, and all I could think of was Eric Holder and Lois Lerner having thumbed their noses at Congress, in contempt and contemptible. They walked away in their arrogance, one who had the awesome responsibility of seeing to it that the Law is upheld, and Lerner who served her lefty handlers to make sure the TEA Partiers were neutralized by using the powers of the IRS. Guilty of contempt, but there were no consequences. She lives in a multimillion-dollar home on Nantucket (I think, or the Vinyard).
We ought to be holding all the courts, judges, prosecutors and lawyers to the standard of our being a Nation of Laws, not Men. I suspect many are DEI hires. I am disgusted by the relentless "lawfare" and persecution of Trump... and that the stacked courts (stacked by Dems), stacked with ideologues who are apparently ignorant of The Law. Maybe not ignorant, but of depraved heart.
Wouldn't it be nice if a Dem finally grew a conscience and said, "Enough is enough. We must return to the Rule of Law."
31 people like this.
Reply 24 - Posted by:
MickTurn 1/26/2024 6:24:39 PM (No. 1645200)
This will all be tossed out on Appeal, and the "Judge" should be Thrown out and Disbarred...and SHOULD be put in PRISON for his behavior during the trial!
28 people like this.
Reply 25 - Posted by:
Quigley 1/26/2024 6:31:39 PM (No. 1645212)
There are several things I don't get about this case. Here are two of them.
1. The statute of limitations for her claim expired sometime around year 2000. At some point in time - 2021? maybe- The New York legislature reopened the statute of limitation for that type of claim and said anybody that had a claim with an expired statute of limitation could file their claim within 1 year of the date of the legislation and it would not be barred by the statute of limitations.
To me, taking away a statutory protection retroactively is unconstitutional. Trump's rights under that statute of limitations had accrued and NY stripped him of those accrued protections.
Imagine if they gave a 1 year grace period for every person with a claim for debt that was barred by the statute of limitations? You borrowed money from me in 1982 and never paid it back. The statute of limitations ran in 1992. Now NY says I can sue for the debt if I want to. I think it would be unconstitutional. Imagine the bedlam it would cause.
Or for personal injury. I fell on you front porch in 1982 and now I'm suing you for it.
I wonder how many lawsuits like hers were filed in that 1 year period. Just Trump's? It might be a sort of Bill of Attainder.
2. Is the judge saying that if a court signs a judgment saying that you did in fact do a wrongful act, but you afterwards say you didn't do it, you are guilty of defamation? That would be implicitly calling the person who accused you of doing it a liar. Or do you have to explicitly call them a liar to be guilty of defamation?
If you denied that she had won a jury verdict would you be guilty of defamation? (That would be a lie since there was a jury verdict against you- NOT what Trump is accused of doing).
19 people like this.
Reply 26 - Posted by:
Hermit_Crab 1/26/2024 7:00:37 PM (No. 1645228)
Did I ever mention how much I hate juries, judges and lawyers in general?
If Trump was an illegal alien who snuck in over the border and actually raped her, he'd be released without bail and been permitted to rape again and again.
27 people like this.
Reply 27 - Posted by:
udanja99 1/26/2024 7:00:45 PM (No. 1645229)
PDT needs to counter-sue her for defamation for falsely announcing to the world that he is a rapist. That’s far more defaming than calling someone a liar.
30 people like this.
Reply 28 - Posted by:
smokincol 1/26/2024 7:01:18 PM (No. 1645230)
to say this was / is a travesty of justice would be an understatement but the Plaintiffs lawyers love it
14 people like this.
Reply 29 - Posted by:
cireskul 1/26/2024 7:47:03 PM (No. 1645252)
Well, send EJ Carroll the bill for Ukraine, she can afford it.
14 people like this.
Reply 30 - Posted by:
bighambone 1/26/2024 7:49:05 PM (No. 1645255)
Chances are this case will finally be decided by the US Supreme Court long after the 2024 General Election.
11 people like this.
Reply 31 - Posted by:
Dodge Boy 1/26/2024 8:01:30 PM (No. 1645260)
#7 and #16, don't forget what the left has also done to Roger Stone. Remember him? Since the 29 fbi thugs stormed his house at 6am on January 25, 2019, and took him away in handcuffs and leg irons (the fbi's russkie collusion scam), he has had to sell his house and relinquish all of his financial wealth to pay his legal fees. And he still has eleven court cases that are pending. He and his wife have been driven to financial ruin. Stone's crime? He was an ardent Trump supporter. They only have God now to offer them His love.
This what the left has had in mind for Trump and Melania from the very beginning. To bankrupt them, if they can. Why do we permit the left to be in charge of anything? Just a matter of time before they come after us.
19 people like this.
Reply 32 - Posted by:
franq 1/26/2024 8:02:15 PM (No. 1645261)
Excellent points, #25, but the media is out to whip up lofo bloodlust and is succeeding mightily. e. coli Carroll best enjoy her 15 minutes of fame, as the landing will be harsh.
10 people like this.
Reply 33 - Posted by:
southcarolina 1/26/2024 9:55:30 PM (No. 1645290)
As I remember Trump did not shake hands-- because he had a fear of germs. He had to overcome this problem when he decided to run for president.
So this man who lived his life staying away from germs would hanky- pank with this old hag?. She was not young way back.
This does not add up.
Do I remember this correctly?
15 people like this.
Reply 34 - Posted by:
Trigger2 1/27/2024 1:41:16 AM (No. 1645348)
Thus proving that she's a Class A grifter, only in it for the money.
3 people like this.
She doesn't look at all feminine to me. He said "not my type". There could be a twist in this soap opera.
1 person likes this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Dreadnought"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)